A swarm of internet nasties descended on Laila Alawa, an American Muslim writer, publisher and activist, after she was targeted last week as public enemy #1 by an assortment of right-wing sites — starting with The Daily Caller then spreading to assorted even more fringey sites from JihadWatch to PamelaGeller.com.
Alawa’s most horrendous crime, in the minds of her attackers? She once tweeted that the 9/11 attacks permanently changed the world.
No, really. Here’s the tweet that triggered the onslaught of Internet harassment that’s made Alawa’s life a living hell:
You may notice that she did not say that 9/11 changed the world “for the better.” She said “for good,” a phrase that everyone with even a rudimentary grasp of English should know means “permanently.”
But somehow every right-wing Muslim-hater who saw the Daily Caller post that launched this wave of hate decided that she was praising the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001 in that tweet. Adding to their indignation: the fact that Alawa had participated in the making of a recently issued Department of Homeland Security report on violent extremism.
Professional Islamaphobe Pamela Geller gave her post on the subject this absurd headline:
Freedom Daily meanwhile, declared:
A site called The Political Insider offered a similarly twisted misreading of Alawa’s tweet; the site also managed to transform her work last year with the Department of Homeland Security into a direct appointment by Obama after the Orlando massacre.
Within a few days, there was so much nonsense about Alawa floating around the internet that the urban legend-busting site Snopes.com felt obliged to weigh in with a lengthy rebuttal of the most outrageous false claims, leading the author of the Daily Caller piece to attack the author of the Snopes.com piece as a “failed liberal blogger.”
As assorted right-wing websites and blogs fanned the flames, a virtual army of the internet’s worst people descended on Alawa, flooding her Twitter and Facebook mentions with an assortment of angry and threatening messages.
“On Tuesday, June 14, 2016, I woke up to a hell that even I could not have predicted,” Alawa wrote yesterday in a post on The Tempest, an online publication she founded and runs. “Hundreds of people were tweeting at me, the vitriol, hatred and fury in their messages each worse than the last one.”
Here are some of the messages she collected, one of which I’ve lightly censored:
This fellow gave Alawa a promotion to the top job at Homeland Security:
This fellow showed that he actually does know the difference between “for good” and “for the better” — unless the person using the phrase “for good” is Muslim.
And this lovely lady tossed in a plug for Donald Trump after wishing Alawa a gruesome death:
Meanwhile, this familiar face did his part to spread the Daily Caller’s blatant misinformation:
And all of this because a “reporter” at The Daily Caller searched through at least two years of her tweets in order to find a “smoking gun” tweet that turned out to be neither smoking nor a gun.
In her post on The Tempest, Alawa put the tweet that offended the world in context:
“Just like every American, 9/11 was a tragedy that hit close to home,” she wrote.
I was 10 when it happened, living in upstate New York, and the event and ensuing aftermath left me – and the nation – reeling. So much so that it changed my career path for good – I now fight to ensure that every woman, no matter who or where or how she is, has a media outlet to find a space in. So in 2014, upon the anniversary of the attacks, I sent out a tweet, like I do every year, about the events that had transpired.
She explained the difference between “for good” and “for the better,” knowing full well that it wouldn’t make any difference to
the thousands and thousands of people taking it upon themselves to comb through my private history, any public articles I had written, any photos I had online.
She recounted the abuse she’d gotten over the past week:
I received rape threats, death threats, and images that made me almost throw up. People, furious and filled with a hatred against someone they didn’t even know, had decided I was the perfect target for the entire week.
I couldn’t sleep. I couldn’t eat. Each morning, I’d wake up, and suddenly remember what was happening online, and want to go back to sleep. All I could do was numbly block and report, block and report. … I kept laughing when I told the story in public, because if I stopped, I knew I’d start crying. I’d step away from my phone for 5 minutes, and come back to a hundred notifications.
People told her it would get better.
It didn’t get better. It still hasn’t gotten better. I’m now enemy #1 of racist, conservative, Trump-loving America, the favorite obsession of white supremacists and “patriots,” clickbait for every possible conservative platform and bigots like Pamela Geller, Allen West, and Milo Yannoupolis.
The bitter irony at the heart of all this hate? These abusive, vicious, barbaric right-wing bigots have somehow managed to convince themselves and their followers that they’re the ones defending Western civilization from barbarism.
H/T to Orion Anderson for sending me Alawa’s post.
I always assumed, based on my intuition and no evidence whatsoever, that “for good” was shorthand for “for good or ill”, which is a figure of speech known as merism.
The saddest part of this story is that this harassment will never end. I assume even if she were to stop tweeting, the bigots would still find more insidious ways to get to her, including doxxing her personal information. It’s infuriating how nothing will be done until someone is actually physically hurt.
Can we ban this Lars moron?
kupo
Hm… examples are going to be tough to find.
Mostly I’ve heard it in person, not online (given that I live here, after all).
Imaginary Petal
That actually started off as a comment on how the authors assertion that “for good” always means “forever” is so simplified that it’s actually almost wrong.
If you read my entire post though you’ll see that I did say the bigoted racist asshats who are sending her hate are still at fault.
Oh it’s getting fun now!
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/2568800/patrick-giggling-o.gif
Gotta love how Geller actually slipped in the word “the” into her quote to alter its meaning.
Anyway, she’s not from the southeastern U.S., nor from Syria any time recently. I went to high school with her in New England.
Thanks @JSun.
I was only pointing out the potential for misinterpretation. Yes, many or most the people attacking her likely knew what she meant. But it’s not difficult to see how she left herself open.
@JSun
I’m not asking for links. If it’s used that way where you’re from, surely you can think of an example of how it’s used verbally with that meaning.
@Petal
Seconded. They’re not even an interesting troll.
Given the average bigot’s tendency to twist other people’s words as an attack, I doubt there was any way she could’ve phrased it so as to avoid all possible “offense”.
Haters gonna (find a way to) hate.
For Christ’s sake! Happy now?!?!
I used “her” because the victim in question is a woman. If I said, “A woman must always be careful with her choice of words”, it would be considered even more condescending.
Sadly I agree
kupo
I’m gonna cringe writing this because it’s not really proper english (or at least the proper I’m used to), but
“We did it for good” which in this context means “for the better”.
Also I’ve heard people use “it changed for good” to mean “for the better” but those are typically the ones who… how to put this without sounding like a bigot… didn’t always go to english classes so I don’t count it.
Now that I think about it even “we did it for the better” sounds like it’s awful. At least to me.
Then again so does “we did it forever” and “we did it permanently”
You know what the phrase for good just sucks without the original “and all” attached.
Argh the more I think about this the weirder the english language in general starts to sound…
“But it’s not difficult to see how she left herself open.”
Thanks for that Captain Hindsight.
Did you not even read the fucking post? The Daily Caller combed through two years of tweets to find one thing that could be willfully misinterpreted to use against her. If she was an extremely imprecise writer, they would’ve found something much better to use and found it much more quickly.
Someone should not have to be absurdly vigilant 24 hours a day to keep hate mobs at bay. It’s incredibly unfair to expect that of anyone. Maybe you should go to right wing sites and tell them to learn some reading comprehension. Or better yet, tell them to stop harassing and threatening people they don’t like. That is if you’re truly concerned about accuracy and carefulness.
If you agree that Muslims should have hate mobs going after them for no reason, why don’t you just come out and admit it rather being a coward who hides behind concern trolling?
Oh, and the proper response to Alawa’s tweet should’ve have been to ask her to clarify what she meant. The response should not have been to just decide that she’s a terrorist sympathizer and send a hate mob after her. I know the Daily Caller is not exactly a paragon of good and thorough journalism, but come on.
I guess I just don’t see the point of bringing up some obscure, regional secondary meaning of the phrase that could potentially almost make sense in certain contexts. She clearly didn’t mean that other thing, and the racist trolls and stalkers know this. What’s the point of getting tangled up in these contorted hypotheticals, giving them the benefit of the doubt, when we know with 100% certainty that they’re just making up an excuse to harass women and PoC? I don’t get it.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen the phrase “for the good” used by itself. It’s always been “for the good of…” followed by an object (for the good of mankind, f’rex).
IP,
Agreed. As I said one of those right wing “news” sites could’ve easily reached out to Alawa for clarification. The reason they didn’t is because they’re trying to ruin her and they knew she didn’t really mean 9-11 was a good thing. Asking her for clarification would’ve wrecked their opportunity to try and take her down. There’s no point in pretending that anyone was well intentioned but confused.
I suppose it is possible to construct a sentence along the lines of “The United Nations is a force for good” or “I will only use my superpowers for good” but that fact that when the Tweet was originally made not a single person read it as meaning anything other than ‘permanently’ shows you really have to go out of your way to pretend to have misunderstood it.
I checked on Dictionary.com and on my Longman dictionary of contemporary English (2007 edition) and they both gave only one definition for the phrase “for good”, namely “permanently”. Indeed, only Dictionary.com even mentioned “for good and all” as an alternative to “for good”.
I’m also a linguist, although I majored in German with a minor in English. 🙂
@WWTH
Yes, it’s fucked up that people harassed Alawa.
True, but that’s the reality of 2016. If an individual is commenting on the largest terrorist attack in our nation’s history, he or she needs to be very careful. Especially a person of Middle Eastern descent.
How do you know I haven’t??? Don’t make assumptions about who I am.
Again, more baseless assumptions. I don’t believe that, and you have no right to call me a coward or troll.
How hard would it be to construct a search through the usual suspects’ previous writings to see if they’ve used the phrase “for good”? I’ll lay any money that, if they have used it, it’s always been in the sense of ‘permanently’.
Yeah, I’m Nthing that Lars fuck right off. Anyone who wants to blame the clear victim of a hate mob for not phrasing something just so can seriously just leave.
Especially when, after it’s pointed out, they get all snotty about it with phrases like “lick my balls”.
I would tell you to suck my metaphorical dick, but, let’s face it, I have standards for people who get anywhere near my giblets, and hateful little snots who want to concern troll about people phrasing things instead of getting on to people about their absolute failure of reading comprehension (and their deliberate twisting of words) don’t make the cut.
Hell, just look at the fucking article titles! One of them clearly misquotes her to manufacture outrage.
Just fuck off, Lars. You’re not funny, you’re not interesting, you’re certainly not as clever as you seem to think you are, and you’ll find no camaraderie here.
@”Paradoxical Intention – Resident Cheeseburger Slut”
Your username is not clever, either. And your voice is annoying.
The weird thing about the Milo tweet is that is that was a headline to an article in Janes Defence Weekly it would be quite innocuous. It would just read as Homeland Security rather sensibly employing someone who might have relevant knowledge about a current world issue; and that person subscribes to the view that the post 9/11 landscape has changed national security perspectives (hardly a controversial view).
It just shows his followers will jump on anything as an excuse to hate someone, regardless of context.