We Hunted the Mammoth: The FAQ-ening
Q) A mammoth, huh? What’s this blog about?
A) Misogyny, not mammoths.
Specifically, this blog focuses on what I call the “New Misogyny,” an angry antifeminist backlash that has emerged like a boil on the ass of the internet over the last decade or so. These aren’t your traditional misogynists – the social conservatives and religious fundamentalists who make up much of the far right.
These are guys, mostly, who range in age from their teens to their fifties, who have embraced misogyny as an ideology, as a sort of symbolic solution to the frustrations in their lives – whether financial, social, or sexual.
Some of them identify as Men’s Rights Activists, trying to cast their peculiar struggle against what they see as the excess of feminism and the advantages of women as a civil rights issue of sorts. Alongside those who explicitly label themselves MRAs we find a great number of antifeminist and antiwomen activists we might call Men’s Rights-adjacent – like those in the Skeptic and Atheist subcultures who still haven’t gotten over an offhand remark Skepchick founder Rebecca Watson made about a dude in an elevator a couple of years ago.
Others proclaim themselves Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), declaring a sort of independence from women – while spending much of their time on message boards talking endlessly about them.
Still others see themselves as Pickup Artists (PUA), or masters of “Game,” espousing elaborate “scientific” theories of male superiority while trading tips on how best to pressure or manipulate drunk women into bed. This misogynistic wing of the PUA subculture has a considerable overlap with a subset of traditionalist and far-right blogs. Many of those in what has come to be called “the manosphere” — hey, don’t blame me, I didn’t come up with that name — don’t simply embrace misogyny; they also proudly embrace “scientific” racism and other bigotries.
Still, while some of the New Misogynists see themselves as conservatives, even “neo-reactionaries,” many identify themselves as libertarians or even as liberals. Theirs is a backlash that frames itself as a step forward.
That said, there are numerous posts here that don’t have anything to do with MRAs or MGTOWers or PUAs or any of their ilk. Sometimes I like to post cat pics.
Q) Ok, but you still haven’t explained the mammoth thing.
A) This is a reference to a quote I once posted from a dude who felt women weren’t sufficiently appreciative of what men had supposedly done for them over the ages. Here’s the quote, in all of its weird glory:
We men built a nice safe world for you all the the coal-mines of death, roads, railroads, bridges and tall office buildings. Its $1,000,000 spent per death of a man on a large dangerous project on average now you can just 9-5 it and call it a day in air-conditioned and heated safety. Forget about the wars we died in and the sacrifices made just ignore history or is it now hersorty? You are accruing the benefits without ever having to pay the price you still don’t have to sign up for the draft and who will protect you? The Sex and the City girls will fight off the North Koreans with their Manolo Blahniks?
Men gave you this modern world now you take it for granted we hunted the mammoth to feed you we died in burning buildings and were gassed in the trenches but that was just for fun right?
How quick and conveniently you forget who made this possible.
We gave you Leonardo da Vinci, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy not to mention countless others, Jonas Salk saved half the world from death and you just piss on it all.
This quote is such an amazing clusterfuck of misogyny, entitlement and unwarranted self-importance – not to mention historical ignorance – that the bit about mammoths became a catchphrase around here, neatly conveying pretty much everything this blog is against. And so I decided to make it the name of the blog.
Q) And who exactly are you?
A) David Futrelle. I’m a freelance writer and blogger living in Evanston, IL, and the guy behind the Confused Cats Against Feminism blog. For more on my illustrious career, see the David Futrelle FAQ.
Q) You’re against the Men’s Rights movement. Are you against men having rights?
A) Of course not. As hundreds of posts on this site show pretty clearly, the so-called Men’s Rights Movement is a hateful, reactionary movement driven largely by misogyny and hatred of feminism. It doesn’t help men. It encourages them to scapegoat women and stew in their own bitterness.
Q) Are you secretly funded by the international feminist conspiracy?
A) No. I’m not funded by any organization. Some readers have very kindly given me donations. You can too, if you wish.
Q) What’s with all the cat pictures?
A) I like cats.
No. I’m a man. I like having rights
This response implies that men can’t be misandrist. You often argue that that female MRAs are still misogynist, but I’m sure that each one of them can argue that they “like having rights”.
Stop trying to have the last word on dead threads, Good.
Nope, it doesn’t. It’s merely response to the claim that anyone who isn’t an MRA (and by implication David) doesn’t care about about men’s rights.
See, this is why you’re dumb. Of course men can’t be misandrist. Nobody can be misandrist, because it’s not actually a real thing.
Yeah and white people can’t be reverse racists either. Cuz that is also not a thing.
“Miss Andrist” would be a great Roller Derby name
I had to start using the term hangdown and stickpuss to address Male Supremacists. Men do not like it when their penis is referred to as stickpussy or stickc**t. I can’t imagine why this would be the case!
Mmmm, the “stick” ones are still saying female = bad, though. Hangdown is rather good. 🙂
“Dangler” would work.
::sporfle::
“Floppy”
Nope, never going to be able to take “dangler” as an insult, not after my pharm student and I started referring to genitals as “dangly bits” (regards the anatomy in question, we where discussing wanting a “dangly bit swapper” so our anatomy could swap as desired, because these convos are what happens when non-binaries get naked together…or maybe that’s just us…)
*regardless
I’m installing windows in a VM to make my ISO bootable to install windows on the mac, my brain, it hurts.
Dangly bits is a term that’s been around forever. 🙂
Friend and I used to refer to the Unspecified Pubic Area after a life-drawing tutor pompously said he was going to call it the “pubic area” and didn’t want any silly giggling.
I have been known to refer to my special area as dangling participle, thanks to way too much time of my childhood being dedicated to solving KQ 7
Didn’t Good already receive his spanking before being sent to bed without supper?
That leads to all sorts of interesting possibilities … active participles, imperfect participles, past participles, passive participles, perfect participles … this could turn into grammar porn.
Shame that “insecure about your participles” isn’t an option, since it would be rather appropriate.
Fuck off, neo-nazi scum.
*clicks whitepride’s nym to see what hellkell means, is inundated with cock shots*
You’ve been warned.
On second thought, this might be satire, but if I have to think about it, you failed. Also, some shit’s just too loaded.
I think it is satire, but random cock shots? Blech.
I don’t know what’s going on with that site. I deleted his comment and banned him.
You really have to do a blog entry about Tom Leykis and look at his videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDzyAZrkSqg
@Argenti: I actually built a few virtual machines myself back in the day, to play some old games that wouldn’t work on Vista; it was sometimes a little bit of a challenge, but it was always worth it in the end. 🙂
@Sarah: Yeah, that guy always seemed a little ass-backwards to me, personally.
alternatesteve90 — I did, eventually, get it working. Vista, but working. And I can play Vampire and I am a happy camper. Totally worth the headache.