We Hunted the Mammoth: The FAQ-ening
Q) A mammoth, huh? What’s this blog about?
A) Misogyny, not mammoths.
Specifically, this blog focuses on what I call the “New Misogyny,” an angry antifeminist backlash that has emerged like a boil on the ass of the internet over the last decade or so. These aren’t your traditional misogynists – the social conservatives and religious fundamentalists who make up much of the far right.
These are guys, mostly, who range in age from their teens to their fifties, who have embraced misogyny as an ideology, as a sort of symbolic solution to the frustrations in their lives – whether financial, social, or sexual.
Some of them identify as Men’s Rights Activists, trying to cast their peculiar struggle against what they see as the excess of feminism and the advantages of women as a civil rights issue of sorts. Alongside those who explicitly label themselves MRAs we find a great number of antifeminist and antiwomen activists we might call Men’s Rights-adjacent – like those in the Skeptic and Atheist subcultures who still haven’t gotten over an offhand remark Skepchick founder Rebecca Watson made about a dude in an elevator a couple of years ago.
Others proclaim themselves Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), declaring a sort of independence from women – while spending much of their time on message boards talking endlessly about them.
Still others see themselves as Pickup Artists (PUA), or masters of “Game,” espousing elaborate “scientific” theories of male superiority while trading tips on how best to pressure or manipulate drunk women into bed. This misogynistic wing of the PUA subculture has a considerable overlap with a subset of traditionalist and far-right blogs. Many of those in what has come to be called “the manosphere” — hey, don’t blame me, I didn’t come up with that name — don’t simply embrace misogyny; they also proudly embrace “scientific” racism and other bigotries.
Still, while some of the New Misogynists see themselves as conservatives, even “neo-reactionaries,” many identify themselves as libertarians or even as liberals. Theirs is a backlash that frames itself as a step forward.
That said, there are numerous posts here that don’t have anything to do with MRAs or MGTOWers or PUAs or any of their ilk. Sometimes I like to post cat pics.
Q) Ok, but you still haven’t explained the mammoth thing.
A) This is a reference to a quote I once posted from a dude who felt women weren’t sufficiently appreciative of what men had supposedly done for them over the ages. Here’s the quote, in all of its weird glory:
We men built a nice safe world for you all the the coal-mines of death, roads, railroads, bridges and tall office buildings. Its $1,000,000 spent per death of a man on a large dangerous project on average now you can just 9-5 it and call it a day in air-conditioned and heated safety. Forget about the wars we died in and the sacrifices made just ignore history or is it now hersorty? You are accruing the benefits without ever having to pay the price you still don’t have to sign up for the draft and who will protect you? The Sex and the City girls will fight off the North Koreans with their Manolo Blahniks?
Men gave you this modern world now you take it for granted we hunted the mammoth to feed you we died in burning buildings and were gassed in the trenches but that was just for fun right?
How quick and conveniently you forget who made this possible.
We gave you Leonardo da Vinci, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy not to mention countless others, Jonas Salk saved half the world from death and you just piss on it all.
This quote is such an amazing clusterfuck of misogyny, entitlement and unwarranted self-importance – not to mention historical ignorance – that the bit about mammoths became a catchphrase around here, neatly conveying pretty much everything this blog is against. And so I decided to make it the name of the blog.
Q) And who exactly are you?
A) David Futrelle. I’m a freelance writer and blogger living in Evanston, IL, and the guy behind the Confused Cats Against Feminism blog. For more on my illustrious career, see the David Futrelle FAQ.
Q) You’re against the Men’s Rights movement. Are you against men having rights?
A) Of course not. As hundreds of posts on this site show pretty clearly, the so-called Men’s Rights Movement is a hateful, reactionary movement driven largely by misogyny and hatred of feminism. It doesn’t help men. It encourages them to scapegoat women and stew in their own bitterness.
Q) Are you secretly funded by the international feminist conspiracy?
A) No. I’m not funded by any organization. Some readers have very kindly given me donations. You can too, if you wish.
Q) What’s with all the cat pictures?
A) I like cats.
Evidence so far suggests that, following this logic, you should never have commented here at all. Or anywhere, really.
@Fibinachi.
Yours is an answer. It’s interesting what you write. I won’t reply here, in the FAQ. I hope we’ll have new room for that.
“Why not call it anti-whatever that problem is. Actually it can. If the “problem” you think men are having is gender equality, women, and/or feminism, then that’s misogyny. This isnt very hard to understand”
I think that nothing in history worked out that way. When feminism started to assert rules, it wasn’t anymore the ideal equality. As every social idea did when moving from books to power. So, in my opinion, critics to feminism, as a power super-structure, do not overlap with critics to egualitarianism.
Running total: -38/10
Doesn’t he get extra points for failing to stick the latest clearly stated flounce?
I did not know that feminism was a power super-structure. I wish.
So feminism is a superstructure extending from the base of power? Hm… Picture a ship. A SHIP OF POWER. Power is like the hull of the ship. The feminist superstructure is the part built on top of the hull, where you’d put all the cabins, and dining rooms, and bars, and game rooms, and the never-ending ice cream bar OF FEMINIST POWER.
Feminism sounds pretty awesome. I’m signing up.
Feminist ice cream – truly an exquisite treat if I may say so myself. Also, those free ballerina suits are quite lovely. Undoubtedly a cruise that satisfies the appetite of every misandric warqueen out there.
Does the super-structure have room for the stamen of privilege?
The superstructure is built with the stamen of privilege.
Stamens all over the place on that boat! They’re there so that guests can lop them off if they’re feeling particulary misandristical.
A W E S O M E
Interesting drunk post, guit.
Which troll introduced the stamen of privilege anyways? Mr. Al?
Egaulitarianism. It’s like regular egalitarianism, but French.
Argenti, it actually wasn’t a troll here; it was an AVfM commenter who made a blog post about Occupy Wall Street. He goes by the screen name “limeywestlake” (which makes me wonder if he’s the author of the Comfort Women GOR porn we were discussing the other day…
So he’s an Englishman who lives either just south of San Francisco or in China? If it’s the latter I have a few theories as to why, but for the sake of mockery I’m going to go ahead and assume that it’s neither and he named himself after a type of soup.
Marching for egaulitarianism!
or maybe
marching for DeGaulleitarianism!
Actually I have reconsidered. Egaulitarianism is clearly the movement which strives to make everyone equal by making everyone French.
(Otherwise known as colonialism, subsection “Vietnam and parts of Africa”.)
Does that mean the buzzing fly we shan’t name has been subjected to it? He seems to have the idea he’s French, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Of course if it’s e-gaulitarianism it could mean just colonising the internets.
He seeks to undermine the noble goals of egaulitarianism by convincing the world that French people are idiots.
Oh for the love of plants! Stamen of privilege cuz OWS didn’t want to let white cis men take over?! Really now?
(I originally said plants cuz pecunium and I seem to be planning a plant exchange for next week, but no, it really fits in context even, so my randomness stays)
Cassandra – he’s failing twice over, then. 😀
*shakes head sadly* They never, ever stick the flounce.
I don’t get what Guit was going on about either. Was he trying to pull an Obi-Wan? “Once you ban me, I will become more annoying than you can possibly imagine!” He seems to think he’s proving something when he’s just nattering on incessantly, all the while claiming he doesn’t care.
We get it, Guit, your genitals are very large. Now run along and play with the other children.