UPDATED 7/10/19
Unmoderated or too-loosely moderated internet forums quickly become shitheaps, so we have a few rules here.
One thing to remember right off the bat: this is a feminist blog, designed (mostly) for a feminist audience. You don’t have to be a feminist to post here, but if you don’t think the world would be a better place without so much fascism and misogyny, you’re not going to fit in. You have a right to your opinions, but you don’t have a right to our attention.
First comments from new commenters – or old commenters changing their name – automatically go to moderation. Regardless of your politics, if you start off here with a jerky or tediously argumentative comment, or if you trigger some other red flag for me, your first comment will never see the light of day.
So what are the big no-nos?
You’re NOT welcome if you’re: a racist, a misogynist, an antisemite, a homophobe, a transphobe or TERF, a MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fan, a fat-phobe, an edgelord, an asshole, a bad-faith comment policy tester, or just a blathering dingus that no one wants to have to listen to. This list is not all-inclusive; I can ban you for being offensive and/or annoying in ways not specified here. Sending me long whiny emails afterwards won’t help your chances of being reinstated.
Some things to avoid: slurs (c*nt, tr*nny, etc; keep in mind that TERF is not a slur); piling on; blaming someone’s bad ideas and/or behavior on mental illness or other medical conditions (though it’s ok to mention mental illness if it’s relevant); disrespect towards working-class or poor people, old people, young people, disabled people, people with mental illnesses, people literally or figuratively living in their mom’s basement. Don’t attack people based on their physical appearance.
No threats or violent comments. That includes telling someone to “die in a fire” or remarking that so-and-so would probably be better off dead. No calls for violent revolution or political assassination or any of that bullshit.
No gratuitously nasty personal attacks. Yes, discussions can sometimes get a bit contentious. You’re not required to be perfectly nice all the time. Just don’t be a total asshole.
No doxxing or posting of personal identifying information. Don’t spread rumors or speculate without evidence on the possible criminal activity of anyone else. Don’t use this site to organize harassment of anyone.
No rape apologism, pedo apologism, victim blaming, and so forth. No slut-shaming; no virgin-shaming. (Suggesting that people with terrible ideas about women might have trouble getting dates is fine, however; it’s also true.)
Don’t misgender anyone. If you do it accidentally, apologize and get it right the next time. If you do it deliberately, you’re out.
Don’t attack anyone for their sexual preferences or kinks, so long as they involve consenting adults. Refrain from weird or creepy sexual oversharing. Whatever your opinion of sex work, don’t disparage sex workers, or use words like “whore” as a pejorative. (Feel free to talk about MRAs who are using the word pejoratively.)
Don’t attack people for their religion or their lack of religion.
Don’t be a mansplainer or indeed any kind of ‘splainer. That is, don’t lecture anyone on something they know better than you, particularly if that thing is their lived experience.
Don’t post too much or try to make threads all about you. Try to avoid drama.
Avoid giving unsolicited advice, particularly on medical or weight issues.
No sockpuppeting. No lying. No misrepresentation of yourself or other people. No posting in bad faith – e.g. posting friendly comments here while trashing the site and/or the people on it elsewhere.
Sometimes I do let trolls and MAGA-heads and MRAs through, but only if I think they might be kind of fun for the regular commenters to bat around for a while. I will ban them if they become more offensive/annoying than entertaining.
If someone is violating these rules or being a huge asshole in ways I haven’t specified, don’t just drop a note in the comments, SEND ME AN EMAIL at dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
That’s basically it. If you’re concerned that the rules seem too strict, please read on:
Regardless of all the rules, you don’t have to be perfect to comment here. As sociologist Katherine Cross (@Quinnae_Moon) has noted, very few people arrive “fully formed to the world of activism, the perfect agents of change, somehow entirely cognizant of the ever shifting morass of rules and prescribed or proscribed words, phrases, argot, and thought.”
I want this blog to be open to all those who genuinely oppose misogyny and bigotry more generally, even those who may slip up from time to time.
Still, if you’re new here, or new to feminism, and the regulars here are telling you to avoid certain words, or pointing out something that you’re doing that’s problematic, don’t take it as a personal attack (unless it is couched as a personal attack, in which case email me). If they tell you to avoid particular language, uh, avoid using that language, and don’t explain that in your country calling a person a something-or-other is perfectly fine.
You don’t have to agree with all the rules and/or cultural norms here; but while you’re commenting here you are expected to respect them. If you think a rule is really, really wrong or ridiculous, don’t argue about it in the comments; send me an email about it.
And this brings us to the issue of ableism, which has been a contentious one here.
NOTES ON “CRAZY”
Avoid “crazy” talk. That is, using words like “crazy,” “psycho” and the like to describe the terrible ideas and actions of people you don’t like. It’s stigmatizing to those dealing with mental illness, who really don’t need the extra indignity of being compared to MRAs. Try using words like “ridiculous” or “absurd” or “terrible” instead. Call someone an “asshole” instead of a “psycho.” Try to avoid internet diagnoses of mental illness, and don’t use autism or Aspergers as an excuse for someone’s shitty behavior.
Saying someone is “paranoid,” “delusional,” or “narcissistic” is fine, if you don’t mean it as a diagnosis; these are useful descriptive terms.
If there is evidence that someone you are discussing does indeed have a mental illness, and this is relevant to the discussion, it can be appropriate to bring this up, though you should keep in mind that a hunch is not evidence.
All this said, words like “crazy,” “psycho,” and the like are extremely common, and plenty of people (including feminists, progressives, and people dealing with mental illness themselves) use them casually without intending to stigmatize those with mental illnesses. There’s a difference between saying “crazy people should all be locked up” and “boy, Eraserhead sure was a crazy movie!”
If you’re someone who uses these terms casually, and doesn’t actually want all “crazy” people locked up, it doesn’t make you an evil person, but you need to refrain from doing it here. (Again, if you disagree with this policy, and feel a need to make this disagreement known, DO NOT ARGUE ABOUT IT IN THE COMMENTS, send me an email instead.)
If you are a regular commenter here, and someone uses a problematic term like “crazy” or “psycho,” remind them gently that this is not how we do things here, and send them a link to this comment policy (and possibly the Welcome Package as well). Unless what they have said is particularly egregious, do not insult them or question their motives.
If they argue, remind them that arguing about this rule is also not allowed. If they continue,do not argue back; send me or the mods a note and they will be banned. (This may take a little while, so be patient and please do not give in to the impulse to argue with them.)
If others have already reminded them of the rules, move on.
Again, if someone is acting really shitty in the comments, whether a troll or a regular, SEND ME AN EMAIL.
One other thing to keep in mind:
MRAs read this blog. So I would strongly urge you to comment here using an anonymous handle that cannot be traced to your real identity. And to be very careful about revealing any sort of personal information on this blog. If you inadvertently post something using the wrong account, or that otherwise reveals personal information, let the mods know so we can remove those comments.
Oh, wait, one other other thought:
Enjoy yourself!
Dean, this is not a site for men to use for dating advice. This is a site for mocking misogyny.
Men being unattractive is a hard reality? Um…no. Rape culture is a harsh reality. You not getting sex from women is not a harsh reality. Priorities, dude. How do they work?
I wish that I’d come across the idea of achieving a woman when we were wedding planning lo those many years ago. I would have opted to write the vows myself if there’d been a chance of adding “Achievement unlocked!” somewhere in the proceedings (in place of “I do/will”? After the JP pronounced us married? So many great options).
Needless to say, “travel to Mexico to acquire libido-reducing medication (illegal in your own country) so that you can take it without any sort of professional observation” is not sound medical advice. “If you lower your libido, all of your problems will be over” is not sound life advice. “I had a high libido, and I believed a bunch of misogynistic nonsense; therefore, misogyny is a natural product of high libidoes in straight men” is not sound logic.
+eleventy thousand to Viscaria. No, he has nothing sound in any arena — except in the “sound and fury signifying nothing” sense.
Dean said:
Then declare yourself successful! Why should you care that no one here believes that women owe you attraction, that they deserved your pre-medication anger and misogyny when you didn’t get it, that the FDA is callously ignoring your type of suffering? Why should you care that I wonder about the possibility that your non-prescribed, non-monitored medication has provided more placebo effect than actual effect? Why should you care that you’ve never shown us that if you lose your girlfriend and access to the drug, you’d return to a life of high libido without a relationship but also without misogynistic behavior?
You’ve essentially declared that there’s nothing for you to do here. Fly free, Dean!
All I know is that with a certain medication I could, for the first time in my adult life, keep my mind off of women and sex and enjoy other things that life has to offer. You might want to read the full-page German newspaper spread from 1979, about the development of cyproteronacetat.
Do you know anything about the widely-prescribed medications like prozac, effexor, calexa,depalote, and dilantin?
You are not a doctor (unless you are, unless you are, in which case ignore me.) Self-prescribing based on stuff you read in foreign newspapers from 37 years ago is extremely dangerous. Please, dude. You could seriously risk your health doing that. See a medical or psychiatric professional.
Dean,
Apparently your mind is not off women. Because you’ve been wanking here for weeks about women having the temerity to not sex you, forcing you on to unregulated medication.
@ Dean- the first three are ssri’s and the last two are anti-epileptics that are often prescribed as mood stabilizers. They’re all prescribed to treat depression and anxiety, though from different causes. The drug you mentioned earlier is a testosterone blocker, and it in a family of testosterone blockers used to treat prostate cancer. EJ is right- you should really see a medical professional. They are better at not killing you than random internet articles and advice.
The last time I saw a psychiatrist, I was turned off by the abandon with which he wrote out those prescriptions; and in subsequent years I read about how those neuroleptics were developed — make some alteration in a neurotransmitter molecule and promote it with tons of hype. I refused to take that stuff and was surely better off than those who kept trying one and another hoping that one of those would solve problems. Of course it doesn’t get anywhere, because it’s alll just old wine in new bottles.
Those medications all have side effects, such as causing suicidal tendencies and violent behavior and causing forgefulness, involuntary muscle movements that can become permanent, … And the TV commercials admit to these side effects. My refusal to take them was, by no means irrational!
The medication I talked about which was explicitly developed for the purpose of reducing libido is prohibited here. And the developers and manufacturer never made any effort to market it in the USA. I wonder why.
@Kellen – You can email David by clicking on his pic in the right sidebar. I’m not sure he can change user names on old posts, but I’m sure he’ll delete anything that you need take down for privacy reasons.
The mods can probably help, too. You can email them by clicking the trio of cats in the sidebar.
Good luck! I hope all the swarming parasites leave you alone.
Kellen, once again: I was talking about ways for a heterosexual man to cope with the hard reality of being unattractive to women. I was not talking about women’s problems or the problems of gays of both genders. If one of them wants to post here, I’m sure that they can.
What is this blog for, if not to help those who are suffering needlessly.
Mockery. It says so in the header.
Many of us aren’t doctors, a few are nurses, but none of us are your doctor. Please seek medical advice if you want to control your libido through medication.
The problems of gays. You know, the gays. And their problems.
No, the comment policy page of this misogyny mocking blog does not exist so that you can dispense questionable advice to misogynists. I’m not sure what could have given you that impression. If you would like to dispense questionable advice, I would suggest creating your own WordPress blog dedicated to the purpose.
This is a feminism blog. Not a manfeelz blog. If you want to talk about your manfeelz, do it literally anywhere else on the Internet. Here, I’ll use small words for you: We do not care. Understand?
‘Sup, asshole.
God, I hate being called “The gays.” It’s like “The Jews” or “The blacks,” not just dehumanising but deliberately so.
We are people. Call us people. =_=
That’s not what this blog is for. It’s for mockery. As Falconer said. But hey, helping people who are suffering is always good!
Oh. I see. By suffering of others, you meant the suffering of heterosexual men and their sad bonerfeelz. Because the only suffering that matters to you is that of straight men, right?
Well Dean, the suffering of the sad boner might be considered of great importance in some places. Such as the manosphere. But here, not so much.
I’ll say it with a kitten
Oh for heaven’s sake. This isn’t about sex, is it? This is about you judging your own self worth by someone else’s judgement of you.
I would recommend going away and becoming really good at something. Seriously, anything. It could be Microsoft Excel or it could be Dominion. If you can’t prevent yourself from judging yourself by what others think of you, then you can at least shift the focus of opinion to a place you can have some success with.
Also: please don’t do it on this blog. If you decide to become really good at Fallout 4 then I will eagerly discuss it with you, but otherwise this is not a “men making one another feel good” blog. Quite far from it, in fact.
Why does this blog exist, if not to host my opinions? Why do women I find attractive exist, if not to have sex with me? What even are other people?
Dean, do you have stock in the company that makes this testosterone blocker? Because this insistence that all straight cis male problems with be solved with a magic drug (but *only* this magic drug) makes me think you’ve got some kind of skin in the game beyond simple altruism.
@Flying Mouse
If he does have stock in the company, I can imagine there’s a lot of places that’d be better for pushing that drug. Feminist blog comment policy pages just doesn’t sound like the right sort of place.
@WWTH – That kitten is so cute! I cooed out loud when I saw it.
Get rid of sad boners with this one weird trick!
@Spindrift – I agree that drumming up business here wouldn’t be the smartest move (but neither is Dean’s stated reason for being here – as everyone has already said, this is a terrible way to reach out to sexually frustrated men). The pharma stock thing is just my most charitable hypothesis for why Dean’s been haunting this page for weeks and weeks.
My other guesses are A) he’s doing a new kind of incredibly boring lulz trolling and/or B) he’s trying to get somebody here to agree that the drugs are a good idea so that he can point and say “See! Feminists want to force men to take T-blockers!”
Mwah-mwah-mwahhhhhhhhh…. <– sad tromboner
Dean, that medication may have reduced your libido, but you're still talking about women as if they're distant, puzzling astronomical objects. Some examples: Referring to women as "it". Turning your back and addressing yourself specifically to the menfolk. Talking about being rejected by "the ones that other men don't want" as if it's some kind of merit badge of desperate rock-bottom hardship to have to approach a below-average woman. (Hint: Below-average women don't appreciate being treated like a sack of moldy rice during a famine. Reluctance is not a turn-on.)
These are not problems that are going to be solved by a pill. Reducing your testosterone levels may free your mind a little and open the door to seeing women as fully human, but you're still going to have to do a lot more psychic housecleaning to get rid of that residual misogyny.
Make sure to lock your door first.
Why do they always treat the Comments Policy as the forum for arguing about why the site should exist, and what it should be about?