UPDATED 7/10/19
Unmoderated or too-loosely moderated internet forums quickly become shitheaps, so we have a few rules here.
One thing to remember right off the bat: this is a feminist blog, designed (mostly) for a feminist audience. You donโt have to be a feminist to post here, but if you donโt think the world would be a better place without so much fascism and misogyny, youโre not going to fit in. You have a right to your opinions, but you donโt have a right to our attention.
First comments from new commenters โ or old commenters changing their name โ automatically go to moderation. Regardless of your politics, if you start off here with a jerky or tediously argumentative comment, or if you trigger some other red flag for me, your first comment will never see the light of day.
So what are the big no-nos?
Youโre NOT welcome if youโre: a racist, a misogynist, an antisemite, a homophobe, a transphobe or TERF, a MAGA-hat-wearing Trump fan, a fat-phobe, an edgelord, an asshole, a bad-faith comment policy tester, or just a blathering dingus that no one wants to have to listen to. This list is not all-inclusive; I can ban you for being offensive and/or annoying in ways not specified here. Sending me long whiny emails afterwards wonโt help your chances of being reinstated.
Some things to avoid: slurs (c*nt, tr*nny, etc; keep in mind that TERF is not a slur); piling on; blaming someoneโs bad ideas and/or behavior on mental illness or other medical conditions (though itโs ok to mention mental illness if itโs relevant); disrespect towards working-class or poor people, old people, young people, disabled people, people with mental illnesses, people literally or figuratively living in their momโs basement. Don’t attack people based on their physical appearance.ย
No threats or violent comments. That includes telling someone to โdie in a fireโ or remarking that so-and-so would probably be better off dead. No calls for violent revolution or political assassination or any of that bullshit.
No gratuitously nasty personal attacks. Yes, discussions can sometimes get a bit contentious. Youโre not required to be perfectly nice all the time. Just donโt be a total asshole.
No doxxing or posting of personal identifying information. Donโt spread rumors or speculate without evidence on the possible criminal activity of anyone else. Donโt use this site to organize harassment of anyone.
No rape apologism, pedo apologism, victim blaming, and so forth. No slut-shaming; no virgin-shaming. (Suggesting that people with terrible ideas about women might have trouble getting dates is fine, however; it’s also true.)
Donโt misgender anyone. If you do it accidentally, apologize and get it right the next time. If you do it deliberately, youโre out.
Donโt attack anyone for their sexual preferences or kinks, so long as they involve consenting adults. Refrain from weird or creepy sexual oversharing. Whatever your opinion of sex work, donโt disparage sex workers, or use words like โwhoreโ as a pejorative. (Feel free to talk about MRAs who are using the word pejoratively.)
Donโt attack people for their religion or their lack of religion.
Donโt be a mansplainer or indeed any kind of โsplainer. That is, donโt lecture anyone on something they know better than you, particularly if that thing is their lived experience.
Donโt post too much or try to make threads all about you. Try to avoid drama.
Avoid giving unsolicited advice, particularly on medical or weight issues.
No sockpuppeting. No lying. No misrepresentation of yourself or other people. No posting in bad faith โ e.g. posting friendly comments here while trashing the site and/or the people on it elsewhere.
Sometimes I do let trolls and MAGA-heads and MRAs through, but only if I think they might be kind of fun for the regular commenters to bat around for a while. I will ban them if they become more offensive/annoying than entertaining.
If someone is violating these rules or being a huge asshole in ways I havenโt specified, donโt just drop a note in the comments, SEND ME AN EMAIL at dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
Thatโs basically it. If youโre concerned that the rules seem too strict, please read on:
Regardless of all the rules, you donโt have to be perfect to comment here. As sociologist Katherine Cross (@Quinnae_Moon) has noted, very few people arrive โfully formed to the world of activism, the perfect agents of change, somehow entirely cognizant of the ever shifting morass of rules and prescribed or proscribed words, phrases, argot, and thought.โ
I want this blog to be open to all those who genuinely oppose misogyny and bigotry more generally, even those who may slip up from time to time.
Still, if youโre new here, or new to feminism, and the regulars here are telling you to avoid certain words, or pointing out something that youโre doing thatโs problematic, donโt take it as a personal attack (unless it is couched as a personal attack, in which case email me). If they tell you to avoid particular language, uh, avoid using that language, and donโt explain that in your country calling a person a something-or-other is perfectly fine.
You donโt have to agree with all the rules and/or cultural norms here; but while youโre commenting here you are expected to respect them. If you think a rule is really, really wrong or ridiculous, donโt argue about it in the comments; send me an email about it.
And this brings us to the issue of ableism, which has been a contentious one here.
NOTES ON โCRAZYโ
Avoid โcrazyโ talk. That is, using words like โcrazy,โ โpsychoโ and the like to describe the terrible ideas and actions of people you donโt like. Itโs stigmatizing to those dealing with mental illness, who really donโt need the extra indignity of being compared to MRAs. Try using words like โridiculousโ or โabsurdโ or โterribleโ instead. Call someone an โassholeโ instead of a โpsycho.โ Try to avoid internet diagnoses of mental illness, and donโt use autism or Aspergers as an excuse for someoneโs shitty behavior.
Saying someone is โparanoid,โ โdelusional,โ or โnarcissisticโ is fine, if you donโt mean it as a diagnosis; these are useful descriptive terms.
If there is evidence that someone you are discussing does indeed have a mental illness, and this is relevant to the discussion, it can be appropriate to bring this up, though you should keep in mind that a hunch is not evidence.
All this said, words like โcrazy,โ โpsycho,โ and the like are extremely common, and plenty of people (including feminists, progressives, and people dealing with mental illness themselves) use them casually without intending to stigmatize those with mental illnesses. Thereโs a difference between saying โcrazy people should all be locked upโ and โboy, Eraserhead sure was a crazy movie!โ
If youโre someone who uses these terms casually, and doesnโt actually want all โcrazyโ people locked up, it doesnโt make you an evil person, but you need to refrain from doing it here. (Again, if you disagree with this policy, and feel a need to make this disagreement known, DO NOT ARGUE ABOUT IT IN THE COMMENTS, send me an email instead.)
If you are a regular commenter here, and someone uses a problematic term like โcrazyโ or โpsycho,โ remind them gently that this is not how we do things here, and send them a link to this comment policy (and possibly the Welcome Package as well). Unless what they have said is particularly egregious, do not insult them or question their motives.
If they argue, remind them that arguing about this rule is also not allowed. If they continue,do not argue back; send me or the mods a note and they will be banned. (This may take a little while, so be patient and please do not give in to the impulse to argue with them.)
If others have already reminded them of the rules, move on.
Again, if someone is acting really shitty in the comments, whether a troll or a regular, SEND ME AN EMAIL.
One other thing to keep in mind:
MRAs read this blog. So I would strongly urge you to comment here using an anonymous handle that cannot be traced to your real identity. And to be very careful about revealing any sort of personal information on this blog. If you inadvertently post something using the wrong account, or that otherwise reveals personal information, let the mods know so we can remove those comments.
Oh, wait, one other other thought:
Enjoy yourself!
more like trans-indefferent
Your gutter condo sounds a lot classier than the Chateau Heartiste. Not that that’d be difficult.
Chateau Heartiste is decorated in tear stains, empty pizza boxes, and used cum-socks.
rub it out you two.
CassandraSays – I have a large amount of books on the shelves, a few really plushy chairs, and a lot of soft blankets to stay warm. I do enjoy some great literature, from Anna Karenina to Lolita to Bad Science to Captain Underpants and Cracked’s De-Textbook.
Why yes, I do read a lot. Why do you ask? ๐
CassandraSays – Nah, that sounds a bit fancy. Why used cum socks if you can totally just use your bare hand?
hows that song for the 90’s “My baby likes a bunch of authers”
Comfort is important in a gutter residence, but I’m going to have to draw the line at snuggies or pajama jeans.
CassandraSays – Oh no! I wouldn’t dare. These are more akin toโฆ what do they call them, fleece throws?
Good, the Furrinati will approve. They might even let you use them on occasion.
“Nice leaning from you guys seem ok.”
It’s like a misspelt Wheel of Fortune before and after!
I wouldn’t mind if he’d lean from us, but sadly he seems determined to continue leaning towards us, at least until he sobers up.
kittehs – ๐ The Furrinati can visit any time.
My Furrinati doesn’t mind sharing- she likes going under the covers and I provide extra heat. ๐
Visit? VISIT? What insolence is this? You know you are in Their residence only at Their discretion, you, you human you!
@kittehs
I think Alice meant that the Furrinati that owns you can visit the Furrinati that owns her whenever. Clearly the Furrinati owns everything- but different members own different people/property.
James is banned. He was also, as some suspected, a returning troll, a reincarnation of good old Prester John, the weird fake religious troll.
neuroticbeagle, that makes sense!
Oh the shame that I thought otherwise. ๐ณ
Prester John? I’ve heard that name but I think he was before my time. Good thing that bet didn’t happen, I’d’ve lost twice over.
Oh, and David, is the Dub character a sock, too, or just another weird troll?
Dub just seems to be a weird troll.
James is denying he’s Prester John, FWIW. He’s using some sort of IP anonymizer and has posted from various IPs located thousands of miles apart, including one that Prester John used. I suppose it’s possible Prester John just happened to use the same anonymizer and get assigned the same IP. I dunno. Seems more likely to me they’re the same dude. Anyone who knows more about anonymizers want to weigh in on this?
‘Fraid I don’t know anything about anyonymisers (I keep reading that as atomisers).
Dub’s fairly high on the weird scale. He’s concocted the idea that I’m a homophobic homosexual man.
Maybe that should be “confused” scale?
Hm, it’s possible, you can give the list of known ToR nodes a look — it’d need to be an exit node to show as the IP. It being on there would only mean it’s possible they aren’t the same pain in the ass though.
And anyways, he is a pain in the ass.
Dub also thinks that pets have nothing to gain from manipulating humans.
I’m not sure he’s human.
@kittehs
It’s okay, we’re merely human. Only The Great Furred ones are purrfect.
::sobs with relief::