The pledge drive is still limping along, well short of its goal. If you can donate anything, please do! Thanks!
Over on Incels.is, one prolific commenter called Chudpreet asks the question: “Are women even fit to be parents?”
Then he answers his own question with a “no.”
I see a lot of incels and people in adjacent communities hold up the “tradwife” ideal. Now, I’m not against the idea of a woman’s role in society being relegated to cooking and cleaning. Busywork is probably the ONLY responsibility fefails are competent enough to handle.
The thing is, though, I don’t know how to feel about the idea that women should have the largest role in child-rearing. As we all know, women are highly prone to abusing any and all power they get. I myself deal with an abusive, controlling, piece of shit helicopter mother. I don’t know if women can be trusted with ANY position of authority, even one in the household.
The problem is that these women keep making their kids into gay cucks.
We all know how kids in single mother households turn out, usually gay. Of course this is partially due to the lack of a male role model but also due to the actions of the mom themselves. Many mothers, especially liberal Western ones, love to feminize their sons and indoctrinate them into eglitarian progressive cuckold ideology.
Oh, by the way, Chudpreet still lives with his parents.
My mother is an unfortunate combination of being both a self-identified feminist as well as a third worlder. This means that I had to grow up with both ultra-regressive curry cultural bs as well as constant attacks on masculinity and the deeming of everything as sexist.
My mom may very well be the person I detest more than anyone else on Earth. For the time being I’m dependent on her (I’m 19 so I still live with my parents), but when that’s all said and done, I wish nothing but the most tragic death for this living heap of garbage.
And, oh, it gets worse, as Chudpreet lives up to the Nazi symbolism in his avatar.
The ideal role of women in a proper eugenic society imo is to be enslaved and used as incubators for the babies of genetically superior men (obviously mid and ugly femlets as a whole should be incinerated, only Stacies should breed). I see anything short of the total enslavement of women as cucked. This role as a baby vending machine should only end once they age out of their prime. At that point they should be used as human punching bags to help males alleviate stress, since I can see no other use for them beyond that.
Other commenters stepped forwards with their own fantasies about women. According to turbosperg,
Each stacy should be forced to have 20 kids, and the bottom 90% of foids should be sterilized and used as rape practice dummies and punching bags for men to alleviate their stress.
Gattsu explained that
women can not be trusted with any authority. They are less competent than primitive animals. A dog could raise a child better than the majority of foids.
Toilets have never had any problem with brutally murdering their children (the only humans they have a physical advantage over), and the legalization of abortion proved this wasn’t a consequence of some mental illness, but intrinsic to most foids. If they don’t commit outright infanticide, they spiritually castrate their sons by raising them as women or raise their daughters to be useless cum dumpsters.
Others offered more, er, moderate takes. Med Amine wasn’t sure why anyone thinks that parenting is hard.
i wouldn’t really want to have kids if i am going to fuck a toilet, inflation is really bad and no one can financially support his kid the same way parents of the old gen did. …
also parenting isn’t really that hard, just hit your kid if he does something bad and don’t let him use the internet until he’s 18 years old also i think i would just give the kid to my mother to take care of him.
Lonelyus gave his supervillain origin story, explaining that his mother
didnt let me play call of duty as a kid which made me an outcast and a target for bullying, Yeah cuz being in physical pain and mental pain is so much better than seeing a russian get shot which i can see 100x times in replay if i want by watching james bond
But this was hardly the first thread on Incels.is celebrating the idea of murdering all or most women. In another thread from last month, a commenter called coping_manlet stated straight up that “women need to be violently eradicated.” As he put it,
They’re not even useful when enslaved. Their productivity in physical labor is far lower than any male.
Women simply are a detriment on society, a complete waste of resources. They are a burden and need to be replaced.
I suggest hyper realistic AI girlfriends. The only issue is reproduction.
I suggest keeping small enclaves of foids in government labs. They will be used to have their eggs harvested, and the eggs will be shipped off to men who want to propagate a child in their embryonic chamber devices
It’ll be like growing plants. We will grow humans. Just buy an egg off the internet, then water (cum on) the egg and watch it grow!
I once believed we should torture all women before exterminating them. Although I’ve realized that would also be a huge waste of resources. Women are just NPC’s with no soul so they wouldn’t be feeling the pain anyways. Now we should just mass exterminate them as quickly as possible. Maybe dropping napalm on women’s rights marches and abortion clinics? Lmk your ideas. Thanks for the read brocels who made it this far!
I would dig up a few more threads, but honestly, I’ve hit my limit for today, and I suspect a lot of you have as well.
This is why studies adding up the slurs on Incels.is–like the one I wrote about last week–are if anything understating the ferocity of the misogyny among incels because the context is worse than just the slurs. That’s why it’s worth plunging into the actual threads themselves, even if the evidence is “anecdotal.” I’ve written literally hundreds of posts about incels at this point. At what point does “anecdotal” evidence become more than merely anecdotal?
I hope these dudes lose all custody of their pet rocks, let alone actual sentient dependents.
Okay, if they kill all the non-Stacies and the Stacies only get to be breeding stock…
Who’s gonna raise the kids?
Not these boys, that’s for sure. And their roboslaves aren’t going to be around till after they’ve shuffled off to their pathetic lonely graves.
Maybe we should start forwarding David’s posts to last week’s researchers so they can get it right?
Thank God, this guy is an incel and presumably always will be one. He should never have kids or be allowed near any. The world has too many absentee fathers who only come by to abuse their children now and again.
What. The. Fuck?
Sooooo… Kill off 90% of women? Bad news boys, that just means your chances of getting to *checks notes* “fuck a toilet” just went down even more, because you better believe the rich and the powerful aren’t going to share their Stacies
Wow. That was. . .a lot. I’ve been here roughly a decade and I’m still shocked by it. I mean I get it, virtue signaling, ever escalating rage to keep the dopamine going, can’t back out or it’s social suicide.
but wow.
I’m gonna churn some gelato, anyone need some brain bleach just let me know.
“Busywork” means “non-essential work” and usually with the connotation of “work which doesn’t accomplish much if anything of note, but makes you look busy”. If a tradwife neglected the cooking, cleaning, and childcare, the tradhusband would definitely notice a big difference.
I mean, if you’ve got household staff to do most of the work, then all that’s left is busywork, socialization, and hobbies… but household staff are also generally women, and one would also notice it if the staff wasn’t doing the stuff they’re hired for.
I don’t know if he’s using the word wrong or if he’s utterly clueless how much work it is to take care of a household. It jumped out to me as a bit odd either way.
And they wonder why women don’t like them…
Don’t you have a way with words. What did you get her for Mother’s Day?
PS: You’re 19. You’re an adult. Move out.
I know I really am focusing on the wrong thing but how on earth can you have a “bottom 90%%?
I am trying to understand how that would event work. How is the vast majority the “bottom” of anything?
Andrew Tate has finally been charged.
Collectively, Tate, his brother, and the two other defendants have been charged with human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.
Tate has also been charged with another count of rape; and his brother has been charged with inciting others to violence.
The next step is a judge has 60 days to consider the file and ensure there is a prima facie case and all necessary formalities have ben complied with. It could be years before this actually gets to trial.
Now, to pad all that out into a video.
@Alan- I wonder if the Tates thought they would not be charged. Are there any restrictions, do you know, on whether they can go back to disseminating their vile ‘teachings’ online?
19 year old loser angry at his mom for being a loser. These entitled guys have chosen to go down this radicalization hate pipeline. I hope it brings them nothing but loneliness and misery. As no woman needs to endure this even on a date. May their idols like Tate rot in jail.
@ lizzie
When they upped the charges, Tate was suggesting that was somehow a victory for him. I think his argument was that they’d pitched the case too high, so they wouldn’t have the evidence to support it.
In fairness, overcharging can be a problem. Although it’s often used in the US to get people to plead to the original offence(s). Sort of relying on the golden mean fallacy.
He’s currently under house arrest. That’s a form of bail and it seems Romanian law does allow the court to impose conditions. But he hasn’t been charged per se with being an online cockwomble. So he has been allowed to tweet. Even when he was banged up someone was tweeting vicariously on his behalf.
It might be the prosecution are quite happy with that. He may say something that assists their case.
It’s like with the Trump thing. All the lawyers on twitter are either bemused by his ‘Truth’ postings or vicariously going “Stop admitting the offences!” in second hand cringe for his actual lawyers.
Not playing call of duty is what alienated one of them? Not being a hateful shit?
neuter the animal please
Eugenics programs never work out the way their advocates expect them to.
But then, this is the same crowd (more or less) that would take health advice from Joe Rogan over an actual medical doctor, and who think that a couple hours’ worth of googling or watching vids from their favorite YouTubers would qualify as “research.”
Well, now we know how the Tleilaxu get their start.
Oh, no, you didn’t.
What is with these shits trying to taint non-neurotypicals by association with them?
also parenting isn’t really that hard, just hit your kid if he does something bad and don’t let him use the internet until he’s 18 years old
Not even to play Call of Duty?
(And I note the assumption that this extremely hypothetical child is going to be a son. I presume a daughter would be snatched up to be reared in the breeding camps, to be ruthlessly graded for Comeliness and then consigned at menarche to either broodmarehood or the snuff toy pool?
[Or would you bring her up as your own personal sex-and-violence toy? She would ipso facto have done something bad by having been born a girl.])
also i think i would just give the kid to my mother to take care of him.
Your mother? A foid? Who, by the logic on display here, would long since have aged out of any Stacyhood she might have possessed and been hauled off to serve as a rape practice dummy and punching bag?
And would no doubt unquestioningly embrace midlife parenting along with the sammiches and laundry?
(And, not incidentally, raised you? And does she have any inkling of the bile you’re spewing?)
@Snowberry
I expect the poster is unthinkingly reflected the idea that anything that women do is, by nature, both easy and unimportant. After all, if it was difficult, women would not be able to do it, and if it was important, it would require a Manly Man because Feeemales can’t be trusted with anything important.
Now to wash my brain out.
“Fefails”? Move over, “foid”, there’s a new, even stupider incel term for women on the block!
Yes I am focusing on that to distract from how commonly these people fantasise about some kind of genocide and eugenics.
Listen, if eugenics was really a thing, these maladjusted losers would be among the first to go. It’d be all buff Chads and fit Stacies with brains of Einstein.
I mean, eugenics really is a thing, though not a thing in government policy with humans. But your point that most people advocating eugenics seem to operate under the assumption that they wouldn’t be the ones culled is well-taken.
It’s missing the whole ‘Veil of Ignorance’ issue, the extension of ‘you cut the cake, the other person gets to decide which piece to take’. These people just assume they’re always guaranteed to be on top because they always have been in their experience. (Of course, not actually ‘on top’, but at least on the same side as the people who are ‘on top’, and they’ve been lying to themselves their entire lives about how this makes them better.)
Of course, if you want to see the actual results of a eugenics program… just look at purebred dogs. A great many of which have massive genetic health disorders precisely because of the breeding programs they’ve been through for generations. Or for that matter the various European aristocratic families… haemophilia was a common occurance among them for much the same reason as, say, hip dysplasia in many large dog breeds.
@ Jenora:
While I generally agree, it’s nitpick o’clock in the morning, so I’m going to argue that European royal families aren’t really the best illustration of your point, since they generally spent generations marrying for political-alliance reasons and not physical characteristics.
(The real poster-children for aristocratic inbreeding were the Hapsburgs, who iirc came out of a system where only someone with royal parentage on both sides could be crowned, which really narrowed their options down to people who were already cousins.)
(Also afaik hemophilia entered Queen Victoria’s family tree fairly recently via… Queen Victoria)
@Moon Custafer:
Fair enough, it wasn’t a great example. To my knowledge there hasn’t actually been any serious large-scale ‘breeding program’ with humans that was actually selecting for specific traits (like we have had for dogs), though the idea has certainly been talked about. (Heinlein had such a program breeding for longevity in some of his stories, and Niven had a plot thread about breeding for luck of all things.)
Of course, eugenics by simply removing ‘undesirable’ people from the gene pool has many historical examples.
There’s a 1990 song by the Canadian band Spirit of the West called ‘(Putting Up With) The Joneses’ which is a song about abuses by the mental health system and the way things were often set up more to play to the comfort of the ‘normal’ people rather than the actual well-being of those being committed; the entire voice of the song is deliberately dismissive to the point of satire. One of the verses both speaks to exactly this form of eugenics while also indulging in the band’s odd forms of wordplay:
Yes, that was a deliberate reference to ‘having her tubes tied’ as a sterilization technique.
(With a mix of drinking songs and political/protest songs, it’s no surprise that Spirit of the West was a big draw on University campus tours back when I was in University.)
This seems to be an open thread now. So this may be of interest to anyone interested AI.
Some lawyers got chat gpt to write their legal arguments for a case. All we’ll and good. But at the trial the other side lawyer’s challenged some of the cases on the ground they weren’t actually real.
So although chat gpt had quoted real judges; the quotes were made up.
Anyway, the lawyers got their sanction today. They have to write letters of apology to the judges who got cited in their fake cases.