Categories
misogyny transphobia

Right-wingers now boycotting everything. Can no longer buy stuff; starvation looms

Right-wingers are furious that Sports Illustrated thinks this woman is hot

Check out my new blog, My AI Obsession, and my latest post there, I Prompt the Body Electric

It’s getting harder and harder to keep track of all the companies and people the right-wing culture warriors have decided to boycott.

The last time we checked in on this loud minority, they were yelling at Maxim magazine for featuring “plus size” model Ashley Graham on their cover as their pick for the sexiest woman alive.

Today the perpetually offended right-wingers are railing against another woman on another magazine cover. This time it’s trans singer Kim Petras, who graces (or disgraces, if you’re a bigot) the cover of the latest Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue along with three other women.

Naturally, there are calls for a boycott:

These calls come a day after conservative consumer culture warriors demanded another boycott, this one directed at a beer brand–Miller Light–for an ad from March that … was too respectful of women?

In case you’re keeping score, here are a few more companies that right-wingers are ostensibly boycotting.

  • Anheuser-Busch (maker of Bud Light, now hated for sending a can of beer to trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney with her face on it)
  • Jack Daniels (had an ad with drag queens in it several years ago)
  • Disney (features LGBTQ+ people in movies sometimes, along with people of color, at war with Florida governor Ron DeSantis over the Don’t Say Gay law)
  • Keurig (pulled ads from Sean Hannity’s show on Fox)
  • Kelloggs (issued special edition “made with pride” versions of cereal)
  • Mars (because the green M&M is no longer sexy, or something like that)
  • Hershey’s (something something trans influencer something)
  • United Airlines (pledging to make pilot training more inclusive of women and people of color)
  • Nike (for making Colin Kaepernick and Dylan Mulvaney spokespeople)
  • Amazon (for supposedly banning books by right-wingers)
  • The NFL (for not treating kneeling players harshly enough, and donating to social justice causes)
  • Oreos (for supporting gay pride)
  • Ben & Jerry’s (for being dirty hippies, or something)
  • Starbucks (waging war on Christmas)
  • Gillette (for making ads suggesting that toxic masculinity is bad)

There are many more. Indeed, back in February, an op-ed on the Fox News website listed no fewer than 51 companies for right-wingers to boycott for their alleged “wokeism,” including such names as Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Best Buy, Home Depot, Kohl’s, Lululemon, Macy’s, Target, Walmart, Chewy, Warby Parker, Coca-Cola, and PepsiCo. (Yes, they’re boycotting both sides in the soda war.)

Another list I found, which has apparently been floating around in some form since the Trump administration, listed some 400 companies and people for right-wingers to boycott, including such companies as (deep breath) Allied Van Lines, AT&T, Bank of America, Bath & Body Works, Bigelow Tea, Celebrity Cruises, Comcast, Delta Airlines, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Dow Chemical, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Funky Winkerbean (yes, the comic strip), General Motors, HBO, Hefty, Home Shopping Network, the Humane Society, I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter, IHOP, Land O’Lakes, Mexico (the whole country), Nieman Marcus, Proctor & Gamble, Ragu, Sears, Slimfast, Tinder, Vaseline, Volvo, Wayfair, and Yelp. And that’s just the tip of the boycott iceberg; check out the list to see some of the ridiculous reasons people are calling for boycotts.

At this point it would honestly be easier for conservative boycotters to carry around a list of the companies they aren’t supposed to be boycotting.

Follow me on Mastodon.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.

152 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Surplus to Requirements
Surplus to Requirements
1 year ago

Oh, and it’s not a “hard done by identity”, it’s risk aversion. And it has a good reason. There’s basically nothing below me but a spiked pit o’ doom if I rock my teeny little boat sufficiently that it capsizes. I see the spiral of worsening debts and past-due notices and late fines and payday loans and more late fees that regularly sucks people down into abject poverty and eventually homelessness and I have no wish to experience that firsthand, and the only way to avoid that fate is to avoid that spiral beginning in the first place. And it usually begins with a sharp drop in income or a sharp increase in expenses — a job loss, an expensive car repair, benefits being cut, a giant rent hike, etc. I’m thus quite leery of anything that might cause either, and of taking on any debt beyond penny-ante amounts (say, a fifty dollar grocery delivery charged to a credit card or suchlike, if only I had one, and paid off before any interest could begin to accumulate).

Old School HTML
Old School HTML
1 year ago

Facebook doesn’t require *real* real names, just mostly realistic ones. I was just citing my source. The apps I named don’t require facebook.

1 5 6 7