Categories
culture war drag panic homophobia reactionary bullshit satan transphobia

Natural News takes a journey into Disney’s big gay black hole

Working late in the Disney offices

Conservative cultural criticism is beyond parody these days. Consider the following reflections on Disney and its “Gay Black Hole” from someone called S. D. Wells on NaturalNews.com, which is neither natural nor news but rather a lot of health disinfo and right-wing conspiracy theories.

Apparently, Mr. or Ms. Wells heard about Disney’s Strange World flopping at the box office, took a deep puff off their crack pipe (I’m assuming), and typed out all this.

The trend for Disney lately is to weave in gay scenes and themes in children’s movies and then lose a few hundred million dollars when it flops on the big screen. It’s called grooming, but it’s one nasty black hole for Disney where big bucks go to disappear.

S. D. Wells then begins to hallucinate.

Whether it’s some drag queens in thongs twerkin’ for the kids, or a gay couple shoving their tongues down each other’s throats, grooming is in “full swing” for children of all ages.

This is Disney we’re talking about. Disney. I don’t think anyone’s tongue is going down anyone’s throat.

Disney has come out of the closet, but it’s not about equal rights, fair treatment or love, but rather it’s about grooming kids while the parents look on in utter disgust, unless those parents are gender-fluid drag queens in thongs also.

S.D. Wells certainly has a vivid imagination.

A black hole in space is where gravity is so strong that not even light can escape it and where space time becomes deformed. In Hollywood and Disney, a black hole is where money goes into a film about sex and gender confusion in an attempt to influence children and teens to get gender-bender surgery that leaves them permanently deformed.

Apparently, the Disney folks are into SATANISM as well because Disney subsidiary FX has produced a cartoon TV show featuring the voices of Aubrey Plaza and the demonic Danny DeVito.

Besides pushing gay everything on the kids, Disney loves to promote Satanic worship also, where Satan is personified as a man (film called “Little Demon”) who gets teenage girls pregnant, abandons them and then comes back a decade later to steal “his” baby’s soul.

I’m pretty sure that not everything that features Satan is, by definition, “promot[ing] satanic worship.” I’m pretty sure the Bible mentions Satan a couple of times.

There’s no quicker way to lose a few hundred million dollars … than slinging money at a demented kid’s film for the big gay (Satan’s rainbow) silver screen. It’s the Disney gay money pit. Disney wants every scene of their movies to be a warped sub-plot that makes being gay and demonic the central themes of growing up.

Again, Little Demon is a TV show, not a movie–if that’s what Wells is even talking about here. Maybe he or she is back to talking about Strange World, though I’m pretty sure there are no demons in that. It’s all a little confusing.

Part of turning America into a communist hell-hole involves big media warping the minds of future generations, starting with kids in kindergarten and nursery school. Some parents think they are supporting gay rights by taking kids to public gay strip clubs (Drag Queen Story Hour or Disney movies at the theatre), but it’s all part of a communist plot to strip children of family values, ethics, morals and religion.

Disney movies are “public gay strip clubs?”

This turns future generations into Democrat voters who think all that matters is the extreme liberal agenda, that includes taking cancer-inducing gender-bender drugs and getting genitalia-mutilating surgery to “switch genders” (which isn’t even possible). ….

If you see superheroes in Drag grooming children, take your kids and run the other direction, fast. Disney and Marvel love pumping lute into perverted, pedophiliac films that have no business (pardon the pun) being produced in the first place.

Pumping lute? Is that like pumping iron, only a bit more twee?

Anyway, I would go see a movie about superheroes in drag if there were one.

Hell, I’d pay good money just to peek into S..D. Wells’s fevered brain. Seems like there’s a lot of strange stuff going on in there involving demons, drag queens, and possibly even lutes. It all sounds very kinky, if you ask me.

Follow me on Mastodon.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.

50 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Full Metal Ox
1 year ago

Meanwhile! Something like 40,000 people in Moore County, North Carolina are without power—in December—thanks to somebody who felt that sabotaging a local drag show was important enough to shoot out three power substations; the schools are going to be closed a second day for lack of electricity. (And never mind the folks who rely on electronic medical equipment or refrigerated meds…)

https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/1599254137341825024

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/attack-north-carolina-electric-grid-new-level-threat-governor-says-2022-12-05/

https://apnews.com/article/vandalism-north-carolina-power-outages-47614e4786ca0fb000be779d27f3995a

Battering Lamb
Battering Lamb
1 year ago

Of course the other guy is portrayed as corrupt and a mass torturer among other crimes, but keep in mind who is making those accusations. You’ve got to wonder if the other side of the story is significantly different, were you to hear it. Plus, the one guy sounds a lot like the far right at times, and with the far right, every accusation is a confession, so …

To quote Al Pacino in The Devil’s Advocate: ‘Well, consider the source, son.’

You post read like his epic awesome rant at the end of that film. And I am here for it.

Sheila
1 year ago

@KMB Do you think we could get them to start a rumour that Tucker Carlson is trans? It might be the most effective way to reduce his influence. I mean, he looks soft and womanish, don’t you think? Round girly face, and whines a lot which is stereotypically female. Could you imagine him doing anything traditionally macho, like chopping wood or coding (yes, yes, I’m a cit-het woman and I used to be able to do both, but I don’t think his fans would believe it)
I suppose it would be unethical, which is a pity. It would also be great fun if it got any traction.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

@ shiela

I must confess to not being overly keen on that idea. It seems a bit weaponising the right to identify how you please.

I can’t help but think TC’s personality may have been influenced by his mother disowning him at a very young age. She went off and married an artist from ‘the Bradford Mafia’.

She was quite rich, because of her art, and owning a load of oil and gas shares. She left, nearly, all of that to new hubby.

“I leave all of my earthly goods and possessions to my husband, Michael Erroll Vaughan. This includes but is not limited to; all of my shares of our jointly owned real estate, personal property, common stock, mutual fund shares, bank accounts, silver, paintings, jewelry and vehicles….I leave my sons Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson and Buckley Swanson Peck Carlson one dollar each; $1.00 each.”

(Due to a legal mishap, the Carslon brothers were able to get a share of the shares.)

GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
1 year ago

I liked “Lucy, Daughter of the Devil” myself. Lots of fights with her dad over her boyfriend, DJ Jesus. Also “God, the Devil, and Bob”, with James Garner as God, looking exactly like Jerry Garcia.

@Sheila: But didn’t he tan his balls? I think he’s just a complete wuss. He always looks like he just got hit in the head. Wimp. Girly-man.

@Alan: Let us go back in time and fix that will! We’d be rid of him, at least.

Sheila
1 year ago

@Alan I’d love to know why TC’s mother wrote her will like that. The first thing that comes to mind is that perhaps her sons blamed her for the divorce and she felt that was grossly unfair. But if course we have no way of knowing.

Victorious Parasol
Victorious Parasol
1 year ago

Ah, disowning.

My late father cut one of my sisters out of his will, in large part because she married someone who he did not approve of.

Lest anybody be tempted to defend that someone, I will add my big-sister perspective: I thought he was a little smartass when they were dating in high school. Then I learned about his drug/alcohol habits. Then he started getting violent. Then he decided that his youngest daughter was a suitable target for his needs (not going to get more specific than that, ‘cos this is my niece, after all). Then he decided the best way to deal with the subsequent arrest warrant was to go on the run, which got the US Marshals involved and they recently hauled him back so his photo is now displayed on local news as a sex offender.

In retrospect, I wonder if Dad was worried about my ex-BIL spending any money my sister inherited, which I can totally see. And at any rate, my stepmum came up with a way to see that my sister got some money (with my approval/support) since by the time my dad died, my ex-BIL and sister were divorced.

Full Metal Ox
1 year ago

@Victorious Parasol:

In retrospect, I wonder if Dad was worried about my ex-BIL spending any money my sister inherited, which I can totally see. And at any rate, my stepmum came up with a way to see that my sister got some money (with my approval/support) since by the time my dad died, my ex-BIL and sister were divorced.

And good riddance, from your description; how are your sister, niece, and any other children involved doing?

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

@ shiela

I’d love to know why TC’s mother wrote her will like that

In essence, Carlson’s mother was from old money; but she was a bit boho. Essentially a hippy. She married Carson’s father. He was a journalist, not from a monied background.

She introduced TC to drugs at a very early age. When TC was six his father moved to take up a new journalism job. The kids stayed with him. She stayed in LA with her arty friends. She subsequently divorced TC’s father when TC was 8. She eventually re-married. To another artist. She had no more contact with her previous family after that.

Her original will just left everything to her new husband. The $1 each for her sons was added as a later codecil.

When she died it appeared there was no will. So the intestacy laws applied. Hence the brothers getting a share of her legacy. The will was later found. Her new husband had also died by then; but his son challenged the original probate on the grounds everything should have gone to his father and thus to him. But the court said (probably correctly) that as probate had been completed it was too late to challenge.

As to why she disowned her kids, it’s hard to pin down a specific reason. Apparently she found them a bit of a drag and inconvenience. She hadn’t had any contact with TC though since he was 6; so it seems unclear why the animosity.

Victorious Parasol
Victorious Parasol
1 year ago

@Full Metal Ox

Well, they’re better than they were, and that’s about all I can really say on the topic. I am having very ugly thoughts about my ex-BIL, but luckily they’ve been channeled into stomping around the house and muttering things to Mr. Parasol. He’s an oldest child himself, so he understands and is careful to point out that if I were to fly halfway across the country to do physical harm to my ex-BIL, he’d have to visit me in prison, which would make him sad. Plus our one surviving cat would miss me.

GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
1 year ago

@Vicky P: he’s so not worth it.

@ Alan: So does the early drug exposure explain TC’s constant look of befuddlement and lack of reasoning?

I dunno, Robert Downey Jr. survived that (barely) and seems fairly smart. And generous — he made sure the other Avengers got more money in their contracts, as he was getting paid many times their salary.

Dave
Dave
1 year ago

Does Tucker Carlson actually believe any of the stuff he says? His dad got him into the right wing tabloids because Tucker had zero skills as an actual journalist. I think Tucker just saw a good thing and ran with it.

Chris Oakley
1 year ago

@Surplus:

Slight correction– Maximillian is actually red.
Source: I saw the movie in its original theatrical run and own a copy of the DVD.

Big Titty Demon
Big Titty Demon
1 year ago

@ Victorious Parasol

I’m really sorry to hear about it. But as someone who was in an unfortunate childhood situation with similar characteristics, I can with 100% certainty say that your niece is immeasurably more likely to be able to put back together a better life with someone like you in it. Committed belief in and support for your niece are the things that matter in this. Just by being there, you are doing the best possible thing.

Xenical Dot Warner
Xenical Dot Warner
1 year ago

Right; it’s totally a validation of the whole “get woke, go broke” B.S. narrative. Nothing to do with the plot allegedly being formulaic, or the fact that people may be waiting for it to come out on Disney Plus. (Also: the continued use of “woke” as a pejorative is just sad.)

P.S.: Screw my autocorrect for turning “Xennial” into “Xenical.” Diet pills are not even on my radar.

Last edited 1 year ago by Xenical Dot Warner
Xennial Dot Warner
Xennial Dot Warner
1 year ago

Also: I hate the autocorrect that turned “Xennial” into “Xenical.” Diet pills are not even on my radar.

GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
1 year ago

@Dot: I like your name anyway.

@Dave: By now I think he does — he’s part of the echo chamber and he’s been mouthing this crap for so long it’s gotten grooved into his tiny brain. We know he can barely hold one thought at a time (honestly, did mom do drugs when pregnant with him?), so having to hear and say that every day must have fixed it in his noggin.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

Apropos nothing (well, we were talking about space films); but we have our first space launch on Wednesday!

comment image

That is not a shed. It’s a spaceport!

Xennial Dot Warner
Xennial Dot Warner
1 year ago

@GSS ex-noob: Thanks!

Anyway: rumor has it that Strange World has a formulaic plot. That is a likelier explanation for its lackluster performance than the usual right-wing snowflakery holding any water…that, or people may just be waiting for it to hit Disney Plus.

Last edited 1 year ago by Xennial Dot Warner
GSS ex-noob
GSS ex-noob
1 year ago

@X-Dot: Are you cuuuuute? 😉

The one trailer I saw looked super-generic. So probably not worth the big bucks to take the whole family out.

I’m an Old and I wait for D+ too. Last movie I saw in theaters was “Black Widow” and all the other Marvel content I’ve waited for, because plague. Knowing you’re going to have the kids home from school for a couple weeks and all hyped up on Santa and sugar, you’d keep as much in the queue as possible. It only takes 6 weeks for flops, so having a new movie ready for the boring days of February is worth it.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

Pesky courts. Refusing to overturn elections…

comment image

I guess this is to be expected from one of those Commie judges…

https://ballotpedia.org/Aileen_Cannon

Last edited 1 year ago by Alan Robertshaw
Makroth
Makroth
1 year ago

@Alan Robertshaw

Do any of these “stop the steal” cases actually have jurisdiction? I find myself wishing they did. So someone in court could explain to these people very slowly and carefully why none of their “proof” about this election fraud holds water.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

@ makroth

Do any of these “stop the steal” cases actually have jurisdiction?

Most places have some sort of judicial oversight of elections. So there are perfectly legitimate ways of challenging a procedure or result.

The key issues are jurisdiction and standing.

A court can only look at an election in a territory for which it has oversight. So a state court can only look at elections in that state. You’d have to go to SCOTUS to challenge the whole national result.

Then there’s who can bring a challenge. In some cases it’s only an aggrieved candidate; in others though it can be a purportedly disenfranchised voter.

There were about 30 challenges to the 2020 election. Some were struck out on the above procedural grounds. Others though lost on the merits. Trump’s lawyers had to concede they had no evidence of impropriety. A lot of the time they were seeking a stay pending an investigation as to whether there was anything shady.

But Trump’s own cases weren’t really brought in any hope of success. It just allowed them to say there were issues with the election but the corrupt or incompetent judges wouldn’t do anything about it. And as something like 40% of Americans believe the election was stolen; it appears to have worked.

On the more practical front though, a number of red states are trying to pass legislation that would remove judicial oversight of elections from the purview of the courts and instead leave the final result to be determined by the state governor.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/gop-controlled-legislatures-overhaul-election-laws-ahead-2022/story?id=82730052

ETA: I liked this from a case…

comment image

Last edited 1 year ago by Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

Boo. They’ve postponed our space launch. With the rather dubious excuse they want to keep the skies free for Santa.

They have to give two weeks notice of any launch; but they’re hoping to go again in the new year “after Santa has done his thing”.

(It’s not like Christmas isn’t on calendars)

Gerald Fnord
Gerald Fnord
1 year ago

[PUSHES GLASSES UP HIS NOSE-BRIDGE] Correction:Satan is mentioned only once in the Bible, in his role as the LORD’s loyal prosecuting attorney and, admittedly, snarky troll, in the Book of Iyob.

<sectarian:snark>I’ve heard that in some Christian book or another he’s less loyal, but the piece only mentioned ‘the Bible’.</sectarian:snark>

Last edited 1 year ago by Gerald Fnord