I haven’t done a sexbot post in a while, but you can rest assured that the MRAs and antifeminists are still obsessed with the idea of making women obsolete with new technologies, in particular new technologies that have titties and can fuck.
And the MRAs don’t really mind that the scenarios they put forward almost always involve civilization just totally falling apart.
Some dude called JT_Trenton spells out his vision of the future in a comment on the AntiFeminists subreddit.
It’s funny how Feminism now tries to enforce puritanical views on men and shame them into submission under the new regime by withholding sex for non-compliance.
“Non-compliance” is one way of putting it. Or maybe these guys just won’t stop talking about sexbots making women obsolete.
Effectively replacing God with Vagina worship and trying to enforce the same morals that benefit woman (I.E. Marriage)… but this is totally unsustainable and woman are in for a collective ass whopping as no self respecting man is ever going to be their beta bucks pay pig and he will inevitably find alternatives.
Uh oh, if the ladies can’t leech off of some hapless male how will they survive? Or will they?
Sex Robots, artificial wombs and true virtual reality are coming and when these technologies get here, humanity as we know it is pretty much done for.
Whatever happened to that Chinese blowjob machine sperm extractor? I thought it was going to bring about the end of civilization already.
Concepts such as love will become meaningless, and woman will honesty get it worst of all as their market value will fall through the floor and ironically they will end up in the same situation most incels are in today where society will just have little need for them and they will soon need to deal with feeling truly unwanted (Something woman don’t really know how to deal with and have never experienced.)
No woman has ever felt unwanted. But in this dark future human women will have to mark down their, er, prices to get men to pay attention to them.
This honestly is not the future I want… but humans are collectively too selfish to avoid this dystopic future.
Wait, you don’t want your own sex robot?
It’s the end result of Feminism treating men like dirt… Men already don’t feel needed anymore, so they will adapt quickly to the new system and become content with the idea their life has no meaning and they should just give into meaningless sex with robots and virtual wifus (Practical already there in some ways.)
Yeah, sorry to break it to you but we’re not “practical” there. The alternatives today are all a little clunky when compared to real women and/or toasters. (Don’t put your dick in the latter.)
Woman will not be able to handle the lack of attention however… they will triple down on trying to shame men, try and make sex robots and virtual reality illegal… but they will be completely powerless as their only real allies will be the same puritanical religious zealots that think the old system of female servitude under the lord is the answer.
Where exactly are these feminists trying to ban sexbots? The only people I ever see even talking about sexbots are you weirdos.
In the end, everyone’s life will become meaningless… sex will become meaningless… love will become meaningless and both woman and men will be effectively obsolete. What a nightmare, but at least it will be better for men then the way things are now I guess.
All in all, a very inspirational pos, Mr. Trenton.
But what happens if the women make themselves some male sexbots? Wouldn’t this become a real danger?
Be careful out there, guys.
Follow me on Mastodon.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.
I regret to inform you that I have seen “gender critical” folks say they want to ban both sexbots and artificial wombs, because they will allegedly “make women obsolete.”
@bcb
right, right. Completely on brand and everything.
But the question remains, where exactly are the FEMINISTS who are trying to ban sexbots?
Okay, let’s get real here.
If you can’t love anyone after the first time you try virtual reality sex with integrated blowjob machine, then you can’t love anyone right now.
And honey, maybe that’s your problem.
Wait, so you think society is going to get worse when you’re too busy wanking on the VR net to interact with women? ALL THE LOL.
All the projection of a 10,000 seat iMAX auditorium squished into 3 pounds of neurological jelly!
==============
It really is pretty pathetic that he can’t tell the difference between “no one is sucking my boner” and “no one loves me”.
Statistically you’ve got a mom, a father figure, 1.4 siblings, maybe even some best friends. Even if none of them is sucking your boner, one or more of them might actually love you.
I mean, not YOU, Trenton, but the indefinite “you” from which you (Trenton) believes the core revolutionary corps will come (but not “come” like “cum” come).
==============
Finally, a couple of David’s typos were amusing:
Not sure if this would be better with caps or with adding a “t”. I think I like the dangling double-meaning better.
I think you misspelled “either” just there, David.
TERFs vs incels, huh?
You guess? Well, okay, then.
Whatever will women do without validation from the type of men who think not being a beautiful teenage hotbod makes us entirely and disgustingly worthless. We need the gifts and kindness they insist they shower us with to live!
@Crip Dyke
No worries, I got the joke:)
nihilistic much little incel? This view leaves out so much humanities need for human interaction and insists on rapidly growing obsolete gender roles. In other words he’s an idiot.
Actually the incels pose an interesting question. What would the societal results be if cheap, realistic sex bots were widely available? What about VR sex? Would that lead to more or less sex between humans? A science fiction author should answer this question.
What’s the current lead time (aka “moving goal post”) for sexbots? Is it still “five years from now”?
Nothing is stopping them from wanking now, so I don’t see how slightly more elaborate wanking will upend the status quo. If orgasms cured loneliness or substituted for love and affection, their problems would already be solved.
OT:
Nichelle Nichols passed away yesterday – family just released the news a little while ago. 🙁
Here is the future he worries about.
LOL at the complete failure to recognize that:
a) any truly realistic and satisfying “sexbot”-type devices will be manufactured, and used, in male forms just as much as, if not more so than, in female forms.
Have you seen recent stats on vibrator use by women? Is there any reason to think that would change once the artificial penis has a believably appealing artificial man attached to it? Women in general will be at least as big a market demographic for sexbot sales as men will. (Well, except that men will probably purchase more of them overall because of the larger subset of men who will destroy the toy through violent abuse and then want new ones.)
b) the sort of bitter spiteful men who dream of making women “obsolete” would never tolerate for even a day the kind of care demands placed on them by having sole custody of offspring produced via “artificial wombs”. Yeah, you look EXACTLY like ideal single-father types, guys.
Sheesh. The day when these men are actually able to get the fulfilling artificial sex that they dream about, and can finally retreat into satisfied wank-filled (nonreproductive) solitude and leave real-life women alone, cannot come soon enough.
I mean, we’ve already seen Jude Law as a sexbot.
Think how much more women could get done if they didn’t have to put up with annoying men dirtying the bathroom, leaving their undies on the floor, and whining for sex. They’d do great at their jobs and have better mental health. Fire up the sexbot man, get your jollies, put him away and go live your best life.
Decent men will still get women, because they realize women are humans worthy of respect. Incels don’t get any anyway, but if sexbots were cheap and realistic, they could have sex with the perfect jailbait skinny except for boobs and butt bot, who will never expect anything from them. And thus not hassle real women.
Sounds like a good idea. Roll on, sexbots!
I am sure there is a woman’s group that has or will form that will govern what those robots will a) look like and b) do.
At the same time male children will be raised to respect woman’s bodies and this will dove tale with the above plan which will free women from having to please men and yet the control over men’s sexuality will be maintained.
Sexbots just seem inconvenient. If you don’t have a lot of storage space, where are you going to put it? How much is that thing going to weigh?
The point of making a human-looking robot is, I guess, so that people will find it sexually attractive, but how many people are actually going to be attracted to a robot? Will it ever be possible for robots to climb out of the uncanny valley? How will they be made safe–remember that chess robot that recently broke a child’s finger?
There will always be a small number of people ready to try out even crude, creepy-looking sexbots, but at this point it’s hard to imagine it becoming common. A vibrator or other sex toy is small, easy to clean and store, and you won’t get creeped out if you catch a glimpse of it while you’re using it.
@LouCPurr
My dildo also won’t jump scare me in the middle night if it starts peaking out of the closet
@Kimstu
Ah, so you have also seen the horror stories from sex doll repair shops.
One small flaw in their plan are men who actually like women and want something more than a sex toy. The benefit to women who want to be with men is this will help weed out the ones who don’t. There are still those who want a maid or a mother, but once good housekeeping robots are around that’ll take care of that.
Just thought I’d mention a beloved SF novel about a teenage girl and a male sexbot who run off together:
http://mporcius.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-silver-metal-lover-by-tanith-lee.html
@ full metal ox
And also the plot of Asimov’s Robots of Dawn.
@Jack Rabbit:
I am sure, with a lot more rational likelihood, that there will be no such thing. FFS, there’s no “woman’s group” that “governs” even what real-life female porn actresses and sex workers can look like or do, much less sex dolls or cartoon porn characters or any other figments of imagination. There’s not going to be any “woman’s group” controlling sexbot design either.
@Jack Rabbit:
More gibberish grievance fantasies from the permanently irrational resentful mindset of the manosphere.
Nobody is now, or is going to be in future, “controlling men’s sexuality” in any significant way (with the partial exception of the criminal justice system somewhat halfheartedly trying to discourage men from committing sexual violence against actual human beings). No feminists are going to be in charge of deciding what your inanimate-object sexbot can look like or what you can do to it.
(If this was in fact a parody post mocking manosphere paranoid resentment and I just missed the sarcasm, then well done. But somehow I have a feeling that a parody poster would have spelled “dovetail” correctly.)
Aww, I was hoping to hear about the adventures of that plucky little dove…
@Gaebolga
Not pony tales or cotton tales
No, Dove Tales!
Woo-oo!