This fellow has a unique plan to lose not only his own virginity but the virginity of 11 of his best buds as well. And all they need for this plan to work is just one willing virgin of the female persuasion.
So romantic! What non-virginal adult woman doesn’t fondly remember her first 12 dude Reddit virgin gangbang?
This perfectly sensible, nothing-could-possibly-go-wrong plan was originally posted on r/virgin, then reposted in r/NotHowGirlsWork.
Follow me on Mastodon.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.
This kind of makes sense when you have an undying belief that women are banging Chads left and right in massive orgies all the time, so for your first time why not be nice, close your eyes and do some incels a favor I guess… for a loose definition of “kind of” anyway.
(Though I find it odd he straight up says “No ladies need apply”, which seems to defeat the purpose.)
You just know a fight would break out about who gets to bang the woman first, and therefore “truly” take her virginity.
Yeah, I am sure some young woman is going to want to have sex for the first time with a dozen guys, none of whom have ever heard of foreplay.
@45:
(Though I find it odd he straight up says “No ladies need apply”, which seems to defeat the purpose.)
He evidently means “ladies” in the sense of respectable™ women, who might expect a ring, commitment, and fidelity up front in return for their hymen(1)—as distinct from the extremely hypothetical sort who’d be happy with serving as a responsibility-free Cherry Disposal Bin for a dozen strange Reddit dudebros.
(Which regrettably isn’t a magic token that can guarantee you those things—conservative evangelical churches to the contrary. Fortunately, conservative evangelical churches need a Domestic Supply of Infants to adopt.)
Brilliant.
Yes, this would certainly solve 12 guys’ most pressing problem.
Wait. It seems that you’re not actually interested in resolving this desperate situation for you and 11 other guys. In fact, you’re so uninterested that you warn off any virgin woman who — against all odds and against any good judgment — might be interested in this proposition.
I think the idea is that any woman who would volunteer for this is automatically unsuitable because she’s not chaste enough. Which is how purity culture and rape culture intertwine.
I don’t even… Look, unless he’s going to break the laws of man and morality, he might as well join a monastery now instead of waiting twenty or so years to realize that no woman would ever have him.
@Mimi Haha – yeah, even if a woman was unselfconscious about this (“virgin” not necessarily equalling “shy”), it sounds physically painful. And kind of dull, IMO. Tedious too for the guys waiting – wouldn’t they get bored? Unless they’d would be willing to do stuff with each other…but that’s probably not the idea.
Like, I fit under the allosexual umbrella – bi specifically – but the idea of spending that much time waiting for sex? I’d bring a book or something 🙂
Of course he doesn’t want to hear what the women in question think of his dumb idea,
I have a better idea: each of them goes and pays a sex worker to lose their virginity. I’m not sure why the woman needs to be a virgin.
What if they just bought a sex doll together? At least the doll wouldn’t feel bad about it!
I think that the “no ladies need apply” clause is just to head off the inevitable lack of applicants for this idea.
Gotta say, I always assume that a guy who wants to do one woman with a load of other guys has a more than passing interest in… other guys. And there’s nothing wrong with that, but dude – just be honest about it.
@SpleenyBadger: I don’t think that’s how it works? When the focus is on the men, it’s about objectification and/or degradation of the woman, you know, like a toy being passed around or similar. While when the focus is on the woman, it’s more like dominance and/or empowerment, like “watch me sexually conquer multiple guys at once!” It’s kind of funny how essentially the same act can have extremely opposite connotations.
Like, maybe there might be some repressed bisexuals in the mix, but I don’t think that’s common.