Categories
armageddon incels MGTOW misogyny we hunted the mammoth

Just another incel fantasy of a nuclear war putting “strong men” in charge again

Nuclear war is cute and funny

Here’s a creepy bit of copypasta i found crossposted on the MGTOW subreddit and the incel-infested Black Pill Club site. It’s a little apocalyptic fantasy envisioning some variety of “WW3” tearing down our allegedly lady-dominated society and putting “strong men” in charge again.

“We need WW3/something really devastating so strong men can take back western society,” the post begins.

Its no secret that western society (so far, its likely that other the rest of the world will be feminist soon as well) has been ruined by feminism and all sorts of degeneracy.

Ah, “degeneracy,” that favorite Nazi dogwhistle.

Men, especially straight white men are villified and get no respect. Everything is blamed on the “evil” patriachy. Lots of men are brainwashed into believe the whole women being oppressed narrative. I won’t even get into the lgbt+ degenerate bs here.

People are ungrateful to men who build and made the US and in general the west so powerful.

WE HUNTED THE MAMMOTH, er, sorry, “built and made the US” to feed you!

And things will only get worse. We have had it too easy in the west so people in the past few decades (and now with social media it has only gotten worse) became focused on dumb shit like feminism.

We’re living in the midst of a pandemic that has already killed more than ten times the number of Americans who died in Vietnam. Fascism is on the rise worldwide. I’m not sure things are quite so “easy” as you think unless you live a pretty cosseted life.

We need real problems, maybe WW3 or something else that is devastating so people grow up and appreciate men again

You really think you’re the grown up in this scenario? You live in a fantasy land.

Follow me on Mastodon.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.

83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

Whiners of any gender will be low high on the list of “people who get to eat today”.

You can solve two problems at once!

Chris Oakley
Chris Oakley
3 years ago

The irony is that if a nuclear war did/does break out, incels would probably be among the first casualties.

Big Titty Demon
Big Titty Demon
3 years ago

@Alan Robertshaw

Imma feed you all the beets if you’re in my apocalypse clan, they grow like weeds but I hate ’em. 😛

I checked out the handbooks, super interesting! I wonder if my mother learned some of her food preservation methods from a program like that, because basically all the ones I was passed down are mentioned there. Theoretically I could pressure can if I had to, but I’m actually way too scared I’ll do it wrong and end up with botulism, so I’m waiting for the apocalypse to force my hand before I try that.

Side note, freezing figs is the way to go. Unless you eat an absolutely absurd amount of fruit, one (mature) tree produces enough fruit for an adult human for a whole year. Since one persimmon tree is the same and one apricot tree is currently being measured with a no-loss canning sesh, but omg, just quarts and quarts of the stuff, it presents a problem if one hasn’t enough humans around…

Elaine The Witch
Elaine The Witch
3 years ago

I had to be the one to teach my husband how to catch fish, and the first time I showed him how to skin a deer he nearly vomited. Yes, this was the sniper marine. I’d like to see any of this pansy ass incels do that.

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
3 years ago

@Dalillama : well, yes. With propaganda and luck you can make people believe that they aren’t worse off a war quite often, especially when it “only” kill your men abroad.

Seth S
Seth S
3 years ago

I mean, do you have to gut an animal to be a survivalist? I can persuade a plot of land in Zone 12 to give up enough calories to sustain a person without doing that, I imagine it must be easier in more hospitable climes. And I’m not even a survivalist, I just like to grow interesting plants.

Oh, certainly not, realistically. It would be possible to be a vegan survivalist, even, if you planned well…corn, beans and squash, the “Three Sisters” of the native peoples, together provide a complete set of the necessary amino acids to make all the proteins we need. Meat should not be necessary for someone who ate those three as staple foods every day, IF you prepare the corn properly with nixtamalization to free up the niacin and amino acids. Then, just supplement with greens and whatever fruits can be found to cover the vitamins and minerals – tender young dandelion greens are a surprisingly rich source of vitamin C to prevent scurvy, among other important nutrients – and you have a complete People Chow.

But these guys are Big Men (Temporarily Embarrassed Action Heroes…. I love that, lol), and such truly quality males eat manly things like MEAT. Salad is for women! And for people who don’t want scurvy, obvs, but… whatever, action heroes don’t die of scurvy. Big damn hero Jordan Peterson is a manly man carnivore, so they can be, too! *gag*

galanx
galanx
3 years ago

As John Scalzi described the ultimate fate of all those he-man libertarian types after the breakdown of society, “thin strips of Objectivist jerky”.
You had a lot of these guys infesting fansites when The Walking Dead first came out (back when it looked like it might develop into something good), gun-nuts boasting that they didn’t need no cooking or laundry, they’d just run naked through the trees with their guns, while the snooty feminists who had rejected them would beg for protection.

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
3 years ago

@seth : from a survivalist viewpoint, I would rate “being able to prepare animal corpse into non poisonous food” rather high. Not because it’s impossible to go vegan ; but because the main hypothesis is that you don’t have backup to explain you what to do in case of a new vermin cratering a specific crops, or simply if you can’t go to a place where theses crops can grow.

Most herbivorous animals are opportunistic meat eater ; like deers will eats eggs and baby birds to supplement their diets. Not because it’s necessary in their diets, but because it’s a very low cost way to get calories. If you want to maximize your survival odds, it’s a seriously good thing to do.

That’s even more necessary because you would need several month before your crops, and it’s not a given you can tend to enough crops for yourself either, since presumably you don’t have modern tools and might not be very experienced in that either.

(of course, you could decide to take the risk to starve rather than go non vegan, no shame in that)

Also, gutting animals is a rather advanced thing, and not the immediate first thing to know to survive in the wild. I mean, you don’t need it for eggs, and only need a very basic understanding of that for smaller animals, which are the one you’ll try to trap or hunt if alone in a survival condition. Butchery is useful once you’re talking about boars or horses or wolves or other big animals, and I seriously advice against hunting any of theses if you’re not at least half a dozen.

In short, if I would rate skills for survival after apocalypse, it would be water filtering > gathering/knowing how to not poison yourself with fruits > basic animal/egg huntings > craft > agriculture > domestication > butchery > beermaking.

Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

@ big titty demon

I love all those WW2 booklets.

Side note, freezing figs is the way to go

There’s quite a bit of debate in vegan communities about figs. See here for example.

https://theveganreview.com/are-figs-vegan-or-should-they-be-given-a-wide-berth/

Personally I don’t have a problem with them. In the same way I’d eat a Venus fly trap.

But speaking of figs, the Romans grew a popular variety called Liviana.

That was so named as a tongue in cheek reference to the rumour that Livia assassinated Augustus via poisoned figs.

(He’d become so paranoid that Livia was out to kill him that he refused any palace food and only ate figs directly from the trees. So according to legend Livia just smeared poison on all the fig trees in the local area)

https://open.spotify.com/show/4MppQmxAXo1KJUxwdXa4oK

Kereea
Kereea
3 years ago

“We need real problems”
Jumps right to WW3 for problem level.
WTF.

Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

@ ohlmann

it would be water filtering > gathering/knowing how to not poison yourself with fruits > basic animal/egg huntings > craft > agriculture > domestication > butchery > beermaking.

If you put beermaking as your first priority then you don’t have to worry about the water filtration. Also, you would have beer.

LollyPop
LollyPop
3 years ago

@Ohlmann

main hypothesis is that you don’t have backup to explain you what to do in case of a new vermin cratering a specific crops, or simply if you can’t go to a place where theses crops can grow.

The botanist James Wong talks about this a lot, mainly because he has lots of organic food “we should all just forage” advocates having a pop at him when he discusses the miracle of modern farming. A kitchen garden is a wonderful thing but extremely unreliable and subject to the vagaries of nature, and people wouldn’t have starved throughout history if growing your own was easy to do. It would be especially hard under the pressures that any post-apocalyptic world is going to throw up.

The sad truth is most of us would die if society collapsed. There’s so many of us we’d eat out any natural resources within months, like people eating all the frogs during the famine in North Korea. I guess the survivors would be anyone who could hide out the chaos long enough that the human population collapses and nature has time to bounce back. Which is a pretty horrible thought!

opposablethumbs
opposablethumbs
3 years ago

@Ohlmann, @Alan – isn’t that pretty much what “small beer” was? (as in, very low in alcohol and mainly a way of making water safer and more palatable to drink?)
(or is that one of those “everybody knows” things that are really just a vague myth?)

Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

@ opposablethumbs

isn’t that pretty much what “small beer” was?

Good question.

There was certain some contemporary thought that small beer was healthy. But that was mainly for its nutritional content than the water purity thing.

“For the drink of the more robust children water is preferable, and for the weaker ones, small beer …”.

Communities throughout history have managed to obtain clean and safe drinking water. It just seems that for a lot of people, they just preferred beer to water. As the kids say, relatable.

Later it became a cost thing. Small beer was cheaper than regular beer; and it attracted lower taxes.

It was also considered socially acceptable to drink. See for example Hogarth’s comparison of small beer drinkers to gin drinkers.

comment image

Covered In Cat Hair
Covered In Cat Hair
3 years ago

Well, what can I say. I am a woman. I was raised on a farm and know how to handle, train, milk, and care for cows, goats, and horses. I spent a summer as part of a crew building a house. I can take care of simple machine repairs. I am a textile artist and know how to spin, weave, knit, tat, and rug hook. I am a very decent cook who bakes all kind of bread etc all the time. I don’t know how to shoot (Canadian) but have taken a fair number of self-defense courses.

What exactly are these guys offering me?

Victorious Parasol
Victorious Parasol
3 years ago

Another woman here. I only grow a small patch of rosemary, thyme, and lavender (planning to add jalapenos and cilantro next year), but I can spin, knit, and weave (though I’m better at the first two). I figure I’m better off trading fiber goods for food in whatever post-apocalyptic future I live to see, or joining whatever local community is set up … and considering I live in an area where a lot of hippies settled back in the day, I figure my odds are pretty good.

One thing I’ve noticed with these incel fantasies is that they tend to assume that a post-apocalyptic future will be triggered by a Big Event. Carrie Vaughn’s Bannerless series would disagree – her post-apocalyptic setting is triggered by an epidemic, which leads to a decline in infrastructure, which leads to a more general decline. I find that more believable, especially given what we’ve seen with the pandemic. That slow gradual change isn’t something incels can shoot their way out of.

francis
francis
3 years ago

@Alan

I believe those Hogarth pictures where for an advising campaign for gin

Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
3 years ago

@galanx

You had a lot of these guys infesting fansites when The Walking Dead first came out (back when it looked like it might develop into something good), gun-nuts boasting that they didn’t need no cooking or laundry, they’d just run naked through the trees with their guns, while the snooty feminists who had rejected them would beg for protection.

Used to find these types from time to time in the more isolated parts of Iraq and Syria during sweeps once the ISIL lot had been forced out or left. We invariably found them gutshot, stripped, and left by the road to die by the locals they were going to live off.

Sheila Crosby
3 years ago

The YouTuber, Beau of the fifth column, has video about the people who say they can take on the US gubmint because the Vietnamese did. Asymetrical warfare for the win!

Yeah, no. The Bugaloo boys might fantasise about living off bugs and the like, but they’re pretty much exactly the people who had a meltdown when their favourite restaurant went Take Out only, and when they had to wear a piece of cotton on their face to get into Walmart. Besides, what happens to your family while you’re off with your mates living off the land? The war isn’t 6,000 miles away, it’s right where your family are.

Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

Sort of related. Well, it’s food and clothing in desperate times.

I just found out today about this.

comment image

In the 30s some flour mills found out mothers were using the sacks to make clothes for their children. So they started making the sacks in different patterns so the kids could have nice clothes.

That’s both heartwarming, and sad.

So many people in the comments though saying how their parents would take them along when they went to buy provisions so they could pick out what dress they wanted.

comment image

Victorious Parasol
Victorious Parasol
3 years ago

@Alan

Yes, the flour sack clothing is something you see in American literature from the 30s (either written then or set in that time period). You also see people today making quilts or other items from flour sack material.

Alan Robertshaw
3 years ago

@ Vicky P

They even made cuddly toys! Now I am gonna cry.

comment image

(It’s like the Shelterbox teddybears thing; just hits you with the reality for the kids)

Nequam
Nequam
3 years ago

I’ve seen some sacks of flour that still have a pattern on them in case you want to make a dress/pillowcase out of them.

moregeekthan
moregeekthan
3 years ago

@Seth S
Your description of nightshade berries led me to try and identify the nightshade-like plant growing in my yard, which has bright red berries. Looks like it is bittersweet nightshade, which is not as poisonous as famous nightshade, but still nothing you want to eat. I had been going to rip it up, but the bumblebees love the flowers so much I couldn’t bear to.

Big Titty Demon
Big Titty Demon
3 years ago

@Alan

But why does that make you cry? I think it’s a nice way to put fabric to a second use, debatably better than tons of plastic and unrecyclable paper waste from flour sacks now.

What’s the problem if it came from a grocery store instead of a pristine fabric shop? Piecing was always a part of sewing until very recently in fashion.