I‘m not sure which of these is worse. This first message is from a father to his son, who is also a father, and it’s mostly about how shitty the “females” of the world have been to both of them, allegedly.
This one is, if anything, even ruder to the mothers of the world.
Have a happy non-MGTOW Fathers’ Day, everyone.
Follow me on Mastodon.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies on support from you, its readers, to survive. So please donate here if you can, or at David-Futrelle-1 on Venmo.
Ding, dangit… I sent a txt to my son (also a daddy), and I got one from him, but we BOTH forgot to even MENTION the awfulness of women. Guess we were too caught up in the “father’s day” thing….
So do they want to be fathers or not? I’m so confused.
Isn’t that something from the Bible? Jesus-related? (Christian upbringing, spotty memory.)
Mildly related: My boyfriend took me out to a restaurant for my birthday today (I’m 33! restaurants are finally open again!) but on the metro I was working on a Sanskrit translation exercise for my linguistics class. One sentence was particularly stubborn, so I went “Jesus, this sentence is hard” and then “I mean, Vishnu, this sentence is hard” (Vishnu being mentioned in the next one).
I keep doing stuff at the last minute. 🙁 But the restaurant was nice.
As for Father’s Day! I feel a bit bad about not remembering. My dad just came back from a week-long trip (he had to go to the next province to get a minor surgery done) and I forgot to say Happy Father’s Day. No wonder he waited after he said “Happy Birthday” to me; I didn’t catch the hint.
But yes, Happy Father’s Day to all the fathers…except if you blame everything on women, you’re going to make yourselves and/or other people miserable. So don’t do that.
@epitomeofincomreprehensibility:
Isn’t that something from the Bible? Jesus-related? (Christian upbringing, spotty memory.)
That it is—with the effect that the OP seems to be equating himself with God the Father and his son with Jesus: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+3%3A17%2CMatthew+17%3A5%2CMark+1%3A11%2CMark+9%3A7%2CLuke+3%3A22%2CLuke+9%3A35%2C2+Peter+1%3A17&version=ESV
OT : I have had a lot of discussion about police and what to do with it. Which lead me to the fact I don’t have a good reference for a project to replace the current police. Outside of the anarchist PoV of replacing it by nothing.
I would say we really need to have more specialized services instead of a one-size-fit-all police that do everything from helping domestic violence victims to arrest dangerous criminals. But I am not sure it would solve all the problems, nor that it would be practical in smaller communities.
This was a hard Father’s Day weekend for me this year. I read a dad joke to Mr. Parasol, commented that it was EXACTLY the sort of joke my dad would’ve liked, and then burst into tears.
These animal dads set a better example than our MGTOW friends.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/these-unappreciated-animal-dads-make-big-sacrifices-for-their-young?
There’s maybe also some advice for incels; or is this gorilla PUA tips?
completely OT for this thread, with apologies; I just noticed that one of the two organisations that Corbyn names in this tweet is the very one that Alan mentioned the other day – ShelterBox
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1406986280660045828
@ VP
All the internet hugs to you. Loss is hard, and anniversaries/special days can be real tough.
Hang in there.
@ Ohlmann
I am no expert, but from what I’ve gleaned in casual online readings, you’ve about hit it on the head: Not complete elimination of the police (unfortunately we need armed people willing to go hands on and hunt the most dangerous game), but a reduction, and the addition of other services such as trained people to intervene in mental health crises, more EMTs, private investigators, that sort of thing, so the cops really only need concern themselves with the more violent offenders. It sounds good in theory, but like you, I have my doubts. Still, it is certainly worth a try.
@Victorious Parasol:
Yeah; suddenly and utterly without warning, you’ll stumble headlong into a yawning dad-shaped hole.
Father’s Day – one of only 365 or 366 days a year dedicated to complaining about the ladies.
@epitome of incomprehensibility:
That’s a perennial problem with all holidays and occasions that refuse to stay put on the calendar, unlike decent well-behaved ones like Hallowe’en, Christmas, Canada Day, Independence Day, and people’s birthdays. You can’t just memorize a date, let the blatantly obvious commercial spamming of the upcoming event jog your memory once it gets to a couple of weeks away (months in the case of Christmas), get a card, and make plans for Month the Someteenth. Instead, you’ll be vaguely aware that it’s coming up, but uncertain what date it actually is, and then at some point you decide to go look it up somewhere, and surprise! It was yesterday. Or worse, you decide to go shopping on what turns out to be the exact day and when you get there, surprise! The stores are all fucking closed in the middle of what would be their normal operating hours on any other Monday. Or you go to work and everything’s locked and darkened and there’s nobody there. Etc.
I’d wonder if it was all a conspiracy to sell reminder apps, except that it’s been this way since before the iPhone was a twinkle in Steve Jobs’s eye.
@Ohlmann:
Which wouldn’t work. Some biker gang would appoint themselves the replacement, unilaterally. “True” anarchy is unstable against some group gathering (or making) a bunch of guns and than declaring their leader to be Emperor Whatsit.
Avoiding despotism seems to be achieved in practice, when it is achieved, by having multiple competing power centers, and particularly by distributing power out toward the edges of the network. The problem with doing that with weapons, specifically, is that you get a lot of local fiefdoms that get into turf wars around their edges. See also: medieval Europe.
So you need some armed group to have a monopoly on all of the stronger weapons, but to lack autonomy to do much more than maintain that monopoly against would-be usurpers. They need to be legally compelled to follow the orders of a civilian government authority, and that then needs to have the power distributed out to the edges. In theory, that’s what happens with the police: the vast majority are the metropolitan police of some city, under the command of local politicians chosen by local elections. The military meanwhile is restrained by (in the US) the Posse Comitatus Act to mainly operate abroad, and control of them (and of federal law enforcement) is supposed to be vested in an elected federal legislature that draws representatives from districts spread out all over the country, again spreading out geographically the power.
In practice, of course, we’ve seen these systems corrupted up and down, from election irregularities to special-interest capture of the federal government to corrupt LEOs and military units, and we’ve seen cops and soldiers carry out coups in various places and times, rather than remain obedient to the civilian government. Even in the US, there was police and military complicity in the failed putsch on January 6.
It’s definitely a thorny problem.
@.45:
I’d be concerned that the “trained people to intervene in mental health crises” will end up given the power to have people committed, and this will inevitably get abused against the usual targets of oppression, and against “troublemakers” who give the wealthy and powerful sufficient sleepless nights, as a way to have people imprisoned indefinitely without trial. That could end with replacing the police with something even worse, since at least the police are limited to two options: summary execution, with an escalating risk of triggering widespread civil unrest, or the whole arraignment/trial/jury verdict route, habeas corpus rights, defense attorneys, and all.
Notably, they can’t remove a troublemaker without making a lot of noise. Either there’s a dead body on the spot, and likely eyewitnesses, or there’s an arrest record and other paperwork at a bare minimum. That it happened at all will quickly become public, and judicial review is very likely to occur at some point — always, if someone is arraigned.
Empower the cops or their replacements to quietly disappear people without trial and we’re immediately staring down the barrel of defacto dictatorship.
In theory, there’s a defense right now: don’t actually break the law, try to have an active enough social life to be alibied for every minute of every day, don’t arm yourself, and stay very still in the presence of police so there’s no way they can think (or just argue later) that you are drawing a weapon on them. Then — again in theory — they can’t shoot you, they can’t hold you for very long without arraignment, and you then get to have a lawyer and your day in court and if you didn’t break the law you should have a strong defense. In practice, they can still get you, at least with a good enough roll of the dice as it were, but you made it difficult for them, and impossible for them to do it without raising a public fuss.
Against widespread agents of the state with the power to commit people to asylums, there’s no defense whatsoever. They say you’re a danger to yourself and others and need to be confined, then they lock you up, and then they throw away the key. No trial, no defense, no lawyers, not even a guaranteed maximum sentence duration after which they have no choice but to let you go; no way out unless they decide of their own volition to release you some day. They hold all of the cards and don’t have to roll any kind of dice. There’s no contest that you can potentially win by some combination of ingenuity, luck, and not actually having done anything wrong, where if you do win they have to abide by the rules and let you go no matter their own preferences. All that will matter is the “prosecutor”‘s preferences, and the preferences of the government higher-ups and their wealthy shadowy backers who are holding the prosecutors’ leashes.
It’s an authoritarian’s dream and a maverick outcast’s nightmare. Someone can just knock on your door one day, for any or no discernible reason, who is holding the combined powers of cop, prosecutor, judge, jury, and jailer and feels like using them. After we’ve just spent centuries trying to separate out all of those powers into separate people in separate organizations with various (however flawed) oversight mechanisms precisely to mitigate the danger presented by having such a concentration of power in one individual, whose whims and potentially corrupt dealings would never be exposed to public scrutiny, let alone the withering glare of cross-examination at trial.
@45: “hunt the most dangerous game” was maybe not the best choice of phrase given that the story it comes from centers on a rich, sociopathic bastard who feels he has the right to hunt and killer “lesser” people because he’s bored with any other sorts of fun.
@Victorious Parasol – My condolences, and to everyone who’s grieving their fathers (or have ones who are/were neglectful or abusive).
@Full Metal Ox – That was it, thanks.
@Surplus – Yes, the moveable holidays are annoying! They should stay put! But when I said sorry & Happy Father’s Day today, he said he didn’t remember hinting at it last night.
He was very tired, having just spent half an hour on the phone with my brother who insisted on discussing the internal conflicts of Canada’s Green Party. With the poor man still feeling woozy from painkillers. I’m nicer to him; I just ramble on about linguistics. 😛
@ Surplus
I was thinking along the lines of person acting delusional in public and gets someone more like a nurse to talk them down, rather than a cop rolling up with a taser right off. Going full totalitarian government and giving said “nurse” the ability to act as judge, jury, and executioner was not the plan. One might argue we already have that going on enough with the cops already.
@ Nequam
True, but I like the story anywho. Short little thriller.
Edit: Concerning the guy rambling about being proud of his son despite those meddling womens… yeah, so I see someone’s bitter about not winning custody.
Happy 21:21 on the 21st day of the 21st week of the 21st year of the 21st Century!!!
Allow me to counter this toxic Father’s Day message with some of my favorite Litterbox Comics strips, plus the latest one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/furry/comments/o404mj/a_litterbox_comics_binge_for_fathers_day_comic_by/
https://www.litterboxcomics.com/cant-break-it/
@45: Oh, I agree it’s a great story, but it still feels like a phrase I don’t want to associate with law enforcement (or soldiers for that matter).
That’s a lovely pic, Alan. What is the name of the place?
The problems we have with police forces abusing their authority certainly won’t disappear at the stroke of a pen, but defunding – significantly reducing the remit the police are supposed to have – would at least be a useful step in the right direction (and would be good for anyone decent there might be on the force as well as for us).
The more I learn about some other people’s fathers the more grateful I am for the one I had.
Both my husband and I had good relationships with good fathers, and it’s my sincere hope that one day both of our sons will feel the same way.
Test2
@ opposablethumbs
Boscawen-Un. My favourite stone circle. Just love that place.