By David Futrelle
It’s Three-for-one Tuesday today (is that a thing?) as I bring you not one, not two, but three soul-crushingly horrible items from the Incels.co fourms.
So enjoy, I guess?
Let’s start with the virgin who wants to fuck his sister.
INCESTPILL
“Why is this forum not ready to accept the incestpill yet,” asks an incel calling himself Total Imbecile.
Its like you guys swallow every pill so easily but when when the incestpill is brought up half the users here spit it back out
The thing is Im a virgin and my sister is a very young and nubile looking 20 year old
Jesus Christ dude.
Im obviously not suicidal enough to actively pursue her but fuck me if I wouldnt grope her a bit or make out with her or even fuck her if I ever get the chance
“B-but muh siblings growing up repulsion theory” or whatever its called
Isnt this the whole point of marrying your HS sweetheart? That you grow up and grow old togerther
Not to mention that my sisters and I arent even that close, like wed interact with each other cause we live in the same house but those interactions would always have 0 depth so they might as well be strangers to me tbh
Maybe some of you guys just dont want to admit it idk
Or maybe his fellow incels have somehow managed to retain enough of their basic humanity that they understand the reasons for the incest taboo? Maybe they have some small sliver of morality left in their otherwise wretched souls?
INTERCHANGEABLE LEGO WOMEN
Based on his observations of women at his job in a bookstore, one incel bravely concludes that all women are basically the same and that no one should care about them.
“[B]y working in a bookshop I’ve seen hundreds of women in the last month and I’ve reach the point where I can barely notice any personal/individual trait,” writes The Reaper.
it’s like lego: an endlessly slightly different combination of the same pieces(legs,asses,eyes etc.) but there’s nothing that can be consider really unique, nothing that can’t be found in hundreds of other women.
I think what’s going on here is what they call depersonalization. And that’s not a healthy way to look at the world.
once you’re over the phase of considering women special,all that’s left is the desire of sex, and that’s honestly the only thing that’s worth pursuing.
if you don’t believe me ask yourself this:
“why is chad leaving women for which you would kill your entire family?”.
if these angels/special beings really existed chad would not left them.
So the fact that Chads break up with hot women (or maybe get dumped by them) means that all women are basically identical? That’s quite a leap there, skipper.
Oh, but things get worse.
IT’S FUN BEING A DOG
One dogpill-believing incel reflects on what he sees as the joys of being a dog in the world of today.
“Anyone else wishes they were a dog?” wonders Lv99_BixNood.
It might be best to stop reading this post right about now.
Well, ok, you’ve chosen to continue. Don’t say I didn’t warn you. Lv99_BixNood, take it away:
While we are rotting, dogs are out there living the chad life. Tongue kissing prime teen girls, lapping up peanut butter from their pussy, humping their legs and pumping them full of dog sperm. Jfl if you are not a dog in 2020.
Ew ew ew ew. Sorry to ruin your dinner or perhaps your entire day.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Sigh.
Good to know V.C. Andrews characters exist in real life.
Well, I am always up for a walk and a biscuit.
@ Alan
Not up for the early (snip – snip) visit to he vet myself.
Dropped my phone laughing at that, Alan. Maybe the best test is- if you saw a rotting carcass, would you roll in it?
So if she seduces you, you certainly wouldn’t say no. Is that because it would be rude.
You’re not really familiar with that line of thinking, huh.
Sure, having sex with your sister is just like marrying your high school sweetheart. Many fine people say this.
Wait, which is it. Would having sex with your sister be just like marrying your high school sweetheart. Or would it be just like having sex with a stranger.
Off topic: Melania Trump tonight at the RNC
I feel like I’ve seen this outfit before. Oh yeah, it looks like the jacket she wore to the immigrant children’s detention center at the US-Mexico border. The jacket that had a message scrawled on its back: I Really Don’t Care. Do U?
I think his reasoning is
“close sibling relationship : high-school sweetheart :: distant sibling relationship : stranger”, so either way it is justified in his mind.
Um… he’s not?
Because– and I mean this in the best possible way– I have never met a woman who inspired any impulses towards familicide.
WWTH:
I first read “incelpill” and felt comfortable not quite knowing what to expect.
It’s mostly the olive drab color:
Or – do you eat cat poops out of the litter box?
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2018/6/25/1775347/-When-a-Jacket-Isn-t-Just-a-Jacket-The-Fascist-Message-of-I-Don-t-Care
Long story short: it resonates, probably as an intentional dogwhistle, with a slogan used by Mussolini’s blackshirts in 1930s Italy.
The jacket in the RNC picture is different, though, and seems designed to resemble a military uniform, or part of one.
@Lumipuna
Me too! Then I was like, wait, what, it’s incest??? Then I realised I read it wrong the first time and felt like I had not given myself the proper mental hardening lead time for that bullshit…
Somehow the picture of Melania at the RNC was visible while I was writing my post, but then it disappeared. That’s a new one for me, so I’m gonna go with poster error.
AFAIK, the sibling repulsion only happen if they are socialized together early on. Humans tend to have a bias to find people who look like themselves attractive, so a lack of socialization can easily lead to incest.
Of course, the social taboo should still say them that it’s bad. Someone with decent morals could say he is attracted to his sister but won’t act on it ; it take an incel to say, litteraly, “fuck that”.
TMI full disclosure:
I don’t quite wish to be a dog, but I do like sometimes roleplaying as one. Having an “owner” for those occasions would be nice; even better if she were a woman and a regular life partner. (BTW, surprisingly many human puppy players are gay men)
Partnered puppy play may on may not involve actual sex, as in something conventionally understood as such. It may not even be sexually suggestive, as in involving nudity/elaborate fetish gear or relatively intimate petting (pun intended). Typically, it is a sexual experience for the puppy (and often the owner), sometimes not, although this distinction can be highly ambiguous. (For the purpose of my point below, I’m establishing a distinction between outward vs. inward sexual expression)
A purist might say that actual (outward) sex is not an element of puppy play, but rather something you might choose to mix with puppy play. This is because in our common perception, sex is indeed not a normal part of human-dog relationships. Likewise, human puppy play is often outwardly relatively nonsexual, perhaps less sexual than popular stereotypes might suggest. The more outwardly sexual sort of puppy play has more mainstream appeal and tends to be better represented in porn etc.
My point here is that some of these “dogpill” ranters seem to imagine a typical dog-human relationship as being outwardly more sexual than a typical puppy play session actually is. Which is kinda ironic, I guess, considering that puppy play is commonly classified as sexual play and actual dog ownership isn’t.
Huh, women-hating bestiality-fetishist also a racist and probable white supremacist? What are the odds of that?
Does he mean the Westermarck effect?
I’d imagine that marrying high school sweethearts isn’t very common these days, and as with a lot of younger marriages, often falls apart. I’m sure it’s possible for these marriages to succeed, but it isn’t the fantasy it’s often sold as.
@Kat
All the best people say this, folks. Only the best people saying this. A lot of people didn’t know this.
@Lumipuna
IIRC LGBT people are much more likely than cishets to engage in BDSM as a whole (with bisexual women being the group most likely over all) so this is to be expected.
I think of puppy play as a bunch of them doing zoomies in the yard. I do not wish to change that head cannon.
But you could say the exact same thing about men. And the OP. “Ohh, ARMS. How original.” (eyeroll)
I guess what he really wants is a girlfriend with 11 bioluminescent tentacles and a chitinous exoskeleton?
So his sisters avoid him. I wonder if that has anything to do with him being a self-obsessed, priapic creep who doesn’t understand why there’s an incest taboo. Real mystery here.
???
This guy has been playing with some weird Legos. When I had Legos as a kid, the parts of a minifigure were torsos, legs, heads, hair/hats, and a few miscellaneous accessories. Not legs, asses, eyes, etc.
@Buttercup
If so, he’s been watching way too much hentai, even by incel standards.
There are times I feel it would be useful to have tentacles, but over all it sounds like an inconvenience. Clothes shopping would be hard.
Incel: I interact with women on the most shallow and superficial vendor/customer level possible.
Also Incel: I find women to be shallow and superficial.
He’s been spoiled by video games, where the NPCs blurt out their individual quests with little interaction. No, a woman isn’t going to open up her personality to the fucking bookstore clerk, because why would she? That doesn’t mean she doesn’t have one.
@ lizzie
I’d probably avoid the rotting carcass; but I do like the smell of cow poo. It’s a happy memory thing. I’ll stick with the tea tree shower gel though. For now anyway.
My dear departed doggy would have related though.
“Leave that Sas! You have perfectly nice dog food at home.”
“But you don’t understand; these aren’t just any old discarded KFC bones; they’re three week old discarded KFC bones!”
“This guy has been playing with some weird Legos. When I had Legos as a kid, the parts of a minifigure were torsos, legs, heads, hair/hats, and a few miscellaneous accessories. Not legs, asses, eyes, etc.”
I feel obligated to snark about how you said legs twice :p
That being said, changing a specific leg – to have a legs part with two different color legs for example – isn’t supported by lego and can be rather destructive. Plus, adding a shapely butt to a lego minifigure will hugely compromise its mobility. Probably forcing it to bend over, which actually might please that incel ….
Since I am currently collectioning LEGOs, I also kind of feel like there are *much* more diversity than he seem to think. Less diversity than IRL in particular because there is only body type enforced to everyone, but still I know of at least one hundred different head and a lot of clothing / accessories / tatoo to make an unique minifigure.
@PoM : also, they alway seem to think that if they input the secret cheat code the NPC woman will start the romance subplot, or something like that. They don’t seem to realize that often, a woman won’t react not because the man was an asshole but because she is not interested at the moment. Of course, they solve that problem by being huge asshole and ensuring they won’t be interested at any moment.
The posts about “incestpill” and “legopill” (sorry) don’t seem outstandingly creepy by incel standards (although that’d be a high bar to cross). However, I struggle to see how they relate to being incel ie. having supposed difficulty in dating.
Incel community seems to inordinately attract men who just have some random obsession on being creepy about women. Wonder why that is?