Categories
Uncategorized

You wouldn’t let a dog or cat vote. So why let women, MGTOW Redditors wonder

Cats are smarter than you think

By David Futrelle

So an amateur phrenologist in the Men going Their Own Way subreddit has come up with a new (to him) bogus reason why men are smarter than women: their brains are a little bit bigger. (Never mind that brain size doesn’t actually correlate with intelligence.)

Then he has some thoughts on dogs and cats and the right to vote.

Speak for yourself, dude. I would totally let dogs and cats vote. Not so sure about humans, though.

My favorite response to this post?

Know wonder why they say there light on their feet. They have half a brain.

Know wonder.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lukas Xavier
Lukas Xavier
2 months ago

Once, I lost my keys in the grass. I asked a passing dog to help me. It sniffed out the keys in less than a minute. I gave the dog a bit of pizza in return.

Big Titty Demon
Big Titty Demon
2 months ago

I mean I like it better than, “Women don’t need to vote because their husbands or fathers will be influenced by them if they are any good women at all, so there’s really no need for it!”

But only because it’s more honest. Other than that this dude can go fuck himself with a comments policy violation.

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

has three times less neurons

But maybe women have the brain bit that knows the difference between less and fewer!!!

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

a woman brain is 170g lighter than a man brain

IIRC Albert Einstein’s brain was discovered after death to be smaller than average.
Point being, brain size isn’t what determines intelligence.

would you allow those animals to vote and decide a future of your country ?

I can’t speak for anyone else’s pet, but I’d let my dog vote. She couldn’t make much worse choices than many humans have.

Or ask them for an advice ?

I’ve asked my dog for advice. She doesn’t usually respond, but I’ve asked.

A crazy mix of different hormones randomly changing across the day

Do men think they don’t have hormones? The majority of hormones are in common across all people.

who have 3 base goals – get resources, get sex and raise children. That is all the goals for women.

Is this the outline for their new video game? Which resources do I need?

@Alan Robertshaw
I know, and my junior high English teacher, who was a woman, knew, so evidently some women know.

Karalora
Karalora
2 months ago

Even to the extent that brain size does correlate with intelligence (which it does, some…in studies comparing different species, not individuals within a species), it’s not absolute brain size but the ratio of brain to body size that counts. So men’s brains average 14% larger than women’s brains. Isn’t the difference in overall body size about the same?

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

Human brain size has actually diminished over recent time.

H. Heidelbergenis; H. Neanderthalensis, and even earlier versions of H. Sapiens sapiens, all had larger brains on average than contemporary humans.

Although as I’m a firm believer that all of the above are actually the same species and the supposed differences are just ones of morphology, I don’t find that surprising. We’re just generally smaller now anyway.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/why-did-our-brains-stop-expanding-001791

ETA: Ninja’d by Karalora

sunnysombrera
sunnysombrera
2 months ago

@Naglfar

Is this the outline for their new video game? Which resources do I need?

Hehe. Yeah I always find it weird when they use the term “resources”, which is a lot. They make it sound like life is a game of Terraria. The phrasing is just…off.

Do men think they don’t have hormones? The majority of hormones are in common across all people.

Nah it’s specifically female hormones, extra ones on top of estrogen and progesterone that totally exist but (((((doctors))))) won’t tell you about ’em because they’re protecting the gynocracy, something something.

Today’s Biology Troof brought to you by the same people who think that the female orgasm is a myth. And also that menstruation is a malfunction, apparently.

Mark
Mark
2 months ago

If we think gross brain size determines intelligence, then the only logical conclusion is that whales – and only whales – should be allowed to vote.

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
2 months ago

the part of the brain responsible for managing complex abstract things

*waves hand vaguely* Oh, you know, abstract thingamajigs. In the cerebrainal doogummy. The whatchamahickey that gives me superior thinky-thoughts. You ladies don’t have it, so you can’t vote.

a crazy mix of different hormones randomly changing across the day

Someone’s never done a 4-point saliva cortisol test.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@sunnysombrera

Yeah I always find it weird when they use the term “resources”, which is a lot. They make it sound like life is a game of Terraria. The phrasing is just…off.

Was thinking Minecraft, but same idea applies. I’ll go sneak into the PvP bases and take what’s in the chests.

extra ones on top of estrogen and progesterone that totally exist

How can I get these into a prescription? I should get these, seeing as I’m part of the trans agenda and Jewish.

weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee

My dog and cats want bones and tuna. I trust their judgement more than the humans who want fascism.

Schnookums Von Fancypants, Assailed by Gynocratic Powers
Schnookums Von Fancypants, Assailed by Gynocratic Powers
2 months ago

who have 3 base goals – get resources, get sex and raise children. That is all the goals for women.

Pfft, everyone knows that the primary goal for women is to construct additional pylons.

KindaSortaHarmless
KindaSortaHarmless
2 months ago

@Schnookums Von Fancypants

(Disclaimer: not a Starcraft player)

But doesn’t that require a lot of Vespene gas?

Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
2 months ago

Nah. Pylons are 100 minerals. Still annoying early on when you’ve got 10 jobs for every probe though.

Archer
Archer
2 months ago

Long time first time, and I just had to say my dog will gladly eat unidentifiable roadkill but also possesses a degree of empathy, so I trust her judgement more than the entire Republican Party.

Michael Suttkus
Michael Suttkus
2 months ago

Fun fact: Most of the mass difference between male and female brains is due to men having more of what’s called white matter tissue. Women have more grey matter. Until recently, it was thought that white matter was more structural, less involved in actual thinking. This is why “grey matter” is slang for intelligence. And women have more of it!

Turns out, it’s more complicated than that, of course, but it’s a fun bit to bring up against the sexists.

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
2 months ago

Have I missed something? Do dogs and cats want to vote? In the USA, women campaigned for 75 years before winning the right to vote. I haven’t seen even a single letter to the editor from a dog or cat advocating animal enfranchisement.

Relax, MGTOWs. You don’t need to fight this fight. This is just one of your own spouting bullshit. Same old, same old.

Penny Psmith
Penny Psmith
2 months ago

I’m reminded of Frances Hardinge’s book The Lie Tree , which takes place in Victorian England and whose young woman protagonist has to endure a lot of Victorian thinking, including, at some point, a whole lecture from the local doctor about the brain size thing meaning women are less intelligent.
She later meets a rather smart woman that the doctor hates a lot, and it turns out the reason is that the doctor tried to woo her with the big brain thing, and she told him that this is very interesting and she’s sure he’s right so she’ll make sure to marry the tallest man she can find, seeing as taller men have bigger brains on average. The doctor, being not especially tall, has resented her ever since.
(I’m sorry if this is a little bit spoilery, but it has nothing to do with the main plot of the book so I hope it’s okay.)

Penny Psmith
Penny Psmith
2 months ago

Also, can we give the less/fewer thing a rest? It’s fairly arbitrary, as far as I remember from reading about it. I mean, all grammar rules are, to a degree, because language is arbitrary, but it’s one of those like the split infinitive bullshit, where a grammarian just suddenly decided “you know what, there should be a differentiation, even though there hasn’t really been one before, I say it and so it must be true” (clearly a very big brained dude with no random hormones whatsoever). Cue decades of language snobbism.
[As usual in these cases of prescriptivism in language, Geoffrey Pollum of the Language Log does a great job of dismantling them – see for example https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2819 and related articles.]

In this case, the guy doesn’t even really seem to be a native speaker of English – his whole grammar structure is a bit off. But I think we should reserve criticism to the despicable content, rather than to the fact he doesn’t write perfectly in English.

Penny Psmith
Penny Psmith
2 months ago

Running out of edit time, so adding a source about the less/fewer thing here – as always, Geoffrey Pollum of the Language Log does a great job of dismantling prescriptivist ideas, see for example this article (and the linked earlier ones).

Edit: well, now I see my previous edit after all, so apologies for the repetition.

Battering Lamb
Battering Lamb
2 months ago

Do men think they don’t have hormones? The majority of hormones are in common across all people.

From what I’ve read, a woman’s hormonal balance is a lot less subject to a lot of outside factors. The time since the last period is usually very indicative of one’s hormonal state.

Meanwhile testosterone levels are affected by, among other things: are you employed, do you have children, have you had sex recently, your age, diet, body weight, stress etc.

And yet, it’s women that are deemed unpredictable and hormonal. Idiots.

@Alan: so it seems brains are like computers with the old models filling up a gymnasium where the newer ones can be handheld. Kind of. :p

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Battering Lamb
This reminds me a little bit of how some TERFs were insistent that only women have hormones. They seemed aware that men generally have more testosterone, so I’m not sure what they thought testosterone was.

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
2 months ago

Giving vote to every human isn’t because all human are intelligent enough to get the implications and vote correctly towards their ideas. It’s because there is no way to ascertain who is worthy, any system that try that will just exclude on arbitrary basis to favor some interests. Cats and dogs don’t vote because in a very real sense we don’t know how to make them vote, so even if we wanted to, we could not.

In addition to the fact we don’t have solid basis to evaluate intelligence or reasons to believe that bigger brains are more intelligent, I would also assert that homo sapiens sapiens might not have evolved toward more intelligence compared to neanderthals or whatever. There’s no way to check how thoses human species behaved, but being less cooperative, less sociales, or simply less able to speak could be bigger factors than intelligence. Maybe all neanderthals were able to solve differentials equations but didn’t do commerce because they hated big scale cooperation, after all.

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

@ penny

Well, ok; but I will never not stop whinging about double negatives.

@ battering lamb

so it seems brains are like computers with the old models filling up a gymnasium

Yeah, but as IBM confidently predict there’ll never be a need for more than five computers thats probably ok.

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

@ olhmann

There’s no way to check how thoses human species behaved

I’m really fascinated by human evolution and development.

There are obviously still huge gaps in our own knowledge but we’re learning more all the time; and that’s causing some radical re-interpretation of our understanding of our ancestors.

Neanderthals for instance created art:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02357-8

Took care of their sick

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181004110042.htm

And engaged in ritual behaviour

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/12/131216-la-chapelle-neanderthal-burials-graves/

I have no doubt that if you took a kid from Neanderthal, Denisovan, Heidelbergensis; or whatever other human population, and stuck them through uni, then there’s no reason they couldn’t have gone on to be a rocket scientist.

Or at least engineer some really creative bongs; college after all.

ETA: But the idea that the various populations may have had different approaches to life is a really interesting one; and brings up some really fascinating questions as to to whether that’s socialisation or innate.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Alan Robertshaw
I’ve seen replicas of Neanderthals in museums and it looked like with some modern clothing they could probably pass for human. If we ever find a way to create one, it would be an interesting experiment (though probably unethical) to raise them as a H. Sapiens child and see whether, if properly socialized, they can interact with modern society.

Homo Erectus may have also made art, as we have ancient statues that date back to when they were the dominant species.

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

@ naglfar

Well of course, Neanderthals were human. But as you say, we wouldn’t even notice them if they were around today. A lot of people classed as Neanderthals don’t even noticeably show the classic Neanderthal features. The first Neanderthal skulls found weren’t identified as such because they had no real distinguishing features. It’s really only the population from the Neanderthal valley that can be readily identified; and they seem to be a bit of an outlier group. Most Neanderthals have features that fall within the modern population.

But even the most ‘obvious’ Neanderthals hardly stand out.

comment image

comment image

Viscaria
Viscaria
2 months ago

Know wonder why they say there light on their feet.

Is this a thing people say about women? It’s a thing people say about cats. Is he confusing women and cats?

Speaking of cats, my cat gives great advice sometimes when I ask him. He delivers it in the form of blank stares and the occasional headbutt, so it can be hard to interpret, but he’s definitely helped me figure out some things over the years.

Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
Threp (formerly Shadowplay)
2 months ago

At the risk of a self own, give the male Neanderthal up there black hair and he’s the spitting image of my maternal Grandfather …

Sheila Crosby
2 months ago

I’ve spent much of the last 3 years saying that a dead cat would make a better president than Drumpf so letting cats vote doesn’t seem too outrageous.

We might just wind up with comfy seats on every street corner as mayors court the feline vote. I’m less sure about the rolls to toilet paper hanging on the walls of public buildings ready to be shredded though.

Mrs Morley
Mrs Morley
2 months ago

The first Neanderthal is a double for a guy I went to school with (I’ve seen him recently); the second would fit perfectly in the family of a close friend.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Sheila Crosby
My only issue with cats voting is that I’m allergic, so I’d worry about voting booths getting cat hair all over.

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

Yeah, but as IBM confidently predict there’ll never be a need for more than five computers thats probably ok.

IIRC, some creationists maintain that both death and procreation only started after the Fall, when human sin destabilized the Garden of Eden. In other words, God initially expected there’d never be a need for more than two humans.

(And yet he built them with mutually compatible plugs)

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
2 months ago

I would be interested in knowing what are the minimal requirement to be educated like a human and being meaningfully a part of our society. I suspect it’s almost the same thing as being able to talk, and I wonder if something like thoses grey gabon parrots could not actually be educated to be member of our society.

Battering Lamb
Battering Lamb
2 months ago

Is this a thing people say about women? It’s a thing people say about cats. Is he confusing women and cats?

Since I’ve heard people express the belief that all dogs are men and all cats are women that wouldn’t surprise me that much.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Battering Lamb

Since I’ve heard people express the belief that all dogs are men and all cats are women that wouldn’t surprise me that much.

I had a cousin who was a conservative Christian who thought this. I was unable to persuade her otherwise. Since she was about 14 at the time, she may have grown out of this belief since.

@Ohlmann
African Grey parrots appear to top out at about the intelligence and verbal ability of a human 5 year old. So they could probably participate similarly to a human 5 year old. Regarding voting, in the US the right to vote requires understanding what voting is, so if a parrot was able to become a citizen and understand voting they could maybe vote.

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

I suspect it’s almost the same thing as being able to talk, and I wonder if something like thoses grey gabon parrots could not actually be educated to be member of our society.

We should not speak for the parrots but let the parrots speak for themselves…

AFAIK there’s plenty of precedent in assisting mentally disabled humans in voting. At least in my country it’s common for, say, nursing home staff to assist the voting of residents who barely understand what voting is anymore. Naturally this is somewhat controversial, with all the possibility for voter manipulation, and you have to draw the line somewhere.

The principle seems to be that all people over 18 can vote, as long as they manage to make a deliberate voting choice and express it. (I think professional caregivers are expected to assist in the act of voting, but not in any research to make a truly informed choice) The assumption is that adults are *usually* capable of making a somewhat informed choice, and exceptions must be tolerated (including also people who simply choose to vote at random) because, as Ohlmann wrote,

Giving vote to every human isn’t because all human are intelligent enough to get the implications and vote correctly towards their ideas. It’s because there is no way to ascertain who is worthy, any system that try that will just exclude on arbitrary basis to favor some interests.

(continued)

Moogue
Moogue
2 months ago

@Naglfar

If we ever find a way to create one, it would be an interesting experiment (though probably unethical) to raise them as a H. Sapiens child and see whether, if properly socialized, they can interact with modern society.

Well what else could we raise them as? 🙂

@threp

“At the risk of a self own, give the male Neanderthal up there black hair and he’s the spitting image of my maternal Grandfather …

But that horrible photoshop job…

One of my ex’s had the most slanted forehead humanly possible, probably at least as slanted as a lot of the skulls shown in the Neanderthal exhibit at the museum, if not more so. You wouldn’t even notice it unless you looked at him closely from the side. He had a lot of hair,
and wasn’t a terrible looking guy by any measure.

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

One might ask whether, say, children aged 12-17 would be much less competent voters than adults generally are. Would they be collectively competent enough to deserve the right? What if only few of them would bother to vote anyway, and those would be self-selected for relative maturity? What if some huckster could suddenly mobilize many of them with patently unrealistic promises….oh wait.

I suppose that presently at least any demographic or species where most individuals cannot read to gather information should not be eligible for voting. This might change when we all have personal AI servants reading for us – and then we can discuss whether those AIs should be also eligible to vote.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Lumipuna

The principle seems to be that all people over 18 can vote, as long as they manage to make a deliberate voting choice and express it.

This is the issue parrots would have, we don’t know how well they can express an actual choice rather than just repeating what humans say to them. If you ask a 5 year old who they want for president/prime minister/other high level position, they will probably either suggest someone not on the ballot/not real (e.g. Superman, Willy Wonka, etc) or, if they suggest an actual candidate, will probably say whoever they overheard their parents or guardians talking about without doing any research, because they’re 5. Parrots would likely do the same.

AFAIK parrots cannot read either, so their research would be limited even if they are capable of making a choice.

As for letting children 12-17 vote, some towns in the US have experimented with letting 16-18 year olds vote in local elections. The result in Takoma Park, MD was increased voter turnout for all ages, as teens convinced their parents to vote. This could have been an unusual case, but I wouldn’t be opposed to lowering voting age nationwide to 16.

EDIT: Apparently parrots can learn to recognize words, but there is a big difference between recognizing and saying individual words and being able to full sentences or understand sources of information like news stories or campaign information.

@Moogue
I more meant that it would be unethical to tell them they were H. Sapiens rather than another species, as it would be deception.

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

“What do we want?!”
“Polly want a biscuit!”
“When do we want it?!’
“Polly want a biscuit!”

Mind you, would the results be any worse than we get currently?

Alan Robertshaw
2 months ago

@ naglfar

I more meant that it would be unethical to tell them they were H. Sapiens rather than another species, as it would be deception.

I would have to disagree there. The species/sub species classification is so arbitrary.

Already there’s been a shift in taxonomy from Homo neanderthalensis to Homo sapiens neanderthalensis; and I think even that distinction will vanish soon.

If people can interbreed, bring up children; and those children carry on interbreeding themselves; then how are they not all the same?

To me, telling children they weren’t of the same species, would be the deception. There’s nothing to suggest the marginal differences in morphology are any more relevant than hair colour or build.

No doubt there would be people who insisted on a distinction; we make enough out of insignificant varieties in attributes as it is (not suggesting for one second that’s your reasoning).

Although as it seems Neanderthals may have skewed white*; I wonder what the usual suspects would make of them?

(Possibly with reddish hair and freckles!)

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

Alan wrote:

Well of course, Neanderthals were human. But as you say, we wouldn’t even notice them if they were around today. A lot of people classed as Neanderthals don’t even noticeably show the classic Neanderthal features.

I suspect any particular population of live flesh-and-blood neanderthals would present a combination of subtle racial features that doesn’t quite match any current sapiens population. A lone neanderthal would easily pass for a slightly weird looking sapiens. A population would be clearly “different race”, though not outstanding looking compared to the sapiens racial diversity.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Alan Robertshaw

Although as it seems Neanderthals may have skewed white*; I wonder what the usual suspects would make of them?

I’m sure if there were enough Neanderthals we would see anti-Neanderthal discrimination begin to occur. Bigots will find any little thing to be hateful about if it means getting to maintain power over others.

Looking online I’m seeing a lot of different artist depictions of what they looked like, ranging from very similar to modern humans to having very different facial structure. Given the differences in facial structure, I’m curious if some would pursue plastic surgery to try to look more like modern humans (or go the other way for Sapiens to look more Neanderthal-like).

If people can interbreed, bring up children; and those children carry on interbreeding themselves; then how are they not all the same?

To me, telling children they weren’t of the same species, would be the deception. There’s nothing to suggest the marginal differences in morphology are any more relevant than hair colour or build.

I was thinking that someone who was created from ancient Neanderthal DNA but wasn’t told that, night later find out and feel like they had been lied to. I’m not sure how they’d feel because I’m not in that situation, but it seems possible.

Lainy
Lainy
2 months ago

Derrick (my neighbor cat) just jumped from her balcony to ours and spent a good amount of time scratching up the screen to our balcony door before i caught him.

This little bastard boy is so lucky he is cute.

Naglfar
Naglfar
2 months ago

@Lainy
My dog did that when she was very little (the screen-shredding, not the balcony jumping). She’s grown out of it, but when she stopped I had to replace 3 screens she had destroyed. Maybe you could set up a scratching post nearby so he can scratch something that’s meant to be scratched instead of your door?

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

Already there’s been a shift in taxonomy from Homo neanderthalensis to Homo sapiens neanderthalensis; and I think even that distinction will vanish soon.

If people can interbreed, bring up children; and those children carry on interbreeding themselves; then how are they not all the same?

A while ago some racists on the internet were arguing along the lines of “As far as I understand, human races are basically different subspecies*, so isn’t miscegenation like, borderline bestiality?”

* You can always find some crank with vague scientific authority leaning toward this taxonomic view. I suppose these get often cited by neonazi propagandists.

Indeed, if “bestiality” were as simple as interracial families, then what’s the problem with it? What exactly is bestiality, anyway?

Traditionally, bestiality gets a bad rap mainly because we intuitively tend to hate people having really weird sex. Also something about mixing and blurring neat categories, which we also tend to hate. Traditional prejudice against “miscegenation” apparently reflects these same gut feelings to some extent, plus ethnic territoriality.

There are/could be some genuinely problematic aspects in traditional bestiality, but these don’t apply between, well, humans. There’s no inherent communication or power imbalance issues. There’s no known adverse health effects for the “hybrid” offspring (despite what neonazis sometimes claim). It probably wasn’t much different between sapiens and neanderthal – or perhaps childbirth might have been rather dangerous with sapiens mothers due to the head size.

Dalillama
Dalillama
2 months ago

Modern humans and Neanderthals definitely interbred, and most people in/from Western Eurasia have significant Neanderthal DNA, but that gets into the weeds of what exactly a species is. Coyotes, wolves, Cape Hunting dogs, and domestic dogs are distinct populations with distinct traits, but they can all interbreed with each other. That’s probably a reasonable estimate of how various members of genus Homo interacted. Clearly Sapiens Sapiens had some kind of edge, cos none of the others exist as distinct populations anymore. But neither do red wolves, and they were a species before the coyotes got them.

Lumipuna
Lumipuna
2 months ago

Long ago the late Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurten wrote two novels on hypothetical sapiens-neanderthal interaction in northern Europe. He had this idea that neanderthals maybe perished because interspecies hybrids had reduced fertility – in the novels, the hybrids were fully sterile. However, Kurten struggled to explain why the hybrids would be predominantly born in neanderthal (rather than sapiens) communities.

In the novels, the neanderthals were very pale (compared to the brown-skinned black-haired sapiens migrating from far south), had decent technology and mythology but no visual art, and had complex language despite somewhat limited phonetics. They saw the sapiens as “baby faced” and therefore harmless, but also culturally superior. The sapiens saw them as ugly and not much human, “trolls”. Even a sapiens boy grown up in a neanderthal village would later find sapiens girls more pretty when he eventually got to see them.