It’s PLEDGE DRIVE time again! If you’re a fan of this blog, please help fund its continued existence by clicking the button below. THANKS!
By David Futrelle
Attention asexual ladies and lesbians! It looks like the incels have figured out your dirty little sex secret, which is that you don’t exist. No matter how you define your sexuality you are actually Chadsexual — able, willing, and eager to have sex with any Chad that comes your way, even if you pretend to like only women or to not like sex at all.
That, at least, is the consensus over on the Incels.co forums, where the regulars like to discuss this topic endlessly, and then some. “The only female sexuality is Chadsexual,” declares a fellow called Simp, speaking for many. “Every single woman would fuck Chad. Even ‘lesbians.'”
A commenter called Reprobus is very angry at all these phony lesbians who won’t fuck less-than-perfect specimens of manhood like himself. “I hate foids in general,” he begins,
but lesbians are the greediest of the bunch. Lesbians, it doesn’t matter what they look like can get a girlfriend and the odds are never against them. …
And they don’t even need these girlfriends, because there are men out there waiting to have sex with them.
Women in general don’t need to be lesbian, SO MANY MEN on Earth will fuck them any day of the week. NOTHING about being lesbian is difficult they are a waste of resources and the ultimate sign of greed.
And why do they resort to buying dildos when real penises are available for nothing?
There is NO reason a foid need to use some plastic dildo when 1000 other men in their phone will do it for free. ALL lesbian sex emulates how a man fucks a woman for the most part.
To borrow a line from Marge Gunderson: I’m not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police work there, Lou.
I believe there is a sound reason for any man to be frustrated with these foids, they will date land tank foids that you mog from hell and back and ACT like you don’t exist. BUT as soon as Chad comes walking in he’s the prize.
OverForRedditcels manages to work the dogpill (eugghh!) into his, er, analysis.
All foids are hard-wired to be chadsexual. They might fuck a girl or a dog once in a while if Chad is not currently available, but it’s impossible for them to overwrite their natural attraction to Chad.
Ionlycopenow thinks it has something to do with makeup. After all, women are
repulsed by all things ugly. And since the average woman, while ugly and often uglier than the average man, can put on makeup and reach 7/10 (something very rare for men who can’t fraud), they would rather just go with women instead if Chad isn’t available.
A-virgin-n*gger, meanwhile, is similarly convinced of the non-existence of asexual women.
If a femoid is in an environment full of subhumans, she will claim to be asexual but once that Chad/Tyrone comes along, she will become the degenerate slut all other femoids are. They are all Chadsexuals. I’ve encountered my fair share of self proclaimed asexual femshits, each turned out to be worthless whores who go to clubs and suck off every Chad and Tyrone they can.
Commander-zoidberg adds:
Its just an excuse not to have sex with their looksmatch because they only want chad. You see it all the time.
Well, despite all the wrongness on display here, these guys are right about one thing: No women regardless of sexual orientation wants to have sex with them.
Could their utterly terrible ideas and feelings about women have anything to do with it?
H/T — EXPELincels who inspired me to look into incels’ ideas about “chadsexuality.”
@Naglfar
I’m a bit hazy on the details right now, but I think she has OCD and that’s affected her ability and willingness to touch people.
@Masse_Mysteria
Hannelore is definitely OC,It’s in Her Character profile .
@Naglfar
Probably. Like ADD, OCD is sufficiently comorbid with autism that it’s likely that they are in fact part of the spectrum. Anyway, she has loads of other tells, whether Jeph meant to put them there or not. Very much in the mould of Nikola Tesla, although it seems extremely likely that he was actually ace/aro.
The thing is, in QC AIs check every cases to be considered human by me, so a human/AI relationship in here seem perfectly cool.
In other settings, that could change. In particular, I feel there is a big chance that an AI cannot correctly consent, either by being too dependant on a single human or because they have been created to be enamored with a specific human.
That is true but given the real world bigotry that exists towards human same sex and interracial relationships I wonder if there is similar bigotry towards human/AI relationships. Of course Jehp might have removed all of that from his world making it a moot point.
That can be a issue in other settings. Another webcomic I read is a sci-fi one called Freefall. One of the characters is a genetically engineered humanoid Wolf and is considered a AI and bound by the three laws of robotics. Recently She’s entered into a relationship with a human and I’m pretty sure they’ve both expressed some concern over consent in regard to the second law. Because of this I think they are taking things slowly with the physical side of their relationship
@Fabe:
There have been a few points where characters have expressed concern about the possibility, but at present there’s no actual evidence for it existing in-world. Then again, the vast majority of AI in the United States presently lives in urban parts of Massachusetts in-world (the comic takes place in Northampton), so maybe it’s really safe for them there.
Hi. Could you link to an iota of proof that any of the quotes above from purported incels are actually what you claim they are, i.e., actual disgruntled males?
That would be helpful, because otherwise, it just looks like another ADL styled #fakeswastika type if disinformation thingy.
Or, a bunch of lesbians and their LGBTQEtcetera pals masquerading as #fakemen online:
https://www.elle.com/culture/news/a34512/woman-who-started-incel-movement/
As a general rule, the burden of proof is on those promulgating a conspiracy theory, not on those promulgating the null hypothesis.
@Jocelyn Adlberg
David linked to the original source. Have a look for yourself.
Is this a new antisemitic conspiracy theory?
Did you read your own link? That’s not what that article says. The term “incel” was created by a bisexual woman to apply to men and women, it was later taken over by angry misogynists upset about how women wouldn’t fuck them. At no point was it lesbians pretending to be men.
Wait a minute … are you implying that men exist on the internet??? I thought everyone claiming to be male was just a lesbian pretending!
It’s true. All the incels are a lesbian trying to give men a bad name. And all the commenters here are socks of David’s.
@PoM, WWTH
And if all the men on the internet are lesbians pretending to be men, and we’re all socks of David’s, does that mean David is a lesbian pretending to be a man and we are all a lesbian pretending to be a man pretending to be various other people? It’s like a sockpuppet inception!
Of course the problem is never THEM?
My sis said men who hate women should maybe try men, but literarely nobody would want them??
? Are they really too stupid to see the problem are themself and their gross misogynist views?