Categories
creepy cringe men who should not ever be with women ever NoFap precious bodily fluids semen Uncategorized YouTube

This NoFap parody of Johnny Cash’s cover of Hurt is possibly the worst song ever recorded

You make Johnny Cash sad

By David Futrelle

Yep, some NoFap dude did a NoFap version of Johnny Cash’s famous cover of Nine Inch Nails’ “Hurt,” with the lyrics changed to make a point about the evils of “cooming” while jerking off to porn. Just listen to this mess, if you can:

Every day we stray further from God’s light.

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

243 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee

Uh, Obama’s foreign policy wasn’t really different than any other US President. Also, western men oppressed western women plenty before 2008.

I mean, there’s definitely a backlash against social justice, but the election of Barrack Obama was one small part of the push and pull, not some giant catalyst.

LindsayIrene
LindsayIrene
1 year ago

abstention from orgasm will give a regular average woman after a few years way more energy, wealth, brain power, political power, military power than she would know to do with

Given that around 10 to 15 percent of women report being unable to reach orgasm, and also that married straight women tend report lower sexual satisfaction than other demographics, if that was true, the planet would be dominated by straight married women.

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
1 year ago

Oh, look, he’s already begun laying the groundwork for his flounce.

Hippodameia
Hippodameia
1 year ago

Is this guy a bot?

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

Oh, cool. So in addition to nuns and menstruating women and asexuals, over-50s are also doomed to failure. Children too, presumably.

Maybe I’m dense, but I don’t see the point of promoting an energy harnessing technique that’s only possible for a very specific demographic group.

@Autistic Giraffe

The energy that powers our bodies comes from the food we eat for example, but not exercising doesn’t give us more, it makes you weaker and less healthy.

That’s why Trump doesn’t exercise, other than griftgolfing. He believes that people are born with a finite amount of energy, like a battery, and exercise only depletes it faster.

I think he should be encouraged in that belief.

Naglfar
Naglfar
1 year ago

@Buttercup

That’s why Trump doesn’t exercise, other than griftgolfing. He believes that people are born with a finite amount of energy, like a battery, and exercise only depletes it faster.

Does he actually believe that? It doesn’t surprise me, but it is still a very strange belief.

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

@Naglfar

Yup. This article is a bit old, but I haven’t seen any recent indication that he’s recanted:

https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/donald-trump-exercise/index.html

TacticalProgressive
TacticalProgressive
1 year ago

@Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer

So long story short: you and your ilk believe in Pseudoscience nonsense that’s divorced from reality, kind of like Miasma theory

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

Wait so western women weren’t oppressed until OBAMA???????????

I just… you’re SO wrong, you’ve entered the ‘not even wrong’ territory.

Another note, regarding English – we say ‘people of colour’, because we are putting ‘people’ first. That’s what PoC is. WoC is woman of colour.

I hope you come away with an understanding that the ideology you’ve espoused here is needlessly limited, and limiting.

We all know you won’t, since you’ve opened up about even MORE ridiculous stuff (and i thought ‘ejaculation is the male equivalent of a period’ was ridiculous) but this is ultimately for the lurkers anyway.

:/

Redsilkphoenix: Jetpack Vixen, Intergalactic Meanie
Redsilkphoenix: Jetpack Vixen, Intergalactic Meanie
1 year ago

I think the semen retention guys are misunderstanding a minor point about some of their claimed historical teachers. For the religious ones at least, the celibacy stuff wasn’t the main point of their philosophies; it was a side effect of trying to get closer to their respective god(s). In those cases, sublimating assorted physical desires for a higher purpose makes sense.

As for Anandamayi Ma (the extra ‘a’ on the second word didn’t seem to make any difference in the search results), if her Wikipedia page is anything to go by, she wouldn’t qualify as a SR as defined by the SR Liaison guy posting here. She appears to have been an atypical child in some ways growing up, and according to SR guy only typical people with typical sex drives can tap the power granted by voluntary sexual retention. Based on that article, her celibacy might not have been 100% voluntary, though what else might have been going on there likely can’t be discovered anymore, given she’s dead and everything.

Otherwise, she sounds like a fascinating woman to read up on. She seems to be a fairly progressive person overall, at least in regards to women and spirituality.

Bastethotep
1 year ago

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer

The continued protection of Rome (the city not the empire) for 800 long years is attributed to the spiritual power of an unbroken line of female celibates within the SR community ….known as Vestal Virgins who would be celibate for 30 years before marrying in mid or late 30s

And the evidence in support of this hypothesis is?

Also “continued protection […] for 800 long years”? You know that The City suffered plenty of catastrophes, of which the Great Fire of 64 was just the most infamous, right? Yes, not many foreign invasiouns, but the reason is pretty obvious: Rome was the sacred heart and centre of an expansionist martial empire that, through ruthless pragmatism,, cultural assimilation and unpredenced supremacy in military technology, discipline and logistics, conquered first all of Italy (giving it natural barrierrs on all four sides), and the entirity of the Mediterranean and Western Europe, including all its rival empires (save Parthia, but that was distant, and the asymmetries between the two empires meant that neither could achieve much in the way of lasting conquest). There simply was no external threat left that had any chance to get to the city of Rome. The only threat to Rome was Rome itself. Of course, until the Empire started to fall apart and Europe began to suffer the turmoil of the Migration period…

A Vestal Virgin cursed Rome and its elite ruling class in the 380s after the Christians desecrated and shut down the Temple of Vesta….within a few decades of that Rome was overrun by Visigoths under Alaric after 800 years of peace

Only a few decades? Wow! What a strong causal link!

Also, again: THE HISTORY OF THE CITY OF ROME WAS FAR FROM PEACEFUL, YOU IGNORAMUS!

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@LindayIrene

Their sex energy creation is nullified because eventhough they cannot physically orgasm they do try to have sex, inculcate sexual thoughts in their minds, have foreplay with others

cheers,

@Bastethotep

by continued spiritual protection I meant the time period between two sackings of the city

cheers,

I think I have answered all queries and my work here comes to an end

An Autistic Giraffe
An Autistic Giraffe
1 year ago

You missed my question of where sex energy comes from and how it enters the body.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@An Autistic Giraffe

It’s a mix of food energy, conscious energy, genetic energy, muscle energy

to get a baseline of sex energy best would be to measure the orgasm strength of a man and a woman after 12 years of strict clean celibacy

Naglfar
Naglfar
1 year ago

@SRLO
How does one measure the orgasm strength? And wouldn’t that end the celibacy?

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Naglfar

There has been genuine scientific studies measuring orgasm strength on PubMed….and the result measured in watts

Yes that would end the celibacy, but once you complete 12 years of celan unbroken celibacy, you would have maxxed out and have gotten permanent benefit..after that you may resume your normal sex life if that’s what you want

LindsayIrene
LindsayIrene
1 year ago

Their sex energy creation is nullified because eventhough they cannot physically orgasm they do try to have sex, inculcate sexual thoughts in their minds, have foreplay with others

Soooooo… the it’s really not about the orgasms?

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

This makes zero sense. Zero. You keep hand-waving away all of our counterexamples with ad hoc explanations that contradict themselves. Having sexual thoughts nullifies the sex energy, so that doesn’t count. Not having sexual thoughts means there’s no base sex energy, so that doesn’t count either. Women who are capable of orgasm but too busy for a sex life don’t count, men who are too old to win a UFC championship don’t count (because spiritual clarity is directly correlated with one’s ability to axe kick), all nuns are secretly jilling off, and I have lost my ability to even with this.

If every single person is disqualified from becoming a SR shaman because there’s always a loophole, then it’s an utterly pointless practice.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

O/T, but interesting twist on wives taking their husband’s name…

http://www.advocates.org.uk/news-and-responses/news/2020/feb/new-judge-honours-mother

An Autistic Giraffe
An Autistic Giraffe
1 year ago

https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4002

Here’s a good test. When you hear the word energy used in a spiritual or paranormal sense, substitute the phrase “measurable work capability.” Does the usage still make sense? Are you actually being given any information that supports the claim being made? Remember, energy itself is not the thing being measured: energy is the measurement of work performed or of potential.

@ Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer

It’s a mix of food measurable work capability, conscious measurable work capability, genetic measurable work capability, muscle measurable work capability

Okay so only two of those four make any barking sense. What the hell does “conscious measurable work capability” mean?

And with food and muscle energy, like I said not using that energy is bad for you. Regular exercise makes your muscles stronger and “food energy retention” is not a healthy lifestyle. Why would sex energy be different?

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

I’m curious on how you defend your statement that women were not-oppressed, until Obama was elected.

(all of this is cis/binary, sorry)

Women weren’t actually considered people, under the law, until pretty recently. Women couldn’t vote. Women couldn’t get divorced. Spousal rape wasn’t illegal. Reproductive health is demonised. Woman are forced to bring a child to term, no matter the consequences to their health, or the cost of birthing/raising a child, or the limited opportunities they now have as a parent. Etc etc etc.

But you would claim that all of those are results of… not oppression?

If you think you’ve explained anything, unfortunately it’s just that SR are either people who really, really hate women and are misogynistic, or are people who will cherry pick bits of ‘spirituality’ to buoy their misogyny.

(You’re the second, I’m sorry to say.)

I’m very much agreeing with @Buttercup Q. Skullpants. Re-read your explanations here, and then look at your clarifications. You need to look at them both at the same time, and then try to figure out how you can hold two such contradictory beliefs.

This is a thing that humans do. Cognitive dissonance. We can believe two utterly contradictory things are both true, because we somehow separate things from ourselves.

An example would be basically everything in Buttercup Q Skullpant’s post above, honestly.

Your belief system doesn’t work. It doesn’t hang together. If you find that not having sex/whatever makes you feel better about yourself, cool. No one needs to have sex, that is super important. If you don’t want to, you don’t have to. Own that.

But give up on this ‘sexual energy is a measurable thing’ and ‘crystalised energy’ and other bullshit. It’s all bullshit!!!!!

I hope you manage to extricate yourself from this. I hope that you don’t ruin your streak, and have to go in for another 12 year stretch, and then feel super angry at yourself and at whatever ruined your streak. I hope you are happy.

:/

An Autistic Giraffe
An Autistic Giraffe
1 year ago

PS I hope that my post didn’t come off as fat shaming, I meant the Trump approach to health by my last comment but realized it might come off wrong. Sorry if it did.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@everybody

I explained everything from the framework of semen retention philosophy ..of course it won’t make sense from the Standard Model of Physics..I understand that much

@Rhuu

white western women were nowhere near oppressed by white men as black and us aboriginal men (non-African blackish looking) were

White women always tend to make everything about themselves

In fact white women teamed up with white men to kill these men

Now if you are talking of black women, I am more than ready to consider they may have faced even greater oppression

cheers,

goodbye everybody…thanks for the discussions

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

You’re describing intersectional feminism, @SRLO. Yes, white women (in majority white countries) have it easier than WoC. But they still weren’t people. No women were *people*.

It took longer for WoC to be considered people, because all the Nice White Ladies said “hey, don’t agitate about the racism you experience, be nice and we’ll eventually get to your problems” and then never did.

But you’re just being willfully blind, friend.

You didn’t explain the framework of SR philosophy. You explained the framework of what it means to you, with no supporting articles/arguments/examples from other SRers.

Honestly, I know no more about SR than when we started, because you’re claiming to represent all the ‘non-western’ (I think?) adherents, with no proof that you are representative of a group.

To us, you look like a lone voice.

If you’re done with this conversation, that’s fine. No one is obliged to stay longer than they want, and we all know we’ll never get you to see the contradictions you’re so obviously missing, because that’s not how humans work.

You won’t see our logic, because you believe.

That’s why I wish you good luck with your life, and I wish the people around you good luck in their dealings with you, in the future. You, and they, are going to need it.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Rhuu

Are you seriously going to tell me that in 1930s germany a white woman was more oppressed than a Jewish Man…Heck a Jewish Man was more oppressed than a white woman THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY OF Continental Europe since the later centuries of Rome….Pope declares a Crusade against Muslim occupation of Jerusalem…what do the Germans do? kill thousands of jews who are totally unconnected….German woman Catherine becomes Czarina…what does she do? oppress to the ends of the earth a bunch of Jews

Please donot try to sugarcoat the sins of the white woman…it is best we end this discussion cordially here, as it would open up old wounds for me and my ancestors

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

@ rhuu

Cognitive dissonance. We can believe two utterly contradictory things are both true, because we somehow separate things from ourselves.

Just to be nerdy, and apologies if this is what you meant anyway, cognitive dissonance isn’t the human ability to ‘double think’ thing. Although the term is often used that way.

But technically cognitive dissonance is the discomfort people sometimes get from holding mutually contradictory viewpoints. It is by no means universal of course. Lots of people quite comfortably hold internally inconsistent views.

This is something that crops up of course with my hobby horse, animal rights. Loads of people can quite happily take one animal to the vet whilst they stick another one in the oven.

A lot of the pushback against vegans is thought to arise because the arguments trigger cognitive dissonance in people who didn’t have it before. Hence the hostility; no one likes being made to feel bad.

I suspect that’s a thing with politics generally. Pointing out logical flaws in people’s positions is just semantics; but if you can disturb them on a psychological level then they’ll see you as a threat.

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

@SRLO

I explained everything from the framework of semen retention philosophy ..of course it won’t make sense from the Standard Model of Physics..I understand that much

But it doesn’t even make sense within its own framework, the way you’ve explained it. “Here’s an awesome thing that totally works, except if you have genitalia. Or don’t have genitalia.”

SR is an attempt to take the default state of incels (constant horniness/simmering anger at women) and turn it into something holy. It doesn’t result in inner peace, though, judging from the way SR adherents continue to demonize female sexuality and women. They don’t even see those two concepts as separate.

A more practical approach with tangible benefits would be something like “hey, instead of watching porn this afternoon, let’s go volunteer in the community.” It’s not orgasms that are draining, it’s living inside your head, treating people as NPCs, and expecting the world to also regard your sexual pleasure as the #1 priority.

Catalpa
Catalpa
1 year ago

@SRLO

Why are you presuming that women = white women?

Also, just because there are demographics that experience more violent oppression, that doesn’t mean that no one else experienced oppression.

White women have historically (and presently) been complicit in racism, yes, but that doesn’t mean that misogyny and oppression of women based upon their sex doesn’t/didn’t exist.

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

We’ve reached GODWIN!!!!!!

Too bad he repealed the law, but there we go! GODWIN!!!!!

I greatly enjoy that you went “HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT, with this *very specific historical example*”.

Again, this is intersectional theory. Everyone has their various axis of oppression, that weigh more or less depending on the situation/time they are in.

You can’t pull out freaking Hitler and declare the conversation to be over. Again, you can leave, but I am under no obligation to not respond to you.

@Alan – Fair enough! I had ‘doublethink’ typed. Shoulda left it.

ETA- @Catalpa – Excellent point!

Paireon
Paireon
1 year ago

@Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer – Sure, there have been historical precedents for that bullshit (which doesn’t make it any more legitimate – remember when Chinese traditional medicine thought mercury was the way to immortality?), but the modern incarnation of semen retention, and the one circulating on the internet, was made by weird white dudes with bizarrely anti-female worldviews (and due to crank magnetism, a lot of racist views as well). Plus, telling me this shit originally comes from a bunch of Iron-Age religious leaders doesn’t exactly restore my non-existent faith in this – to me it’s just one more proof that it’s mystical mumbo-jumbo. I don’t give credit to it when it comes from Western civilization either.

Also, if semen retention helps you become a Leader of Men (still not quite sure where Women fit in your worldview) and you’ve been at this for years, I wonder what kind of leadership position you have… Surely you’ve been at it long enough to get somewhere? Because I know plenty of non-abstinent people who managed it (cue him saying that’s not why he’s part of this despite stressing out the importance of that aspect).

In any case, this is definitely one of the sillier threads I’ve seen since I started hanging around here, so thanks for the entertainment value, I guess.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Buttercup

I understand your point..I donot inhabit a female body…nor do most sex energy retainers…So first person female perspective is sorely missing in the spectrum..the female experience of complete unbroken celibacy is a story that can be truly filled in by women practitioners only…A male practitioner can only surmise as he won’t have first hand knowledge of the experience of inhabiting. in a female body 24*7…The few women who have written on unbroken celibate sex energy retention from a female perspective come from non-western lands..so their works remain untranslated..I just pointed out one from Eastern India, but there are famous female Lamaist monks (nuns?) from Tibet and other Himalayan kingdoms..I am sure some of their writings are available on the net if one looks hard enough…but most may be not in English…..focus on the male body already hogs up a lot of bandwidth during the practice of celibacy leaving little to no possibility to understand the female experience in the female body

hope this clarifies my final stance, if some of the things I said may strike contradictory

But i agree just clean No Porn (it does lead to objectification of women if one sees professional porn, may be not if one sees amateur homemade porn or just still pictures) is better for the vast majority than buying into the whole SER (sex energy retention) philosophy

Else I would have had my own dedicated blog….

@Rhuu

nice way to trivialize the near 2,000 year long oppression of the Jews at the hands of both white men and white women…why doesn’t it surprise me that you turned out to be rabidly Antisemitic?

Naglfar
Naglfar
1 year ago

FWIW I’m Jewish and I’d prefer if people didn’t use the historic oppression of my people to make arguments about semen.

@Rhuu
I don’t see anything wrong with what you wrote. This isn’t directed at you.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
1 year ago

@ Rhuu

Well, at least you avoided a copyright claim from the estate of George Orwell!

And I guess language evolves; we use psychological terms colloquially, but technically incorrectly, all the time. “Descriptive not prescriptive” and all that.

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

@SRLO – oh my god, dude. Oh my god. You’re playing oppression olympics, here.

Competing in the Oppression Olympics attaches something like a moral dimension to oppression, in which the most oppressed are worthier.

People who participate in Oppression Olympics tend to ignore the fact that it’s possible for multiple groups to be oppressed, and necessary to address all those problems, without choosing a single group to get all the anti-oppression activism. Oppression Olympics also tends to ignore Intersectionality, except where the existence of multiple degrees of oppression can help an individual participant “win”.

ETA – I forgot! You claimed that ‘white people’ have oppressed Jews for 2000 years. The concept of ‘whiteness’ is much, much newer than that. According to wiki (I know)

The concept of a unified white race did not achieve universal acceptance in Europe when it first came into use in the 17th century, or in the centuries afterward. Nazi Germany regarded some European peoples such as Slavs as racially distinct from themselves. Prior to the modern age, no European peoples regarded themselves as “white”, but rather defined their race, ancestry, or ethnicity in terms of their nationality.

You can say ‘ruling power’, but not ‘white people’. /edit

@Naglfar – thank you!

@Alan – pls no copyright claim, plz plz plz

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Rhuu

you suspiciously use the same kind of language as some alt-rightists would…The last thing I need in my life is debate with some Lauren Southern types

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

Rest assured, I am not alt-right. Did you look at the link I got that from? It’s the geek feminism wiki. If an alt-right person is using that term, they have co-opted it from the left.

Oppression olympics is real. I know this, because you literally just did it!

Interesting that you chose a female ‘type’, as well. I wonder why?

Buttercup Q. Skullpants
Buttercup Q. Skullpants
1 year ago

@SRLO

Agreed, the current version of SR is very male-centric (it’s even embedded in the name). Female celibacy tends to get dismissed in the incel community as “oh, it’s much easier for women to go without sex”, but it can be just as difficult and lonely for women.

Men are taught from an early age to always be in control, and orgasms are very much the opposite of that. It’s possible that many incels feel weak and ashamed that the object of their loathing also has the power to make their bodies react involuntarily. SR offers them a way to reclaim that power. The problem is, it’s based on a faulty model of sex as eternal power struggle.

Maybe “opinion retention” would be a more rewarding practice for these guys, because venting hatred online to anonymous strangers is certainly much more harmful than ejaculating into a sock. Anger feeds on itself.

LindsayIrene
LindsayIrene
1 year ago

This whole thing reminds me a bit of prosperity gospel. Just worship God the right way and you’ll be rich! Not rich? You’re just not doing it right. Try harder!

Retain your semen and you will be a leader of men! Not a leader yet? Well, you must be having some sexual thoughts or something. Try harder!

An Autistic Giraffe
An Autistic Giraffe
1 year ago

you suspiciously use the same kind of language as some alt-rightists would

comment image

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Buttercup

The western incel rightwing characterization of women living without sex is wrong….There is strange commodification of sex in both western rightwing spectrum as well as western leftwing spectrum…In western rightwing incel spectrum sex is seen as the be all and end all of human achievement especially with “sexually attractive” (Chad-Stacey) human beings

In western leftwing spectrum inability to acquire romantic and sexual liaisons automatically terms an individual as some sort of “loser”

Look at how I was mocked by a loyal poster here (a presumably leftwing site) upon discovering about my ex-gf …saiyng that no wonder the relationship didnot last without ever knowing what led to the dissolution of the said relationship ..(absolute no fault of hers or mine..just Global political circumstances tore us apart)

I said before and i will say it again one would do himself/herself huge disservice by trying to understand Sex energy retention while limiting himself/herself only to English ..The vast majority of sex energy retention literature,biographies etc are in non-western languages…almost all of them remain untranslated

The English SR subreddit from which almost all posts are lifted here is barely a couple of years old.

The paradigm of celibate sex energy retention also means living with other celibate SRers and using the extra money from livelihood to support women of the blood or clan whose husbands may have left them…

I would be happy to read any account of voluntary celibate sex energy retention account of any woman who has English or German as her first language..not only that but buy them, as I have bought countless Sex energy retention related books

cheers,

An Impish Pepper
An Impish Pepper
1 year ago

SRLO says all this stuff about the oppression of POC and vague progressive ideas, but ultimately seems to be stuck in the same neoliberal/colonialist mindset and general white guy thought patterns as the people he’s trying to distance himself from:

– talks about political and military power as positive results of SR
– a monolithic view of “the left” resembling the stereotypical middle class Democrat, apparently unaware of any other non-right-wing viewpoint
– a Great Man/Event/Civilization view of history, viewing singular events as causes rather than symptoms of historical trends
– centering the Roman Empire as the One Example that vaguely seems to corroborate his views, if you just look at one or two events
– even has an avatar of a white guy, a strange choice if he’s trying to claim that he isn’t a white guy (seems to be kind of implying this in a few statements here and there)

Also if the argument is that white women weren’t oppressed relative to other groups before Obama, that… hasn’t really changed since Obama, either. 53% of white women voted for Trump. This century’s Women’s Marches have been co-opted by racists and transphobes (at least from what I’ve heard). White women are still paid more than black men.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Impish Pepper

I mentioned western historical events because that is what this forum would understand..My personal orientation is SER vis-a-vis Eastern historical events as well as how SER may have played a part in the Native American war against European oppression .if power is not important why women urge Oprah to run for President for the sake of emancipation of American women?

I am in no way,sense or blood white…what whiteness do you see in my picture? I look like 90%+ of my people (non-white) and donot trace any lineage whatsoever to White Europeans

I put my pic against my profile defiantly because all my life me and my people have been mocked, bullied for a certain “noticeable” facial feature , which becomes even more prominent in side view….

I hope you understand what I mean and where I am coming from , if not..no big deal cuz else certain “segments” here will accuse me of engaging in “Oppression Olympics”(despicable term)

LindsayIrene
LindsayIrene
1 year ago

why women urge Oprah to run for President for the sake of emancipation of American women?

Literally no one has ever said that

An Impish Pepper
An Impish Pepper
1 year ago

how SER may have played a part in the Native American war against European oppression

I hope someday you come to understand what this sounds like.

Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
Semen_Retention_Liaison_Officer
1 year ago

@Impish Pepper

I have said this once and I say this again..I completely understand that it would sound ridiculous from Scientific materialist viewpoint, from the view of point of Standard model of Physics

I know EXACTLY what undiscovered fundamental force and particle should exist, so that supernatural paranormal powers can become feasible in light of science…and I also know why they donot or possibly cannot exist

I am the proprietor of an algorithm optimization consultancy company..

I know the EXACT physics arguments against supernatural forces, rebirth, soul, magic, spirit realm etc…

I still chose to follow my worldview because of my reasons no matter how oh-so-lordy ,oh-so-snooty white men and women try to badge me as some sort of “quaint noble savage”

Thank you

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

If you need to de-legitimise all of my points by painting me as an anti-semite alt-rightist, I really worry about you.

Did I perhaps strike a nerve? Did I say something that maybe got through? Is that why you lashed out?

When you stop playing oppression olympics, I’ll stop calling it out.

Re: this steaming pile of bullshit

In western leftwing spectrum inability to acquire romantic and sexual liaisons automatically terms an individual as some sort of “loser”

On this page I said this:

No one needs to have sex, that is super important. If you don’t want to, you don’t have to. Own that.

Part of being sex positive is also saying “If you don’t want to have sex, that’s fine.” I’m fine with people having sex, I’m fine with people not having sex. I don’t care, it is actually none of my business.

So no, the ‘left’ doesn’t think you’re a loser for not being able to ‘aquire romantic and sexual liaisons’.

Anyone who says that is being a jerk. No one’s value is tied up in how much sex they are or are not having.

Re: this

I still chose to follow my worldview because of my reasons no matter how oh-so-lordy ,oh-so-snooty white men and women try to badge me as some sort of “quaint noble savage”

Quote where someone has said that.

Lainy
Lainy
1 year ago

@ semen

By facial feature do you mean nose because I’m very confused now?

Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
Rhuu - apparently an illiterati
1 year ago

@Lainy – He’s Jewish, I’m pretty sure. He’s trying to be coy about it for some reason.

Lainy
Lainy
1 year ago

@rhuu

Oh

@ semen

If that is a picture of you and it helps I think you have a very nice normal size nose. I have a big honker of a German nose so let me tell you yours is a normal size nose. I don’t think it’s very noticeable at all. In fact from that picture the first thing i notice is your hair. I hope that helps

Mrs Morley
Mrs Morley
1 year ago

Wait what?

If SRLO is a Jew that doesn’t make him a person of color.

I’m a Jew and I’m white.