By David Futrelle
Western incels often fantasize about solving their no-one-wants-to-have-sex-with-them problem by moving to Southeast Asia where, they assume, they’ll have their pick of attractive, extremely impoverished young women ripe for sexual exploitation.
Incels tend to put it a little less delicately. “It seems that, if you’re white,” one prolific Incels.co commenter called RegisterUserName wrote recently, “the only way you can ascend is through going to Asia and fucking some noodlewhore who’s desperate for a green card … .”
But carrying out this plan would involve moving to, or at the very least visiting, a country far from home, and competing with other Westerners who might be more handsome or at least less objectionable as a person than you, and so for most incels this fantasy remains just that.
But RegisterUserName has some up with some ideas as to how he and his incel colleagues can find similarly poor and/or vulnerable women out there without even leaving their hometowns.
“[W]hen you can’t get what you want with mainstream methods,” he wrote in a recent post, “you have to think outside the box to solutions that have a greater chance of working.”
His suggestions?
Join a 12-step group like “Alcoholics Anonymous or one of those circle meetings to find someone in a rough patch in life.”
Get yourself admitted to a mental hospital so you could “find some crazy bird.”
Start a cult. This might be a bit tricky, as RegisterUserName notes, because you’d “have to be able to be very charismatic and preferably not a turbomanlet.” But if you can pull it off, he continues, you could fill the cult with “girls [who] could be anywhere from 16 (depending on age of consent; obviously don’t break the law) to around 25 or so)” and find yourself your very own Squeaky Fromme.
Join a cult. If actually starting a cult would be too much work, you can always try
Cultmaxxing by leeching on someone else’s cult and finding [a] wife, but be careful that a fellow incel hasn’t made it into a sex cult where he fucks your wife
Exploit homeless girls. RegisterUserName has a somewhat elaborate fantasy of “saving” some homeless teenager, who can’t help but feel so grateful that she “repays” you, her savior, with sex
and then they fall in love with you or something … you gotta have your own house and stuff, preferably be able to fulfill a father like role because she probably had circumstances which led to her never having anyone to be a father … . I think I like this one the most because … you’re actually helping someone so it’s the most morally acceptable … .
Sexual exploitation isn’t “helping,” dude.
Only one of RegisterUserName’s suggestions doesn’t involve exploiting a desperately poor or otherwise vulnerable women. But it does require you commit a violent assault. Yes, we’re talking about the time-honored mating strategy of beating up some cute girl’s boyfriend.
Fight girls’ boyfriends and try to hit on them after. You see all those stories man you never know. (Works best if you’re young, tall, good fighting success. You can snag teenage girls depending on laws in your area so from around 16-25 where they might just get turned on by it and are drunk and are angry at their boyfriends, but it probably won’t be a long term thing ever because, I mean, come on, it’s the type of girl to leave her boyfriend for an ugly subhuman because he got beat up)
As it turns out, RegisterUderName isn’t the only one with fantasies of explaoiting vulnderable girls and women. One of the other commenters, apparently writing from Saudi Arabia, explained that he had
considered … hiring a live in maid and hope she will fuck me to keep her job but that’s nearly impossible to do in Saudi Arabia or dealing drugs and hope one of the tweakers will suck my dick for some drugs but I don’t know anyone to buy drugs from and selling drugs has death penalty here and I’m not ready to die yet.
You know, fellas, maybe if you weren’t the sort of guys who spend your days fantasizing about ruthlessly exploiting desperate women for sex you might be able to get a date with an actual willing woman.
Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
@gaebolga
There was no study on plastic bags. You have been had.
@Richard
Here are some quotes. Some of them are Gloria Steinem quotes where I replaced “men” and “women” with “Jews” and “Aryans” like you requested. Others are unedited Hitler quotes. Let’s see if you can guess which are which.
TW: antisemitism and racism
These quotes are pretty different, so you should have no trouble distinguishing Gloria Steinem from Adolf Hitler.
richard –
You thinking that men and women = Jews and Aryans = Aryans are women who want to gas Jews, aka men. It is disgusting. Are you actually reading what you wrote? Really think about it. That equivalence is so distasteful, so disgusting, so wrong. You literally made my lips curl up, as if I had smelled the grossest fart (that you!)
The slaughter of millions of people, men AND WOMEN (you fucking jackass), is race feminism?
What is fucking wrong with you?
I VOTE PERMA-BAN. MAKING LIGHT OF THE HOLOCAUST IS A FULL STOP in my book. GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL. DO NOT COLLECT $200.
@Richard
Who exactly fabricated quotes? David provides links to sources, so if you go there you can see that the quotes aren’t fabricated. First though, to see the difference between Hitler and feminists, take a look at some of the quotes.
Anyway, there was a study on plastic bags. Feel free to read it at the link I gave in the other thread.
@cornychips
I agree. I provided those quotes to try to prove him wrong. Please note that by posting those quotes I am not voicing agreement. No, I am voicing strong disagreement and revilement of Richard’s mockery at the deaths of millions.
@Richard
Still pulling shit out of your ass to pretend like you know what you’re talking about instead of dealing with what people actually said.
Yawn.
Just for shits and giggles, I tried inverting Richard’s directive to “replace men and women with Jews and Arians [sic]“; it provided some interesting quotes. I’m going to attribute them to the fictitious Alice Hitler, an actual feminazi:
Alice Hitler. What an asshole.
I’ll just point out a comparatively small flaw in Richard’s argument: “human nature” has never even been adequately pinned down so trying to say anything goes against it is meaningless. How can you appeal to something that has simultaneously been defined by different people as
1. Selfish and warlike (e.g. Hobbes)
2. Peaceful and benevolent (e.g. Rousseau and Locke)
3. Non-existent because humans choose every aspect of their own psychology at an individual level (e.g. the existentialist philosophers)
And those are just the most common viewpoints on the matter.
For what little it’s worth, all I can tell is that it acts in a way that can only be described as chaotic and arbitrary, and so it cannot be said to be conducive to any one kind of social system. But I’m no more likely to be right than any of those other folks I mentioned.
@Richard
I don’t want or need protection from a man, and I love fucking outside of marriage, with men different people and my fiancé. You need to fuck off, you can’t tell people how to live their life you ass hate
@Pie and Ohlmann
Thank you for replying to me about why fear of falling is a human instinct. I understand it better now.
Anonymous,
Didn’t you get the memo? Human nature is whatever Richard says it is. He doesn’t even need to back up his assertions with any evidence. We’re all supposed to just take his assfax as The Truth and argue from there.
A song for Richard.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BohQVxOwnSI
(And before anyone asks, yes , that’s Peter Baumann of Tangerine Dream fame.)
@weirwoodtreehugger
Don’t get me started on how to define “truth” too, we’ll be here all week if I do that.
@Seraph4377
It seems to work pretty well for opossums.
It really endeared me to them when I learned that they don’t deliberately “play dead,” but pass out from sheer terror.
@Allandrel
I didn’t know that, but now I feel sorry for the poor things.
That would make it a reflex rather than an instinct, Richard.
Re: fainting
IIRC which stress reactions are “preferred” is subject to social conditioning, too, IIRC even including fainting back when it was culturally condoned. But YMMV with that, this is not a topic I know a lot about.
There’s definitely social conditioning around fight/flight/freeze/fawn though, plus more individual behavioral conditioning.
e.g. my reaction to sudden loud noises tends to be
– turn immediately towards the source of the noise
– raise my hands in front of me and be very quiet
– if I can’t see the noise source, move as little as possible until I locate it
Y’all can probably figure out where that comes from, and it is helpful in some contexts. But it doesn’t work so great when the noise source is some jerk running a red light, as one of my friends noted last month when she had to pull me the rest of the way across the street.
one time a Possum got into my best friends dog pin. It did the play dead thing, and penny, her dog, has this habit of picking up one of her toys and bringing it to my friend when she comes in to give them food, change their water, clean up, stuff like that. So penny brought it over and my friend thought it was Penny stuff rabbit, so she went to take it, but penny dropped and my friend pulled back because it obviously had a much more solid sound then a stuffed rabbit. Found out it was a possum, she thought penny had killed it so she picked it up by it’s tail and through it out of the pin. She then went to go get a trash bag to throw it away and the damn thing had woken up and slunked away. My friend then freaked out when she realized she had picked up an alive possum and thrown it.
There’s also a type of snake that fakes a full-fledged seizure as it plays dead, it even lets its tongue droop out of its mouth when it “dies”.
@Anonymous
It’s called a hognose. I love that.
@naglifar
Number 2 by Hitler. Remainder by GS?
@Anonymous, @ Lainy:
I love how when someone picks it up and rights it, it goes “no, I’m dead!” and rolls over again.
@Moon Custafer
It’s like a Shakespeare play “and I die, and I die again, by the way I’m dead, People in the back did you get I’m dead! oh Romeo I’m dead”
@Richard
Hitler was 2, 3, and 5. Should have been obvious, seeing as Steinem never said anything about superior races or national socialism. Feminists and Nazis: not very similar.
Re: Snek
“No! You don’t want to eat me! I ate something that made me die in a terribly painful fashion, see? It was AWFUL and DRAMATIC and TERRIBLE! I’m dead! Dead, I tell you! Dead!”
That video above is a perfect demonstration of why middle-school-me decided the eastern hognose snake is the best snake ever.
If you’re wondering what shark is best shark to go with the best snake recommends, totally the Atlantic Weasel Shark. They’re small and have the most adorable yellow racing stripes, and they are super-cute.
Re: Trollolol
As a former biology student, I laugh in the face of some rather simplistic (and not even simplistic in the good “get to the root to understand and then branch out” sort of way) evo-psych.
Biology, despite kinda being a squishy-by-nature science, is much more complex and interesting than can be dreamt of in Lobster-Stan philosophy.
@Naglfar:
I just snort-laughed. Thanks for that. 🙂
@Contrapangloss
I’ve never really understood the whole lobster thing. Humans and lobsters are pretty different, so it never made sense to me to infer anything about humans from lobster hierarchies. On the other hand, we could maybe learn a thing or two from bonobos.
@naglfar
The lobster thing is a trolling opp. It gets JP invited to smug talk shows so that he can demolish them.