By David Futrelle
Not all heroes wear capes. In the case of the Reddit user called IntrovertedMagma, I’m going to assume, it’s more like a stained Rick and Morty t-shirt, some cargo shorts, maybe a MAGA hat? I’m just guessing, really. And for all I know he does actually wear a cape.
In any case, IntrovertedMagma is a Man Going His Own Way who has been waging a brave and tireless struggle for Men’s Rights on Reddit, up until about six months ago anyway, when he evidently left to concentrate on what I assume were even more heroic pursuits. His weapon of choice in the struggle for men and against women?
The word “WAHMYN.”
You may be saying to yourself, “that’s not actually a word.” True, but that is the brilliance of InvertedMagma’s strategy. “WAHMYN” (he always puts it in all caps) is a variation on the 40-year-old joke of sarcastically calling women “womyn” to make fun of radical feminists. But then it’s got that “WAH” at the start, to suggest that the womyn in question are also crying like babies! Obviously that makes it twice as funny. And twice as powerful.
Just watch him at work here, as he muses on the impending collapse of civilization because women won’t have sex with him, sorry, I mean, with the 90 percent of men who aren’t Chads.
![IntrovertedMagma[S] 5 points 11 months ago
at some point, society will reach a state of complete degeneracy.. WAHMYN sleeping exclusively with top 10% (don't forget about the 13 year old WAHMYN seeing all this degeneracy, they will be 10x worse than current WAHMYN).. single motherhood in turn will prevail.. and your average beta male will literally face two choices: raise chad's kids or no sex at all.. why would the new generation of WAHMYN sleep with any guy uner 90th percentile?
of course, betas are still paying all the taxes which will go to single mothers who are the majority.. How long can you sustain a civilization like this? not long. they will speak up.. no body will listen to them. they will stop working, then the cunty government will make laws to force them to work.. then the beta males will fight the government at this point.. break it down and build it with patriarchal laws (the only way any successful civilization can thrive!)
and this is what I meant with force. I give it 50 years max. The islamic empires had fallen in under 100 years because their princes stopped ruling and focused on pussy and drinks and WAHMYN made the decisions behind the stage and of course degeneracy took over.
So I would say since feminism started in the 60s, another 50s from now would be the last years of this gynocentric civilization.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019-05-31_16-18-14.png?fit=520%2C1024)
In this thread, he thoughtfully suggests that women — sorry, WAHMYN — shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Or work. Or remain single and/or childless after the age of 25 without paying a penalty.
Here he weighs in on the critically important Men’s Rights issue of some random woman who flashed her tits at a hockey game, thus proving that all women are “complete trash.”
69 upvotes, nice!
But for all his vitriol, IntrovertedMagma is willing to admit that while men are stronger than women WAHMYN, they can be, if not smart exactly, then at least cunning. And they stick together, like bees.
Now, I should note that IntrovertedSmegmaMagma is not the only, or even the first, MGTOW to have embraced the brilliant strategy of calling women WAHMYN — there are plenty of others who have gone the WAHMYN route, sometimes impressively so, like this fellow, who has some very interesting thoughts on how wahmyn shouldn’t have any rights at all because
Wahmyn’s rights are the worst thing in human history. Wahmyn should not be allowed to have “rights.” Wahmyn’s rights my ass. They don’t deserve rights. Wahmyn are THE MOST PRIVILEGED CREATURES ON EARTH AND THEY ARE EXTREMELY PRIVILEGED IN EVERY SINGLE ASPECTS OF LIFE. Every. Single. Aspects. No exception. Women are garbage, the most useless, worthless, incompetent and unproductive thing in the universe.
But IntrovertedMagma has been the most enthusiastic. And he’s the only one who remembers to do it in all-caps.
Truly a hero for our times.
PS: Did I mention that this guy is a fan of Stefan Molyneux? Because of course he is.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Following from my last post, I just realised that “MRA” could stand for “Muppets’ Rights Activist”.
Somebody needs to create a parody Twitter account where Animal the Muppets’ Rights Activist rants in broken ALL CAPS about WAHMEN and taking “the felt pill” ??.
Soorry dude, Pete Wylie is the Wah man.
Hi NicolaLuna! Nice to see you again.
Laws that penalize women who don’t have a husband/children after the age of 25…JFC, what an asscasserole. 30% of the population would end up in jail, including a large proportion of the elderly (obviously you can’t fine women if they aren’t allowed to work). Who’s going to pay for all that? Why would marriages based on avoiding prison be happier and more stable? How is a society where 1/3 of the population are classified as criminals LESS degenerate?
Also, WAHMYN in all caps looks like an acronym.
1) Well Actually, Herr Magma is a Yipping Nincompoop
2) We’ve All Had it with Misogynists Yelling Noisily
3) Women Are Hella Marvelous, You (K)now
The alternate spelling looks like an affirmation. “So it is written, so it shall be. World without end, WAHMEN.”
This generation and the immediate last has a problem. Young people are inherently curious and will find all this material and they are going to have to go through and process all this hate, sexism, racism and bigotry at a pretty young age without a lot of knowledge and context and find some way to square the information, their own thoughts and their real lives as they grow older to find some kind of normal place.
Mass media was curating information and the bigotry, sexism and hate you would confront would be in your neighborhood, town, or some rare conflagration that would covered by media. For those who read a lot there would be some of this material but it would be material in a historical context.
But now with the sheer amount of hate floating around and widely accessible it could be tempting for many who do not have historical context and enough awareness to begin to look at the superficial and form their own identities around some of these hateful ideas.
While this site does a lot of good it is mainly about awareness and mocking of ideas that are outrageous and so disconnected with real world experiences of real people and women that a lot of these seem to be the very young without real interaction with women, those without social context and some really disturbing others. This site is not the ideal place to form a more sophisticated and deeper understanding as any kind of contextualization of these ideas and actions could easily be mistaken as some kind of acceptance of vile and toxic ideals so the default is superficial mockery.
This definitely needs more work, maybe newer discussion contexts as there is a real risk of normalizing and segmenting them as some weird others but whose ideas are being disseminated widely in a context of plausibility where it is not immediately confronted and dismissed. Just like wahabbism has an impact in radicalizing young men so does this. We will have large groups of people going through life in this hateful contexts and some will inevitable lead to violence and terrorism as we have seen.
Thanks all. Good to be back. Been dealing with some pretty nasty PTSD stuff for the past year, but am now coming to the end of 4 months of therapy and in a way better place.
Oohh acronyms…
Who Asked Him, Mansplainer Yelling Nothings
Why Are Horrible Men Yowling Now
Come on and SLAM and welcome to the WAHMyn
My favourite bits:
1) The slash in “catfood/antidepressant stocks” that implies catfood and antidepressants are the same thing, or at least they are manufactured by the same companies.
2) He contends that our downward spiral as a society will lead to “WAHMYN sleeping exclusively with the top 10%,” but then a couple ellipses later he says “your average beta male will literally face two choices: raise chad’s kids or no sex at all.” Will women be sleeping exclusively with the top 10% of men in this nightmare scenario, or will average betas still have an opportunity to get laid? I demand consistency from my frothing misogynistic fantasies, and so should you!
Dropping cloaking shields long enough 2 say “Hi” & how much I appreciate this site & all the commentary by the long term members.
Long time reader, 1st time commentator, I doubt I’ll comment often (life & all that), but you all are a pleasure 2 read & a much needed antidote.
@Cat Mara
2nded–that grammar screw up also set off the “Nuns in my Head.” If you think Grammar Nazis are bad…
NicholaLuna: glad 2 see you posting again & good 2 read that you’re in a much better place.
@CarrieV
I just hope they don’t hurt any women, is all the comments policy will allow me to say.
Off topic but a dog that looks like Jordan Peterson can’t wait for the right time.
Sure, like:
The Ottoman Empire (1299–1923)
The Safavid dynasty (1502–1736)
The Mali Empire (1230s–1600s)
etc.
I know that out of all the asinine crap this guy said, this is probably the least important, but the history nerd in me cannot let it go.
@Raul
Was the fact that this entire site has roundly and unambiguously condemned all of that hate completely lost on you? Or have you failed to notice that the mass media has an even worse track record for failing to criticize bigotry of all stripes, and indeed often is directly responsible in perpetuating and normalizing it in the exact same way you claim this site is doing?
Nobody here needs to read a whole damn history textbook describing the context of why misogyny and hate are bad in order to figure out that failing to treat people as people is fundamentally wrong. Now spare us your “won’t someone think of the children!” horseshit, we don’t do concern trolls here.
Maybe he just wore out his caps key?
@anonymous
That seems to be a misreading of the comment. Its a mistake to think that this is a niche or will always be a niche and people are not being radicalized.
Look at the response to wahhabism and contrast it with this, and it becomes obvious that this kind of hate is not being treated with the same seriousness.
There is no cracking down on wahhabi preachers and their networks. Imagine the NYT calling a wahhabi preacher as a ‘new generation intellectual’ yet that’s exactly what their profile of Ben Shapiro says. You see the same kid glove handling of things like the hate preachers this post covers normalized and reframed as the ‘intellectual dark web’ in mass media.
There is no massive school or educational staff outreach programs – ref the the Prevent program in the UK, no extra attention from law enforcement, no entire global flying security changed, and yet terrorist attacks in the last 3 years already shows a sharp uptick from supremacists and incels.
This is not just some people talking on forums, this is spilling into the real world, it is being reflected in how people respond to change and changing roles and the massive animosity and hate towards people like Omar, AOC and others.
@ Raul,
I’m confused. Do you think that THIS website doesn’t take the threat of incels/MRAs/MGTOWs etc seriously?! I mean, I know this site usually takes a mocking tone, but I think you underestimate how serious the author, and commentors, are. Just because we laugh at something doesn’t mean we don’t recognize the danger of it.
@ Doethreetwoone,
My inner history nerd also did a massive eye-roll at that.
O/T: In sexbot news, MRAs & MGTOWs will be gratified to learn that the director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics at the University Of Manitoba believes some of us will be having “great sex” without human contact¹ within the next six years, and this kind of thing will seem positively mundane by 2050. Self-identified “IT tabloid” The Register brings the snark.
¹ Pfft, why all the fuss about that? I’ve been doing that for years! Er, did I saw that out loud??
The thing is, banning women – sorry, wahmen – from working, really only means banning them from paid work. Women will still be slaving away, doing all the drudgery they’ve always done.
Hi, NicolaLuna. Funnily enough, just last night I was wondering what had happened to you. I didn’t remember your user name, only that you had colorful hair.
You all mock this great thinker at your own peril.
HE starts by pointing out that:
See how he uses NOT ONE BUT TWO .’s That’s how you knos he’s a very serious thinker.
then he owns the feminaz’s with:
OBVIOUSLY another 50’s would be the last years. So he’s owned the libs, but GOES FURTHER and ENDS with:
AHHHH! Fight the ‘mst support the female’
About the “cunning hive-mind” thing…does that mean that women literally share their minds?
Guess I’ve been missing out. But, if it’s not too late, I’ll tap into the collective consciousness and insta-teach myself calculus, several programming languages, the basics of linguistics, how to answer emails on time, and all the other things I’ve been wanting to know.
Thanks, IntrovertedMagma! Appreciate it.
Migtoes are waaaaaa-men.
@Raul
What does Islamic fundamentalism (as I assume that is what you mean by Wahhabism) have to do with ANYTHING here? The people who are likely to be “radicalized” as you say only come here to insult and attack us- none of them have ever given the slightest indication that they took it their ideology by seeing us blow it out of the water.
Besides, mockery seems to do a very good job of taking the wind out of these people’s sails since their whole goal is to be taken as seriously as possible, probably by people like you who think that they might actually bring down civilization…somehow. And of course they’re not getting special attention from law enforcement, the police are much too busy trying to remember that the brown people are in fact human beings.
Now either remove the stick from your ass or go be a Very Serious Person ™ somewhere else.
@anonymous
You need to have a look at the list of terrorist attacks in the last 3 years globally [1] and also look at the rise of hate mongering globally. Fox News, Breitbart and DailyCaller are among the top linked sources from Facebook for the US and far right parties are polling between 12-30% in the EU. They are in power in Hungary and Austria and they have the exact same ideology.
Ben Shapiro has been referenced by the last 3 terrorists attacks including the attack in New Zealand that killed 50 and the attack in the synagogue in Canada that killed 9. Just in 2018 there have been 118 deaths and injuries from school shootings. [2] If we go back to 2016 there are a lot more. Between 2009 and 2018, white supremacists killed more than three-quarters of the 313 people murdered by extremists in the US. [3]
No one is going to consider this ‘non serious’. You need to stop trying to minimize their impact.This website amply documents people like Moleneux so ignorance cannot be the answer, this willfull minimizing and immature mocking of other commentators suggests you are not here for good faith discussion.
[1] http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2018/12/Global-Terrorism-Index-2018-1.pdf
[2] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46507514
[3] https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47626859
@Dormousing__it
In the 1980s some second-wave (possibly second-and-a-half-wave) feminists decided that the word woman should not be used because of this:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman
So different spellings were created: womon (as in womb) or womyn was the singular, and wimmin was the plural. Variant spellings of these new words were also proposed.
Unlike other radical changes in language that feminists launched (Ms. instead of Miss or Mrs., woman instead of girl or chick, he or she instead of the generic he), this one never caught on — probably because most people aren’t aware of the etymology of the word woman.
That said, some men never got over their rage about the words womon and wimmin.
@Raul: You’re spending a lot of words on trying to explain your position. What are the action items? What is it you actually want us to do?
@Raul
News from Austria:
Our Conservative-“Freedom” government fell last Monday. After a massive corruption scandal of the “Freedom Party” (the Nazis), most ministers stepped back, the chancellor was given a vote of no-confidence.
We now have a in-between government stacked with experts until we can vote again in early autumn.
The conservatives are already pushing right and the “Freedom” party is pushing “especially NOW!”.
The social democrats are getting accused of “overthrowing” the government (because, you know, a video of the vice-chancellor openly suggesting that a russian oligarch should take over the biggest newspaper to get them more votes and offering public contracts for donations is not a reason to do shit) and have to go into defense.
@theKND
I’m old enough to remember a time when any country with “Democratic” in the name was communist – i.e. not democratic at all. These days it seems any political party with “Freedom” in the name means Nazi or very close to Nazi. i.e. no freedom at all.