By David Futrelle
White supremacists — perhaps the special-est of all special snowflakes — have a tendency to sink into tooth-grinding rages over the tiniest symbolic threats (or what they see as threats) to the supposed purity of their race. And never more so than when they feel that “their” white women are being sullied by so-called “black brutes”— which often feels to fragile racist men like a kind of cuckolding.
These racist white dudes are especially attuned to anything in the media that suggests “race mixing.,” crying “white genocide” every time they spot an interracial couple in an ad for cereal or condoms or sweatpants.
Now a writer for the Daily Stormer has declared war on what he evidently sees as a looming threat to his race: a new set of emojis featuring a variety of interracial couples, straight and gay.
In a Daily Stormer post on Monday (NSFW archived link), someone called Pomidor Quixote (presumably not his real name) warns his readers about this existential danger of these tiny cartoon couples holding hands.
As he sees it, the new “array of emojis for miscegenation” is an assault on the most oppressed minority of all: white people.
These diabolical emojis, he argues, are a plot by the non-white majority to literally eradicate the white race — by targeting horny white women eager to do some race-traitoring in the sack with dark and handsome men.
[W]hat they’re really after is white genocide. Killing white men, more specifically, because they expect women to reproduce with the invaders and to blend in the brown goo, but white men can’t really blend in the brown goo, and actually, they don’t want to blend in the brown goo.
White men are innately driven towards beauty and creation while white women are innately driven towards degeneracy and destruction.
So how do cute little cartoon figures play a role in this whole degenerate death-of-the-white-race march?
Emojis are a ubiquitous part of the lives of normal people, and by sneaking a big enough selection of interracial emojis in the everyday lives of normal people they advance their white genocide agenda.
It normalizes being a coal burner in the subconscious of women.
A “coal burner,” if you’re not familiar with neo-Nazi colloquialisms, means a woman who has sex with a black man. A woman who “burns coal,” will some day “pay the toll,” these racists declare, citing as evidence every news story they run across in which a black man beats or kills his white girlfriend or wife — while ignoring the much greater number of stories in which white men beat or kill their white partners. But hey, “coal” and “toll” rhyme, and to white racists stories in which female “race traitors” get their comeuppance are inherently hilarious.
But alas! Every “coal burner” killed means one less womb for the white race.
These whores will eventually have to pay the toll, and even though that’s funny, it still leaves us with one less white womb-machine every time, so white people as a whole also pay the toll for their mistakes.
White womb-machines? It’s really rather remarkable just how much some white supremacist dudes hate the white women they purport to be defending — suggesting that their endless hyperventilating about “white genocide” is motivated less by allegedly lofty concerns about racial purity than it is by fears of being “cucked” by black and brown men having sex with women the white supremacists see as rightly “theirs.” (Including, sometimes, their actual girlfriends.)
It’s telling that most of the white supremacists yelling the loudest about “coal burners” and other “race-mixing” white women don’t actually seem to give a shit about white men dating women of color.
Indeed, many white supremacist dudes openly fetishize Asian women. For evidence of this, one need look no further than the very page on which Quixote’s post appears: the Daily Stormer’s banner at the moment features a naked Anime girl, a strange sight to behold alongside the sites’s wide assortment of posts bemoaning the alleged evils of miscegenation.
But this is only perplexing if you think these guys are genuinely motivated by allegedly noble concerns about genetic purity — and not by the sexual insecurity and aggrieved sexual entitlement that oozes from every one of their rants about “white genocide.”
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
So…we’re just saying the quiet stuff out loud now?
I can’t imagine why women would not find men who refer to us a “womb machines” attractive. I’d rather be with another man of any race or ethnicity than a Nazi who doesn’t see me as a human, but as an incubator for white babies.
That’s why I’ve never dated a Republican.
Non-womb-machine woman reporting. Also, Anglin must revel in being as vile as possible. It’s like he’s trying to get an omni-bigot achievement. This shouldn’t surprise me, given that he’s a Nazi, but it does.
nothing sez “oppressed, silenced minority” like the whining of a majority group that literally controls 100% of everything….
@ wwth:
oooooh… that burn was so fierce I think you escaped Earth’s gravity!!
@Jane Done:
I was thinking the same thing.
I went to an NCADV conference years ago, probably 1999, and there was a **very** well attended workshop with legendary activist Suzanne Pharr. (She wrote “Homophobia: A Weapon of Sexism” among other things.)
Though it wasn’t planned as a plenary session (she spoke at one of those, too), a good half of the conference showed up. One of the things she said struck me as gross, but over the top and really unrealistic, but the rest of her lecture was right on.
The part that was gross, over the top, and not based in reality? She stated that she believed that the constant attempts to control women’s sexuality and pregnancies by the right wing would eventually lead to open advocacy of mandatory pregnancy for “desirable” women and, after that, to attempts to create artificial wombs as part of a plan to make women obsolete.
She was clear that she thought it unlikely that they would succeed, but also warned the group that if we don’t actively oppose such things when we hear them, that we’ll end up regretting not taking those statements seriously. It was her opinion that such constant discussions of how and when to remove women’s sexual agency in the present and over periods of decades would eventually lead to a substantial segment of the population becoming convinced that there really were no reasons to ever place any limits at all on women’s autonomy, and, really, no reason ultimately to value women at all since they place such high value on controlling women and real women inevitably subvert or escape such control far too often for their liking.
At the time it was an analysis that seemed like it was a compelling argument only if you did not maintain a faith in a minimal level of humanity on the part of your political opponents.
At the time, I wanted to maintain that faith, so while I took to her heart warning that persistent denigration of women’s importance, competence, and agency would have long term negative consequences, I dismissed the ultimate destination she described as both unlikely and apocalyptic.
I. WAS. WRONG. AS. FUCK.
Suzanne Pharr: smarter than I ever appreciated.
That burn had a specific impulse greater than an idealized LH/LOX chemical rocket!
that burn had a specific impulse greater than a Hall Effect thruster!
No, no! That burn had a specific impulse greater than an argon-propelled VASIMR engine!
Yeah, that’s the ticket!
So white women are inherently beautiful and creative and degenerate and destructive. Which is why white men want us and hate us.
Actually, that explains a lot of my dating life.
I don’t know why but the idea of interracial always being portrayed as white woman (usally blonde) with a man of color always bothers me. There are several other types of couples that don’t make up that. I know a lovely couple that is a black man married to a Korean woman.
I had a casual friend – we were never too close – who was 1/2 Black & 1/2 Japanese.
My son has a black wife and black kids and seems at peace with the world. He is pretty intolerant of openly expressed bigotry, though in his maturity he no longer leads with his left.
When he was in high school, Flo Jo died. Some idiot walked past him and another boy mourning her and said, “She was just another nigger bitch. Who cares?” He shortly afterwards found himself being held off his feet against the wall by my son, who was actually shorter than him. He was told that he was entitled to his opinion, but if he knew what was good for him, he would keep them to himself.
The principal called me to explain, and said that since no teacher had seen it there would be minimal consequences (this was NOT policy, it was an excuse). My son had to work through a basketball practice. The other guy got a full on in-school suspension for using racist language in public (mind you, this was a private school for kids with certain kinds of learning disabilities).
Just to explain the DS banner. They are supporting Andrew Yang 2020. Ironically or not, they are meme’ing it.
@Lainy
It’s because they don’t give a flying fuck about any other combination. If concern about racial purity was really what mattered they’d foam at the mouth just as much about white men with black or brown women. It’s really all about getting what they want and keeping everyone else under their thumb.
*gleefully watches the downward spiral into WTF territory*
Artificial wombs would be awesome for women (liberated from a physically dangerous experience) and you can, if you search hard enough, find sexist arguments against them. Oh, and transmisogynist arguments against them too.
I don’t get Pharr’s argument on that front (it almost seems like a concession to the idea wombs are the most important thing about women – which is kinda abhorrent), but the rest of it sure seems legit. It’s a slippery slope argument but one that’s proven accurate over time.
Remember that she’s saying that this is what the misogynists will argue, not that this is what misogynists will have a good basis to argue.
Saying that thinking X leads people to eventually think Y doesn’t necessarily mean that X logically entails Y.
At least that’s how I understood her.
Right, because there’s nothing destructive about Nazis.
Also, Nazis are pretty quick to declare other white men degenerates.
Also also, something tells me this man and I have very different ideas of beauty.
Also also also, you’d think people this obsessed with white birth rates would try a little harder to not be repulsive to white women.
So the white race is objectively superior, and also the white race is existentially threatened by little pictures on your phone and fully half of it is innately degenerate and destructive?
Uh, okay.
Well remember, fascism essentially requires an enemy that is both existential yet also paradoxically easily defeated. It’s a required tension for their particular brand of bullshit and it’s kind of great for the rest of us because it leaves them unable to objectively evaluate the strength of their opposition.
It would take thousands of UPS personnel working overtime to unpack all the wrongness here.
Nobody seems to believe white people are ridiculously fragile more than white supremacists. If the existence of our entire race is threatened by little cartoon people, do we really even deserve to continue existing?
White men love beauty. Where can they find it? Certainly not in white women, who may be beautiful on the outside, but on the inside love degeneracy and destruction.
What a conundrum for male white supremacists, especially because they love creation. Who can they create babies with? Not those beautiful-on-the-outside, ugly-on-the-inside white women.
But wait. If a Nazi controls his woman’s every move, perhaps this relationship might work.
Nazi’s woman: Should I wear the red or the green blouse today?
Nazi (triumphantly): Neither. Wear the blue.
NW: Should I eat toast for breakfast?
N (becoming irritated): Yes, fine.
NW: Should I take the bus or walk to the grocery store?
N (angrily): Don’t you have a mind of your own? I’m trying to watch TV.
NW: My water broke and the baby is coming. What should I do?
N (panic-stricken): How the fuck should I know? Don’t you know anything? Take care of this yourself!
Darn. This hasn’t turned out well.
It will never stop being weird to me how these people find white AFAB folks so base and evil and contemptible in every way, but still want them in their lives at all costs. It’s slave owner logic and I just can’t get my head around even though I think all the pieces are there?
It’s almost like you have to give away some very deep part of your humanity to see other people that way, and it’s almost like giving it away is like cutting off your own limb.
There’s a good article in the Atlantic about the roots of “white nationalism” in the US: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/04/adam-serwer-madison-grant-white-nationalism/583258/
@Jane Done:
Oh, they’ve been saying the quiet stuff out loud since 2016, at least.
But you knew that already, amirite?
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: these guys really wish they were the Tleilaxu from the Dune universe. I don’t know much about Frank Herbert’s personal politics, but he certainly nailed this kind of rank misogyny just perfectly.
This. At the risk of going into TMI territory (I suppose I’ll put a Content Warning on this post for discussion of not-so-great things), being the unabashed and rather frequent porn consumer that I am, I have always been a tad perplexed by the popularity of animated hentai as a genre. At least when it comes to static images in that style, there’s some variety in the content. Different characters, different body shapes, different positions, number of participants in what’s going on etc.
But when I looked at a couple of hentai PornHub-style sites… not only was “rape” a tag for videos, but it seemed like every single clip was tagged that way. It’s obnoxious enough that the majority of decently-animated ones are censored, but I had to look through at least a few pages before finding ones that didn’t involve sexual assault of the characters.
It turns the stomach, but I think I understand why these guys love anime/hentai so much. It’s basically the only outlet these guys have to live out their fantasies of unrestrained dominance and sexual subjugation. Combine that with the stereotype of the “submissive but sexual” Asian woman and it’s exactly what these horrible people would get off on.