Categories
"ethics" antifeminism cuck entitled babies evil SJWs hypocrisy irony alert mantrum men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny oppressed white men playing the victim racism troll nation TROOOLLLL!! white supremacy

Attack of the Tomato Killers: Captain Marvel haters lose it after Rotten Tomatoes blocks them from crapping on movies that aren’t even out yet

It’s PLEDGE DRIVE time again! WHTM is ad free and entirely dependent on folks like you for its continued existence. If you can afford it, please DONATE HERE NOW! Thanks!

By David Futrelle

The movie review-aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes has made some changes to its website that will prevent angry trolls from talking shit about movies none of them have seen, removing the ability of anyone but professional critics to review movies that aren’t out yet and shutting a feature that allowed users to report whether or not they want to see a movie that’s about to come out.

It was clearly a response to an organized downvoting campaign against Marvel and Disney’s upcoming Captain Marvel movie, which has angered the internet’s angriest men because it features a woman — Brie Larson — in the titular role. Trolls had apparently managed to push the film’s “want to see” rating down to 27% before the feature was disabled.

As Collider points out, this is hardly the first time angry dudes have tried to tank a movie at the box office with mass downvotes.

Over the last couple of years, it’s become commonplace for “fans” who have yet to see a movie to enact a negging campaign designed to bring down the film’s audience scores prior to release. The Ghostbusters “fans” did this by downvoting the trailer for Paul Feige’s female-led reboot [and] Marvel Studios “fans” intentionally tried to tank the Rotten Tomatoes score of Black Panther … .

Naturally, the trolls are pissed, and many have taken to Twitter to denounce Rotten Tomatoes for allegedly taking away the First Amendment rights of ordinary, hard-working Americans by preventing them from crapping on a movie they haven’t seen on one privately-owned website:

RottenTomatoes Congratulations on revoking the 1st amendment right of the users of your site. This will not be forgotten.

Indeed, the critics charge, the Rotten Tomatoites are apparently destroying democracy itself.

But what else would one expect from the gang of beta cuck feminazi fascist assholes who run Rotten Tomatoes?

Bunch of beta cucks and feminazis over there at Rotten Tomatoes who were denying people their voice fascist assholes

According to this self-described Jordan Peterson fan, the “fucking fascist dictators” at Rotten Tomatoes have taken away his right to tell the world that he wants to see a different movie, although he has in fact told the world this in the very tweet in question:

Where do I post that I want to see #HowToTrainYourDragon3.  Oh yeah, I CAN'T, because you fucking fascist dictators suppressed my freedom of speech.

The powers that be at Rotten Tomatoes are apparently a rather unique breed of Nazis in that they are also liberals:

Rotten tomatoes are liberals who hate free speach... way too take down the rating for the new shit marvel movie... fuck this shit site and start using anything else that isn't against free speach... Rotten Nazi's more like it

They are also, apparently, fascists who hate white men. (Which would be sort of a new twist for fascism, I have to say.)

This fellow, with a Covington Kid avatar and zero followers, is also very much concerned about the rights of white men:

RottenTomatoes Fuck you fucking fuckers and your Disney masters.   From an individual born a white straight male you fucks.

As is this fellow with nine followers:

#RottenTomatoes  I have invested years into MCU, Some were average most were good. Then Brie Larson opened her mouth. Now there is the typical excuse for bots, trolls next will be Russains.  As a white man I am tired of the lies told about me and my ancestors to suit the agenda

And this lovely fellow with five followers and an Elon Musk avatar:

Nah I’d rather not. Silencing consumers on @RottenTomatoes thanks to @brielarson is shameful and disappointing. If your a white man just know she hates u and doesn’t wish for u to share ur opinions or thoughts

Evidently Rotten Tomatoes is not only racist against whites but also racist against everyone who isn’t white:

RottenTomatoes wait so the only good feature of your website is removed because @Marvel can't understand people do NOT like SJW bullshit! you are silencing me! a minority latin american person! how could you do that!

The brave free speech defenders made sure that their own personal free speech was filled with all the right angry internet dude buzzwords:

lmao the cuck boys over at rotten tomatoes modifying their review system after captain marvel got negative reviews... get off the mouse’s dick, cowards
RottenTomatoes are scumbags. Stop virtue signaling and acting like snowflakes. Remove 'Users Want To See' amnd follow the new policy you set up by removing user scores and comments. The 'Users Want To See' are SJW's and feminists who won't see this movie. #BoycottRottenTomatoes
RottenTomatoes you guys are pathetic. I wonder which Soyboy from @MarvelStudios told you to get rid of the “want to see “ % score.
rotten tomatoes is yet another organization to bow to the npc overlords.

Other commenters leaned heavily on the slurs:

RottenTomatoes weak ass Faggots. People don't want to watch a movie so y'all just remove the "want to see" percentage all together. I'm incredibly disappointed
You guys are pathetic censoring cunts and officially an unreliable movie review aggregator. Fuck your Captain Man-hater.
Rotten tomatoes: Disney's bitch.

Some even made up their own slur just for the occasion, combining the name of the actress playing Captain Marvel (Brie Larson) with the old favorite “retard.”

RT went full Brietard and destroyed any legitimacy it had. Might as well take the whole site down. And this only confirms that no one should see Captain Marvel.

Some of the criticism got weirdly specific. For example, these critics are angry that the people running Rotten Tomatoes are evidently too enthusiastic about performing oral sex:

Taking away the "Want To See" because people don't want to see Brie Feminazi Larson's SJW movie? I guess you're really going down hard on Marvel's cock... Your site's been bullshit for years, now you've proven you suck.
RottenTomatoes you sickafantic Disney pussy lickers. Your job is to be a review site not protecting movies from the public . Wow.

As a result of Rotten Tomatoes’ actions, at least two white MALE asses will not be attending the movie.

I have officially cancelled my ticket order for #CaptainMarvel in response to the change in #rottentomatoes website. I WAS going to take one for the team, because it's the #MCU. But #Disney , you can kiss my white, MALE ass.
I have officially cancelled my ticket order for #CaptainMarvel⁠ ⁠ in response to the change in #rottentomatoes website. I WAS going to take one for the team, because it's the #MCU. But #Disney , you can kiss my white, MALE ass.

This white man, thinking ahead, apparently plans to boycott a completely different Marvel movie coming out later this year:

Rotten Tomatoes removes "want to see score" from Captain Marvel 

Brie Larson:  “I don’t want to hear what white men have to say” and this white man plans to BOYCOTT #AvengersEndgame

Meanwhile, the same people who insisted they didn’t organize the mass-downvoting of Captain Marvel have evidently decided to organize a mass-upvoting of the movie Alita: Battle Angel — I guess to prove that angry manbabies don’t hate all superhero movies centered around women, at least not if the women in question have weird huge cgi-ed anime eyes.

All those upset at being silenced by #rottentomatoes and the #SJW/#NPC crowd/critic shills on #CaptainMarvel - u can still make sure your voice is head and stick two middle fingers up at these same people by going to #rottentomatoes Alita: Battle Angel page and giving it 5 stars!

So far these newly minted Alita superfans have pushed the Rotten Tomatoes audience score rating for that film up to 94% — a considerable improvement from the 59% score from critics.

So sad that these thoughtful critics and their assorted sockpuppets have been denied their sacred right to voice their opinions about a movie none of them have ever seen, at least on one particular site out of the gazillions of sites on the internet that would like its audience rating scores to actually reflect the views of the audience and not of angry mobs of woman-with-normal-eyes-hating trolls. I can only hope that free speech somehow manages to survive this assault.

139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ichthyic
Ichthyic
5 years ago

I can only hope that free speech somehow manages to survive this assault.

that is not sarcasm.

this right wing stupidity might indeed kill real free speech.

and they will have precisely themselves to blame for it.

Weatherwax
Weatherwax
5 years ago

Oh, but pay attention, angry white men. It’s way worse than you think it is. What about all the libtard SJWs that haven’t even set up a website that publishes film criticism, never mind removing a previous feature? Aren’t they all robbing you of your First Amendment rights by being too lazy to provide you with a platform? And there are millions of them! It’s a conspiracy!

In all seriousness, congratulations to them. I’m not a comics fan so was blissfully unaware of Captain Marvel until the online chatter after Infinity War. So I didn’t really know enough about the character to get excited. But these entitled numpties have just guaranteed I will be going to see it at the cinema (just as their forebears guaranteed my attendance to see Ghostbusters). Thank you angry white men!

Ariblester
Ariblester
5 years ago

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation wrote on
February 27, 2019 at 9:43 pm:

OK, how do I load a 100%-up-to-date copy of a page around here? I keep being stymied when trying to catch up by being served copies that I know are stale, usually because the “Recent Comments” section is missing a comment that I know exists because I’ve seen and read (if not wrote) the comment in question. Shift + reload does NOT seem to get me a fresher copy in such cases. It’s slower, as if it is reloading everything from the server and bypassing caching as it should, but at the same time I still get a stale version of the page proving that it is NOT actually bypassing caching.

How do I force a load that is 100% fresh and up to date down to the last byte, embed of any kind, etc.? Using current Firefox x86_64.

I think it was @Valentin who first pointed this out, but navigating to the main page, and then clicking through from there to the article you want tends to load the latest version.

Ariblester
Ariblester
5 years ago

It does tend to break the edit timer, though.

Ariblester
Ariblester
5 years ago

occasional reader wrote on
February 28, 2019 at 3:32 am:

I often read (here, mainly) this call to the 1st Amendment revokation, but i never dug a bit to see what this amendment says. So i look a bit on wiki.
Well, first, i do not really understand why it is called first amendment ? On wiki, there is something called a bill of rights in which the freedom of speech is just a few words in the third article (not the first). Does this mean the third article is in fact the first amendment to the article 1 and 2 ?
Second, the third article speaks about the Congress being not allowed to pass laws prohibiting the freedom of speech (among other liberties). Does that mean that the Rotten Tomatoes site is part of the Congress and can edict laws ?

Sorry, i am not good at legislation (even with my own country laws, alas), i probably miss the point somewhere.

@Alan Robertshaw already gave an excellent summary of the Bill of Rights, but if you wish to learn more about the USA’s system of government, Laws and Sausages is an ongoing webcomic that is quite accessible.

weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee

I wonder if all these freeze peachers are equally offended that Trump is heavily restricting journalism at his summit with Kim Jong Un?

Gaebolga
Gaebolga
5 years ago

@occasional reader

Alan Robertshaw covered the nitty gritty of it well. I’d only add that the US Bill of Rights is what we call the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution; the Articles are the original Constitution, so the numbering is different: Article 1 outlines the powers and duties of the Congress, Article 2 does the same for the Office of the President, Article 3 for the Judicial system, etc. After that, we get to the Amendments, so the First Amendment is, indeed, Amendment 1.

Also, as has been pointed out, the First Amendment dictates that the government can’t punish you for saying whatever you want to say (with some very specific limitations established by the Supreme Court), but it doesn’t require that other people allow you to use their platforms and publications to distribute your speech.

Which is something that white-wingers…I mean right-wingers don’t seem capable of understanding, at least when it involves conservative voices.

Rei Malebario
Rei Malebario
5 years ago

Who would they want to play Captain Marvel? Steven Seagal? Arnold Schwarzenegger? Jason Statham? Do these fuckers want every part in every movie to be played by white men?

At any rate, I’m going to see Captain Marvel with my wife. I’m sure we’ll both enjoy it.

Kätzenjammer
Kätzenjammer
5 years ago

Does anyone know why these folks are so excited about Alita? It seems puzzling. Admittedly, I haven’t seen it yet.

Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
Weird (and tired of trumplings) Eddie
5 years ago

“Freeze Peach” is the right for me to say whatever I wish, including the freedom for me to say “you can’t speak”.

“Censorship” is when anyone whom I say can’t speak is nonetheless allowed to speak.

Ariblester
Ariblester
5 years ago

weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee wrote on
February 28, 2019 at 6:28 am:

I wonder if all these freeze peachers are equally offended that Trump is heavily restricting journalism at his summit with Kim Jong Un?

They’d probably argue, in all seriousness, that Trump’s silencing of the (((MSM))) allows conservative alternative voices to finally be heard, and so net-net it’s a good thing.

Peter
5 years ago

Haters gonna hate the upcoming marvel movie is promising. I’ll be watching it with my family. We are solid MCU fans.

Cindy
Cindy
5 years ago

I can’t wait to rub their faces in it when Captain Marvel comes out to rave reviews. The manboys hated Fury Road, and Ghostbusters, and Star Wars… and then those movies kicked all sorts of ass!

Fabe
Fabe
5 years ago

Also, as has been pointed out, the First Amendment dictates that the government can’t punish you for saying whatever you want to say (with some very specific limitations established by the Supreme Court), but it doesn’t require that other people allow you to use their platforms and publications to distribute your speech.

Or As XKCD puts it

comment image

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

@lady c destroyer of incels
Welcome! And the answer is never.

Cat Mara
Cat Mara
5 years ago

@Fabe: It’s a great cartoon but for me the real stinger is in the alt-text:

I can’t remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you’re saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express.

Yeah… it’s not exactly the ringing endorsement the FREEZE PEACH fetishists like to think it is, is it?

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
5 years ago

@Catalpa:

Also, being on a page with a url that ends with /#comment-xxxxxx seems to also cause issues with loading recent comments.

That shouldn’t even be physically possible. The server never even sees the #fragment part of a URL, under normal circumstances, and the client only uses it to scroll to a specific part of a page.

Try waiting for the 5 minutes for the recent comments list to update and try being on a page not linked to a specific comment for best results.

That’s long enough for an appreciable likelihood for more comments to have been posted in the interim. Not a viable option then when one is trying to get fully caught up. Also what am I supposed to do for those five minutes, sit there in front of my computer twiddling my thumbs and getting nothing done?

I will try the control-F5 to see if it works any better than shift-F5.

Katamount
Katamount
5 years ago

The entitlement is nothing short of breathtaking. It’s really telling that these guys can’t fathom that if they personally don’t want a Captain Marvel movie, or don’t personally want a feminist like Brie Larson in the role, then as the perceived end consumers, they should have some form of not just veto power, but publicly visible veto power, something to serve as warning to others that might be thinking of doing something perceived as “SJW.” They have just no capacity to understand that other demographics might be just as large as them and interested in seeing the film, or that the film might have broad enough appeal to satisfy all audiences.

They learned nothing from Mad Max: Fury Road.

It’s odd that these guys are so infatuated with Alita: Battle Angel though. Not being into anime and manga, I know nothing about that work, but reviews said it was alright, but that Alita’s oversized eyes pushed her into uncanny valley territory. The Daily Beast pointed out a trend of Captain Marvel haters praising Alita and a whole bunch of conservative “documentaries” like Dinesh D’ouchebag’s Death Of A Nation. Does Alita’s design or plot satisfy their fanservice needs or something? Do they perceive it as “feminist free” because no Brie Larson? I wonder what the story is there.

Lumipuna (nee Arctic Ape)
Lumipuna (nee Arctic Ape)
5 years ago

I’m just trying to make up some quip about throwing rotten tomatoes at the performer on stage, versus throwing frozen peaches at them.

Jenora Feuer
Jenora Feuer
5 years ago

@Fabe:
As is common with xkcd, the alt-text for that image is worth noting itself:

I can’t remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you’re saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it’s not literally illegal to express.

And yeah, most of the big ‘Free Speech!!!11!!’ types are really just actively engaging in the Heckler’s Veto.

Jenora Feuer
Jenora Feuer
5 years ago

And I see Cat Mara made my comment while I was composing it.

@Surplus:
You’re thinking entirely on the server side; the client could be sending different requests to the server based on the presence or absence of the /#comment-xxxxxx portion of the URL. This is probably especially true because Javascript links so often use ‘#’ as a placeholder for the actual ‘link’ while instead running some Javascript, which means the browser doesn’t necessarily want to do a re-load in case that’s happening.

@Katamount:
There was an article I saw recently (which is on my other computer so I can’t link to it right now) which tied together the level of entitlement seen with Captain Marvel with the recent Kickstarter someone had to digitally remove the rat from the final scene of The Departed in terms of (a loud portion of) the audience insisting that they know the story better than the people writing it.

Gaebolga
Gaebolga
5 years ago

@Katamount

Speaking as a long-time fan of Battle Angel Alita, I’m also puzzled by the whinebro’s embrace of the movie; neither the movie nor the source material are particularly sympathetic to their worldview. One of the consistent themes in the original run of the manga was about Alita breaking free of the roles that others tried to put her in.

Ironically, in the second run — Last Order — a copy of Alita decides to become male (and renames himself Sechs), and you know the whinebors would absolutely lose their shit over that….

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

@Surplus
Once again, the correct response when people offer you help and tips is not to yell at them about how inconvenient those solutions are to you.

Herbert West
Herbert West
5 years ago

Well, it’s nothing new that they, for some reason, embrace anime that either contradict their worldview, or even outright denounce it as evil.
A really bad example we could see here a while ago was using an edited pitcure form Kiniro Mosaic for some right-wing twitter shit I think, I don’t remember anymore, except that it was ironic to use KM there. That show’s basically about a japanese and a british girl who are enamoured with each other cultures (and each other, too).
This is ridiculously common amongst them, and I have no idea why.

Cat Mara
Cat Mara
5 years ago

OT: please enjoy these droll webcomics