By David Futrelle
It’s getting outright genocidal over there in the Braincels subreddit.
Yesterday, one incel Redditor by the name of numbnow suggested, without a trace of irony, that the world would be a much better place if women were to be literally eliminated.
“Can You Imagine A World of Men Working Together With Eugenics?” he asked in a creepily cheerful post on the subject.
Imagine if the human species became a race of men; divorced of the female gender.
The world as one giant incel circlejerk. What an utter joy to contemplate.
I think that the blackpill will be looked on as equivalent to the enlightenment era in later centuries tbh. One day we will have a civilization that fully acknowledges and accounts for this knowledge, women won’t vote, they might not even exist anymore aside from AI.
This guy takes the “sexbots will replace women” line literally.
Just imagine the accomplishments which we could attain without the female. We could be exploring other worlds already; seeding our species throughout the cosmos. No drama, no bullshit.
Dude, I don’t know if you’ve heard of a thing called “history,” but men have basically been in charge of human civilization for several thousand years, and, uh, there has been rather a lot of drama and bullshit.
Just imagine a race of genetically specialized Ubermensch completing the dreams of man.
The only “dream” the typical incel has is to complain about women rejecting them 24 hours a day. After getting rid of sleep, these “genetically specialized Ubermenschen” of Incel Planet would probably have to genetically recreate women so that that they’ll have someone to complain about.
No inequality, just a civilization of brotherhood and betterment throughout the universe. What a beautiful cope..
Numbnow’s grand plan got a mixed reaction from his fellow incel Redditors. But most seemed to like the idea of using eugenics to defeat the evil “foids” — aka “femoids,” aka “women.”
One suggested that the aspiring Ubermenschen could achieve many of the same results by simply engineering women to have lower standards when it comes to men.
“I would support using eugenics to eradicate hypergamy in foids,” proposed JucheforWhitePeople.
We could create a breed of loyal, compassionate foids. After foids have dictated sexual selection for aeons and caused countless men to suffer, I think such actions are more than justified.
After stopping foids from breeding with dark triad sociopaths, we could also solve so many problems, such as all the war and crime in the world. They only exist because foids like these thugmaxed men.
Yes, the guys proposing to either eliminate women or to somehow reprogram them to put up with any amount of bullshit from their male partners still somehow think of themselves as the good guys. Because that’s the incel way.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
I know this will drown in the sea of reason that’s s already been poured out regarding incels, but: female humans are not a separate species from male humans. Not a separate breed. If you somehow breed women to be docile slaves, then you’re doing the same to men. It just, it just doesn’t work like that!!
@Kereea
Back when I played 40k I always thought the Spess Marines were pretentious and poorly balanced and took great pleasure in reclaiming their biomass to feed the Great Devourer.
How are these guys planning to spread their seed across the universe without women? Do they think a fledgling space colony could produce artificial wombs, let alone sexbots of the caliber that they probably want? And where are they planning on getting female DNA? That was a problem in Ethan of Athos, btw – the men there had a limited amount of female DNA, & were getting inbred as a result. (Its been a while since I’ve read the book, so please correct me if I’m wrong.)
I’m assuming that once they kill us all off, they will continue killing baby girls as they are conceived (however that happens). What will that do to the “pro-life” people, who are mostly male? Who will care for babies? The sexbots? Or will they make nannybots? Yet another drain on colonial economies. This will not work – something I hope they realize before they commence with the genocide. It occurs to me that if men kill off women, that they will have to take on our traditional roles, thus becoming women…
(I posted a comment on this earlier but it seems to have been eaten– or in moderation?) Has anyone read The Iron Dream by Norman Spinrad? This incel bullshit could’ve come straight out of it.
(Spoilers follow)
Spinrad wrote The Iron Dream back in 1972 because of his concern at what he saw was an acceptance of right-wing tropes in SF and fantasy. The conceit of the novel-within-a-novel is that it is a work of fantasy by Adolf Hitler (!) who in a parallel universe emigrated to America after the Munich Beer Hall Putsch and became first an SF illustrator and then a pulp writer. It is deliberately lurid, badly-written, has a Mary Sue protagonist, and is terrible in every way Spinrad can make it. Then, to turn the troll-level up to 11, he closes it with a fake essay from a psychologist in the parallel universe who mentions the inexplicable popularity of Hitler’s work among SF fans, how they cosplay his characters at conventions (!), and how deeply psychologically disturbed it all is. In an early example of how some things never change, Spinrad had complaints from fashy-leaning SF readers about spoiling a good yarn with “politics” ?, while the American Nazi Party apparently had it on their reading list for years, not realising it was satire!
The novel takes place on a far-future, post-apocalyptic Earth populated by mutant abominations where in only the nation of Heldon (the German word for “hero”) is the “true human genotype” to be found. But after a genocidal war with the Dominators, the novel’s stand-in for (((you know who))), the Dominators succeed in finding and detonating an ancient nuclear device, blanketing the world in fallout and ensuring that the human race will never breed true again. But all is not lost! The scientists of Heldon perfect human cloning, ensuring the human race will continue in the form of blond Aryan supermen (and it is only men; there are literally no women characters in the novel), forever! The novel finishes with the Earth conquered by Heldon and them planning to, er, “fecundate the stars” in a scene of hilariously grotesque imagery:
???? ?
@Bonelady
Not quite; they had been growing ovae in cultured ovaries, but those only last so long, even in high tech nutrient baths etc. So they need a bunch of fresh ovaries. The failure of this shipment to arrive is what sends poor Ethan out into the hostile universe.
@Bonelady
Presumably they think the Tleilaxu from Dune are a model worthy of emulation.
(Spoiler alert: All Tleilaxu women are converted into bioreactors.)
@Snowberry:
Yeah, there’s a great old quote from the 1960s:
I don’t think that they’ve ever put an incel on the moon, but, hey, it’s worth a moonshot.
@ crip dyke
Well there is that moon of Saturn; the one that looks to have a sub-surface ocean.
@Crip Dyke:
Of course not! I believe space agencies are very meticulous and thoroughly disinfect their craft before they fly to ensure there is no risk of microbial contamination of the landing site! ?
(With apologies to microbes everywhere, of course, for the unwarranted comparison to incels)
We already have the technology to do without men completely. It could be as simple as collecting semen from each young man before… well, getting rid of them. Maybe send them to Mars to have a nice female-free society.
Or perhaps using stem cells (or manipulating extra ova) to create sperm cells from females, thus eleminating the Y chromosome altogether.
No, I’m not in favor. I rather like most men, faults and all. I admit that finding a solution to the the societal ills that have created the modern incel would be nice. They are the victims of technological change that has been too fast for our culture to keep up with and our culture has changed enormously*. I believe their misery is real, even if it is hard to care because they are so fucking poisonous.
Until we solve that problem, my advice to the miserable incels is “Get off the fucking computer and go for a walk, for fuck’s sake”.
*Just understand, when I was a little girl, I wanted to be a cop. I was patted on my silly little head by everyone but my dad, who pointed out that I was probably going to be too small, but that if that was what I wanted I should go for it. Or to put it another way, I was an adult when the first video game was invented.
Daddy longarms:
Good point. I just was thinking of a more imminent issue, namely that in order to breed future generations of cooperative women, you’d need the cooperation of the current generation of women. It’s kind of a chick and egg problem…
Ugh. Exterminationist MRAs legit terrify me, and I consider ideologies like theirs a very real and present threat. A world without women really is one of my fears for where our future is headed. (Along with many, many other forms of eugenics and slow genocide.)
I mean, I’m also quite paranoid about men’s motives. (See: PTSD.) But the distance from objectification to genocide is not as great as most privileged folk like to think, and genetic engineering is a thing now.
@Kereea
Oh gods 40K, I hate that franchise and much of its fan base with a passion. For those who haven’t heard, it’s where “God Emperor Trump” comes from.
Well, given that the distinction between the male and female sex generally lies in their sperm, and before that, permeates every cell of their body including the ones used to make sperm, I really don’t know how they’re going to achieve this lofty aim. I can’t imagine how to engineer a man to produce sperm with only Y-chromosomes. And I believe you need X-chromosomes in your other cells to be alive, e.g. there is no YY, although there is XYY (but I could be wrong about that).
And in response to the point above:
Yes, this. It’s possible to imagine breeding men to be more or less docile, or whatever, by messing with the Y-chromosome, but any genetic material that’s in women is potentially also in men.
PS. I realize there are some exceptions to these generalizations, but I’m going to assume our genocidal friends are not factoring them into any plans they might make.
The Y-chromosome is a crumbling little vestigial architecture, with a higher than normal mutation rate and a host of issues. It’s not some sort of all-powerful information carrier that carries What It Is To Be Man on it. It’s just got some information on it that informs hormone production as far as I’m aware.
All of the heavy lifting is – you guessed it – on the X-chromosome. Because all of the chromosomes are X-chromosomes, because that’s the shape of a chromosome, sex-based or otherwise. “Breeding docility into women” would absolutely breed it into men as well, because we’re the same damn species.
People with Y-chromosomes are more vulnerable to mutations resulting in cancer or disease because they don’t have that second X hanging around to correct for a fault in the first. The Y sucks!
I guess this is good news overall, though. These dickbutts aren’t gonna have much luck at engineering their all-male society with their grade 11 biology.
@Cyborgette
I lovbe 40k, but I recognize that it isn’t for everyone, and I completely understand what you mean about some of its fans.
For those unfamiliar with it, Warhammer 40,000 is a science fiction setting with the tagline “In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war.” It is a hellish nightmare where the human Imperium is a theocratic, fascist dystopia and the aliens are even worse.
The appeal comes from the deliberately over-the-top nature of its “grimdark” approach to everything. The guiding design principle is basically “heavy metal album covers on steroids.”
But some people take it at face value and think that the Imperium is the Good Guys, when one of the themes of the setting is that There Are No Good Guys (well, maybe the Salamanders).
The “God-Emperor Trump” thing is a good example of this. The God-Emperor of Mankind is an incredibly powerful psychic who reunited mankind, but whose dreams of a new order failed and who is left as a rotting carcass on life support while his empire slowly dies around him in in a grotesque parody of everything he stood for.
Someone looked at that and went “Yes, that is clearly how I should regard Dear Leader, rather than a warning about putting your faith in demagogues.”
@Pen:
Yeah, the Y chromosome is missing quite a few vital gene sequences (it’s why it’s visibly smaller than the X under a microscope and it’s what gives it its name) so that even if a YY zygote ever were to form, as far as I understand it, it would not be viable after more than a couple of cell divisions.
The way bio-essentialists go on, you’d swear that the Y-chromosome was some kind of essence of masculinity, like if you looked at it under a strong enough microscope, it’d be bright blue, wearing a little sports-team jersey, and holding a brewski in its tiny arm or something ?. This is pseudo-vitalist bullshit: in reality, there’s only a handful of genes on it that are actually responsible for producing male sex characteristics. The most important of these is the SRY gene which instructs the proto-gonad tissue in the foetus to start developing into testes and kicks off a developmental cascade that in most cases results in a male human. But it’s possible for someone with an XX karyotype to end up with a copy of the SRY gene. The opposite can also occur; a person can have an XY karyotype but their copy of the SRY gene is deleted or fails to express for some reason. This is in addition to conditions like X0, XXY, XYY, etc.
@Scildfreja Unnyðnes:
Don’t forget the colour-blindness either. ☹️ Don’t have it myself but I know a few people who do.
(Aside: one of my first encounters with trans folks online was a long-defunct Web site back in the 90s that checked your own site’s accessibility for people with various forms of colour-blindness. Very useful but my first reaction was, “why is this site run by a woman? Women don’t get colour-blindness!” Bless my twentysomething heart ?)
@Cat Mara:
OT: I have seen this absolutely everywhere, and I just gotta wonder, what IS it with programmers and this incessant god-complex? What makes them think they’re so special?
This whole “we create amazing things from NOTHING!! WE ARE LIKE GODS!!” (literally what some fellow alumni have said) needs to burn in a fire and die. Programmers would be nothing more than nerdy outcasts if it weren’t for the electrical engineers who create the circuit boards that make up a physical computer, and electrical engineers would have nothing to work with were it not for chemists, scientists, etc who advanced work in metallurgy and electricity. Programmers are no better or more amazing than anyone else, and they rely on other people/occupations just like everyone else.
Like seriously, where did this hubris-large-enough-to-cause-gravitational-lensing even come from?
‘Come back to the Gay Planet soon, incels!’
@Cat: I’ve not only read The Iron Dream, I have a copy, and alluded to same book in an earlier post.
It’s got a misaimed fandom among the American Nazi Party because of course it does…
Have you read any other Spinrad? Bug Jack Barron and Child of Fortune were entertaining.
Jane Done – well put. I’ve occasionally wondered what people with the capacity for programming skills did before the Post-industrial Revolution. Nothing particularly earth-shaking, is my guess.
@Jane Done:
In fairness to Fred Brooks, when he made that “builds from pure thought-stuff” quote, he was saying, “this is a bug, guys, not a feature!”; sorry if my quoting of him didn’t make that clear. You won’t get any argument about their being a surfeit of tech-bro hubris in this world, from me or from Brooks. In fact, he called them out on in back in the 80s when it wasn’t nearly as bad as it is now in a famous paper called “No Silver Bullet” that he issued as a challenge to the tech-bros. In summary his argument was, “you guys are on crack. You talk about all these new methodologies and new programming languages but I bet you that by the end of the decade, we won’t even see a 10% improvement on the delivery of big software project in terms of them coming in late, over-budget, or not at all. Prove me wrong, arseholes.” Well, he was dragged for this in the computer press. He was called a crank, a relic from the mainframe days, etc. The hotshots of the PC revolution would put this old geezer in his place! Guess what? He was right. He’s still right.
My take-away from Brooks is that when someone who works in another creative discipline has a job to do, there are certain constraints that are dictated by the laws of physics. When an architect, for example, executes a commission to build a house, there are a whole slew of possibilities they can immediately discount because the laws of gravity makes them impossible on the surface on the Earth given the materials we have to hand. This also places an upper limit on how long it will take for the house to be built. Computer programming, in comparison, is much more of a tabula rasa: there are no “laws of physics” as such inside the computer. The tech-bros have elevated this into some sort of proof of their own awesomeness, like they have anything to do with it– Brooks, on the other hand, points out that this lack of constraints, the endless malleability, just makes it harder to figure out how long it’s going to take to do anything. And people underestimate, badly: I’ve seen a quote from Margaret Hamilton which suggests that MIT didn’t even bother to send in an initial estimate to NASA for how long the software was going to take for the Apollo Flight Computer because how long would it take, really? Sure, it’s only software! The hardware is the difficult bit, right?
My opinion? A cheerleading and complicit press who will kiss the arse of anyone with money. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs, all tech-bros, all billionaires; therefore, they’re doing something right. Listen to them, for they are wise and good ?. Forget that they have done actual crimes, just look at the size of those wallets! Software is eating the world, y’all, and you could be eaten first!
My perspective on this, as a woman who is a programmer:
Ever since the 80s there have been these messages about elite programmers/hackers in the media. On top of that it’s a profession that was invaded by men and given the title “engineer” despite most programmers not actually doing any engineering (we’re lucky if they spend 5 minutes thinking before they dive in and start tinkering), so they have this illusion of prestige that the work just plain doesn’t fit. Add to that the vast majority of them (IME) are from middle to upper class backgrounds, so they’re used to being treated like some kind of god.
@Nequam:
I’ve read Bug Jack Barron. It’s fun, though very much of its time (a lot of the racial stuff in it probably wouldn’t pass muster nowadays), but not Child of Fortune. There’s a couple others of his I’ve picked up secondhand over the years: The Void Captain’s Tale, Between Two Worlds (both of which are quite feminist in theme), No Direction Home (a collection of short stories) and Little Heroes (a vaguely cyberpunk-y one). He’s still writing, or was, though I think he self-publishes now.
We’ll have to get an open thread for SF…
@ cat mara
Not that they were any better on the hardware side.
As I’m sure you know, when the team building the command module asked MIT for the physical specs of the computer so they could incorporate it into the design, MIT just plucked a figure from nowhere because they’d never bothered to work it out.
Hence it being “Er, it’s a one foot cube…”
(I like that the command module team had such little confidence in MIT that they decided to incorporate a sextant into the design)