By David Futrelle
Well, this little joke went over well on Twitter so I thought I’d post it here too.
Here’s one that didn’t go over quite as well. But it might just come to haunt your dreams.
I saw this so now you have to see it too pic.twitter.com/mSHcWXj6ou
— David Futrelle (@DavidFutrelle) August 15, 2018
Some good-ass tweets by people who aren’t me:
https://twitter.com/maddc8/status/1029184821329833986
https://twitter.com/BoringEnormous/status/1028321380213907458
Somebody waited their whole life to write this serial number pic.twitter.com/WxnKJwVbHw
— WendigoPBFox (@tmaxxnc) August 14, 2018
Accidentally shitting yourself vs. Defiantly shitting yourself to own the libs. pic.twitter.com/HIGCYuP1dJ
— Sir Woofingtons (@Sir_Woofingtons) August 15, 2018
Are you willing to grant unicorns the same rights as tiddily-winks, Steph?
Why are you dodging the question?
@gaebolga
If this is the case (which very obviously it is not) why can you not come out and say that men and women have equal rights to marry?
Really. This would be the simplest thing would it not?
You cannot do it can you?
It sticks in the throat. The fingers cannot type..
You.. just…cannot…say….it.
@London Pilgrim
So I’ve always been curious about what motivates someone to rape goats. I just don’t understand why someone feels the need to do that.
Since you seem to be a rather prolific goat-raper, perhaps you could explain it to me. Why do you do it?
@Gaebolga
I meant ban them from this page. He’s just inventing nonsense and trolling. I don’t really see the benefit to him being here imo.
He’s tiresome with his lies.
@London.
Quote the person on this board who thinks men who don’t wish to marry are incels and women who don’t wish to marry are empowered princesses.
Name them, quote them or stop lying. You haven’t asked me a question you just keep making stuff up.
Somebody ban him.
@Steph
Ah, gotcha.
I wonder if LP/RF is actually trying to find someone on WHTM who said the shit he claims we say.
It would be pretty fucking pathetic if the troll doesn’t even know he’s lying….
Of course.
@Moon
Thank you
@Moon Custafer
I think a better question is “when didn’t we?”
And LP/RF obviously can’t answer that one.
@LP/RF
Still can’t provide evidence that anyone on this board has ever said that women should have the right not to marry but men shouldn’t, I see.
Just keep on raping goats, dumbass.
@London Pilgrim
Kinda hard to accomplish this though when you experience debate and mild criticism from women as an insult, and repeatedly ignore basic questions.
It’s also kinda hard to slap somebody through the internet. I’m curious, when have you experienced actual physical violence from a feminist (a real one, not the boogeyman kind that only you can see)?
And it’s also hard to have an honest debate when you have the positions of feminism and the right wing exactly reversed. Here in the US, the right wing has spent the last 50 years systematically dismantling a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body. Jordan Peterson thinks it would be swell if women had less choice about whether to get married. Incels literally think women should be punished for sleeping with the wrong person. You (and numerous others) argue that sexual freedom causes the downfall of civilization and should be suppressed. These are all well documented right wing positions. Feminism opposes them. I don’t even understand how you can call yourself pro choice, unless you’re talking about men only.
@Gaebolga:
I know, but since London Pilgrim asked me directly, I didn’t want to grant an excuse to say “well everyone’s answered my question *except* moon custafer, so I’m going to say the question stands.”
He’s a liar, and he’s here in bad faith.
He can’t even point to anyone on this site who has ever said that women should have the right not to get married but men shouldn’t, and yet he claims that that’s what we say.
And, ironically, early on he was all torqued up about people putting words in his and Jordan Peterson’s mouths.
Typical right winger: dishonest and hypocritical. And obvious about it.
That’s the first pin in; the second will hopefully hold things fast for stitching.
I will reply to you a bit later; relatives are here and I like making an effort in hosting. Until then, I’ll assume you didn’t contend any of my points you left unmentioned.
You wield Ockham’s razor well, but wield it against shadows. A tragically common skill. A shame, really.
Back later!
@Gaebolga
I have given you no less than five chances to retract your personal implication and yet you have failed to do so. Your only response has been to call me a goat raper with no evidence offered.
The implication seems to be that the only reason a man might not marry is that he prefers raping goats. Naturally you do not say this about women and so my point is proved.
@London Pilgrim/Robert Ford
What the fuck are you talking about?
“Raping goats” means making extraordinary claims and refusing to provide any evidence to support them, even when asked to do so.
You’ve been doing nothing but raping goats since you started posting here.
I have never said or implied that you not being married has any relationship whatsoever to your habit of raping goats, and I’m not even sure how the two relate.
But you just keep right on raping goats, fuckstain.
i like goats :c
@scildfreja
Mmmm I am not sure if I should admit to liking them too.
Does London Trollgrim not realize that this blog is owned and authored by an unmarried man? And we don’t call him an incel or a misogynist? In fact, the only ones who have disparaged his relationship status are the manuresphere trolls who say he’s only pro feminist because he can’t get laid.
@London Pilgrim/Robert Ford
As for evidence that you rape goats, I point to your claim that the people on this site say that women should have the right not to get married and men shouldn’t. You have repeatedly made this claim, and yet you haven’t provided a single piece of evidence to support that claim despite being asked repeatedly to do so.
So, prima facie evidence that you are a goat raper.
Another non sequitor; what does liking goats have to do with anything?
Troll has an argument style that’s like a hellish combination of Gish and Trump. Make a million different points and lie about absolutely everything.
Is there a funny name for that? A Cheetoh gallop?
@gaebolga
Take a cold shower and be kind to yourself.
@Scildfreja – Thanks! That was helpful, and I learned a new term. 🙂
The “stream of consciousness” thing: in a post about Peterson you used the expression it in the colloquial way, and I explained the literary meaning*. When I looked back on my explanation, I found it show-offy, like “Watch me! I have the specific (otherwise rather useless) knowledge to explain this literary term!!” 😀
*It means narrating a story as if recording a character’s thoughts and impressions; people also use it to mean writing whatever comes into their heads. Use 1 is more “correct” but Use 2 also makes sense, since the term originates in psychology as “a person’s thoughts and conscious reactions to events, perceived as a continuous flow” (thanks, Wikipedia).
…
@London Pilgrim – Okay, that last comment made me laugh. 😀 But surely you can see that Gaebolga’s claim isn’t a serious accusation, but a send-off of you making claims without evidence.
You were saying that the commenters on this blog held a “double standard” about men and women. There’s no evidence for this except for a stereotype you (apparently) believe about feminism. People told you straight out that they don’t think an unmarried man is less worthy than an unmarried woman.