Categories
Uncategorized

Evo psych prof takes the delusions of Reddit’s dateless dudes as facts — and produces a study only an incel could love

This survey of people I agree with proves I’m right!

By David Futrelle

If you were to ask one Reddit’s self-described “involuntary celibates” just why they were celibate, they would probably give you an answer something like this: Because I’m ugly and short and a socially awkward loser, and in today’s terrible world “Chads” get all the chicks — though back in the good old days I would have been assigned a wife through some sort of arranged marriage or something and thus I wouldn’t be alone and mad and, oh, by the way, women are a bunch of worthless whores.

Apparently these views are held pretty widely on Reddit. In a new paper, Menelaos Apostolou, an Associate Professor of Evolutionary Psychology at Cyprus’ University of Nicosia, looked at a Reddit mega-thread devoted to the question: “Guys, why are you single?”

With help from several other researchers, Apostolou sorted and categorized the 13,429 comments that attempted to directly answer the question, discovering that dateless Reddit dudes were most likely to conclude that they were dateless because they were ugly and/or short and/or socially awkward losers. Typical comments included:

Cause I am ugly as fuck and have been cursed with awful genetics.

Being under 6′0″ means I am invincible to women.

Because I have massive self-esteem issues, I think I’m worthless, and I don’t do social things because I don’t want to inflict my stupid, worthless presence on other people.

If I remotely have a crush on you I’m probably gonna be really fucking awkward. 

Sounds a bit like the Braincels subreddit, minus the extreme misogyny.

It’s not clear how many respondents, if any, commented on “Chad’s” relative dating success, but Apostolou felt the need to inject it into the discussion, not as an incel obsession but as a simple statement of fact, declaring that “men who are … good looking may choose not to commit to a long-term relationship, but choose instead to have many different casual relationships.” (Guess what, dude? Men who are not conventionally attractive can do that too.)

Apostolou also brings up the arranged marriage issue, noting that men who are bad at flirting suffer in the contemporary world, in which people seek out partners themselves. “We can ask whether in a pre-industrial context, where marriages were arranged and/or male-male competition was strong, these same men would be single,” Apostolou writes,

The answer is most probably no. Flirting skills were irrelevant because men did not have to flirt with women: Wives were either provided by parents or obtained through force.

No wonder so many guys today are bad at flirting, Apostolou suggests: Evolution hasn’t prepared them for it!

[I]n an ancestral pre-industrial context, the selection pressures on flirting skills would be weak, resulting in many of our ancestors having poor capacity for flirting. This capacity has passed to contemporary generations who live in post-industrial societies. 

And they. Apostolou  suggests, are kind of screwed.

Apostolou isn’t just reporting what Reddit dudes think are the reasons they can’t get dates. He’s basically accepting their explanations as fact, and adding some convenient “evo psych” rationales to buttress their arguments.  He’s taking the skewed perceptions of Reddit’s single men and treating them like scientific insights.

He is certainly aware that a Reddit thread is not a scientific or demographically representative survey,  and that there is no proof that any of the answers given are actually true. He mentions both of these issues in his paper. But in the end he concludes that most of the respondents were probably telling the truth and that’s good enough for him. “We think … that most people have an accurate understanding of what drives them to be single,” he writes, “so this is not a major bias.”

Really? Because after spending nearly ten years reading (if not always posting on) Reddit, with much of my attention in recent years devoted to incels and MGTOWs and other dudes who can’t find dates (or who claim that they don’t want to), I would have to say that I am a little bit less convinced that Reddit dudes “have an accurate understanding of what drives them to be single.”

Well, that was a bit of deliberate understatement. I’m convinced that a pretty hefty chunk of Reddit’s single men have no fucking clue why they’re single. Incels are convinced that they are too ugly to date women, who only want to date the absolute handsomest of men. Neither of these things are true. When incels post pictures of themselves online to “prove” to the world what horrible ugly freaks they are, most of them look just fine. And women date less-than-perfect-looking guys all the time.

Hell, some of the most romantically successful guys I’ve known have included a pudgy goofball with a weird baby face, a guy with a cleft palate, and a short grouchy schlub who rarely shaved. A former roommate basically lived the life of an incel until his mid-twenties when he suddenly found himself dating a series of women most people would have assumed were out of his league. (And no, he didn’t learn “game”; this was more than a decade before any of that crap.) A friend of one of my close relatives is happily married to a lovely woman even though his face was burnt off by acid when he was four.

Some of these guys succeeded because they’re smart and funny and confident and genuinely decent people; the others, well, I’ve never been able to figure out what women see in them. But they share one thing in common: Seeing only their pictures, Incels would classify them all as ugly “subhumans” destined to spend their lives alone. And they would be wronger than wrong.

Apostolou’s study was posted online only a few days ago by the journal Evolutionary Psychological Science (note to self: do not subscribe to Evolutionary Psychological Science), and it’s already being discussed in the subreddits populated by Reddit’s angriest single men — where it’s seen as belated scientific proof for the incel worldview.

Not that they’ve given Apostolou much credit for coming to the same conclusions they came to long ago. While some took issue with the way the study was being framed — in a way that focused on the social awkwardness issue and downplayed the issue of looks (the incel obsession) — others complained that it was little more than a restatement of what to them seemed obvious.

Pointing to Apostolou’s discussion of arranged marriages, one Braincels commenter sneered: “I have been saying this for YEARS you hack.”

“Another groundbreaking study from the academic journal of No Shit, Sherlock” wrote a commenter in r/ForeverAlone.

If your “scientific” study simply reiterates the accepted, er, “wisdom” of some of the internet’s most hateful and deluded men, you might want to think twice about publishing it. Hell, you should probably reconsider your entire career.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Violet the Vile, Moonbat Screech Junky
Violet the Vile, Moonbat Screech Junky
2 years ago

@Catalpha

Ah, you have given me some real food for thought there. I really like what you said about forgiveness. “Forgivable by whom?” is a great point. After all society as a whole is a great deal more likely to be “forgiving”, in the sense of forgetting and moving on, of a rape than the actual person who got raped is.

And you are absolutely right about the quest for forgiveness. Demands for “forgiveness” can be just as much an assault on someone as the original attack, because essentially the person who committed the assault is once again demanding that the assaulted person do what they want (ie forgive them when they feel they ought to be forgiven, with no regard to the feelings of the person they hurt) Demanding someone “forgive” is just another way of breaking someone’s boundaries. It’s not really something you can ask for, is it?

Violet the Vile, Moonbat Screech Junky
Violet the Vile, Moonbat Screech Junky
2 years ago

@WWTH

What scares me is how there seems to be this almost universal consensus among men that any of them could, if the circumstances were right, turn into a virulent misogynist.

Yes, that scares me too. There’s this strange dismissal/minimisation reflex people have about misogyny, even progressive people, and I genuinely don’t think they know they’re doing it.

When I was at college a while ago, there was a girl there, Kate, who had a boyfriend but also flirted with this one guy Tom. Just after our finals…something happened. Tom said they had sex. I heard, second-hand, that Kate said he had raped her.

What astonished me was the immediate, knee-jerk reaction that Kate was a lying liar. From everyone in my class. Not just the men, but the women as well, including some very progressive women. It was instant – they literally met the disclosure with “Oh no, that’s not possible.” It was immediate, unanimous, and it was scary as hell.

I honestly don’t think one of them even considered the idea she might be telling the truth.

For what it’s worth, I utterly believe that little turd was a rapist. But Kate didn’t come to the graduation ceremony, and I never saw her again.

She was very pretty. I think there was an element of they thought she should be taken down a peg or two in it. Because god forbid a woman should be pretty, and bright, and flirt with a man who is not her boyfriend.

I think that reflex is part of it. I think misogyny is so normalised that people don’t even understand it as an attitude. They don’t understand that the idea “any man could turn into a violent misogynist” is terrifying. It’s how they think the world actually works. They think it’s fine.

Nanny Oggs Busom
Nanny Oggs Busom
2 years ago

An evo psych article being full of nonsense? I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!

*snerk*

I agreed to review a book earlier in the year by an evo psych writer. A psychiatrist with no training in evolutionary biology beyond reading ‘On the origin of species’ several decades ago, and then picking and choosing from writers that support his pre-existing beliefs, tried to give ‘complementarianism’ a scientific basis. It was painful to read and I had to be relatively polite in the review.

wolfkin
wolfkin
2 years ago

> > Why Men Stay Single? Evidence from Reddit

whoa whoa whoa you lost me at Evidence. That’s not evidence that’s opinions from Reddit. You actually COULD make a decent article on self perceptions of a subgroup but in no way it the ramblings of those losers evidence of anything except intent to harm.