Incel dating tip: Make women hate themselves by asking them out

I propose emailing david in the morning calling for feministguy ban time. No sense in sending david an email this late at night for a tedious lying troll unless one of yall beat me to it.

So feministguy, seeya! And YOU creep me out. Your behaviour is fucking rapetastic.

Edit: new evidence. Emailing david again.

I used to have a thing for Dana Carvey. I like little guys. Hal Sparks, Adam Scott, and Damon Albarn are maybe too handsome to be considered not conventionally attractive? But a big part of why I like them is that they have a smallness about them that I’m into. Carvey is for sure not a hottie by most standards though. Feeeemaaaales are supposed to only like big tall burly guys, so maybe that counts.

“And YOU creep me out. Your behaviour is fucking rapetastic.”

What?? Rape?? Where did I even remotely mention that rape was OK? I think rape is disgusting. What the fuck?

Ok am I the weird one here because I can’t see what Feministguy does that’s so horrible? Did I miss some crucial stuff he wrote? All I see are people piling on him while he seems to be trying to stay inoffensive?

Dvärghundspossen:

I haven’t followed that closely either, but seems that Feministguy has been mildly-but-persistently annoying in a way that gives off a trollish vibe. Especially in recent threads it’s been quite subtle, like he’s taking care to not get banned in a strongly moderated environment, despite his extensive refusal to accept criticism. Even when he says something agreeable and on-topic, it tends to be generic platitudes that come off like a cover for his sealioning.

It’s almost like we’re training a repeatedly banned veteran troll to build a credible feminist commenter persona, to the point that he eventually stops being a troll.

Alan:

Now I hear you say “But Al, she’s conventionally attractive”, and I would agree; I’d love to meet her. Unfortunately she died about 22,000 years ago.

Well, apparently her remains weren’t undateable.

Alan, what’s the status of forensic facial reconstruction in English law? I know that such reconstructions are not legally admissible as evidence in US law, because it’s as much art as science and different practitioners tend to produce different results.

In the case of modern humans, we know a lot about the musculature and fatty tissue to be expected, and yet there’s still that variation in the results. In the case of Neanderthals, presumably we’re mostly relying on speculation about that?

Here’s a paper, “Forensic Facial Reconstruction under Test”, by a forensic anthropologist, which talks about the subjectivity involved, albeit with students.

Reconstructions of Neanderthals are fascinating, but I do wonder whether a real Neanderthal would look at our results and say “what the fuck? How rude!”

Starfury, I find it hard to judge guys, but I think most people would say that David Tennant is conventionally attractive, particularly when he smiles.

@Dvärghundspossen

I can’t see anything either BUT I don’t spend lots of times in the comments so maybe he has been truly objectionable across multiple threads.

Here’s a paper, “Forensic Facial Reconstruction under Test”,

Ooh thanks for that Moggie; it was an interesting read.

I couldn’t think of any examples of facial reconstruction being used as evidence in a trial here; and Google doesn’t bring up any examples either. What I have seen happen is they’ve used facial reconstruction in missing person cases, and then once they have a possible ID, they confirm that with familial DNA, dental records, earlier x-rays etc. I have to say, the reconstructions do turn out to be remarkably accurate (although things like hairstyle, skin tone, eye colour etc make a big difference).

I suspect the Neanderthal reconstructions are a similarly accurate. We’ve gone from seperate species, to sub-species already; and I have no doubt as we learn yet more about Neanderthal anatomy and culture, even that distinction will vanish. They’re just people like the rest of us.

Animal reconstructions might be another matter though. Have you seen where they’ve applied the techniques they use on extinct animals to modern animals? The results are, well let’s say, surprising.

@feministguy

I’m not really interested in how rejection makes incels feel, tbh. Rejection is part of life for everyone. You just have to take it on the chin….what’s the alternative? I mean, it’s not like you can spend the rest of your life safely whining about how UNFAIR it is on the internet instead of taking risks and confronting your issues….oh wait

The only place incels face “constant rejection” is in their own heads. I’d bet my entire year’s salary all of them could get a date, if they were willing to get therapy, deal with their shit and actually risk trying to connect with women emotionally.

But it’s easier for them to keep their heads up their own asses, because that way they can blame feminists, society, Stacey, Chad, and the One-Armed Man for their own failures, right?

Or pretty much the entire thread on MGTOWs and Gandhi where we repeatedly explain to him the problem with saying that some guys are just too ugly to ever date or sex. He has a habit of asking questions and then entirely ignoring the answers and restating his original statements instead.

My trolldar was always going off with him, but when I asked him to stop asking us the same questions in multiple different threads, told him that ignoring the answers we took the time to write out was disrespectful and if he cares about respecting women and our boundaries, he’ll heed this request, and he told me that I couldn’t have boundaries that don’t involve sex, that was certainly the last straw for me.