By David Futrelle
In the Men’s Rights subreddit, the regulars only discuss the most important issues affecting men. Prostate cancer. Circumcision. When scientists will get around to developing some new technology that will render women obsolete — or that will at the very least make women feel really bad about themselves.
In one (sort of) recent discussion of the Obsolete Women Question on r/mensrights, one gay MRA called Eryemil, a real out-of-the-box thinker, suggests that it won’t take anything as fancy as a sexbots or artificial wombs to make women unnecessary. All that straight MRAs really need to do is to start having sex, not with women, but with each other.
There’s just one little roadblock: straight men generally don’t want to have sex with each other. But maybe science will find an answer!
All we have to do to completely take away women’s social power over men is to discover a means to allow men the choice to become bisexual.
Like, I guess, a Gay Pill, or some sort of Gayifying Machine?
At the moment women couldn’t hope to compete with men in terms of sexual desire and common interests; the only thing that gives them so much power is that straight men have no other choice.
Actually, there are lots of men who think of themselves as straight who have sex with men. But never mind.
The most beautiful thing about this is that I don’t think this would work in reverse (making women bisexual, if they aren’t already) because of women’s evolutionary derived meta values i.e. hypergamy.
So a Gayifying Machine won’t work on women because they love sweet, sweet man cash too much — and their fellow women don’t have enough bucks to make them worthwhile hosts to latch onto? Well, at least this is an acknowledgement that men tend to make a lot more money than women.
Even if only a minority decides to go through with it, it will leave heterosexual males with an elevated sexual market value by virtue of their relative scarcity. You’d have a society of hetero men with harems of women eager to please him (and probably making all the babies) and a bunch of bros hanging out with their buddies playing video games and sucking each other off.
Damn. If scientists can pull this off — er, maybe that’s not the ideal phrase to use in this context — it sounds like women are DOOOMED.
I don’t if there was a twin study on orientation or not. There were identical twins on a season of top model that had different orientations.
@Rabid Rabbit
I vaguely remember somewhere years ago (I think it was an intro to psychology or sociology textbook) paraphrasing a study showing that someone is much more likely to be gay if their twin is also gay, but it’s not 100% guaranteed. Sadly I didn’t pay attention to the name of the study.
Is this evidence of what the Ron Paul Institute calls “False Fags”?
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2018/april/17/false-fags-are-real-us-has-a-long-history-of-lying-to-start-wars/
“Alright, guys, back to the pile!”