By David Futrelle
Here’s a little lesson in vaginanonmics from a Man Going His Own Way who might, I suspect, be a little bit hungry.
Other MGTOWs agree: Once some guy eats a woman’s virginity peanut with his penis, she is no longer a tasty snack for any other man.
![[deleted] 16 points 1 year ago* Very true. As far as I'm concerned, any woman who's already experienced one cock is just as used as a full-blown slut. A lot of guys will hamster "Well, she's only had sex with 2 or 3 guys, which is a lot less than most girls these days!" When girls bring nothing to the table but their sexuality and their sexuality has already been enjoyed by another man, what do they have left to offer? permalinkembedsave [–]FuckTOW[S] 0 points 1 year ago Yeah those guys that hamster are nothing but CUCKS. CUCKS who are happy being cuckolded. Happy in their position as lesser men. One cocks all it takes. We live in the age of science, and even science agrees the strongest bond is with the first cock. If that cock was a one night stand / initiation into adulthood due to peer pressure / any excuse to take a cock before the right time means you've fucked yourself for life. Then the next cock is just another cock, is another cock, is another cock. It has no value therefore, for me, that pussy isn't worth jack shit](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/r78tf9yguho0ip.png?resize=580%2C564&ssl=1)
In addition to being peanuts who are also somehow sheep, women are of course parasites. Parasitic peanut sheep.
![FuckTOW[S] 13 points 1 year ago Women are worth a negative value as they literally are parasites. Emotionally mentally physically and financially they will take everything they can from a man.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/jhjjhjh.png?resize=469%2C292&ssl=1)
Stay safe out there, fellas! It’s a dangerous world, metaphorically speaking.
I haven’t exactly researched this, but my impression is that this crap has become far less common over time. You still have this nice guy trope where a guy who hangs around for long enough deserves the woman as a price, but these straight up rapey scenes are hard to find in more recent movies.
@Dvärghundspossen
There’s no misandrist like a misogynist.
Firstly, I googled Sheep Nuts to see where those were sold since I am a Chocoholic. I can agree with David that you don’t want to google those keywords.
OT:
I was talking to a friend about an anime… and he trailed weirdly into a pretty **detailed** screed/rant about his anticipation of upcoming sexbot technology.
… it was akin to seeing a buddy succumb to the effects of a zombie bite 🙁 .
Pardon my lateness, but wasn’t “rationalization hamsters” a thing with MRAs a while back? (metaphorical creatures running about in ladybrainz justifying all they do)
Turns out there’s a whole set of whtm posts tagged “hamstering”. It’s a pretty eclectic collection.
https://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/category/hamstering/
Sorry if this article has already come up in the comments, I’ve been too busy to read them recently.
https://newrepublic.com/article/147744/rise-male-supremacist-groups
Nothing very new there, but there is increasing mainstream awareness of the central role of misogyny in the current rise of the far right.
@Jo:
That’s a very interesting link, thanks. As you say, what’s new isn’t the story, but the paper publishing it.
One of the things I’ve been saying for a while is that our beloved host David has inadvertently made himself a world expert on what has accidentally become one of the most important malevolent forces in the modern world. People should be interviewing him.
Help me out, little MGTOW: Am I mutton? Or a husk?
Also, who are you to judge women — you wantonly mix your metaphors! Tsk.
@Kat – I pairbonded with that first metaphor. It stretched my mind out of shape and ruined me for all of the subsequent metaphors.
Until you get laid off, or become disabled, or have to take a pay cut, or retire, none of which *ever* happen to men!
I mean, it’s nice to be optimistic and assume that things will just keep getting better and better for you and worse and worse for your enemies, but the just-world fallacy rarely pans out. Life doesn’t follow a coherent narrative arc.
Yeah right, all men have jobs and all women just leach off of men.
My current job is fixed term that run out by June, but I have applied for a couple of tenured jobs that I might actually have a shot at. (I’ve interviewed for one of them and they only interviewed four people, but I won’t know if I get it until 24-25 of April or thereabouts.) If I get one of these jobs, my husband will quit his current very hard and stressful job and go back to being a student just for the fun of it. 🙂 Imagine that!
@Dvärghundspossen
That’s exciting news on the job front! Do please keep us posted.
I’m a contract academic myself (or as a friend describes us, drive-thru academics), currently with five separate contracts, which is fairly normal for the first half of the year. I don’t always love life in the precariat, but there’s no way I’d have someone else supporting me. Not sure where these guys get their knowledge of the world – oh wait, we already covered that 🙂
OT, but has anyone been following the unfolding HBomberguy story on Twitter today? It’s ugly as hell. And the person at the centre of it has been subjected to unrelenting abuse by fanboys.
Hasty disclaimer: I don’t know the full story or the extent of HBomb’s culpability; and I haven’t seen anything from him at this stage. But it’s getting real nasty.
@Mish: I’ll hold my thumbs (as we say here) that we both leave the precariat soon!
@Zaunfink,
Lord Rammington Codstroke there is referencing two things.
First is the whole “zombifying vagina goo” thing, where science shows the womz lady estrogens crawl up the mans donger and into his brain and make him her love slave! (It actually just shows that some chemicals in vaginal secretions trigger dopamine and endorphin production, which encourage pair bondings)
Second is the fact that orgasm also triggers dopamine and endorphin production, and orgasms while you’re young tend to more strongly have this effect. So “her first is her strongest! She’ll always be pair bonded to him the strongest!” (Not that dopamine or endorphins work that way in the slightest, but you know.)
Oh yeah, so, you remember that article way back ago where the mans were claiming that womz don’t have orgasms at all and that man-dudes shouldn’t worry about giving her the cumcums? (ugh, are these guys f’n six year olds?) Yeah, turns out that’s only true half the time. Other half the time, women have orgasms by having a penis waved in front of them, and they pair bond to its owner immediately.
In reality, orgasms give you a little burst of brain chemicals that make you feel nice, and that help you learn. End result is that it’s easier to emotionally bond after an orgasm. Happens to both men and women.
For men this has become the root of a bunch of “no masturbating, no pornography, don’t waste your manhood” movements in the nazis and the MRA and the moral-panic crowd; for women this has become … well, see the article above. Funny how everything turns into a reason to control and subjugate women, that.
As usual, they take a slice of actual science, exaggerate inappropriately, and then use it as a load-bearing beam in constructing their bilious tower of hate.
@Scildfreja Unnyðnes
*claps hands* That is brilliant!
It’s kinda funny how they talk about the only purpose of women is for teh secks and perpetuation of the species, and yet when science demonstrates just how the biological mechanisms might work (to support the procreation part of the argument), it’s all about conspiracy to control teh menz!
I dunno. It’s like they learned about the basic process of development of the embryo into fetus in high school biology, where sexual differentiation starts with the female development path then reroutes into the male development path, and then went “Nuh-uh! We were here first! Men rulz! It’s a conspiracy!” Like massive projection and overcompensation due to a ridiculous inferiority complex. Over basic biology that is socially and morally neutral but somehow the largest existential threat ever.
I know the first guy is talking about sex & virginity, but he also says women are only good for popping out babies, which makes the “monkey nuts” metaphor sound like he wants to eat a baby ?
shh, they might be listening!
It’s sort of funny. They claim to be ultra smart and know all the sciences but when you dig into what they actually claim, it’s all misinterpreted distortions of cherry-picked studies or badly-remembered high school biology. They know they’re smart (’cause they’ve always been told they’re smart), so they don’t even question the idea that their grade 11 biology course might possibly have been a micro-introduction to the topic with huge generalizations up and down it. No, they figure it’s the height of knowledge!
Speaking of: the idea of “we’re all female in the womb, then development makes some male!” is one of those high school generalizations. We’re undifferentiated at first and, without the presence of testosterone, sexual traits develop towards cis-female.
It’s sort of neat how that happens too! At that stage, the cells in question are impermeable to estradiol (estrogen), but not to testosterone. So if there’s sufficient testosterone around it will enter the cell, which then turns it to estradiol, which then does the estradiol thing inside the cell to masculinize it. (Testosterone and estradiol are chemically very similar; it’s just got a little wonk on the end between them and a little more hydrogen aside it. Take that how you will)
So next time those dorkuses womble on about manly testosterone and the horrors of soy? Feel free to remind them that estrogens (and phytoestrogens) are chemical relatives to testosterone and their digested products are perfectly suited for synthesizing their precious man-juice; and while you’re at it tell’em that all their manly man-bits were made because there was sufficient estrogen in their dongle-cells while they were in the womb.
Then put on your shades and walk away from explosions.
What a load of rubbish
Shaming people for how much sex they do or dont have is daft. These so called MGTOWS need to hang their heads in shame
@Mish:
Could you link me please? I’ve checked his twitter feed and it’s just Rick and Morty jokes.
I like Harris Bomberguy. I hope I don’t have to stop liking him.
@Feministguy:
Wasn’t that something you were doing in the other thread?
Nope, sex and money isnt indicator of whether a person is good or bad.
@ F is for Fro,
Try looking for “Bridge Mix”.
@Feministguy:
You’re still here?
@Mish
I had to unfollow HBomb after he went full BernieBro (it’s hard to take his self-proclaimed feminism seriously when half of his tweets are “HILLARY CLINTON IS WORSE THAN HITLER AND SATAN COMBINED” and/or “TRUMP-RUSSIA IS A HOAX”). What’d he do now?
“I always imagine this person at the end of their life with an Everyman-style review of their deeds and watching them try to justify all the time and effort they’ve devoted to being terrible, and all they have to show for it is a headstone destined to be overgrown and forgotten.”
That’s the penultimate scene in A Christmas Carol, which is a prime revenge fantasy if ever there was one.
http://www.biblicalcounselingthroughsong.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/RepentantScrooge.jpg”
(Added: now there’s a revenge fantasy that is a revenge fantasy, a revenge fantasy worthy of the name, and it’s as unlike the puling squalid attempts at revenge fantasies ones finds in the manosphere as brie is from butter).
@Z&T
Found some!!! Thank you!
*sigh* Alas, there is no better way to tell that a dude hasn’t done anything with his life than when he launches into a rant about how “dah menz built society”. Bob, sit down. You didn’t build jack shit. And you don’t get to appropriate the accomplishments of others just by virtue of them being the same gender as you.