Brave Redditor advocates for LGBTQAPWSITSOWMWEYAAMGTOWWBSB rights, minus the L

“I often though fried semen would make a good omelette but I guess it would be gay to eat your own jizz.”

Why yes, squeezeonein, as it so happens it is gay to eat your own jizz…but OTOH it is So Totally Not Gay to eat someone else’s jizz.

On contrary, it puts you on the high road to shitlordhood and alphadom. That’s a little-shared secret, and you heard it here. Now go forth, squeezeonein, and conquer. Do it for all our sakes, as well as your own.

{squeezes tears of wheezy laughter out of both eyes}

Hi IP!!!!! Great to see you again!

@bekabot

If they wanted to really stick it to the sexdoll-hating feminists, they’d dredge it with flour first, then roll in breadcrumbs afterwards.

*stifled laughter*

Zaunfink: Well, I only knew him very vaguely. He was really weird overall. A friend of mine, though, thought he was interestingly excentric and developed a crush on him. She was the one who told me that he once made an omelette with his own semen.

In the future….
Sexbot- “I’m leaving you Paul”
MGTOW- “but I designed you to be mine!!” who is it you vile female?”
Sexbot-“your toaster Paul, she has always been kind to me unlike you.. “

(The following will conflate sex and gender for simplicity’s sake)

When women are framed as a tool necessary for male reproduction, sometimes you get the impression that the very existence of the human female is somehow supposed to be conditional on this reproductive use. Like, when we finally have artificial wombs (and stem cell eggs, I suppose), women will simply disappear like some obsolete technology nobody wants to buy or manufacture.

Now, in reality women exist because roughly half of human embryos spontaneously develop on the female pathway. And, obviously, both sexes are (currently) equally necessary for each other’s reproduction.

Now, we’re already increasingly able to select the sex of our children, and it has resulted in some “deficit” of women China and India because families (usually consisting of a mother and father) favor sons over daughters. This deficit is known to be a problem for the society, when heterosexual pairing is still very much considered a practical and normative necessity. However, families seem to expect some other family will raise a daughter to marry their son – and if not, they can’t do anything to help that.

However, in developed societies (including, increasingly, urban middle class China and India, I think?) there doesn’t seem to be particular preference for either sex. Presumably, this would also apply if we stopped using female bodies (or male bodies) for reproduction. So people would still have both sons and daughters.

Now, it’s faintly possible that men with access to independent reproduction might indeed collectively abandon women, if they’d rather live and raise children with robots. Would the men still want to raise daughters along with sons? Possibly not.

More interesting question is, would the the men want to raise enough sons to sustain the male population? Even with sophisticated robotic help? Maybe, but who knows.

Presumably, in that scenario, women would also be able to reproduce independently – actually it could be a case of women actively segregating themselves from men rather the other way round. Then, If it’s actually true that women are indeed naturally more interested in raising children, the whole human reproduction would disproportionately depend on women (and their robotic help).

More to the point, the survival of the male sex might actually depend on whether women still want to raise sons along with daughters.

It looks like there’s laws on the books in some states to give the death penalty for drug trafficking but since it hasn’t been applied no one has taken it to court so the legality might be up in the air. Is that about right?

I’d also be interested to know what the details of this proposal are. If Trump even thought of any. How much drug would have to be trafficked and which drugs specifically? How much is it going to cost to put a ton more on death row. He also seems to only want this apply to drugs coming in from Mexico. Are domestic drug traffickers exempt? Are sham “pain clinics” that exist to prescribe pain pills to anyone asking for it exempt? Are the owners of pharmacies that act as fronts for dealing pain pills (a thing that exists in places like West Virginia) exempt?

The classic anti-drug commercial (US category, 1980’s):

https://youtu.be/3FtNm9CgA6U

Any questions?

XD

Good afternoon everyone! I come bearing gifts of salt from 4chan!

https://imgur.com/a/t3XeP

PD: what’s the code for posting images?

You know, if the courts rule that causing a death indirectly by trafficking drugs is death penalty eligible, wouldn’t that open up a whole can of worms? Like, if an energy company is negligent with worker safety and miners die, couldn’t the execs responsible be given the death penalty? That kind of thing? Whether that would realistically happen, probably not, but it seems like in theory polluters and owners of companies that neglect workplace safety and owners of companies that put out dangerously faulty products could be opened up to capital murder charges rather than just civil suits.

As if the Cambridge Analytica story wasn’t disturbing enough already

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-execs-boast-dirty-tricks-honey-traps-elections

I really, really, really hope this is the thing that finally prompts governments to start regulating social media companies more. If we don’t nip this shit in the bud soon, we’re going to end up in a sci-fi dystopia where every aspect of life is controlled by a corporate surveillance state.

Uber just killed its first pedestrian. In Arizona. Where the state governor has been relaxing regulations so as to encourage self-driving car testing.

What marvellous disruption.

@ Alan

That gives me a really warm feeling. Thank you for sharing.

Speaking of sharing….

https://www.betterbundobook.com/

@ diego;

re: drunk as fuck… izzat Richard Spencer???????

E.T.A. by the holy white… whiteness… what is the igno-right COMING TO?????