Why is it worse for women to cheat than for men? “Because Penis,” Redditor explains

PPS NTR may seem “quaint” to you ladies, but then again, you are not males, and so do not and can not know our hearts, and the pain of such betrayal , which you yourselves are the root causes! Oh, how sad it is to be a male! Our existence painted in both the red of desire and the black of despair! Tsk tsk tsk

we are not all “ladies” here.

secondly you are simply a moron if you believe hearts of men and women are so different. you quote Chekhov, but I doubt you have any insight to understand him.

I got hammered on Vodka several times in my own youth , Chekhov among them , does that count?

I think, no.

And of course male and female hearts are not that different, physiologically speaking, but to be psychologically speaking, they are yin-and-yang

you originally talk of metaphorical hearts, and you change now to physical hearts only to joke and only because you can’t defend your position. there is no such thing as male/female brain. if you believe people that way you will never experience meaningful connection with another.

congratulations on your first source)) but you didn’t listen what Scjild said? you can Google but it can say exactly what you want, if you don’t have any judgement to see what is reasonable or unreasonable.

second if you are happy to live alone that is fine. people like different things. people have different brains))

it is strange that you think that “meaningful connecton” means you must to stay every moment with people you love. I never stayed longer than 3 months with my girlfriend, and often we are apart for 4 months, sometimes even 7, because of my job. connection is not about you must always stay together physically. it is steange actually you believe that there is any relationship where people stay together 24h 7d 52w ?

@ JDSM

But the moment a Male mate leaves the Female mate alone, much more often than not , she’s going to stray

Or catch up on Coronation Street. YMMV of course.

But the moment a Male mate leaves the Female mate alone, much more often than not , she’s going to stray

Huh? But I thought that women were the ones that only had sex after falling in love, and that men were the ones that could have sex indiscriminately without developing any feelings. And that men were the ones who were biologically designed to screw multiple people at once, since cis men can “perfectly” impregnate multiple cis women, but “females” can only be impregnated by one cis man at a time? Isn’t that what you said?

What is the basis for your hypothesis that women are the ones that will immediately stray?

@JDSM
So nothing. Totally full of shit. No ability to do more than assert a bunch of things about other people.

And also typically you want us to look up your arguments. Lazy fuck.

No. I refuse to do your work incompetent. If think people are a certain way it’s your job to show it. You play being amused merely for face saving at this point.

Edited to add: finally a link, but now all they do is link drop. Like I have accept a link they don’t actually quote any data from.

“These people say X!”

Now point to a specific thing in the paper that they say is different because I don’t believe you understand what you have.

Okay, I’ve read JDSM’s link. There are a couple of interesting things in there, but it mostly discusses animal studies and then hypothesizes that they’d carry over to humans. Animal studies can point to something we might want to look out, but you can’t assume animal studies automatically apply to us. Especially when it’s animals that aren’t all that similar to us. Like mice.

Then there’s paragraphs that miss out on really obvious counters that go completely unacknowledged. Like this

These findings continue to accrue. In a study of 34 rhesus monkeys, for example, males strongly preferred toys with wheels over plush toys, whereas females found plush toys likable. It would be tough to argue that the monkeys’ parents bought them sex-typed toys or that simian society encourages its male offspring to play more with trucks.

Well no, monkeys don’t encourage boys to play with trucks and girls with dolls. But humans do and it’s human researchers that give the toys to the monkeys and as much as they might try to remain neutral when offering monkeys toys to play with, they might be subtly encouraging female monkeys to play with plush toys and male monkeys with wheels.

Many of these cognitive differences appear quite early in life. “You see sex differences in spatial-visualization ability in 2- and 3-month-old infants,” Halpern says. Infant girls respond more readily to faces and begin talking earlier. Boys react earlier in infancy to experimentally induced perceptual discrepancies in their visual environment. In adulthood, women remain more oriented to faces, men to things.

Then there’s this. Okay, differences appear early. So what? You know what else happens immediately upon birth? Boy and girl babies are treated very differently. Babies pick up on environmental cues.

There’s a lot of this kind of thing in that link. A lot of listing of behavioral differences and saying there must be a biological component. Not a lot of acknowledgement that humans, many of whom are really heavily invested in gender roles being set can interpret data in a way to make it say what they want it to say.

Whatever the flaws and strengths of the article however, there’s one thing it definitely didn’t do. And that’s confirm any of troll’s claims. There is nothing in there about healthy women needing to fall in love to have sex. There’s nothing in there about men needing to be promiscuous. Nobody is really saying that there are absolutely no differences between male and female brains. What we are saying is that you can’t make a sweeping generalization about male and female behavior and call it science and you can’t claim culture has zero factor in how different sexes behave. Even the neuroscientists who believe that a lot of behavioral differences between sexes is biological don’t claim that 100% of behavior is biological. That includes this article

Trying to assign exact percentages to the relative contributions of “culture” versus “biology” to the behavior of free-living human individuals in a complex social environment is tough at best. Halpern offers a succinct assessment: “The role of culture is not zero. The role of biology is not zero.”

Anyway, I doubt trolly will heed my recommendation, but I’ll always take any opportunity to suggest reading Delusions of Gender by Cordelia Fine which gets into a detailed analysis of the issues with neuoroscience trying to prove biological sex differences.

Human females are addicted to the feeling of being in Love , which gradually faded away after around four years at most , on average , which is partly why in present-day USA (bellweather for the test of the Developed World) , half of all heterosexual marriages end in divorce and 80% of divorces are unilaterally initiated by the wives and of those that remain married, half of the wives in them are adulterous or wish that they were tsk tsk tsk Modern Marriage is just not worth it for a heterosexual male if you have any self-respect at all.

EJ, I Will quote what Buzz Armstrong said to Woody and leave it at that. Tsk tsk tsk

And that genre is , as I said relatively rare , compared to its opposites I.e. niche. You see any mainstream successful fictional series , of any medium , with a genuine reverse-harem set-up (polyamory, not cuckoldry like that Outlander tv series) anywhere in the world today eh?

Ah, sorry, typo obviously, tsk tsk tsk

But my point still stands , and I will say no more on this topic with you .

Ban the kid. He’s boring.

Nah, more bored than anything. I mean, punch it up a little. Sell me these biotruths!

Human females are addicted to the feeling of being in Love

Your link didn’t back this up.

And you didn’t even respond to my breakdown of your link.

Please try again.

Tusk tusk tusk