By David Futrelle
So the Daily Mail is reporting that two former Infowars employees have filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accusing head Infowarrior Alex Jones and other staffers of harassment and discrimination, describing a workplace lousy with racism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, sexual harassment and way more shirtless Alex Jones than anyone should ever be subjected to.
Documents filed by ex-Infowarrior Rob Jacobson suggest that working for Jones as a Jewish person was, well, a lot like one might imagine it would be to work for Jones as a Jewish person.
According to the Daily Mail,
the controversial Infowars owner joked with staff who called … Jacobson ‘The Jewish Individual’, ‘The Resident Jew’ and shouted ‘Yacobson’ across the office, it’s claimed.
Jones allegedly continually bullied, ridiculed and humiliated Jacobson – who worked for Jones’ company Infowars for 13 years – before firing him last May.
Apparently working for Jones as a black woman isn’t much of a treat either.
Ex-Infowars production assistant Ashley Beckford says “the discrimination began almost immediately” after she started work there in 2016, the Daily Mail reports.
According to an EEOC complaint she too has filed: ‘I was subjected to different terms and conditions of employment, in comparison to my non-Black African-American peers, when it came to my salary/wages and benefits (travel), and in regards to my dress, including my hair style.
‘I also was subjected to harassment and racial slurs by Respondent’s management and some peer colleagues, as well as subjected to sexual harassment and a hostile, sexually offensive work environment.’
In a series of allegations, Beckford, who is African American, says she was ‘mocked’ for her skin tone, called a ‘coon’ by a senior manager, and denied promotions to match the salary of other coworkers, according to the complaint documents.
She also accuses Jones and several other supervisors and colleagues of ‘commonly leering at women in the office’, and making ‘sexual gestures and advances’. …
Beckford claimed that Jones groped her behind with his hand and commented to others, ‘Who wouldn’t want to have a black wife?’ …
She claims he made ‘sexual advances’ towards her and made comments about her having a ‘good body that looked like I worked out a lot’ …
She added: ‘Alex often spent his time shirtless, and endlessly leering, with or without a shirt, at female guests and employees while creating a disgusting, hostile environment.’
Apparently, the Infowars offices are also full of dudes who love guns (and Donald Trump) a little too much.
Beckford … claims she was intimidated by the constant display of guns in the infowars’ office in Austin, Texas, which created an ‘extremely hostile work environment’ and alleges she was reprimanded if she ever questioned the actions of President Donald Trump.
For more of the sordid details, check out the documents posted by the Daily Mail.
Alex Jones, for his part, says it’s lies, all lies. “I mean nobody accuses me of stuff like that,” he told the Daily Mail. “No, no and in fact I’m not the type of person to say those kinds of things. So that’s why my feelings are hurt. Wow. That’s all I can say.”
Jones’ dad, who runs the Human Resources department at Infowars (!), wasn’t quite as definite in his denials, admitting to the Daily Mail that at least one of Jacobson’s accusations might sorta be true, maybe. “That might have been a case of 30 seconds of somebody giving him some crap, I can see that, it’s like a damn locker room,” he told the Daily Mail, choosing his words very uncarefully.
Presumably since this interview Alex has confiscated his dad’s phone.
yes, exactly! in fact, most people don’t have this privilage, especially people who live and work in counties without a reliably welfare system. we cant say why Jacobson stays in this job for this long, but there are plenty reasons why people stay in such jobs.
I am glad you are free from your abusive one, and I am glad for Jacobson too, it is good he speaks now about what happened to him, he doesn’t need to give any explanation. we should listen and believe! and fuck info wars!
now I will say my story, because this something which happens to me right now. I believe my girlfriend is in abusive job, her boss bullies her and harasses her and then next time says nice to her. she is confused and upset and yesterday I have to persuade her not to quit, even though I don’t want her to work there and it is against everything she also wants, but she can’t quit. if she quit then we will have very big problems with money. she doesnt have privilage to quit. we don’t have privilage that she will quit. and she worked in this job for more than 4 years already. I hope soon she will find new job, she made applications and we wait for news, but now she can’t leave and it is horrible but that is life and it is life for most people in this world I believe.
@nparker: As redsilkphoenix points out, the ancient astronauts stuff is generally chock-full of what TV Tropes politely calls Unfortunate Implications– in particular while Von Daniken wittered on about how the Pyramids in Egypt and South American *had* to have been built with alien help, he’s remarkably quiet about Stonehenge…
hugs for Myriad & Kupo ?
@Nequam,
While I’ve never read (that I recall, anyway) anything by Von Daniken, I have heard something akin to the ancient astronaut theory about Stonehenge. In fact, as recently as several years ago there was a group of primarily archeologists who went out to do another study of how Stonehenge was built, and who were throwing out theories involving telekinesis as ways of moving those rocks.
Meanwhile, the two engineers in the group managed to show that all the ancient builders really needed to move huge stone slabs several miles was lots of big logs, strong ropes, and a whole bunch of very strong people for pulling them along.
So yeah, even among the very ancient peoples of the world, where there’s a will (and enough available resources), there’s a way to do some really cool stuff. Something that modern peoples tend to forget more often than not….
Hello all. It’s really nice to see this place come back together. I have missed all of you and your insightfull comments.
Bannon: wears too many shirts.
Jones: wears not enough shirts.
Average them out, and you have… well, still a really gross human being, I suppose.
While it looks as though when the natives of Rapa Nui explained to anthropologists that the statues “walked” into place, they meant exactly that:
https://youtu.be/YpNuh-J5IgE
Many ancient astronaut theorists simply are under the impression that there is a singular progression of technologic innovation- they think that because we use a lot of technology to make things nowadays, then earlier people won’t possibly have made any technology that can do the same thing, as technology has one single ‘strand’ rather than many different t branches developing at different times.
It isn’t correct, but that explains a lot of it. While some of the theories or approaches may have slightly racial undertones (mainly subconscious) that isn’t the sole explanation. The point I make is that although some may have certain racial undertones, calling it ‘white supremacy’ is just really utterly inaccurate.
I can understand von Daniken not talking about Stonehenge, but I don’t think it is really comparable with the pyramids and such. Sure, Stonehenge looks amazing and all, but it doesn’t look in any way as complex to build without modern technology as the pyramids. I can see why the imagination wouldn’t run away with oneself about Stonehenge while doing so for the pyramids.
I think nparker’s right about the fallacy of the single strand of development, but I think there’s also an extent to which our society is very quick to overstate the effects of technology and understate the effects of social organisation.
The pyramids are a good example: the Egyptians didn’t have any amazing technology to build them with. They did, however, have the ability to conscript large amounts of labourers during the agricultural off-seasons and put them to work in an organised fashion. When you have the latter, you don’t really need the former.
This also holds true for the “why” of why they built the pyramids. Social reasons (to overawe neighbouring states, to impress the peasantry, to show the might of the ruling dynasty) often get discounted in favour of technological reasons (to guide spacecraft, to sharpen razor blades, to store grain).
Social organisation, however, leaves fewer impressive archeological artefacts than technology does. For people as obsessed with our material culture as 19th and 20th century westerners were, this meant that it was easy to overlook.
Isn’t there an obvious anti-white-supremacist interpretation of “ancient astronaut” theories? To wit, advanced aliens came along and decided the most promising candidate humans to teach to build a civilization were a bunch of brown and Asian ones in South America, Egypt, the Middle East, and Thailand, but as for those white barbarians to the north, they just shook their heads (if they had heads) and said “nuh-uh, waste of effort”. 🙂
@ Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Yes, I think that’s a good point.
Ancient astronaut theories may posit alien assistance as the reason for various advanced-seeming historical feats, but it isn’t the aliens who do the work in them, it is various non-white races who do the work, and are indicated to be so intelligent that they can understand alien technology, and as you said, it would mean aliens chose non-white races to give their secret to, which would be a pretty big compliment.
The premise behind alien technology theories is that the people coming up with them think the people could not possibly have come up with the technology to build these wonders themselves, so they find it *more plausible* that an alien race visited us from *probably tens of thousands of light years away* in order to teach humans how to build these wonders. They have so little faith in the non-white civilizations that they think these feats *completely* out of the realm of possibility for them despite the clear evidence they actually built these wonders, so they make up a theory based on precisely zero evidence rather than trust the evidence that’s there. But they have no trouble in grasping the advancements in technology the West has made.
That’s white supremacy.
Plus, a lot of the ancient astronaut believers think that the reason we evolved from our ape ancestors is that the aliens boosted some of those apes in order to make us intelligent enough to mine gold them. Because apparently when super advanced cultures run out of gold in their neck of the woods, mining it with machines on alien planets or creating a synthetic analogue is less preferable than genetically engineering and enslaving a race of intelligent beings. Because… reasons? Anyway, this would suggest that aliens were visiting civilizations because they saw the people in those civilizations as ideal slaves. So the whole brown and black people = slaves thing is another layer to the white supremacy thing.
I doubt for most of these people the white supremacy is intentional, but it’s definitely there.
The whole “advanced civilisations travel around in awesome space craft, finding other planets to get the resources their society badly needs” trope is more than a little absurd. The physics of it really do not work out.
(I’m happy to rant about it if anyone is interested.)
@EJ
Depends how you define resources, doesn’t it. 😛
I can see a species travelling the universe (physics and lifespans permitting) looking for life and intelligence. For when you have both life and intelligence – you have creativity. Which is a rare resource by most definitions.
Of course, there’s probably physical resources we don’t have clue one about yet, so can’t judge on the rarity of those. For all we know, we’re sitting on the biggest stockpile of anti gravity precursor in the known universe (and are probably doing something dumb with it like making chewing gum) 😛
I’ve been sometimes thinking about this. There’s been a huge number of ancient societies (most of them preliterate) and some (relatively few) of them left monuments that seem extraordinary in the light of the technological and economic resources of those societies.
I mean, it’s hard to believe that Americans were able to send people to the Moon and back with 20th century technology. If they’d built a stone monument with those resources instead, it’d overshadow the pyramids.
@Bina and Valentin
Thank you. The hugs are appreciated.
The takeaway from this article is that bodyshaming and objectifying based on appearance or clothing choices is ok, when it’s a white male victim when it’s lefty feminists doing it. It’s one standard of behavior for them but a different one for everybody else I guess.
Taking your clothes off as a form of sexual harassment is a clothing choice now? Cuz that’s the only criticism of clothing choice I see. I’m not sure where the body shaming is either.
As gotchas go, that wasn’t the best I’ve ever seen.
@Micky
Uhm… where are we applauding a female boss of color for strutting topless thru her workplace despite the complaints of her team? Cos I didn’t see that part of the discussion…
Oh dear.
It’s like somebody can’t tell the difference between an office and a strip club.