The Summer 2017 WHTM pledge drive is on! Donate generously to enable our continuing coverage of whiny baby-men! Thanks!
By David Futrelle
A tragic day for whiny baby-men — the BBC just announced that the next Doctor Who will be a lady. Naturally, these sensitive souls took at once to Twitter to make their displeasure known. And to make jokes about Doctor Who turning into Nurse Who amirite fellas high five!
Here are some of the best of the worst Tweets I’ve seen so far. I can’t decide which are my favorites — the ones lamenting the loss of a crucial male “role model” or those suggesting that a female Doctor Who makes as much sense as a male Mary Poppins (which would be perfectly fine to me, by the way).
https://twitter.com/thomasdeeacon/status/886723202168344576
I'm actually quite shocked at the decision to cast a woman the should call it Nurse who now lol 😂😂
— Rhys (@rhysjordanstew1) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Gapehorner/status/886609824242438144
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886613308639514624
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886629727745826816
"Doctor Who" what's the deal? Pushing the "gender fluidity" narrative now? Remember when entertainment wasn't social engineering propaganda
— Dan (@NotoriousDano) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Amen1924/status/886681803167236099
https://twitter.com/spcwriter/status/886664276877991936
https://twitter.com/Erin_Danielle77/status/886639647387942912
The BBC have literally just ruined all the heritage and history of Doctor Who making the new Doctor a woman
— Aydin Osman (@Aydin_Osman96) July 16, 2017
Doctor Who officially ruined. Time Lords being women not an issue, 50 years of tradition out the window is. What next 007 being Janette Bond pic.twitter.com/Hj3buVMx8s
— Ewan McColl (@TheMcColl) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/hucksworld/status/886682969833865217
https://twitter.com/williamparslow/status/886700469648842752
https://twitter.com/GreavesyX/status/886613123666513920
#DoctorWho So patronising to women to be chosen due to political correctness. No room for merit and talent if PC comes first.
— Holomatrix (@Holomatrices) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/BasedKielbasa/status/886647001885978625
https://twitter.com/MJDebio93/status/886691678647705600
https://twitter.com/racerdog45/status/886677551770476545
Women have their own heroes like RIpley, Buffy and Wonder Woman, there is no need to take away role models for men #notmydoctor
— P. J. Lowry (@PJ_Lowry) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/thomasoldham/status/886712069021683712
https://twitter.com/Keef44002574/status/886700034934362112
https://twitter.com/Electromoth/status/886674967106125824
I remember when Ripley, Leia, Buffy, Xena et al. trailblazed great women characters. But now, feminism seems pleased with mere pandering.
— Bradley Yellop (@bazz83) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/winklewilly89/status/886689221418856448
https://twitter.com/revjackashcraft/status/886693656647913473
https://twitter.com/__AlexN_/status/886631666915172352
https://twitter.com/Blackbirds1632/status/886655183224229890
#doctorwho The regressive left are going crazy over the choice, next they will want a transgender to take the role as the Doctor.
— Rust (@Rust_NoMask) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/amusedphysicist/status/886655148235161600
No, I don’t understand what that last one means either.
Oh, my sweet child of summer.
Personally, this is some of the most exciting news I’ve had in a long time. Peter Capaldi is my Doctor, to be honest, and I will miss him terribly. But Jodie Whittaker taking over soothes the sting quite a bit. I’ll be surprised if she doesn’t end up also being my Doctor.
I’m beyond ecstatic, and cannot wait to see what she does with the role!
I really liked nequams idea about a Dr spending a few episodes figuring out their gender. I bet you could shoehorn in a lot of really funny social commentary about gender expectations
Wasn’t that the name of the mathematician in Jurassic Park?
Which does not make it any less confusing, in context …
Fishy Goat:. This discussion actually came up with one ofy cousins today and she actually said “But is she a ginger?” on being told a woman was the new doctor…
Personally I’m disappointed. I would have preferred an older woman. It seems inevitable that they’ll jam some godawful love story, probably between her and Bill. Bill will be turned into a simpering idiot who will be constantly yearning for the doctor’s touch.
Even though I stopped watching way back when a set of stairs was the best defense against a dalek, I still think it’s great they have a female time lord. I’m only wondering why it took so long.
On a slightly separate note:. I do hope it works out, the Ghost busters reboots failure didn’t do any favors for projects with women as the leads and I’d hate to see a second failure so close…
She’s going to become a famous pediatrician?
Isn’t male Mary Poppins basically Mr Belvedere?
@Alan Robertshaw — Yes, Joanna Lumley would have been perfect.
@THiaT: I was rather hoping the first female Doctor would be Catherine Tate for those reasons…
Wasn’t that a movie called American Gigolo? *snerk*
https://mobile.twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/886652944350941184
*snerk*
@Lindsay
Somebody take my money!
Putting aside the transphobia… Do these people even know what Dr Who is?
Welp, this is my favorite “oh snap” moment:
http://i.imgur.com/TgeS5cG.png
A few people brought this up already but umm Michael Rooker in essence played a male Mary Poppins in GotG Vol. 2.
Like, does the Doctor even have genitalia? Or even nipples and a belly-button? The Doctor tends to wear a lot of clothes. There could be anything under there.
@ Axecaliber
IKR?!
(I’m biased. I think Rooker should be in everything.)
Ok, now I want a movie called Pretty Bloke and I want it to star the gigolo character from AI set before he met the kid. A handsome, wealthy woman can “rescue” him from his life for a time, at which point some antics occur and he’s on his own again to lead into the movie AI.
Marx didn’t write much about feminism. Marxism became much more popular among the left after Louis Napoleon’s coup, partly because Marx claimed his theories explained why both Napoleons took power after a revolution. The main idea is that revolutionaries need to “smash” the organs of the state that protect the bourgeoisie (needless to say, that has never worked well).
Mao Zedong took that a step further by claiming that a new bourgeoisie could emerge within the ruling Communist Party, so you need a continual cultural struggle against it. Maybe you could call Maoism uber-political correctness in a sense. You also have Cultural Hegemony from Antonio Gramsci and the Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) from Louis Althusser, which are both very complicated modifications of Marx’s theory that (sarcasm) even a really smart person like Jordan Peterson can’t understand very well (end sarcasm).
I sort of doubt the people who originally wanted the Doctor to have a female regeneration in the 1970’s were reading a lot of Gramsci and Althusser. (sarcasm) But they were to the left of the people who want AI gods to involuntarily sterilize all the genetically inferior people, so who knows? (end sarcasm)
Yes. Ian Malcolm is the mathematician in Jurassic Park and The Lost World (both the books and the movies).
I just came to cast my vote for Doctor Who 2027 – Cultural Marxism Edition.
Also, for your enjoyment:
https://twitter.com/JoeScaramanga/status/886627478969753607/photo/1
Dr Who has always been against the ultra right-wing (and ultra left-wing, too). Multiple stories about how Daleks (who have an emperor), and Cybermen (who have a strict hierarchy) always lose in the end. How long has it taken these idiots to realize that? Apparently 50+ years, and an announcement that the main character is changing apparent sex.
Strong female leads since at least Sarah Jane Smith and Romana, and others I haven’t seen since I didn’t watch much past Tom Baker until recently. Social commentary from day one, even in the early years in “historical tourism” style. SciFi has always had social commentary.
I’ll also never look around a plumbing supply store the same way ever again. Wait, that’s the arms of the Dominators’ robots! That’s part of a Dalek! There’s part of the ray gun from, well, almost every early episode that had a ray gun.
*yawn*. This kinda stuff no longer engages me. It’s become far too routine. A reboot of a popular movie or television show with a female or POC protagonist is announced, MRAs and alt-righters on the internet argbargle about it and vow to boycott it. Lather, rinse, repeat. It’s happened 100 times before, it’ll happen 100 times more in the future. Most people – including the producers of the media itself and most of the general public – aren’t even aware of their objections, and they sure as hell don’t actually care about them. So it’s not as if it has an actual effect on anything. All it does is provide passing amusement to internet feminists like us, but because they say the same things each time, it no longer yields even that to me.
There’s a scientist who claims to have figured out why Napoleon’s revolution happened … and also why Trump happened.
http://peterturchin.com/cliodynamica/
The short of it is, most civilizations periodically produce a surfeit of ambitious ladder-climbers, more than the upper levels of the socioeconomic pyramid can absorb. This intensifies competition in the upper echelons of society, until norms of fairness and civility break down.
One first gets “let them eat cake”ism (present-day form being neoliberalism) as these “elites” try to maintain their lifestyles, despite their increased numbers, by squeezing the working classes. It escalates to uncouthness in the upper ranks (alt-right and Trump indicate we’ve reached that point now) along with increasingly cutthroat competition at the top (the sabotage of the Sanders primary campaign was bad; the various dead Russians turning up peripheral to the Trump campaign indicate that the level of viciousness to the competition on the Republican side may have been a lot worse).
Usually there is eventually serious violence (last time it happened in the US it culminated in the Civil War). There seems to be actual empirical data backing this theory up, and peer reviewed articles.
On the other hand, the author also likes to use his blog to push paleo as a “one size fits all” diet, which sort of problematic behavior was recently being discussed on this site. Also, notorious racists JayMan and hbd_chick have occasionally commented there, mostly pushing the former’s blog, though I’m not aware that Turchin has done anything to encourage them or expressed any kind of approval of their views. Needless to say, seeing them turn up there raised my eyebrows.
So you may want to take everything there that’s not backed by empirical data with a grain of salt, though, AFAICT his own politics are mildly progressive if anything.