The Summer 2017 WHTM pledge drive is on! Donate generously to enable our continuing coverage of whiny baby-men! Thanks!
By David Futrelle
A tragic day for whiny baby-men — the BBC just announced that the next Doctor Who will be a lady. Naturally, these sensitive souls took at once to Twitter to make their displeasure known. And to make jokes about Doctor Who turning into Nurse Who amirite fellas high five!
Here are some of the best of the worst Tweets I’ve seen so far. I can’t decide which are my favorites — the ones lamenting the loss of a crucial male “role model” or those suggesting that a female Doctor Who makes as much sense as a male Mary Poppins (which would be perfectly fine to me, by the way).
https://twitter.com/thomasdeeacon/status/886723202168344576
I'm actually quite shocked at the decision to cast a woman the should call it Nurse who now lol 😂😂
— Rhys (@rhysjordanstew1) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Gapehorner/status/886609824242438144
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886613308639514624
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886629727745826816
"Doctor Who" what's the deal? Pushing the "gender fluidity" narrative now? Remember when entertainment wasn't social engineering propaganda
— Dan (@NotoriousDano) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Amen1924/status/886681803167236099
https://twitter.com/spcwriter/status/886664276877991936
https://twitter.com/Erin_Danielle77/status/886639647387942912
The BBC have literally just ruined all the heritage and history of Doctor Who making the new Doctor a woman
— Aydin Osman (@Aydin_Osman96) July 16, 2017
Doctor Who officially ruined. Time Lords being women not an issue, 50 years of tradition out the window is. What next 007 being Janette Bond pic.twitter.com/Hj3buVMx8s
— Ewan McColl (@TheMcColl) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/hucksworld/status/886682969833865217
https://twitter.com/williamparslow/status/886700469648842752
https://twitter.com/GreavesyX/status/886613123666513920
#DoctorWho So patronising to women to be chosen due to political correctness. No room for merit and talent if PC comes first.
— Holomatrix (@Holomatrices) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/BasedKielbasa/status/886647001885978625
https://twitter.com/MJDebio93/status/886691678647705600
https://twitter.com/racerdog45/status/886677551770476545
Women have their own heroes like RIpley, Buffy and Wonder Woman, there is no need to take away role models for men #notmydoctor
— P. J. Lowry (@PJ_Lowry) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/thomasoldham/status/886712069021683712
https://twitter.com/Keef44002574/status/886700034934362112
https://twitter.com/Electromoth/status/886674967106125824
I remember when Ripley, Leia, Buffy, Xena et al. trailblazed great women characters. But now, feminism seems pleased with mere pandering.
— Bradley Yellop (@bazz83) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/winklewilly89/status/886689221418856448
https://twitter.com/revjackashcraft/status/886693656647913473
https://twitter.com/__AlexN_/status/886631666915172352
https://twitter.com/Blackbirds1632/status/886655183224229890
#doctorwho The regressive left are going crazy over the choice, next they will want a transgender to take the role as the Doctor.
— Rust (@Rust_NoMask) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/amusedphysicist/status/886655148235161600
No, I don’t understand what that last one means either.
Ahmigah Jenno
Normal psychology is, like, nothing but failure modes. Like, a big heapin’ stack of failure modes, cascading into other failure modes on top of a huge sodden foundation of failure modes, like some sorta seven-layer-failcake.
Anyone who points at someone doing something stupid or evil and says some sorta lol-armchair-psychology-mental-disorder isn’t so much trashing the person they’re pointing at as they are takin a big ol’ bite of that failcake. Human beings aren’t broken by life, that’s the default setting.
As for the CYOA thing, than you for the support! Here are some questions on that for you, if you like to give opinions:
– would it be better for a narrow topic of study, or a broad one?
– would it be better for a short book or a large one?
– Paper, PDF, app?
– would you buy it as a book in a store, or would you prefer to see it as a school textbook? If in the store, what would you pay for it? If an app or website, would you subscribe to it?
– what age group do you think would best benefit from it?
I mean, there are plenty of things I could ask, but those are the basics. I once put together a part of a basic math exam for elementary kids in this style, and ended up going with a somewhat conversational tone. Added a little humour, some higher math explanations for things if they wanted that, that sort of thing. And the end would still have a perfectly gradable math assignment that could be submitted and marked like any other exam.
And well, of course. I have no idea how I’d publish such a thing. Or if there’s a market! Still, it’s a fun idea I’ve been kicking around for a few years.
Narrower (or less in-depth), I should think. The more total information you need to convey, and the more important it is that the reader cover all of it, the harder a nonlinear format becomes (because it’s possible to miss stuff).
It has to be fairly short because the information is not very dense compared to a traditional textbook.
App!
I’d expect to see it distributed by schools or by specific groups (eg, the Audubon Society putting out a “learn all about birds” app). They can also be available for parents to buy directly, but I don’t usually expect that to be the main market (as with most educational stuff).
K-8. High schoolers might not have the patience for the format.
I’ve said it about biology and evolution before, but it applies just as well to psychology: the Russian Dancing Bear. “People do not applaud because it dances particularly well. People applaud because it is amazing it manages to dance at all.”
There’s a lot of stuff out there that only works because various failure modes usually take longer to happen than the reactions that can shore things back up. Heck, try paying attention to how you walk next time. Assuming you don’t fall over. Most bipedal walking is essentially a controlled fall where we are slightly off-balance to allow gravity to pull us forward, but then catch ourselves before we can actually start falling. All done with enough practice to be entirely ‘under the hood’. Why? Because it’s the most efficient way to get around.
Oh, and yeah, for the CYOA, app. I wonder if anybody still has Hypercard sitting around somewhere.
(I once read an article from Jason Shiga, the guy who did the Meanwhile… book I pointed out earlier. For context, the CYOA decisions in that book are all lines from the comic panels, and many of them go off the edge of one page, then drop down to a tab sticking out from another page below it, and so you turn to the page with that tab and follow the line in from there. In order to go back ‘up’ to an earlier page you have to cross the middle of the spread and go ‘down’ the left side instead. The fellow who set it all up mentioned that, in order to actually figure out how to set up the tabs so that it would all work, he had pretty much pre-plotted out the thousands of possible paths in the book, fed it all into a custom computer program as an optimization problem, and waited several hours for the layout to be done.)
dreemr – I’m going to re-read The Dark Tower 1 just as soon as I’m done with the book I’m reading now (Giant of the Senate by Al Franken) because I need a refresher. It’s been at least 20 years since I read that series.
Schnookums said
Nope. I’m right there with you, but with extra Stephen King fangirling added.
It’s been so long since I looked at a CYOA that I barely even remember them. I just remember being frustrated because it’s way too easy to die. The only way to win them seemed to be to do trial and error and memorize the right choices. I just don’t have the patience for that.
Idris Elba. *Swoons*
That is all.
The Parslow comment is the one that flabbergasts me, honestly. I haven’t read 8 pages of comments yet so I’m sure this has been said already, but: this guy thinks “third-wave feminists” aren’t watching Doctor Who?
This is probably the most conclusive possible proof that he has never met a feminist.
@Scildfreja – maybe I’m too literal, but when imagining your CYOA-style study aid (that’s how I translated it), I was specifically thinking of the index cards I made last year for my son when he was studying basic chemistry.
Full disclosure: I did very well in school, but I also managed to flunk basic college chemistry not once, not twice, but THREE times, due almost entirely to laziness. Plus, Fine Art major lol.
Anyway, in my mind I imagined an app that’s like a chapter study guide, with multiple-choice questions. Say the question is “what part of an atom has a negative charge?”, then you have the choices A) Proton B) Neutron C) Nucleus or D) Electron.
Choose “A” and you’re linked to a graphic showing the atom with the protons labeled and emphasized, glowing or enlarging, with the charge labeled. Choose “B” and you go to a similar graphic emphasizing the neutrons, and so on.
Maybe I’m too literal and this is too simplistic, but something like that with interactive visuals, would have helped my son so much in being able to engage with the material and really learn it.
Chemistry, Physics, Biology, Maths, all lend themselves very easily to this kind of setup.
I should maybe mention that my son is very mildly ADHD-Inattentive type (daydreamy) so visuals really help him connect. He has some difficulty processing multiple steps as well, like identifying main points, etc., and so gets anxious when confronted with a wall o’ text.
There just aren’t a lot of aids to help him with these things.
Well, y’all had quite the discussion while I was at work, huh?
Anyways, can I just point out Something Really Fuckin’ Obvious?
Why is it whenever there’s a woman (or PoC, or LGBT+, or any other minority) actor/actress getting a role, these fuckwhizzles always whine about how they weren’t picked for the role because they were talented or anything, it MUST have been because someone’s filling a quota for the PC Police!
It’s just fucking baffling to me how these people never seem to think that the actors/actresses are actually fucking talented and skilled at the art of acting, just that they’re “taking” the job away from someone who “deserves” it more, like a(nother) cishet white dude who’s more “talented” than the minority actor.
It keeps fucking happening and I keep being fucking baffled by it.
– would it be better for a narrow topic of study, or a broad one?
Depends on your audience. The site I mentioned before is narrow and deep, but has one very specific audience in mind.
– would it be better for a short book or a large one?
Short.
– Paper, PDF, app?
App.
– would you buy it as a book in a store, or would you prefer to see it as a school textbook? If in the store, what would you pay for it? If an app or website, would you subscribe to it?
I do subscribe to the website I mentioned. I can find hundreds of paper/pdf books, often for free, on the same topic, but I subscribe to a website because it takes a similar approach to the one you mention and that works better for me than reading dry text about the topic.
– what age group do you think would best benefit from it?
I think middle school to high school would benefit most. College students don’t have time to learn, just for rote memorization before the test, but adults looking to learn more about a topic outside a classroom setting might also benefit from it, depending on the topic and how much information is out there. If you have a specific topic you know there’s an adult market for, do it. Otherwise, aim for middle and high school students.
If it’s an app that depends on the format, but websites are easy to publish, phone apps are a little more difficult but you can use tools like phone gap to build an Android and iPhone app simultaneously (not sure how well that works since no one seems to use it), and I have no idea what it takes to publish a windows app.
If you want help with any Web development, depending on how things go with my job search (which takes a lot of time), I might be able to assist.
As far as a market for it, I just had an interview with a learning software company and it sounds like there’s always a market for more tools to help students learn. This specifically? I couldn’t tell you.
Ugh…no time right now to catch up on the previous 7 pages of comments…but I’m now pretty sure CYOA *does not* stand for “Cover Your Own Ass”…lol.
Even less odious people often work from the unexamined assumption that everything belongs to white guys by default, so they expect anyone else to prove why they deserve it while never expecting white guys to do the same.
For instance, if only white guys have ever won an award, people will go “but they were really good!” The assumption being that if a white guy is really good, he automatically gets the award. Meanwhile, if a woman or minority is also really good, they have to sit down and wait their turn until some year when there isn’t a really good white male who gets first dibs.
Or when the same white-guy directors get all the big movie projects. And the women and minority directors? They have to wait until there’s a project that no white guy wants, apparently.
I gotta step up my comment reading game.
@Petal
Tl;dr version: Nick was doing that thing again.
@Singerdog
CYOA = Choose Your Own Adventure
The big spike in CYOA books seems to have come late enough that they never had a real big appeal to me, though I do have and love one Edward Gorey book that uses the same non-linear approach: The Raging Tide, or the Black Doll’s Imbroglio.
https://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/886997710376775681
Diego Duarte
Ummm – how do we know that any of the previous doctors weren’t trans men?
I went to the Daily Mail (UK) to see if their coverage of Jodie being cast as the Doctor was as terrible as it was rumored. It was (topless photos and video?? WTF…), but they spotted an MRA we haven’t roasted yet.
Sick of tolerance @Do228BN2T tweets ‘I trust her companion will be a disabled, transgender, asexual, Muslim Afro Caribbean gay all rolled into one to keep the PC BBC happy’
What an idiot.
That’d be awesome if that actually happened.
@Falconer,
Sorry, I had to go home and go to sleep, I was feeling poorly. Thanks for the info about the terrible Indy RPG, I’m weirdly tempted to see if I can find it.
This whole thread is making me muse on the technological aspects of fandom – that is, the fact it so much easier to consume a story when and where you want to now, than it was when I was growing up; and therefore ‘ownership’ of a story seems to be a more strongly held idea than it was.
I haven’t had a properly coherent thought that wasn’t about work in the last couple of days, however, so I feel I am incapable of developing this further.
Instead:
A friend of mine who’s an RE teacher has just shown me the leaving present some of her students have got her – a cuddly pope Francis. To her credit, she was unphased when I suggested that the next time the pope regenerates, I’d like the replacement to be a woman.
@JS, Ooglyboogles
Re: disabled, transgender, asexual…etc
Frobisher was all those things and more; the more, specifically, being an alien shape-shifting penguin.
But at least he was a boy! No FEMALE alien shape-shifting penguin should be allowed in the Tardis!
#sarcasm obviously.
Come for the feminism, stay for the incredible geeky nostalgia! I’ve already got “When The Tripods Came” on order due to a previous thread reminding me how much I enjoyed the original trilogy. Now fondly remembering my time with the Fighting Fantasy books and browsing Google Play looking for the Android phone versions 🙂
@ Simon
Ooh thanks for reminding me. Someone asked about the IP rights to do a Tripods based board game. I’m limited in what I can say but the IP rights generally are optioned to a film company, and those rights include merchandising and peripheral products, which would include games.
(In response to the obvious question I was told not to hold my breath)
– would it be better for a narrow topic of study, or a broad one?
Broad. This sort of thing would work best if it’s broad and shallow, because there’s only so far you can drill down into any topic before it gets very difficult indeed to explain it to a lay audience.
– would it be better for a short book or a large one?
Large book (An app with a lot of backend data, as below.)
– Paper, PDF, app?
App!
– would you buy it as a book in a store, or would you prefer to see it as a school textbook? If in the store, what would you pay for it? If an app or website, would you subscribe to it?
I’d engage with it best as a single app which acted as a frontend for numerous topics. I don’t want a dozen apps on my phone if I want to learn a dozen different topics.
This would also make it easier to do cross-disciplinary things. For example, if I’m learning about how trees grow then I may read about soil and weather, which could lead to a segue into geology and/or meteorology.
(It should be possible to download more topics into a single app, right? All you’re really doing is sending more backend data to the phone and then letting the UI know how to engage with it.)
– what age group do you think would best benefit from it?
Two groups:
– Older children, because it’s about broad-but-shallow learning rather than deep understanding.
– Adults who haven’t learned the stuff that most children know about this topic.
As we’ve seen from things like the Khan Academy, there’s an enormous market of adults who want to learn things but are worried that they’ll be laughed at for not knowing them already.
RE: The TSR Indiana Jones RPG, If you guys don’t know, the the last unsold copy in TSR’s UK office was burned, and the remains were encases in a perspex pyramid. In 2001, this became the Diana Jones Award, after a chunk of the logo which survived in a legible state. It’s given out each year at Gencon to a group, individual, publisher or game which has promoted excellence in gaming in the prior year.
(slight humblebrag, I’m involved in one of the Irish games conventions which won the award in 2006 for our charity auctions)