The Summer 2017 WHTM pledge drive is on! Donate generously to enable our continuing coverage of whiny baby-men! Thanks!
By David Futrelle
A tragic day for whiny baby-men — the BBC just announced that the next Doctor Who will be a lady. Naturally, these sensitive souls took at once to Twitter to make their displeasure known. And to make jokes about Doctor Who turning into Nurse Who amirite fellas high five!
Here are some of the best of the worst Tweets I’ve seen so far. I can’t decide which are my favorites — the ones lamenting the loss of a crucial male “role model” or those suggesting that a female Doctor Who makes as much sense as a male Mary Poppins (which would be perfectly fine to me, by the way).
https://twitter.com/thomasdeeacon/status/886723202168344576
I'm actually quite shocked at the decision to cast a woman the should call it Nurse who now lol 😂😂
— Rhys (@rhysjordanstew1) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Gapehorner/status/886609824242438144
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886613308639514624
https://twitter.com/DelDiablo007/status/886629727745826816
"Doctor Who" what's the deal? Pushing the "gender fluidity" narrative now? Remember when entertainment wasn't social engineering propaganda
— Dan (@NotoriousDano) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Amen1924/status/886681803167236099
https://twitter.com/spcwriter/status/886664276877991936
https://twitter.com/Erin_Danielle77/status/886639647387942912
The BBC have literally just ruined all the heritage and history of Doctor Who making the new Doctor a woman
— Aydin Osman (@Aydin_Osman96) July 16, 2017
Doctor Who officially ruined. Time Lords being women not an issue, 50 years of tradition out the window is. What next 007 being Janette Bond pic.twitter.com/Hj3buVMx8s
— Ewan McColl (@TheMcColl) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/hucksworld/status/886682969833865217
https://twitter.com/williamparslow/status/886700469648842752
https://twitter.com/GreavesyX/status/886613123666513920
#DoctorWho So patronising to women to be chosen due to political correctness. No room for merit and talent if PC comes first.
— Holomatrix (@Holomatrices) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/BasedKielbasa/status/886647001885978625
https://twitter.com/MJDebio93/status/886691678647705600
https://twitter.com/racerdog45/status/886677551770476545
Women have their own heroes like RIpley, Buffy and Wonder Woman, there is no need to take away role models for men #notmydoctor
— P. J. Lowry (@PJ_Lowry) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/thomasoldham/status/886712069021683712
https://twitter.com/Keef44002574/status/886700034934362112
https://twitter.com/Electromoth/status/886674967106125824
I remember when Ripley, Leia, Buffy, Xena et al. trailblazed great women characters. But now, feminism seems pleased with mere pandering.
— Bradley Yellop (@bazz83) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/winklewilly89/status/886689221418856448
https://twitter.com/revjackashcraft/status/886693656647913473
https://twitter.com/__AlexN_/status/886631666915172352
https://twitter.com/Blackbirds1632/status/886655183224229890
#doctorwho The regressive left are going crazy over the choice, next they will want a transgender to take the role as the Doctor.
— Rust (@Rust_NoMask) July 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/amusedphysicist/status/886655148235161600
No, I don’t understand what that last one means either.
Suddenly GANJEES:
After chewing over the responses, I’ll admit, I’m being snobbish. I’ve butted heads with my own family in my snobbishness, so it’s something I’ve been aware of and I’m trying to curb.
And sorry to harp on about this when the conversation has seemed to move on a bit, but I’m actually offended at the assumption that liking GoT means you must not be savvy.
I didn’t say that. What I said was that plot points that are obvious tropes of the genre were suddenly shocking to a lot of people when the Red Wedding occurred. And I should have said this up front: all the reaction videos the Young Turks showed were of people in their early 20s, so likely college kids. Maybe they haven’t actually read Romeo and Juliet or Dune or The Godfather or one of the dozens of works where warring families inflict collateral casualties in underhanded gangland killings, but I guess what bothered me is just how over-the-top the reactions were. Yeah, it was gruesome and I can appreciate a reaction of revulsion to it, but I got the sense that they really didn’t see that coming down the pipe.
Did they watch Gilligan’s Island and think that this episode they’re really really going to get off the island that time?
Again, this is just the Red Wedding I’m talking about. I don’t know much about the rest of the story, so for all I know, it’s inverting tropes all over the place and I’m missing out.
Don’t get me wrong: a lot of great stuff–really great stuff–is derived from older works and can’t be claimed as “original.” And GRRM obviously put a lot of work thought and care into GoT. You can enjoy it on intellectual merits. I didn’t mean to indicate that liking it was bad or pointed to any kind of unsavviness and for that I’m sorry. I should have been more explicit that it was the reactions to that particular scene that I was drawing attention to and that’s my fault.
My brother was a lot more into the official CYOA books than I was. I tended to get killed and get discouraged. I remember one SF adventure where it seemed like there was no survivable ending.
There were time-travel branching-path books that I enjoyed better, because they didn’t tend to kill you.
And I remember getting one D&D or D&D related book out of the library, reading it a bit, and getting killed by a bugbear. It was a little skimpy on the description of the bugbear, but I got that it was a big, furry humanoid, which was good in retrospect. The earliest bugbears in D&D were apparently bears with pumpkin heads, which would have led to many pleasant dreams.
EDIT: Never even heard of the Lone Wolf books until years later. Got an alleged app that’ll play all of them on my phone a couple months ago, but it’s never downloaded what it needs.
Between working full time, being primary caregiver to a stroke patient, and dealing with my own bipolar disorder, I don’t have a lot of energy left for deep media analysis. I basically just want to be entertained and emotionally engaged while looking at a variety of humans that I find attractive.
What’s the basis for the assertion that “Whedonites” haven’t seen any other musicals or are ignorant about cinema in general? It made the author feel good to insult someone for their taste? It made you feel good to post it uncritically so you could feel equally special? I’ve seen plenty of musicals and Once More With Feeling is on the shortlist of ones that I actually like. Why? Because there’s an explanation for the singing and dancing that makes sense within the universe and because while it could be a stand alone gimmick, it advances the plot and character arcs. It annoys me how musicals have people singing and dancing for no reason at all. Of course, I also acknowledge that this is simply a matter of personal taste. I don’t think die hard musical fans are idiots with bad taste. I even put Camp on the shortlist of musicals I can enjoy because I don’t think you even need to be a musical theater nerd to empathize with most of the characters and because again, there’s a reason for songs to be in there.
I love how on a post about misogynistic reactions to a female Doctor, there’s been two mansplainers in here who are supposedly allies to splain how I’m a fake geek girl and an ignorant plebe for like GoT and Joss Whedon’s shows and brag about explaining District 9 to a stupid silly girl who isn’t here to defend herself. And men wonder why we have trouble trusting men who come to feminist spaces sometimes.
The funny thing to me is that there is nothing more tired and cliche than ragging on GoT fans and Whedon fans these days. I mean, GoT has become so popular the last few years that people are taken aback if you haven’t seen it. Buffy and Firefly have huge cult followings, but once Whedon got the job directing The Avengers, it became more hip and cool to hate him than be a fan. Mocking GoT and Whedon and their fans is seriously the easiest and laziest thing you can do pop culturewise. Was anyone supposed to be impressed with this shit?
@Falconer:
This? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_Traveller
Actually, even with the Red Wedding, I think I’m being unfair. Rewatching the scene, the lead-up really does lull the viewer into a feeling of safety and cautious optimism, so I can see how people might react to it with shock.
Just ignore me, I’m talking out of my rear.
@Latsot, Falconer
A friend of mine (who actually got me into my one and only RPG, ‘Rifts’, but that’s another story) told me that the CYOA book ‘Hyperspace’ had a secret ending that could only be discovered by accident; he claimed it was by misreading one of the ‘go to page whatever’ bits. A quick Google search does not yield up an easy answer to this, maybe someone here knows.
I swear Kim Newman has also done a sort of CYOA-style book called ‘Life’s Lottery’, which another friend of mine recommended – definitely not a kid’s book though.
@Dan, Falconer:
I haven’t heard of that. Starship Traveller was notoriously impossible, though.
It could only be solved if you visited the right places and did the right things. Whatever you did, the book would suddenly and at random insist that you plot a course into a black hole in order to get home. If you hadn’t found the right coordinates, you’d simply die and that was that.
I’ve never even heard of anyone who finished that book without cheating. I certainly didn’t.
I don’t know if anyone is behind on GoT but planning to watch it,
but there will be season 3 and 4 spoilers in my post. Just to warn everyone.
I had a feeling that Robb was a goner as soon as he was crowned King in the North. Even though I managed to keep myself ignorant of spoilers. I read the books after the 1st season of the show and when I got to the RW I still had a very large emotional response even though I had predicted that Robb would die. So what? It’s not like it was shock in retrospect, but it was expertly done and I was absorbed in the story. So much so that being on a crowded rush bus at the time didn’t distract me from the impact and I had a really hard time not making an ass out of myself by yelling at a book in public.
What an idiot I am! I must never have read Romeo & Juliet or seen mafia movies before! As it happens, I have. But I haven’t read Dune. My dad has read Dune. But he thought Waiting for Gidot was a Shakespeare play for some reason. Which one of us is the more stupid one with less of a right to have reactions when we watch stuff? Or are we both lesser creatures than your exalted self?
Or you know, I reacted because it was very well written. And the show version was not quite but almost as good.
I’ve seen my share of RW reaction videos. They showed a brief period of people having a reaction to something. That’s it. It’s not like the people in the videos were interviewed afterwards. How do you know that they didn’t think about it and conclude that the event made sense within the story? Did you read their minds? Specifying that you only pass judgement on people who yelled at the TV during the RW doesn’t really help make you look any better here.
Yes. Because a complex drama is exactly the same as a cheesy sitcom. You sure showed us silly GoT fans!
Well, yeah. Robb was the classic avenging son and instead of completing his vengeance, he was killed by the same people who killed his father. And then Joffrey was killed instead by entirely different people for entirely different reasons in a way that was not anywhere near as emotionally satisfying as it would have been if Robb or Arya killed him in a righteous fury. So there’s that.
Again though, I’m not so sure why it’s so important for tropes to be inverted. Just inverting a trope to invert a trope isn’t actually good storytelling. People make fun of the M Night Shyamalan twist ending because doing something unexpected does not in and of itself make a good story. The twist worked in the Sixth Sense because that was a pretty good movie. It didn’t work The Happening because that was a shitty movie.
In the show, that’s what did they did. In A Storm of Swords, the Arya and Catelyn chapters leading up to it had a sense of creeping dread to them. Something felt wrong, but you couldn’t quite put your finger on it. Both book readers and show only fans tended to have strong reactions.
You’re missing the point though. People don’t actually have to justify the way the feel about things to you. The issue here, is that you seem to think people only have permission to feel something if you find it valid in some way.
@Latsot, Falconer
If I ever played the ‘Starship’ book, I imagine I gave up in frustration, I had a low tolerance for that sort of thing in the 80s.
But overall CYOA were a lot easier for me to engage with than the Fighting Fantasy books, because it just required the book; once you started having to buy dice and play with other people, it was trickier, because 1980s Derbyshire was not a good place or time for buying 16-sided dice, and my £1 a week pocket money was going on ‘Red Dwarf’ videos bought over several weeks from Argos.
Which (and this is not what I meant to start writing about) was why my local library, with its Tom-Baker-era Who novelisations, CYOAs, and F.Paul Wilson hardbacks, was so important for me; and why I’m so gutted that our local council has decided to close it for not-even-slightly-politically motivated reasons.
Anyway; going back to the quote that NickNameNick used that seemed to kick all this off, if I hadn’t had access to those tie-in novels and gamebooks, I wouldn’t have moved on to anything else, and the enjoyment I get from them now is both a mixture of that original enjoyment and the nostalgia factor.
(F.Paul Wilson was chosen at random, I remember getting ‘Nightworld’ out because it was a sequel to ‘The Keep’, and then slowly building up the pieces of the Adversary cycle over the next 20 years until I felt I had the whole story. Then he brought out the Repairman Jack novels and I both wanted to cheer and cry.)
I’m signing off now, I’ve been outside all day running PE activities for year 7 kids and I may have a touch of sunstroke, which may be reflected in the rambling nature of this comment. I won the tug-of-war though! (Not a euphemism).
And I can watch The Sixth Sense over and over again even though I know the twist because it’s good storytelling. I’m sure as hell not going to watch The Village again, though.
@Latsot, @DanHolme,
No, I don’t think that’s it. I think it would have been published around 1990.
There’s like, you and your brother, and you’re in something like Starfleet, and you can show up on Earth but if it all goes tits-up you both get shot (I remember that scene because you can see the bullets, which I thought was implausible at the time), and in another ending, you get captured by Not Klingons and most likely executed (there is an attempt to do a nerve pinch on the leader but it doesn’t work).
I have a mixed reaction to Rifts. It’s absolutely a delight, but the rules are terrible, even for a system coming out of the early 80s.
They Kickstartered a Savage Worlds adaptation a couple of years ago, and it massively overfunded in a matter of days. That’ll tell you something.
I still have all my CYOA books on my shelves, I was such a nerd I even brought the official guide to the fantasy ones. That said I never managed to figure out Starship Traveller. My favourite one though was House of Hell, it was an interesting twist on the genre and a pretty awesome horror story as well.
I think that’s the risk of that kind of cultural saturation. I can’t speak for Whedon as I don’t travel those circles, but in the game stores I frequented GoT was everywhere. All the YouTube channels I subbed were talking about it every week. Once you see something everywhere, you kinda want to get away from it. Look no further than Trump. After all, I think it’s safe to say we rag on his fans.
I went through the same thing with Twilight and 50 Shades when the films were coming out. I was tired of hearing about them because their fandoms just baffled me. Harlequin’s been publishing bodice-rippers for decades, they never hit the jackpot like those two cash cows.
I’ll stop, I’m just bellyaching at this point.
Re: Choose Your Own Adventure books, and hidden endings:
Take a look at http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/cyoa-choose-your-own-adventure-maps ; people have been using graph theory for a while to map out CYOA books, and it talks about hidden endings. (The map for ‘Escape from the Haunted Warehouse’ has one branch with two square ‘ending’ markers on it, as one ending gives you the clues to look for the other one.)
Somebody else already pointed out ‘To Be or Not To Be’, which was done by Ryan North of Dinosaur Comics. Despite mostly being known as a comic book writer these days, North’s degree is in computational linguistics. (North also wrote the Adventure Time comic book for a while, including one issue of Adventure Time as a Choose Your Own Adventure with a fairly high level of fourth-wall breaking.)
For that matter, take a look at Jason Shiga’s ‘Meanwhile’ at some point; it’s also a combination comic book/CYOA, but gets rather philosophical. (And it also has a hidden ending which you can’t get to from anywhere.)
That’s not why we rag on his fans. Not AT ALL. What makes you think ANY of that has to do with over saturation? How lucky you must be that your reason for hating on Trump fans is “I’m tired of seeing it everywhere” and not “I’m worried I/my family members/my friends will die as a direct result of them and their president”. Holy fuck.
@Falconer
I caught your comment about the not Klingons and it kind of rang a bell, I was sure there was some dodgy Klingon-alike on the cover so googled a load of CYOA book covers to see if I could spot it.
This quickly turned into a fun five minutes trying to work out which are parodies and which originals; there was a fun Breaking Bad one, and a Hunter S Thompson one, but I didn’t see yours. I will investigate the charity shops and see if I can come across it.
But it DID remind me that there were a series of Indiana Jones adventure books that I’d forgotten I’d read, including ‘Indiana Jones and the Cup of the Vampire’, which I remember enjoying (when I was 9); probably a lot more than I enjoyed Indy and the Crystal Skull (when I was 31). I need to get my nieces some of these, and some of the Goosebumps ones as well, that apparently exist.
@DanHolme,
That’s reminded me of the infamously bad Indiana Jones RPG put out by TSR in the mid-80s. The one where they tried to trademark “Nazi.” The one where you could only play Indy, Marion, Sallah, Willie, Short Round, or Wu Han (the guy posing as a waiter in Club Obi). The one they burned when their license expired.
Not asking them to. People feel what they feel and like what they like for their own reasons. After all, I dropped Lost after they killed off the only characters that interested me for no reason I could fathom. I probably had a similar reaction. But some people loved the series to the end. Great, cool!
I’m sorry, I feel like I opened a can of worms here when it wasn’t my intent. I’m in the wrong anyway. I’ll shut up.
@Falconer
There were some LucasArt Indiana Jones adventure games that I remember enjoying. I think they used the SCUMM engine (Monkey Island, Maniac Mansion, etc.).
@Falconer
Sounds fairly awesome, I’ll see if I can find it.
Wow, six pages?? That’s what I get for spending the day away from the computer! I’m just finishing up page 2 and want to leave this before things wind up. I may or may not be successful.
The tears, they are *so* salty!
I other news, I recently found out that there’s a Dark Tower movie coming out and Roland is being played by Idris Elba!! *swoon* Although, I’m not thrilled over Matthew McConaughey as the Man in Black. Won’t keep me from seeing it, though.
I wonder if all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over a female Doctor will overshadow blowback over a black Roland?
@latsot, it isn’t, make sure to aim for something that won’t bust when you hit it with the book.
I do think it starts with you and your bruh getting sent off to get you out of someone’s hair, though.
@kupo,
There were some LucasArt Indiana Jones adventure games that I remember enjoying. I think they used the SCUMM engine (Monkey Island, Maniac Mansion, etc.).
Yes there are, and yes they’re mostly available through GOG, and yes when I get done with all the gold-box SSI AD&D games I’ll give them a try even though I found other LucasArts adventure games like The Dig and Grim Fandango infuriatingly hard.