Categories
alpha males beta males boner rage citation needed drama kings empathy deficit entitled babies grandiosity hypocrisy incel irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny PUA rape rape culture rape is good actually red pill rhymes with roosh virginity

Ex-incel demands compensation for the years society “conspired” to keep him a virgin

Note to male incels: Women don’t necessarily enjoy being virgins either

By David Futrelle

You might not think there would be much of an ideological overlap between dateless incels (so-called “involuntary celibates”) and swashbuckling pickup artists who claim to bed hot babes with alacrity. But they’re really two sides of the same shitty coin.

Both are suffused with an overblown sense of sexual entitlement — a feeling that they not only deserve sex but deserve it with virginal or near-virginal hotties who will have few former partners to compare them to, if any at all. (Many of even the most self-pitying and sexually pessimistic incels will turn up their noses at the thought of having sex with fat girls and/or “sluts.”)

But they’re also convinced that they won’t be able to score the women they see as their due without, well, a bit of trickery or force.

That’s why pickup guides like Roosh Valizadeh’s Bang books so often read like date rape manuals, with Roosh himself cheerfully admitting not only to deception but also to using “muscle” to get what he wants from women.

And that’s why incels so often appeal to a sort of deus ex machina solution to their ongoing celibacy, fantasizing about a world in which some unfortunate women would be more or less forced to have sex with them. (You remember the Government Get Girlfriends guy, right?)

This is all a somewhat long-winded preface to a discussion of a truly frightening post  (archived here) that I was recently alerted to on Roosh V’s forum. It’s by a regular commenter there who calls himself Mercenary — a (de facto) incel turned pickup artist who still feels not only bitterness but rage over the years he spent as a virgin.

In a lengthy comment in a thread on the sadness of sexual “dry spells,” he makes clear he’s still hanging on to the central tenets of incel ideology. It’s scary stuff:

[T]he many years I spent as a virgin seem like a real and true CRIME against my happiness and sexuality. I say the word CRIME in the most literal sense. I feel like the whole system or society or way of life needs to be put on trial for making me frustrated and angry and miserable for so many years, and I should be paid compensation for all the years I missed on sexual experiences because I intentionally kept a clueless beta by everyone and everything.

That is not how the world works, dude. This is the sort of thing you go to therapy to process, not the sort of thing the government sends you a check for.

Everyone and everything was conspiring against me getting any sex or female affection, and only teaching me things that were always leading me to failure over and over. I’m talking about movies, television, books, my elders, my parents, teachers, school, university, work colleagues, government legislation, law courts, the police, male friends, and especially girls all giving misleading, totally false and downright dangerous information on interacting with women.

This is essentially a conspirified reworking of the standard pickup artist pitch: Society tells guys that the way to a woman’s heart is to be a “nice guy,” but being nice doesn’t work; you can only “get laid” by projecting a flawless, aloof “alpha” vibe.

The pickup artists are right that “nice guys” finish last, but only because the “niceness” in question is fundamentally manipulative and off-putting to most women. (See here for my numerous previous takes on the notorious “nice guy,” or start with one or two of these posts. Or this Nice Guy primer from Dr. Nerdlove ) The real solution for straight guys isn’t to learn to act like an alpha — and to turn your whole life into a performance — but to, you know, develop some genuine confidence in yourself that’s not dependent on manipulative PUA garbage.

But, alas, Mercenary’s rant gets darker.

I’m not just thinking of myself, but of all you guys here and I’m also thinking of every frustrated virgin who has never been laid, every man who has spent years as an incel, every man who has been cheated on, and every man whose wife left him, destroyed all he built, and took his money and children. If you really think about it, how many male suicides worldwide, or murders across the globe could have been prevented just from teaching men game and getting them laid with some female affection ? Contemplated this way what we have had for the last 50 to 80 years is a crime of epic proportions.

To Mercenary, what’s happening is a virtual Virgin-ocaust. And he believes this quite sincerely. In his mind, the people who criticize pickup artistry are basically guilty of mass murder. (Unfortunately, he’s hardly the first guy to compare his lack of sex to literal genocide.)

And now we come to the Very Bad History portion of Mercenary’s rant.

In my grandfathers time every man was guaranteed at least 1 virgin woman in his life and some sex and affection from her provided he got married to her. Back then, even if your if your wife eventually became a total cold bitch or got fat, you still had a family, a home and affection from your children. The men who didn’t get married became monks or priests…this is how old society dealt with the MGTOWS and few gays back in the day. Sluts who had children out of wedlock usually were reformed by … putting them into convents and making them nuns.

Literally none of this is true.

Yes, in midcentury America, people tended to get married earlier than they do today, when more people wait to get married or don’t get married at all. And yes, given the youth of many of those getting married and the endless strictures against premarital sex in those days, men were more likely to marry virgins than they are now (and more likely to be virgins themselves). But no man was “guaranteed at least 1 virgin woman in his life.”

Also: WHO FUCKING CARES IF YOUR WIFE IS A VIRGIN, ESPECIALLY IF YOU’RE NOT ONE YOURSELF? Why are supposed PICKUP ARTISTS so obsessed with MARRYING VIRGINS I mean don’t they usually get mad at women who don’t want to have sex with them, do they even know what virgins are? 

But here’s the thing: when people get married very young, their marriages tend to be shitty. A lot of those who married young in the 1950s got divorced in the 1960s and 1970s, Not that Mercenary cares: he seems to think a shitty marriage isn’t a big deal so long as your wife started her life with you as a virgin bride.

Also, though I hardly need to say this, the stuff about monks and nuns is just plain delusional, and not just because only about a fifth of Americans at midcentury were Catholic. It’s true that “sluts who had children out of wedlock” were often sent away against their will to live in “maternity homes” until they gave birth and surrendered their babies for adoption, but they weren’t forced to become nuns.

Even more appalling than Mercenary’s historical ignorance on this issue, of course, is his belief that forcing “sluts” to become nuns would be a good thing for them.

Society was stable, families were strong, children were plentiful, divorce was rare. Being single and living alone was really frowned upon. The old system ensured that in one way or another, both men and women had some form of company and satisfaction in their lives.

But society wasn’t stable. The 50s were a historical aberration, and led directly to the cultural explosion of the 1960s as those who chafed at the restrictiveness of 50s roles and 50s rules tried to figure out more authentic ways of living their lives.

Nowadays the only thing keeping men “sane” is endless online porn.

Speak for yourself, buddy.

Except that it isn’t really….it’s just keeping them weak and demotivated. In those countries where porn is still banned men act very, very differently.

Probably because they live in theocracies and totalitarian regimes?

I wish I could pin the blame on all my sexless years on one group of people or one thing….but the endless cockblocking information was coming from so many different angles and sources that all I can call it is “the system” or “modern society”.

I think this is the reason so many of us get deeply political once we start to master game. We see that the way the world around us has been structured since we got our first boners has been always been totally against our happiness and satisfaction, and also taking most of our money in the process.

Yes, he thinks the world is a vast conspiracy against his boner.

This is the real reason we have the system we have now….it simply produces more much money at the expense of everything else, while keeping most men physically and mentally weak and frustrated & unhappy at the same time.

This is also the reason why today we are considered politically subversive and dangerous by those who want to keep the current system in place at all costs.

No, it’s because you’re raging misogynists who think women exist only for your pleasure.

Game makes men feel and act like real men.
Game keeps your body and mind satisfied, healthy and strong

Game saves lives.
Game is power.

Literally none of this is true. Incel is poison. “Game” is poison too.

155 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paradoxical Intention - Leader of the Deathclaw Damsels

I’m very upset that I didn’t get to go on a journey when I was 10 to catch wild animals and befriend them.

How very dare the gubbmint not make my dream to be a Pokemon Master come true.

I DEMAND COMPENSATION!

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
7 years ago

Georgia Tann – baby finder for the stars. And by baby finder I mean she obtained babies often through deceptive means to supply Hollywood’s rich and famous with the babies they demanded and had the money to buy. The sick ones were killed by starvation and neglect – had to be chubby and adorable white babies for those celebrities! No sickly ones allowed.

I wonder how the process of deciding which MGTOWs would have to become priests and monks would go…

Poor wittle Mercenary…all those years with a sad and frustrated little boner BECAUSE GOVERNMENT. Yeah that totally has to be why. A vast conspiracy the government which has been dominated by men for like..FOREVER decided should happen. Has he never read any legitimately factual source on how things went historically? The men with the most livestock/money/some other resource/etc had to find something to keep the men who couldn’t find wives occupied while they had multiple wives because they had the means to afford them. So maybe mercenary should take it up with the long-dead leaders throughout history for compensation after causing his sad boner plight.

ETA: Bonus points if he conducts a seance to do so.

History Nerd
History Nerd
7 years ago

Historically, most people got married fairly late, at least when both people were over 25. People started getting married around ages 18-24 in the 1950’s, in part because many 18-23 year-old men could get a decent job after finishing high school or college (due to low birth rates in the 1930’s and 1940’s). By the 1990’s, the high school dating culture of the 1950’s and 1960’s was dead because parents were discouraging their kids from getting married or having sex early.

Lots of cultures did really horrific stuff because men were hung up about women comparing their sexual experiences with other men. Female genital mutilation, for example.

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
7 years ago

@PI
Why must the beaurocracies of our governments dictate whether or not we’re allowed to the very best like no one ever was?

@msexceptiontotherule
It’s like Welcome to the NHK but even more sad.

Steph
Steph
7 years ago

These guys. Moan that women won’t f*ck them.
Moan that they can’t marry a virgin.

Literally zero sense. And what is the obsession with virgins anyway?

GrumpyOld SocialJusticeMangina
GrumpyOld SocialJusticeMangina
7 years ago

Early marriages were encouraged in the 50s and 60s, for girls at least. There was a general feeling that “going steady” should be discouraged in high school — remember that contraception was all but unavailable for most teens. Until Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, it was a criminal offense for doctors in Connecticut to discuss birth control with even married patients.

In 1967 hundreds of students at Boston University petitioned [birth control activist Bill] Baird to challenge a Massachusetts law that prohibited providing contraception to unmarried persons. On April 6, 1967, he gave a lecture at Boston University, during which he gave a condom and a package of over-the-counter contraceptive foam to a female college student. He was immediately arrested and eventually jailed. His appeal of his conviction culminated in the 1972 Supreme Court decision Eisenstadt v. Baird, which established the right of unmarried persons to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples

But in that era (I’m a leading edge — 1947 — boomer) it was very common for girls especially to marry right out of HS — at my 50th HS reunion there were a surprising number of couples who had been married for 46-48 years. Furthermore it was a fairly common thing for girls to go to college for a year for no reason other than to snag a husband. It took feminism to bring about the current plurality of serious women students in college.

The availabilty of contraception (particularly the Pill) meant that you could be in a sexual relationship without becoming pregnant, which greatly reduced the pressure for early marriage as a treatment for horniness. That probably prevented a lot of bad early marriages.

JS
JS
7 years ago

TW: Spousal abuse
One of the earlier posters in that thread, goes by the name “I didn’t kill my wife” in all-caps, and has been posting for some time. What might that say about the people running the site, I wonder…

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
7 years ago

@Steph
Christian fundamentalist teachings that fetishize the Virgin Mary? Idk a person once said to me it’s beautiful to be the first person to see someone’s hymen bleed during marital sex, I’m hoping that isn’t the standard way of thinking amongst certain groups.

Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy
Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy
7 years ago

As if every girl bleeds when the hymen breaks anyway.
As if hymens can’t get broken by other means. ??
Also, abstinence literature & virginity porn have a hell of a lot in common – fetishising female virginity being the main theme obv.

Zephkiel
Zephkiel
7 years ago

My father first married in 1960 when he was 20 years old. By the time he was 26 he had three children and had divorced. Both he and his first wife essentially married to escape their families, before realising that they were fundamentally incompatible and were pretty much miserable together.

They both remarried in their 30s, and their second marriages worked out well for everyone. Although my dad has passed away, I know his first wife well, because she comes to family gatherings, even when my mother is the organiser.

The “golden age” marriage certainly didn’t work for my dad, his second marriage (to a non-virginal, post-wall, outspoken feminist, career woman) lasted 31 years until his death.

Bina
Bina
7 years ago

@msexceptiontotherule:

Georgia Tann – baby finder for the stars. And by baby finder I mean she obtained babies often through deceptive means to supply Hollywood’s rich and famous with the babies they demanded and had the money to buy. The sick ones were killed by starvation and neglect – had to be chubby and adorable white babies for those celebrities! No sickly ones allowed.

Yep, that’s one of the baby-scoopers. And she was far from alone. Up here in Canada, we had the infamous Butterbox Babies case:

The Ideal Maternity Home was operated by William and Lila Young in East Chester, Nova Scotia, between the late 1920’s through the 1940’s. William was a chiropractor and Lila was a midwife but marketed herself as an obstetrician. The Home began as a place for local married couples to find maternity care, as well as a discreet location for unwed mothers to have their babies. At the time legal adoptions in the U.S. were not permitted across religious lines and with a shortage of available newborns, many American couples traveled to Nova Scotia to adopt from the Ideal Maternity Home. The cost of the adoptions varied but it is believed that some couples paid up to $10,000 for a baby. At times, there were upwards of 100 babies available for adoption. As time went on, the Youngs’ practices became more and more corrupt. Babies who were considered ‘unadoptable’, either because of skin color or health issues, were left to die and buried in the woods behind the Home or dumped into the ocean. The term ‘Butterbox Baby’ comes from the small mitered pine butterboxes that came from the local dairy and were used as coffins, just the right size for a newborn.

Ironically, the Youngs were considered “advanced” at the time, since they didn’t frame their practice as a righteous penance for sluts, but as “giving babies a chance”. They sold the children using the then-seemingly-progressive line that these poor, “orphaned” kids just needed a nice respectable family to give them better opportunities. The fact that a lot of the unsaleable ones ended up dying at this not-so-ideal maternity home (deliberately starved to death or of untreated infections) at a time when Canada was at war with Nazi Germany over some strikingly similar human rights violations is one irony that didn’t make the headlines until at least one young mother also died at the home, during a botched forceps delivery (which Lila Young, as a midwife, was neither trained nor licenced to do). And even then, it took nothing short of bankruptcy on the part of the overreaching Youngs to finally close the place for good.

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
7 years ago

Where are my glass slippers? Where is my pumpkin-coach?

Where is my prince?

Where is my happily ever after?!!!!!!!1!

I’ve been lied to and I demand compensation!

misophistry
misophistry
7 years ago

I’m unsure of the comments policy; am I allowed to wish cancer on this man’s boner?

Wait I’ve changed my mind; antibiotic resistant leprosy.

guest
guest
7 years ago

I can’t help but be intrigued by the phrase ‘sex or female affection’. He uses ‘affection’ at least twice in his statement–I wonder what precisely this means in his head? I’m inclined to think it means ‘unconditional devotion’ (in which case, if this is so vital to his mental health, maybe he should think about adopting a dog?), or maybe even more likely ‘domestic support’ (and maybe, remembering Paul Elam and some of the others David has written about, ‘financial support’).

Am surprised no one has yet mentioned the war 🙂 The gravitational lens that was WWII warped social structures and peronal relationships all around it; the closer you get to it the less ‘typical’ any kind of social structure or behaviour is.

Ray of Rays
Ray of Rays
7 years ago

@ JS

Wouldn’t put it past the poster or site owners, or that it might not carry a deliberate double-meaning, but I think “I didn’t kill my wife” is a reference to The Fugitive.

Kimstu
Kimstu
7 years ago

@PoM:

He gets so close to some kind of epiphany when he notes that societal forces are a thing that exist and that have strong influence on people … and then whiffs it

Yup. Lookit this:

This is the real reason we have the system we have now….it simply produces more much money at the expense of everything else

Dude actually reveals some faint glimmering of a clue that a society structured around extreme-capitalist consumerism has some negative impacts on human beings’ quality of life.

But instead of actually understanding that, he’s just all resentful that society’s market forces aren’t catering to his desires for sexual consumption of women as successfully as his desires for other kinds of consumption. Poor baby.

misophistry
misophistry
7 years ago

Actually my off-colour post makes me think. What the hell is this guy complaining about, he has a fully functional boner so far as we know. How does he think all the unfortunate folks with damaged or non-functional boners feel. They obviously take precedence in any compensation program as they may in fact actually be sort of incel depending on their circumstances.

He is a winy cry baby hitler.

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
7 years ago

@guest

I can’t help but be intrigued by the phrase ‘sex or female affection’. He uses ‘affection’ at least twice in his statement–I wonder what precisely this means in his head? I’m inclined to think it means ‘unconditional devotion’ (in which case, if this is so vital to his mental health, maybe he should think about adopting a dog?), or maybe even more likely ‘domestic support’ (and maybe, remembering Paul Elam and some of the others David has written about, ‘financial support’).

Oh no, no, no. No participant in the manosphere should adopt a dog. Or even go near any other living being or thing.

No plants!

Maybe he could tend a rock garden. Maybe.

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
7 years ago

@Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Rocks are fine, as long as golems and rock spirits aren’t a fact of life there is no way he can abuse a rock.

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
7 years ago

@Ooglyboggles
Rocks it is then.

msexceptiontotherule
msexceptiontotherule
7 years ago

Yeah but what if he gets it in his head to throw those rocks, that would be bad. Nope, I think mercenary needs to have nothing and no one, until shipped off to seagull island because that’s where people like him go. 😛

guest
guest
7 years ago

🙂 seagulls will give him unconditional love as long as the french fries keep coming.

misophistry
misophistry
7 years ago

He could have a pet seagull? All they do is look sideways at you and inquire about food. If you abuse them they fly off and crap on you messily as they go. Perfect incel pet. This is true I’m sure Alan will agree being a coastal type.

aHa ninja’d by guest.

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
7 years ago

@misophistry
But what if he does things like poison the seagull or break and take away it’s body parts?

Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy
Mish of the Catlady Ascendancy
7 years ago

Seagulls are survivors. No seagulls to be allowed near these people! ??