With Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement like the huge idiot he is, today seems like a good time for another Trump open thread.
Have at it! No trolls or Trump fans.
With Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement like the huge idiot he is, today seems like a good time for another Trump open thread.
Have at it! No trolls or Trump fans.
I thought it was great, though not the best thing I’ve ever seen at the NT (that would be the two-part His Dark Materials adaptation)–but I write about this period, so have a lot of thoughts and feels about what I saw. I actually do plan to write a review for a historical journal (though as I’m not by any stretch an actual theatre critic I’m waiting to read what the heavy hitters say before I jump in).
One of the things I found intriguing about the performance was how ‘the old ways’ were portrayed onstage. I spent part of the holiday weekend at a folk festival watching people in silly costumes do silly dances; I commented to my friends, ‘wow, English people sure are weird.’ Between that sort of twee cutesiness and the full-on Wicker Man bonkers there’s something in the middle that makes me, at least, really get that not too long ago or too far away we performed the same kind of ‘pagan rituals’ that ‘civilised’ First World people spend lots of money to witness tourist-accommodating versions of in ‘backward’ countries or Native reservations in the USA.
@ guest
Ah, in my roadie days I spent a lot of time at the South Bank Centre. It’s funny, once took someone to a concert there as a regular date, and then couldn’t find the actual entrance. So used to just walking in through the loading dock at the back. If you ever want to blag I’d recommend that, no-one ever asks what you’re doing there. One time not only did some guys turn up to nick the grand piano from the Festival Hall, they got security to help them get it in the lift.
@alan I just got a new and very well paid job, so I can afford a ticket 🙂
@ guest
I’m from Yorkshire; it’s the principle.
Another one that works (and I was surprised, but it does) is just to walk up to the back door as a pair. Before anyone asks you for a pass or anything just point to your colleague and say “It’s ok, they’re with me”
Alan:
Did you learn that one from Ford Prefect?
@ newt
Ooh, is that where it’s from? Full of great advice that series. I quite often carry a towel around with me.
On an unrelated note, I took my pet lizard to the pub last night. The landlord said “He’s a bit small isn’t he?”. I said “Yeah, he’s my newt.”
(I’ll get my coat)
@alan Alas I am no longer in Yorkshire (and honestly not a day goes by that I don’t regret that). But yeah, I get you 🙂
@KatieKitten420 Years ago I attended a staged reading of the Paston Letters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paston_Letters
One thing that particularly struck me was a line in a letter from, I think, the house steward to the head of the family, who was about to make a significant decision. (I’ve actually tried to find this line in the letter transcripts with no luck–I’ve searched for the word ‘pray’, but they all say ‘I pray you to do x and y’ so that didn’t really work.) The steward writes something like ‘please don’t make a decision that will cause me to not want to pray for you.’ That was no idle threat–everyone’s prayers were worth the same, and you didn’t want to be caught in Purgatory with no one to pray for you, so no matter how powerful and important you were you’d better make sure when you died that you left enough people behind who could help you get to heaven. In ‘history days’, as my pal Mike Duncan says, there was not typically the kind of egalitarianism we wish for, but there was a lot more sense of connection and transaction–people of all ‘levels’ really did need each other. We still do, of course, but we’ve managed to create a world where it’s easy to pretend we don’t.
Ooh, Katie Hopkins is apparently about to be ‘sacked’ by the Daily Mail. The official reason will be ‘by mutual agreement’. That’s less to do with ethics in journalism and more to do with all the libel payouts the Mail has had to indemnify her for, but still, good news.
Trumpty Dumpy emptied a trashcan
Over Uncle Sam’s head.
Sam grumped, ‘I cant get clean until
Old age renders that wiggy fool dead.’
@alan: Yes, that one turned up in Mostly Harmless. Although people might have been using it before then. To bring us back on-topic, I’m fond of Trillian’s many explanations for presidential stupidity:
Also in Trump news, and relevant to UK readers — squiggly red lines (the FBI use those too, right?) now connect Nigel Farage to the Trump/Russia investigation.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/01/nigel-farage-is-person-of-interest-in-fbi-investigation-into-trump-and-russia
@Kat
Me neither. But for different reasons. I’m actually pissed to see the Democrats push against him with mighty force. You’re supposed to keep your friends close and your enemies closer and the Democrats are doing the exact opposite. I’ve seen many progressives leave our side because they’re tired of attacking the president and seeing him take everything we had piece by piece.
And I can’t even blame him. If I was a Democrat president and the republicans behaved like that towards me I’d refuse to help them and I’d take care only of my agenda.
The number of liberals switching to the right wing side keeps growing while the number of rwingers switching to our side is almost inexistent. We’re losing numbers and it’s not good. The 2018 elections are going to be a disaster if we keep going on like this.
@Alan;
Yeesh, cognitive impairment’s acting up again, I read that as “liberal payments the Mail has had to identify her for”… and I thought, what, George Soros is paying Katie Hopkins? … to what? To shut up???
@Aulma
You think the Democrats would have better luck if they cozied up to Drumpf? He’s a bully, and like all bullies he sticks your head in the toilet no matter how you approach him. His one and only “governing” “principle” is: Trash Obama’s achievements.
5Calls has a script for asking your MOCs to publicly condemn his decision on the Paris agreement, and I’m pleased to say that all three of mine already have. It was nice to be able to make a string of “thank you” calls. Later today I’m going to call the governor with the same praise.
They behaved far, far worse towards Obama for eight Godfucking years and exactly zero Rs began voting D because of it. The brogressive party jumping we’re seeing has nothing to do with how meeean we’re being to the poor innocent monsters and everything to do with how the media normalisation of Nazism has made them feel safe enough to reveal their true colours. You’re blaming the victim.
If anything, the Ds are being way too fucking forgiving. Spineless bastards need to stop talking about doing something and start actually doing something; self-congratulatory tweets don’t stop civil wars.
@Aulma
Im with Scented and Kara on this. Being nicer to narcissistic bullies does not make THEM nicer, it makes them worse.
Liberals need to start doing the opposite. No need to be rude or abusive, just draw lines in the sand and pledge consequences if those lines are stepped over. And by God, deliver on those threats.
@SFHC
Thank you. That was pissing me off way too much for words.
@SFHC : I second the thanks of Kupo. Aulma have no idea how, well, anything work. He also have no idea of how destructive Trump is.
Speaking of striving to stave off what would be certain disaster if left unopposed – good luck to all UK Mammotheers who are campaigning/contributing/phonebanking/writing/doorstepping/doing what we can to get the tories out on June the 8th!
There are almost too many anti-tory points to raise (the Nolan report on forcing NHS trusts to sell off assets into private hands at knock-down prices is only one of the relatively recent to emerge).
fuerza, not long to go now and every bit counts!
@Aulma
Aulma the GOP continued to go through with their bigotry from sheer spite at the thought a black man was POTUS. They’ve used minority groups like mine and others as cheap labor before treating us like trash to exported to different parts of the globe. Recently they’ve celebrated getting a bill halfway to cutting millions from healthcare.
Yeah I got some fucking hate and will oppose them. The nice, pacifistic polite route did nothing but facilitate degradation of all institutions. The Dems need to actually back up their words with threats, and don’t do stupid shit like sitting on their asses and insult their base like they’re too dumb to think that maybe taking things for granted is a bad strategy.
Once upon a time, the city your humble Jivesy was born and raised in elected a hard-drinking crack mayor. He smooth-talked his way into office with the help of a split ballot while offering to “stop the gravy train” and “respect the taxpayer”, empty buzzphrases that drew on suburban resentment for the city core following a particularly unpleasant garbage collector strike. He bumbled his way around the mayorship, offering nonsensical policies that typically involved privatization (when he wasn’t goofing off coaching football) until a video turned up that offered evidence that he smoked crack. Subsequent drunken stupor videos and racist impressions made him a minor celebrity, with even that strapping young Jimmy Kimmel fellow hosting his antics. Meanwhile, that mayor was embroiled in an expense scandal and eventually fessed up to smoking that crack, leading city council to strip him of most of his power. Eventually, the hard-drinking crack mayor got cancer and died, leaving the city with one of the last red Torys in existence.
Your friendly neighbourhood Jivesy accidentally contributed to the hard-drinking crack mayor’s win by refusing to vote for his weasel-faced rival and instead voted for the other Joey Pants, the former deputy mayor of the last guy who Jivesy didn’t mind too much. Your friendly neighbourhood Jivesy learned a few hard lessons that blustery October day… the biggest being not to vote based on purity, and sometimes you have to vote for a weasel-face in order to prevent hard-drinking crack mayors from upending your local politics.
Jivesy also had a hard lesson in the power of resentment. Canada’s a pretty mellow place, but if people think they’re being screwed over by “elites”, anything that makes those perceived “elites” squirm is supported, especially if those “elites” are represented by the media. And even a hard-drinking crack-mayor can maintain a loyal voting base of approximately 30% of the population that will only love him more if they consider him scapegoated by those awful reporter people. It’s the kind of thing that teaches you something about your neighbours (looking your way, Etobicoke).
If your friendly neighbourhood Jivesy has any advice for a certain country south of our border that didn’t heed the lesson of the hard-drinking crack mayor they enjoyed laughing at when it was another country dealing with it, it would be:
1) Stick to issues. When hard-drinking crack mayor-like entities drink and do crack, media beating him up over personal problems makes him look sympathetic. Nobody wants their mayors to do crack, but when your mayor is slashing transit funding and babbling about subways where none are warranted by civic planners, that’s a titch more important than what he puts in his lungs.
2) Don’t get distracted. Hard-drinking crack mayors are going to do buffoonish things. Often. Joke about it for a half hour, then remember that he’s refusing to discuss revenue streams for a cash-strapped municipality the size of Chicago.
3) Keep an eye on the next guy. Hard-drinking crack mayors have a nasty habit of normalizing non-crack using politicos with the same policies. Your friendly neighbourhood Jivesy might have voted for that clean-cut Tory fellow, but only because it was obvious the much superior candidate wasn’t going to win because she was a woman and she was Chinese. His backing dumb a one-stop subway is just the shit cherry on top of the shit sundae. If your alternative to your crack mayor is Ted Cruz… well, ’nuff said.
4) Support your local candidates. While Jives had to put up with the crack mayor for four years, his councillor was an affable young man with solid progressive politics who stood up to the crack mayor at every turn. While he’s a city councillor now, he could be mayor or maybe Premier ten years from now. Work on keeping a deep bench. It pays off.
5) Don’t think you’re an exception. America had a good guffaw at the hard-drinking crack mayor from that podunk town across Lake Ontario, just like Toronto did after having a half-decent administrator as mayor for eight years. Soon America had a crack mayor of its own, and he’s eligible for another term. Organize for your state races like yesterday. It always matters.
And everybody lived crack-fully ever after. The end.
@Karalora
I think you misunderstood. I don’t expect him to deliver anything for us. Getting closer to him will at least make him think twice before doing anything and would buy us more time to fuck him over. I didn’t mean “let’s be nice to him guys!!”, I know that’s not going to help.
He’s a tornado, he’s impulsive more than every other republican president in the past. Time is crucial for us.
@sfhc
Well at least we agree on that. They keep talking about impeachment and collusions with Russia and tax returns and god knows what else but they’re not delivering on anything.
@sunnysombrera
It’s exactly the rude and abusive that bothered me, not the opposition to Trump or the will to stand our ground.
looking at the contour map round these parts looks like the shop I work at will be regularly flooded soon. And the road out of town. We’ll be on an island a few decades later if it all goes according to the Hansen predictions. Good thing I like boats.
Also, this just in: Six Trump supporters who support Trump’s Paris position get retweets!
@A Rose for Emily
You’re talking about the formalization of these beliefs, not the origins. The oldest known instance of the use of the so-called “curse of Ham” as a justification of slavery comes from John Annius in the 15th century. He acted like it was an ancient doctrine, but it basically originated with him. The logic that Ham’s descendants are cursed to dark skin and slavery doesn’t work without Biblical literalism. Unless one believes that the flood story is literally true and that the entire human population is descended from 3 brothers, the justification that Ham’s descendants are properly enslaved just doesn’t work.
(Incidentally, the curse was actually laid on Canaan, not Ham, which shows how willing white supremacists are to twist even their Biblical literalism in the service of white supremacy.)
The story of the “Curse of Ham” as the reason slavery was A-OK spread in the 17th century alongside the Biblical literalism and inerrancy required to make that justification function, when mass-produced Bibles became widely available. Just because we didn’t use the word “fundamentalism” to describe this until the early 20th century doesn’t mean the ideas didn’t exist until that word was applied. They had existed for centuries at that point.
@Aulma
I don’t like it either but if we are going to turn the spotlight from the behaviour of Trump and his cohorts to the mannerisms of his opponents then we are gonna get nowhere. Focus on stopping the enemy, not on tone policing our own side.