No one should be turning to the neo-Nazi online tabloid The Daily Stormer for dating advice, but on the off chance that you are, I have to warn you that they don’t know what they’re talking about.
I mean, they don’t know what they’re talking about when it comes to pretty much everything, but in this case their ignorance involves what actually went on in the supposed 1950s cultural paradise they want to return us to, forcibly if necessary.
In a post with the sarcastic title “Dating Advice: The Key to Good Relationships is Cheating on Your Boyfriends,” regular Daily Stormer contributor “Zeiger” takes aim at a “fat Paki skag” dating expert who has the temerity to argue that women searching for “the One” should date a bunch of guys casually before committing to one of them.
I know, shocking.
Well, it is to Zeiger.
Not so long ago, women didn’t feel like they needed dating advice. After all, they just had to stand around somewhere until a man came to them and took care of everything for them.
All they had to worry about was serving him beer and cooking his food right so he didn’t dump their ungrateful asses.
Zeiger illustrates this point with a magazine illustration from the 1950s depicting happy teenage girls learning to bake a cake, so it’s pretty clear what romanticized past Zeiger is harking back to.
Alas, we have fallen so far from this imaginary paradise!
But in the era of NUMALE faggots and Jew feminism, women are confused. They think it’s somehow their job to understand relationships. This is already a completely insane concept.
But it gets worse.
These days, they’re getting their relationship advice from insane Paki sluts.
The “Paki slut” in question is a “relationship coach” named Sami Wunder who was recently featured in the British tabloid The Express. Despite Zeiger’s headline, Wunder does not actually suggest that women cheat on their boyfriends. Rather, she recommends that women looking for a husband date multiple men, non-exclusively, holding off on serious committment until one of them pops the question.
Whatever you think of this advice, it’s hardly “cheating” to date more than one person when you’re not in an exclusive relationship, presuming everyone is on the up and up on this.
Zeiger is outraged by the very idea.
I guarantee that no real man would “put a ring” on the finger of some hoe who cheated on him with a bunch of other guys. A “man” so pussy-whipped would more appropriately be called a “humanoid slug.” …
What this shows is the urgent need women have for stable, healthy relationships. And that is something that can only be provided by WHITE SHARIA – not fat Paki whore dating advice.
Zeiger’s anger here seems to stem from the same mix of entitlement and insecurity that drives the alt-right obsession with “cucks” and “cucking.” These are men who, on some level, feel entitled to any attractive woman who wanders into their field of vision, and feel betrayed — even “cucked” — when any of these women date or marry or just have sex with some guy other than them.
But we’re not just entitlement we’re dealing with here. More than a few alt-rightist dudes — and manosphere dudes generally — fetishize nubile young virgins, not just because they’re creepy dudes who are way too into women and girls far too young for them, but because virgins have no way to compare their sexual prowess with other men. Many manosphere dudes are quite open about this anxiety, complaining that women who’ve been with more than one guy will endlessly compare them with their earlier partners.
These are the same guys who go around boasting about what “alphas” they are.
But there’s another giant irony in Zeiger’s piece: dating in the 1950s, at least at the start of the decade, looked a lot more like Wunder’s world than Zeigers in some crucial respects.
In the 40s and early 50s, teenagers were encouraged to “play the field,” casually dating an assortment of not-quite-steady partners rather than committing to a single person.
It wasn’t until later in the decade that teens began to shift en masse to the more familiar (to us, that is) strategy of “going steady.” And far from welcoming this new monogamy, many parents were horrified. Magazines at the time were filled with alarming articles on the supposedly grave dangers of going steady.
Here’s one from 1960 warning teens that going steady might be “too dangerous” for them.
Here’s one from 1957 examining the potential “immorality” of going steady.
And here’s a graphic from a pamphlet or magazine article from the era wondering when it was “too early” for teens to go steady.
And parents actually had some legitimate reasons to worry. On the one hand, they worried that teens who “went steady” without dating around first would settle down with the first person of the opposite sex who was nice to them, not realizing they could have done better.
On the other hand, they worried that teens who “went steady” would also end up going further sexually — which could lead, as sex often does, to pregnancy and too-early marriage. Indeed, the age of first marriage dropped precipitously in the 1950s as more teens married, helping to contribute to the spiraling divorce rates of the 1960s and 1970s as these too-hasty marriages fell apart.
It was kind of a screwed-up decade; happily, the sexual revolution of the 1960s convinced a hefty chunk of Americans young and old that 1) sex isn’t the end of the world and 2) it isn’t always such a great idea for teens to settle down forever with the very first person they have sex with.
The weird thing is that the 1950s parents, for all their faults, were more interested in girls and young women having choices than are the alt-rightists of today.
Parents in the 1950s worried that their daughters would end up getting too seriously involved with the wrong guys because they had no good basis for comparison.
Alt-rightists and manosphere dudes today are apparently afraid that no women will settle for them if they realize there are other men out there who aren’t, you know, reactionary racists who think women shouldn’t really be allowed to make their own decisions about anything.
I’m thinking they’re probably right to worry about this. And I’m glad.
Re: books
Does anyone else read the Abrahamic religious books just out of interest in the plot?
I also spend time reading Wikipedia about these books; not because I really care about it, but, as a storyteller, I find their narratives fascinating.
With all the sex and violence and death in the Bible, it’s almost like a proto-ASOIAF. That’s some damn fine storytelling.
@EJ (Marxist Jazz Weasel)
Like these?
http://thepunchlineismachismo.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2015-06-221.jpg
Francesca: I took a religious studies class, basically Judaism 101, taught by a rabbi. We read most of the Torah. It was pretty interesting.
I haven’t read the New Testament, or the Quran, or any holy books of the 19th century US offshoots of Christianity (LDS, SDA, etc). I keep having better things to do.
I should maybe hit up some non-Abrahamic texts. There’s the various eastern religions, and Zoroastrianism.
Mostly though I read Wikipedia.
Haven’t read any of the books of the bible in a really long time because they just don’t hold my attention without a LOT of footnoting and annotations, like Shakespeare. Plus I don’t read Greek.
I did enjoy a few of Bart Ehrman’s popular textual-criticism books about the new testament.
Trump fired Comey
@PaganReader:
THAT’S AMAZING. What’s that from?
It’s from the webcomic Manly Guys Doing Manly Things, which is indeed every kind of awesome. That particular storyline is both great and really bizarre.
@msexceptiontotherule
I’ve seen sharks with warmer eyes than Putin, and that says something. He’s scared the hell out of me for years, what with how all his opponents seem to suddenly get allergies to living.
I read all of the Book of Revelation a few months ago. It goes from didactic to very very strange and never comes back. My overall conclusion was – if you’re ever shipwrecked on Patmos, stay away from the wild mushrooms.
Just think of the corrosive theology we’d have been spared if it had been shunted off with the Apocrypha.
@ Robert
We would have missed out on a lot of heavy metal songs though.
Oooh, I love Apocalyptica!
@ peevee
Did you catch Philomena Cunk’s take on the end of days in that video? You might enjoy it.
(667 – the fax number of the Beast)
@Alan
(668: The Neighbour of the Beast)
@Fran
I prefer other people’s glosses to the original material to be honest. There just isn’t a lot of depth in the original presentation IMO (while some of this may be translation faults, the available material mostly reads like an outline to rather than the actual story. Something like Jesus Christ Superstar I can really sink my teeth into, though.
Well, I can’t stand Martin’s writing in the main, so there’s that.
According to Stephen Fry, the number of the beast should be 616. The claim that it’s 666 is a mistake by people who don’t know enough esoteric Jewish numerology.
This would not amuse the people of Moscow, who had a Route 666 bus line but renumbered it to 616 in response to passenger complaints.
@ EJ
We did this in RE A level (don’t ask, Catholic school). Our teacher, who was a Jesuit so presumably had read up a bit, told us about the theory that initially it was 616 because that’s what the emperor Nero’s name translated to. But then later it was modified to 666 because that’s what you get from Diocletian.
He made it sound pretty plausible.
@ mooncluster
670 – approximate number of the Beast
Alan, no! I havent watched it yet…I will now.
671: the Beast’s neighbor across the street.
Sorry but “Alt Right” or whatever you want to call them are correct.
America was a better place back then in every possible way minus the negatives that haven’t changed.
America was better morally, racially, economically. everything. The world you celebrate – genetic extiction of white people, children in broken homes, out of control lawsuits, impossibly high housing costs, runaway inflation, the welfare state, LGBT Nazi’s telling people how and what to say and think right down to the “tone” they use, race mixing (see: genetic extination) via brainwashing, the intnetional dispalcement of whites by non-whites to even a playing feild that can never be evened, open borders, sodomania, pornography, Anti-God, anti biblical values, Transexual “rights”, brainwashing children to be gay, and every obcene, soul sucking, ruinious, repulsive evil that you people champion as “progress” – this is the society you celebrate.
And you cannot even debate the “Alt right”. All you do is scream and yell and deny thier right to free speech etc.
Because you don’t have ANYTHING except emotions and brainwashing.
I went to Disney recently. Faggots everywhere holding hands and kissing. Disgusting people everywhere. Race mixing. Single mothers strollers with no wedding rings. Maybe 30% white.
This is the world you want.
I honestly don’t see the problem. *shrugs* Sounds fine to me.
@Tell it like you wish it to be
An end to white homogeneity?
People better able to leave bad relationships?
A society and government that takes care of its people?
Queer voices heard and concerns taken seriously?
Racist attitudes towards sex and dating going away?
Freedom of movement and homestead?
Buttsex and blowjobs but only when everyone involved is keen?
Sweet, sweet anime tiddies?
Secular governance and culture?
Trans folks treated like they deserve as human beings?
Accepting and supportive parents and communities for baby queers?
That and a revitalized space program, yeah, this is exactly what I want! 🙂
@ tell it like it is
I usually go with ‘wankers’.
Mind if I steal that for if I ever open a club?
*puts down her Diet Dr. Pepper.
Ohhhh. I thought he said sodamania.
@Telling everyone your fascist beliefs
Refer to Axe’s post. Seconding the want for that world. Being able to vote is nice. Man Disney must be on their ball for people of all stripes to be happy there.
@Dreemr
Funnily enough it’s a name for a real shop in Florida that sells alot of soda brands.
http://www.subs-n-such.com
Is this that Chaucer troll again? Pro Patria Truth Teller?
@Tell us you’re a Nazi
Nah, I’d actually prefer a world without Disney.
Tell it,
You are boring.
Fin.
Reminds me of this:
Like, wow. Two very different people peacefully sitting next to each other and living their lives. Golly, we can’t have that. Next thing you know, dogs and cats will be living together.
Get thee hence, Tell it not like it is! Thy bigotry and ſenſeleſs hate belong neither here nor elſewhere! Remove thy falſehoods and fright to ſome other place, which hath need of a thing over which to affright itſelf. Away with thee!
Thanks for contributing for new seasons of Black-ish, and maybe even a spinoff!
Coco debuts in US theatres, Thanksgiving 2017!
@Tell it like it is
Nah. It wasn’t. I’m a survivor of the 1950s. It certainly wasn’t all bad, but racism and sexism were more overt. I call those moral issues.
And economically? Well, the economic boom (minus any protection against pollution) helped to lead to the current climate crisis, which could, you know, end humanity.
I lived near a steel mill town. I know what I’m talking about when I say that it was perfectly obvious that the activities of the mill were no good for the health of anything that lived in the vicinity. Another moral issue.
Damn it… all the talk about the number of the Beast and I just can’t find a picture of the Mutate 666 joke panel from X-Factor #61. :/
@Malitia,
An image search on Google for Mutate 666 comes up with pics from an X-Men vs. Avengers card game instead of a comic. Not sure if that’s what you’re thinking of or not.