It’s another lazy Friday on the Men Going Their Own Way subreddit, and the fellas are talking about their awesome hobbies and the whitewater rafting trip a bunch of them organized together in Ariz …
Just kidding! MGTOWs can barely organize lunch for themselves. They’re ranting about how awful women are. In a post titled “Women are the epicentre of problems facing society,” a fellow calling himself Malahidael lays out his basic thesis:
I have been with my fair share of women,
I’m going to rate that claim “4 Pinnochios.”
I don’t see the appeal much anymore and I have a feeling most men share my thoughts. I’m reading these stories of women in power getting little to no reparations for their actions, like when that girlfriend murdered her boyfriend and the bitch walked away.
Ah, the famous case of State Vs. That Girlfriend!
Imagine this a women having complete political power of an entire county and a natural disaster or a situation that requires military action occurs the same time she is pregnant, ovulating, or even having “hot flashes” how can we be sure that each decision she makes is based purely on the benefit of the people not because of the flooding of hormones that can lead to rash decisions that gets millions killed.
Uh, dude, you do realize that the current inhabitant of the White House is more impulsive than a woman simultaneously experiencing pregnancy, ovulation, menopause, hysteria, wandering womb, dancing cervix, fallopian tubeworm, mammary foam, boob gout, the vapours, bicycle face, and lady ghostbusters?
I’m just tired of watching all this shit unfold… I can safely say with all this censorship going on as well that MGTOW will remain in the back of this 18 year olds mind till he dies.
I prefer to get most of my information about ladies from 18-year-old dudes who hate them.
A commenter called Helikzhan agrees that women aren’t worth the trouble. At least those women who aren’t simultaneously dogs and television sets.
Sex is all we were ever after. Aside from sex they are just other humans we have nothing in common with. Literally every other companion is better to have. Dog, roommate, online friends, etc. A TV is a better companion than a woman for the most part. Especially so that they don’t do anything other than pay half of the debt she runs up.
TV sets pay off your debts?
The issue is finding a sex alternative. That’s real easy today. No STIs required! No prostitutes. No handjobs while looking at porn (but you can do this, too). I prefer sex dolls but they are pricey. Trust me when I say to you they will fill a void you never imagined could be filled. Don’t underestimate the physical presence of a sex toy. Something to snuggle with, bang when you want, be a creep and talk to it if you please. It’s literally no different than the modern woman and will cost you a fraction of her cost.
The other great advantage of sex dolls is that they don’t run from you screaming.
As JFK7878 sees it, there have been only maybe two great women in all of history.
Women are too stupid to be that important. There were some great women in history like Marie Curie or Joanna Darc,
Er, Joan of Arc?
Women lack intelligence, critical thinking and imagination, they must be led
Who leads women now ? Owners of the media who push degeneracy on them from early age. If you put a woman a desert island for 20 years could she -by herself- grow into feministic cunt with tatooes ?
Only men, who can easily survive on nothing but raw seagulls, are suited to survival and self-tattooing on desert islands.
Look at amish women vs modern women and spot the difference.
Do MGTOWs have some sort of Amish fetish now?
The sick ideas are planted into women so dont get surprised nothing good grows out of them.
Modern woman is end product of ‘social architecs’. If men want better women they must take charge of media and social architecture.
Women control the media? I had no idea that Michael Bloomberg, Rupert Murdoch, Si Newhouse, Mort Zuckerman and Jeff Bezos were all women.
The things I learn from the MGTOW subreddit!
The skull belonging to the Royal Shakespeare Company is called Tchaikovsky, after its former inhabitant André Tchaikovsky. David Tennant used it for Hamlet.
It’s even stupider than that – it’s “McCarther.” It’s supposed to be “MacArthur,” but we’re talking about Davis Aruni of The Sarkeesien Effect here.
“Vincent” would be another good one, as in Vincent van Gogh – given a certain painting from him (and a favorite of mine)…
@ Nick
I’m not a big fan of figurative art; but I like that picture. I suspect it’s already been used for tattoos a lot?
As for skull names, I’d go with ‘Frasier Cranium’.
@ Arctic Ape
It’s not like I ever had any respect for the SOO people, but it’s always rubbed me the wrong way that they named their so-called troop after Odin, if they’re supposed to be so nationalistic. Like we didn’t have respectable gods here in Finland, or something.
I supposed they decided on the name with international marketing in mind (in which case, way to be nationalistic?), or they don’t know much about what went on in Finland before Christianity, or they don’t care.
One of the few bits of figurative art I do like famously has a skull in it:
@Alan:
All figurative art?
@ Nick
Pretty much, yeah. Even stuff like Impressionism or Dada. I’m a pure abstract sort of guy. No idea why that is; but then it’s like attraction generally; totally abitrary. I love the geometric stuff you get in Celtic, Norse and Islamic art. I can stare at that for hours. But ‘pictures of things’ just rarely do it for me.
I can appreciate other forms of art. In fact that Ambassadors is the first painting I learned to appreciate. In the sense someone explained all the technical devices in creating the painting itself (use of light, composition, layout) and all the little bits of symbolism in the picture itself. So I can admire stuff on a technical level, but it doesn’t ‘move’ me like other forms of art.
Ugh, that name, yes. “Proud Boys”, well, it does just SCREAM “skinheads” which is, I suppose, what they’re after.
Of course, we can all see this isn’t really a “fight club”. They’re more like a militia, an “anti-SJW” militia. My hope is that seeing them bring the violence to overall peaceful protests won’t be tolerated even by our militarized police, but then there’s the press to wonder about, in how they’ll choose to frame any sort of clash.
Remember how they reported on Berkeley.
Had a very interesting discussion recently about the so-called ‘Proud Boys’. Probably not to be repeated here as it involved looking forward to when reality finally smacks them upside the head.
But related, Aurini writing in Return of Kings…
http://www.returnofkings.com/119617/10-essential-tips-for-surviving-an-antifa-riot
@Alan:
Fair enough. I’m a “variety is the spice of life” kind of person – it’s hard for me to understand just liking one kind of thing without getting bored.
Long time lurker, first time poster, been thinking about this:
“(also, as an aside: the island-dwelling Polynesians didn’t have any trouble coming up with tattoos on their own.)”
I think it’s significant that the Polynesians lived in communities rather than being lone individuals on otherwise deserted islands. Like, sure, a woman (or any other gender) stranded alone on an island would probably be too busy just surviving to create tattoos.
Where it gets interesting is communities also need rules for cooperation, respecting everyone’s rights, making sure nobody is desperately hard done by, etc. I’m assuming the more scarce resources are, the more important it is to share them out fairly, for community cohesion? Sounds more like SJW than MRA to me, that.
Which ties in with the whole “I could survive on seagulls completely unaided” thing that migtoes keep coming out with. They aren’t well suited to being part of a community because they’re basically complete arseholes. And they choose to deal with it by pretending they don’t need community and could totally fend for themselves totally if they had to, rather than, say, being not such arseholes.
Not a stunning insight, I know, but … please be gentle with me?
@ Nick
I’m generally like that. With music for example there isn’t a genre that I don’t like. But there’s plenty of abstract and esoteric art out there. When I was in London there were 18 galleries I ‘followed’ and that was plenty to be getting on with 🙂
@Arctic Ape:
Well, they seem to have gone international, all right. Or at least, gangs of local thuggies have taken up the mantle, since the name sounds kinda-sorta catchy and they get to wear gang colors that make them feel vaguely heroic, and do pretend good works to try to get the public onside. But when the media spotlight comes on and shows that there are
gamblers in the casinoracists in the SOO, they don’t like that, oh noooo. It’s supposed to be a sooooper seeeeeekwit. And it’s bad PR, to boot. So there’s that. They claim that they don’t allow racists, but a quick glance at any SOO Facebook page over here will quickly dispel THAT notion.There’s also the fact that an awful lot of Canadians don’t know Finnish (and I’d frankly be surprised if any local SOOers do), but I somehow doubt that’s the real reason.
@WWTH:
I’m a little behind on this, but nobody else seems to have mentioned Joan of Arcadia yet. Not quite the same thing, of course, being more in the line of Touched by an Angel or Michael Landon’s Highway to Heaven, but definitely using the reference.
@Jenora Feuer
I was reminded of that show, too, but couldn’t remember what it was called.
Darius Q, sounds about right to me – they more readily fantasise about complete isolation than about any kind of community. Hello, btw 🙂
Welcome, Darius Q.! I meant to say so earlier, but I lost track of which thread you were on – and this is a long ‘un.
@ darius q
Hello! You may find it interesting to read up on the Bounty mutineers’ experiences on Pitcairn to see what happens when a bunch of blokes think they can set up their own island utopia.
Masse Mysteria:
Asatruar and other Nordic neopagans are said to be annoyed because they always run into racists in their circles. Conversely, I find it amusing that racists always seem to come up with Nordic pagan symbols.
My previous remark on “more mainstream nazi-lite group” was about Suomen Sisu, who were interviewed in Ylioppilaslehti a couple years ago. They claimed to promote safe communities* and reason-based policies, yet one of their activists posed in a photo with a goddamn Thor’s hammer. But maybe he just happened to have an unrelated personal religious conviction he wanted to show off?
*White male activists patrolling the streets, always prepared to call out some delinquent immigrant youth in an authoritative white man voice, always prepared to use force but totally only as an extreme last resort in case someone starts a fight with them.
@Alan have you seen this paper suggesting that the Ambassadors draws from the imagery of wedding portraits?
http://www.tau.ac.il/~kenaan/readers/holbein.p
@ guest
Ah, wondered where you’d gone. Responded on other thread, but basically thank you!
Ha yeah I realised I’d commented on the wrong post.
@Ohlmann
I believe the plant was giant fennel, seems it wasn’t suitable (by their standards) for cultivation and had to be harvested from the wild. Its flavour was popular in high status cuisine as well as herbal medicine, leading to unsustainable demand and extinction. I believe they ended up using asafoetida as a cheaper substitute.
My pet skull is named Harold. The previous tenant of my room left the poor dear behind, and I adopted him when I moved in.
I’ve posted pictures of him before, and I find him to be lovely company, especially when he’s filled with candy.