So there was a bit of a battle in Berkeley on Saturday between a motley crew of alt-rightists who wanted to give some speeches and a bunch of anti-fascist (antifas) who didn’t want them to.
Things got a bit, well, heated, with the alt-right anti-antifas going on a bit of a rampage.
https://twitter.com/shane_bauer/status/853353232151609344
Yes, that’s right, that was one baseball-hatted defender of “free speech” carrying a golf club on the off chance that he might stumble upon a golf course in the middle of the protests, I guess.
I don’t know if that guy used his golf club on any of the antifas, but there were definitely a lot of alt-rightists using their fists.
https://twitter.com/DJTJohnMiller/status/853401848287379456
The “Proud Boys” considered the day to have been a glorious victory.
https://twitter.com/MikeEnochTRS/status/853375610277777408
Hail Victory! https://t.co/EsAd0KYiXt
— Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) April 15, 2017
https://twitter.com/irmahinojosa_/status/853441335054958593
https://twitter.com/jackhatesme/status/853407789066178560
https://twitter.com/ProudBoysCA/status/853337688056909824
While capturing flags is, I guess, quite thrilling, what has the alt-rightists most excited is that bit at the end of ??MAGS4?Trump‘s clip above — in which one anti-antifa dude, identified by assorted observers as white supremacist Nathan Damigo, punched an antifa woman in the face.
https://twitter.com/NEETOBO3/status/853368940407345154
https://twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/853371643414151168
https://twitter.com/irrepressably/status/853405160147746816
The punch was quickly memeified.
So now we have this Punch a Communist in the face meme floating around. #berkeleyprotests pic.twitter.com/19atL33nQn
— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) April 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/EvropaAwakening/status/853416124335104000
Meanwhile, some of the biggest celebrity alt-right fellow travelers — who have gone to great lengths to deny being alt-rightists themselves — cheered on the violence. Some were there.
#Berkley pic.twitter.com/aiqUdLIzx3
— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) April 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/Gavin_McInnes/status/853311216596525057
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/853378458520563716
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/853408096953257984
https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/853356615021453312
Southern, ostensibly a journalist, was one of those who was there to witness the “victory” in person, wearing a MAGA helmet and accompanied by “Proud Boy” bodyguards.
https://twitter.com/shane_bauer/status/853367513626759169
Meanwhile, one fellow who’s a bit more honest about his allegiences than many of the alt-right fellow travelers looked toward the future with cautious optimism.
https://twitter.com/NEETOBO3/status/853465353673883648
https://twitter.com/NEETOBO3/status/853466123722936320
https://twitter.com/NEETOBO3/status/853468508679675905
https://twitter.com/NEETOBO3/status/853469689061621760
So how was your Saturday?
It’s kind of amazing that people didn’t think white nationalists were violent until now. The only difference is that we legitimized them by electing a president who is a white supremacist in outright rather than dog whistle kind of way. So the Nazis feel emboldened to openly brag about their violence.
So many people really do live in a bubble of privileged cluenessness.
@TreePerson
I’m distinguishing between whether it’s morally justified, and whether it is, at this moment in time, a good idea. Something being justified doesn’t mean it’ll work or is the best approach.
I’m not a pacifist and would be prepared to advocate violent revolution if I thought it would work or that now was the time for it.
@Policy of Madness
I’m not intending to imply nonviolent counter-protest is safe (and fwiw, I’m not just saying this from some position of privilege – as a disabled woman these guys are really scary, knowing there’s no way I could defend myself). I actually would not advise that either in many cases, I think I’ve suggested I think outright ignoring them might be better. At least, that might be the case since the police can’t be relied upon, if there’s somewhere the cops are more trustworthy or at least more competent it’d be different. I just think going out there intending to fight them is not going to make the situation anything other than more dangerous, for marginalised people especially. If nothing else, what happens to any nonviolent protesters (including those who lack the physical capability to fight) once things kick off? Or anyone in the wrong place at the wrong time? You trust the Neo-Nazis to make the distinction?
Yes, they are very dangerous people anyway and they already were, some of them (some of them are more situationally so imo, they talk big but…), we know that. That doesn’t mean beating them up a bit is going to help – it’s not that likely to make them see the error of their ways, is it? They WANT to play their (world) war (II) games. Again, we’ve seen them show off weapons collections. The really dangerous ones, I don’t think having their teeth kicked in will dissuade them. You’ll get arrested and they’re likely as not to go looking for revenge and take it out on someone who didn’t fight with them.
If you are going to be in danger anyway, preparing for a fight is not necessarily actually reducing that any. I do appreciate there is danger anyway, but I think you are far more likely to be killed by Neo-Nazis if you get in a fight with Neo-Nazis than otherwise. To an extent, it is possible to avoid these people, Neo-Nazis are still a loud minority, a threatening one, yes, but a minority. I’m not convinced they’re all even the ‘standard’ type of actual Nazi. Some of them are just aiming at being outrageously offensive, like Milo, who is horrid, but who may not actually want a fight. This is not the build up to WWII, and it doesn’t have to be.
I think nonviolence can de-escalate. It’s not the Neo-Nazis you’re expecting to respond reasonably, remember, they won’t whatever you do, it’s the more ‘normal’ (yeah, I know) right wingers. While if you’re starting civil war in the streets, you might get people joining in who wouldn’t have – this would be what the Neo-Nazis want.
@Godzilla Roberts
It’s misleading to frame this as lay down and take it. There is a distinction, say, between fighting back if attacked at a non-violent protest or while going about your business, and between heading out to fight Neo-Nazis and random far right idiots who (vile as they doubtless are) may not actually be Neo-Nazis. Wasn’t this a freeze peach protest initially? That kind of thing will attract people who are awful, but not dangerous. At least not in and of themselves. (Lauren Southern?)
I mean we’ve surely encountered this lot online, right? We know how stupidly ridiculous they are. There’s no way I think every single one is a lethal threat just waiting to happen. I don’t even think that about the Nazis, really, or there’d be more violent incidents than there are. They are not all going to kill us, I reckon, but some of them might, and seeking them out for a fight may not be the best way to avoid that.
Hey, Pompous?
Go eat shit.
And live.
@Pompeii
Sorry, where did you see that anyone was “shocked” ? She’s Antifa. Getting punched is basically half her job description whenever protests are involved. We ain’t shocked she got punched, we’re mildly amused that you guys consider it a victory at all.
Y’all cried all over town when Spencer got what he had coming, so now you’re picking random Antifa women to punch and expecting to “trigger” us. Pretty sure that snowflake theory ain’t working out too well for ya.
I think that currently, nonviolent protests are the best model for the non-privileged. Cops are out there looking for an excuse to kill POC, it’s best not to give it to them. YMMV
On the other hand, white kids who can get away with a slap on the wrist from the legal system rather than risk being gunned down? They have a lot more options. It’s time to start taking advantage of that privilege. Nothing will cause those in authority to start undermining white privilege until white privilege threatens them.
It’s also important to show white people opposing white supremacy, and violent protest will always be talked about in right-wing media while nonviolent protests are downplayed or ignored. Yes, they will talk about it in the sense of “look at how awful liberals are”, or “this is why white women can’t be allowed freedom”, but they are still acknowledging that #notallwhitepeople are race-obsessed nazis like them.
@Pompous Eurofag
It was “already tense” because Trump was getting his followers to assault protesters. Stop pretending anti-FA started the physical assaults.
Also, when someone calls for ethnic cleansing, as Spencer has (fuck his “gentle” semantics) they are provoking violent response as self defense.
I’m going to have to take the position here that “ignoring” Nazis is not a helpful course of (non)action. As the Australian guy said, the standard you walk past is the standard you accept. If one is in ANY kind of position to say or do something to object to Nazis, one is morally obligated to do it. And I have come around to the position that sometimes violence is valid.
Why should the marginalized be the only frightened people in danger of their lives? Why should Nazis feel perfectly safe and secure in the knowledge that their intended victims will not fight back? Aside from the practical problems with this situation, there is a moral quandary in the position that the violent should never have to fear retaliation. And keeping one’s head down in the hopes that the Nazis just won’t look in one’s direction very hard is not safe either. Given the choice between unsafe options, I’m not going to come down on anyone for choosing the option that makes that person an unattractive target and a difficult victim.
I’m going to have to take the position that equating non-violent protest with “ignoring” the problem is not a helpful course for discussion to take.
It’s important to keep options for resistance open, so as many people join in as possible.
That Jubal fellow is right about a couple things. I am fit, I am armed, and I have zero compunction against defending myself (a bisexual) my wife (a feminist) my stepdaughter (trans) my stepson, or either of my 2 young children.
I’m part of pink pistols and the LGC. Any nazi comes for me is getting a 1300fps jhp as a present. I male no apologies for this. I don’t start anything, but I won’t lie down for anyone.
I should clarify that my pacifism (well, ex-pacifism now) didn’t come from a place of privilege, but from a misplaced post-traumatic response to my Godawful childhood. Not pulling a #NotAll, just explaining why I held such an untenable position. ^^;; Honestly, it’s about time I snapped out of it.
Good point. Share it with Leo.
Since I was responding to this, maybe you’re agreeing with me?
@ GodzillaRoberts
This fellow latinx will stand by you and I will do what I have to. I also have a lot of relatives who can’t hide in plain sight like I can.
@ Scented Fucking Hard Chairs
I think I love you.
@Betrayer
Wait, is a slap on the wrist really what you’d get? I’d have thought even US police would take it rather more seriously that that.
You’re right though, it will be talked about in the sense of ‘look how awful and illiberal liberals are’. Not sure they’re even wrong about that second bit, liberal does not seem the right classification, you’re heading over to more authoritarian leftwing there (I don’t object) or something.
I don’t agree about Spencer, much as I enjoy watching him be punched each and every time I play the video*. It’s self defence if ethnic cleansing is an actual real and present probability, not if it’s the rambling of a random wannabe-Nazi-nutter. People like him get ignored here in the UK, mostly.
* For any confused Nazis reading, this is not hypocrisy, I can think Neo-Nazis deserve mild punching and think Antifa activists don’t (plus that looked like a harder punch).
I wasn’t equating nonviolent protest with ignoring them, I actually meant ignore them, when possible/strategic. What would have happened, at Berkeley, if no one else showed up? They might have ranted a bit about their precious freeze peach and got bored and gone home. No Battle of Berkeley. They were looking for trouble, but they didn’t have to get it. They’re only invigorated by the fight, as we can see.
I think people are making the mistake here of expecting them to operate like actual Nazis, somehow (or is it that that’s more dramatic?). Some of them, yes (even there, history has moved forwards). Otherwise, they’re not, they’re trolls. Do not feed the trolls. Plenty of them aren’t even pretending to be Nazis, or at least, they’re not doing it very convincingly.
@Policy of Madness
The standard you accept? Not sure going prepared for a fight is really helpful, there, despite relative moral justifications for thumping Neo-Nazis.
The actual real Nazis murdered disabled people like me. Am I worried about this lot, in general? No, because they’re mostly a bunch of bloody ejits. I’m much more worried about the DWP. So if I’m going to protest, that’s where my energy goes, not on fringe loonies (I’m mentally ill as well as physically disabled and a personally fine with that word being used, sorry if it’s not Ok here). Those in America might want to direct it to their elected representatives and their mismanaging of the healthcare system and welfare.
I’d wager there are more deaths of this marginalised group through these official channels (see DWP-related suicides) than because of Neo-Nazis.
I wouldn’t be saying ignore them if I didn’t think it works here or that there wasn’t better stuff you could be doing. They’ve absorbed a lot of time and energy and the attention has only helped them rise to more prominence, that happened with Trump. You can tactically ignore them, rather than entirely literally, too.
Seriously? Here?
You’ve come to the wrong blog.
….Don’t feed the trolls. Because ethnic cleansing, eugenics, and all those fun topics are totally a joke and yeah, sorry, done letting that slide. If someone’s trolling on shit like this I will tear them a new one because that’s disgusting.
And if someone actually thinks that, well, maybe I can break them out of it a bit or at least show we don’t take this shit laying down and quiet.
@Policy of Madness
Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. Yes, I completely agree with you.
@Leo
For white kids? Legally speaking, yes, although practically it means pepper spray, tear gas, and/or a beating when they riot which is basically the same as they get at peaceful protests. Some will be arrested if there is violence, but not that many.
On the other hand, POC can get arrested at a peaceful protest while giving an interview to the press.
You think North Dakota would consider making it legal to “accidentally” run over protesters if the protesters weren’t primarily Amerind?
Well then, no. This is absolutely wrong.
Which would mean no outrage over a dishonorably discharged white supremacist felon punching a woman. No national press attention given to the threat of the rising White Supremacist fascist movement. No exposing their thuggish tactics of smuggling weapons into a protest because they planned violence. And they still would have declared victory.
Not seeing how that’s a better outcome.
Because they ARE operating like the actual Nazis did. I suggest reading a history book about the rise of the Nazi party in Germany. Nazis were treated as a joke, or as outliers who wouldn’t influence the more moderate leaders, or that Nazis didn’t mean what they said. At least until it was too late.
I think you are making the mistake of looking at things in hindsight. The Nazi Party of WW2 after power had been seized was not the Nazi Party when they were trying to install Hitler as dictator. Hitler and the Nazis didn’t run on a platform of genocide, they called for “reasonable” restrictions and ethnic cleansing to preserve culture and increase employment, just like Richard Spencer and the rest of the “trolls.”
FYI, I deleted @hellodumbdumb’s comment and put them on moderation, for obvious reasons.
@Godzilla Roberts
Whoever said trolls were funny? Yes, they’re disgusting, but that’s what gets the reaction they’re looking for.
@Betrayer
Thanks for the information. Yes, I definitely gathered that white kids would get better treatment, but would still have expected arrests. Maybe if it gets even more out of control, though?
Well, for starters, a woman wouldn’t have been punched. People not getting hurt sounds like a preferable outcome to me, especially when they could get killed.
All I got from the press attention was “them crazy American kids be fightin’ (over Trump or something???)”. It doesn’t necessarily come across the way you might hope. The white nationalists view any attention as a recruitment tool – are they necessarily wrong? Cover ‘the rise of white nationalism’ (which makes it sound like more people agree with them than they do) and show them in fights…is that a deterrent to similar types?
Wouldn’t their tactics about weapons smuggling still have been exposed due to their own social media posts? And as is, the Antifa’s intent to fight was, too, which doesn’t come over great.
Yes, they’d have declared they’d won anyway, but they’d look ridiculous, which is the goal. I’m British, we mock Nazis.
We do have the benefit of hindsight, though. The Nazis were still much more organised than this lot, and this is now a world in which we know about the Nazis. Maybe it can happen again, but this is a restriction on it happening again, especially in the same way. I’m sure some of them mean that they say, that’s obvious enough, but some of them like playing Nazi. The Nazis didn’t know they were the baddies. And some of them are not actually trying to be Nazis in the first place – this was about freeze peach for goodness sake, some of them are more fussed about their precious vidya games than they are about 1488 or w/e.
Same Kat, new nym
I haven’t read all the comments, so I apologize if this has been discussed already. (My search of the comments revealed nothing.)
Does anyone have any thoughts on why people of color (Asian, Latina, and African American) are represented among the fascists? (Is it for attention?)
And why the fascists accept them? (Is the inclusion of POC in these confrontations some sort of postmodern, post-ideological meta-joke?)
@Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Speaking for the Asian demographic here. From what I know of ex friends, partly to show solidarity of being “the good ones”, and attempt to paint the fascists as accepting of all who are as hateful as they are. For the Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Laotian, etc who are as hateful as them, well you already seen Gay Uncle Tom Milo. These jerks like all the rest think they’re exempt because the idea of fascists coming after them when they aren’t the ones being demonized by the media and the nazis doesn’t occur at all. Make no mistake, those people are just as bigoted, and as naive in their belief that because they post on /pol/ for several years, they’re somehow not going to be targeted.
For example, some of the Vietnamese people on their side actually say “they’re okay with the idea of the US nuking Vietnam for the safety of the US, the US GOV’T didn’t know they were in the wrong.” What the hell do you say to people who sincerely believe that?
@Ooglyboggles
Hmm.
Sounds like stinkin’ thinkin’ to me.
For whatever it may be worth, in the wake of Spencer’s punching somebody asked experts on fascism whether violence would be effective against the alt-right:
Is it ethical to punch a Nazi? We asked the experts.
At the end of the article it considers some alternatives, though not in depth.
@Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
That sounds like a term for bad thoughts. That’ll be interesting to read up on.
@D
Could you offer another link? It keeps saying the page doesn’t exist.
@Ooglyboggles
“Stinkin’ thinkin'” is an Alcoholics Anonymous term. AFAIK, in AA the expression is about negative thinking: Nobody loves me. I’m stupid. Etc.
Personally, I like to apply it to all kinds of misinformed, irrational, ill-thought-through ideas.