Will sweet sexy sexbots and “carnally-neutral industrial robots” unite to destroy civilization? Woman-hating “pickup artist” and wannabe white supremacist philosopher-king Heartiste says yes.
Heartiste, as long-time readers here may vaguely recall, has been obsessed with sexbots for some time. In the past he seemed most excited by the possibility that pliable and bendy sexy robot lady slaves could render all but the hottest flesh-and-blood ladies obsolete. Or at the very least force sub-par ladies to be less picky about who they have sex with.
Now Heartiste thinks that sexbots might just herald the end of civilization — at least in conjunction with the decidedly-non sexy worker robots who will be terkin all er jerbs.
Mr. H hasn’t really updated his thinking on the sexbot portion of the coming robot revolution.
The biggest impact will be a reduction in the asking price of women (in normie terms: a lot of sub-hottie women will have to date below their league if they don’t want to be alone). Sexbots, and other realistic simulacra of sex with a hot woman, will occupy the attention and, ahem, energy of a mass of omega and beta males who will prefer the intense experience of release with their Minka Kelly lookalike bots over uninspiring sex with the human plain janes and fatties who would normally be their lot.
Well, at least until they realize they need to clean their new robot companions.
What sexbots and VR tech (yolodecks) will essentially create is a massive unemployment crisis among Western women. These castaways will struggle to find love and marriage (which is a woman’s prime purpose in life).
Says you.
Meanwhile, “omega males and those marginal rejects on the left hand side of the beta male curve” will take themselves out of the
sexual market … content to wile away their recreational time (by then almost all their time) in the uncannily supple bosoms of their sexbots.
Meanwhile, cool dude alphas — the kind of man Heartiste likes to think he is — will end up with vast harems of desperate hotties.
“Alpha males won’t have to worry about sexbots,” Heartiste promises.
[F]or them, the sexbot revolution will create a pornucopia of delights as they are besieged by desperate women who literally can’t find a man because three quarters of them are locked in their bedrooms completely satiated from week-long sessions with their Ivanka Trumpbots. Slender hot babes will still have a real man to call their own….as long as they’re ok with him calling additional women his own.
A douchebag can dream, huh?
Oh, sure, the ladies will eventually have sexbots too, but it may take longer, as “lonely women will want them mostly for romantic pillow talk, intuitive understanding, and household chores.”
Heartiste is apparently unaware that women already have a vast array of mechanical sex toys to choose from, and that “pillow talk” is not very high on most lady sex-toy purchasers’ list of priorities.
So the sexbot revolution seems like great news for Heartiste and his allegedly alpha fanboys, right? Not so fast, because there will also be robots doing things that don’t involve penises at all.
[T]he mass immigration of robots into the job market will place more downward pressure on the wages of blue collar men and in most cases drive them completely out of work, with no hope of new market niches opening up that don’t require high IQ and educational attainment to realistically enter.
And then the jerb-terkin robots will invade our offices.
“[C]arnally-neutral industrial robots will move into pink collar and even some white collar occupations,” he warns.
In fifty years, robots will be doing accounting, legal, administrative, HR, data entry, reporting, and maybe even programming jobs.
And don’t think retraining will allow anyone who’s not a certified genius to keep up with the robot usurpers.
As robots take over ever more low-, mid-, and high-skill jobs, the humans formerly employed in those jobs simply won’t have the IQ horsepower or suitable temperament to adequately retrain themselves …
The ones who will be spared the negative externalities of the robot and sexbot revolutions will be those whose creativity, fluid intelligence, spontaneity, and incomparable sexuality can’t be sufficiently mimicked by artificial substitutes.
Sorry to have to break it to you, Heartiste, but you aren’t going to find a lot of people like that in the manosphere.
So what happens after the robots terk almost all the jerbs? Heartiste sees two possibilities: economic armageddon, or Wall-E world.
In the first scenario, jobless Westerners will have no money to buy anything, which will lead to “sexbots rotting on the shelves.”
Or perhaps we’ll all end up like the future fatties of Wall-E world,
all needs catered and pleasures serviced by round-the-clock robots and sexbots, as we get fatter, weaker, stupider, lazier, more feminized, and less rebellious toward the disappearance of meaning from our lives.
Heartiste thinks economic collapse will be more likely.
Robots will herald financial collapse from debt spending and money printing. Sexbots will herald fertility collapse from marriage abandonment and a mass exodus of men and women from the dating scene. Literally, currency and seed will be spilled fruitlessly into an empty abyss.
Try to get that image out of your head.
But there is still hope, Heartiste insists, and it comes in the form of TRUMP!
The people who voted for Trump, in their unarticulated way, are the first angsty salvos against this coming collision. Nationalism, race, and family are the only bulwarks that can stop the dystopian juggernaut, and that’s why the elite are in a frenzy to stump what Trump represents.
If the choice is between a robot-triggered economic armageddon and Trump-world, well, let’s just say that I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords and ladies.
Prove I’m not a sexbot.
Well, I guess we all know now what Heartiste just binge-watched.
Technology has lead to structural unemployment ever since the industrial revolution, how can anyone think it’ll just start with robots and wasn’t happening before?
But what’s becoming obsolete isn’t workers, it’s capitalism. Regressives like Trump are hindering us in adapting to industrialisation, but it’s not like it can’t be done.
Heartiste, I know that you have a nationality.
I know that you have a race.
As a matter of fact, I know that you are — without any kind of basis at all — extremely proud of both your nationality and your race.
But where is your family?!
@Dodom
I agree.
Also, from your mouth to Katie’s ear.
When this blog first started way back in 2010, the manosphere was foretelling an imminent sexbot revolution. Sometimes to occur as soon as in 5 years. Yet it never comes.
It’s starting to remind me of the subset of Christians who think that the rapture is going to happen any day now.
Easy to avoid living in the now and taking any responsibility for your actions or attitudes when you’re forever waiting for an apocalypse.
Manosperians will never be satisfied with sexbots, no matter how technologically advanced they become. These guys seem to need to feel that they’re getting one over on women, and they won’t get that from any sexbot. Not to mention, the technology itself has a long way to go.
Me, I wouldn’t want anything to do with a man who’d be satisfied with a sexbot, much less captivated with one. I believe even the most emotionally stunted person, wouldn’t find a sexbot satisfactory.
When I think about getting it on with a robot, all sorts of things come to mind. Like, body odor. Maybe I’m weird this way, but enjoying my partner’s unique scent is a big part of the experience. Also, body heat. I suppose scent and warmth could be simulated, but what about taste? And sweating, breathing, etc. It’s very, very complex.
it’s really funny that he feels the need to specify that the industrial robots are “carnally neutral”. like he knows that his audience reflexively assumes that robots are for masturbation unless indicated otherwise.
Cliche as this will sound, how privileged do you have to be to think “oh no I’ll lack purpose” when presented with the prospect of something exceedingly close to a post-scarcity economy?
There probably will be some unrest and rather esoteric public debates come mass automation (I’m on team basic income eudaimonia myself), but crashing it all down to maintain the grinding poverty that overshadows most of humanity is the most myopic shit.
Newsflash, loser: Lots of perfectly gorgeous women are already dating men well below their league, in every sense of the word. (Melania Knauss even married one.) The reasons for their doing so vary, and whether any of them will eventually break the pattern all depends, but at the bottom of it all lies the same thing that’s causing you to spout this highly speculative gibberish. That thing is SEXISM.
And that thing is why I’d rather be alone, quite frankly, than put up with shit from some man who is definitely not my equal.
My, my. Little Mr. Wiedmann’s actually assuming that these women would WANT to have sex with those guys. Or that a robot that looks like (insert name here) would somehow solve all men’s problems of sexual monotony, forever.
In reality, the robot, being impersonal and mechanical, would become boring in no time, no matter what it looks like. And these guys are boring already, and will not become fascinating in any amount of time. So why should any woman care if a mechanical object takes up the “attention and, ahem, energy” of such a man?
Not shown: Male sexbots for women, which could in theory solve the problem of these women being lonely. (Smaller, cheaper sex toys already take up a fair bit of that slack.)
Meh. See above. Many of us are already handling that situation with a great deal more aplomb than this dullard would ever know. And ironically, we’re doing it by getting actual jobs. (And also availing ourselves of those smaller, cheaper, already existing sex toys, which, unlike James Fucking Wiedmann, won’t bore us with bullshit and blah-blah.)
Wait, is he saying that his imaginary cure-all sexbots will have slimeballs for boobs? Ewwwwwwww.
Ha ha ha NOPE. We’ll still be kickin’ ’em to the curb. In fact, we’ll be doing it faster, because all this macho asshole behavior will leave us repulsed, not desperate. In the end, it will be the men despairing, not us.
And exactly what kind of jobs will these guys have that will enable them to spend weeks on end with mechanical mannequins that look like Ivanka Drumpf and not be fired for slacking off? And will Ivanka and her orthodox Jewish hubby be willing to let her own image be (ab)used this way? I have so many questions for our overly-imaginative-and-yet-not-nearly-imaginative-enough futurist…
Ha ha ha OH HELL NO. These people are going to be just as much out of a job after Drumpf as they were before him. In fact, he’s only going to hasten their downfall. He’s on a full-speed course to wreck the economy. They were idiots to vote for him, because he’s incompetent at best and in the end will look out only for himself and his fellow elitists…and maybe, MAYBE, the Russian oligarchs and mafiosi who financed him. None of them give a fiddler’s fart about James Fucking Wiedmann or any other manospherian, or indeed any of the other assorted schmucks who voted for Drumpf.
Sexbots will cause massive unemployment among women? What percentage of us does he think works in the sex trade?
Dormousing_it – Apparently the Real Doll repairers get a lot of ‘abused’ dolls turning up. Not ‘joints worn out’ or ‘stored badly’, the usual kind of thing that sex toys get, but ‘knives in face’ or ‘bits bashed off’. The repairers get skeeved out by this, at least enough to talk to journos.
Sometimes I wonder if these guys are aware that Western Women ™ generally work normal mundane jobs in exchange for cash, and that’s WHY we don’t have to automagically marry. I mean, I think they actually are aware, but it doesn’t fit the narrative, which is much more fun if you think women don’t have jobs. There has to be an absolute willingness to lie, to just type this up in a possibly female-architect designed cafe where a likely female staffmember is serving you coffee and while wearing clothes made by a woman in a sweatshop somewhere.
I’m not saying guys don’t do all of these jobs as well, but the time is long gone where one could pretend women didn’t work. It’s so ubiquitous that no one finds it remotely remarkable.
For that matter, the collapse of marriage != changes in fertility, oddly enough you don’t have to be married to become pregnant.
Nah, Mr. H, those guys are never going to get off even with super hot babes as sexbots.
Why? Because what really gets these guys going are the thoughts that “Western women” are missing them / wanting them / desperate for them / sad that they aren’t with them / miserable / upset / in ruins. etc. etc.
Pretty sure the moment those guys who’ve bought thousands of dollars worth of sexbot accessories see women being just fine and happy on their own or with their friends and families will still be frustrated. Because sexbots are suppose to be revenge toys and stick it to us ladies who should have wanted to be with them and not Chad Thundercock (I cannot for the life of me not laugh when typing that)
YOLODECK.
I mean I know the h and y buttons are really close–lord knows I’ve mixed up letters before–but, like, I do that on stupid comments. Heartsie, you run a professional(?) blog, maybe take a bit to reread what you wrote so you can see obvious mistakes like that? Every time I see that word, I feel like I’m back at high school surrounded by people who ate a pot brownie once and cannonballed into a pool once with all their clothes on because they’re just living life to the fullest, yo!
@WWTH
When this blog first started way back in 2010, the manosphere was foretelling an imminent sexbot revolution. Sometimes to occur as soon as in 5 years. Yet it never comes. (Italics mine)
Erectile Dysfunction maybe?
Jesus Fuck, he meant holodeck?
I thought he meant one of these. . .
http://d3d71ba2asa5oz.cloudfront.net/12026510/images/yolodecks-scooter-white__1.jpg
and I was having a dickens of a time trying to figure out wth he meant.
I find it funny that Heartsie thinks that there’s no one who works on the robots. Nope. No maintenance needed!
http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/4d7a36dc49e2aeb309090000-506-253/dont-type-and-9-other-awkward-and-hilarious-captchas.jpg
I hope it’s okay to put this question here: I have never met an MRA (although I regret to say I’ve seen pictures of Roosh). Do they actually live up to the fat, socially brokken neckbeard stereotype in real life?
Also, Trump Tower and the surrounding neighborhood needs to be rechristened “Little Nuremburg.”
I wonder if insurance would cover viagra for owners of sexbots?
@Steampunked
Yeah, I’ve read about that, people mutilating their sex dolls. Oh well, it’s their property, and at least they aren’t abusing another human being.
Concerning women working, female-dominated occupations have long been denigrated, as if these jobs are any less “work” than traditionally masculine jobs. I really believe some of these guys don’t see pink-collar jobs like, say, waitressing or cashiering or retail customer service, as “real jobs.”. AIl I can say is, THEY ARE WRONG.
On the subject of jerb-terking robots:
While for most people life would go on as it always has, if his hate-wanking demographic get their toys and
then they won’t be reading his blog any more. Bye bye Fartiste’s ad revenue!
One of the men commenting on David’s article wrote this:
I would like to know what country he lives in where women cannot choose to live on their own, support themselves, and tell morons like this one where to go and how to get there. “[N]othing you can do about it”? — not in any Western country I know of. Even in the Bible Belt, you’re not actually allowed to imprison your female partner.
Grumpy, and that is why he will eternally stay aline; the perfect MIGTOW example.
Does this dipshit really think that celebrities like Ivanka Trump would let their likenesses be used for sex toys? Only porn stars do that.
*alone.
Edit time ran out.