Found in Reddit’s r/Incels. I don’t even have a joke here. Please, dude, get therapy — for your sake, and for the sake of any “human females” in your immediate vicinity.
Categories
Found in Reddit’s r/Incels. I don’t even have a joke here. Please, dude, get therapy — for your sake, and for the sake of any “human females” in your immediate vicinity.
More OT
The White House has transitioned from saying everything is going smoothly and AHCA is going to pass thanks to Trump’s expert deal-making to throwing Paul Ryan under the bus. Spicer telling the media that there literally wasn’t a single thing Trump could’ve done differently that could’ve gotten the bill through, not a wasted moment. LOL
Not official yet though. I’ll exhale when the vote is in or gets cancelled.
@Alan:
That’s… horrifying. But yes, sounds like there’s all the evidence there for not only animal abuse but also a very deliberate cover up of same. And a sheriff in need of some potential investigation as well.
Also sounds like a case where the defense would probably do just about anything to avoid a jury trial. That said, finding an unbiased jury might be difficult.
@EJ:
A friend of mine once commented on a previous rather loud ‘discussion’ at one point by saying, “I had words with him. Short… sharp… Anglo-Saxon words.”
Re: TrumpCare
They are in a bit of a sticky position, aren’t they? They can’t satisfy both the Freedom Caucus (ideologues who want to tear everything apart so those people don’t get nice things) and a lot of the other Republicans (who recognize that this will hurt their re-election chances next year) at the same time, so even with a Republican majority it seems to be having trouble passing.
Holding the vote and having it fail is losing, which Trump cannot stand. Not holding the vote is both losing and cowardice.
@ jenora
That’s a tricky issue. Some people might be horrified; but others won’t see what the fuss is about. The sheriff didn’t. Horse tripping per se isn’t even illegal in that jurisdiction. The claim (which has just been served) is based on the fact that at the relevant time Brad actually belonged to my friend. She’d bought him specifically to stop him being abused and the defendants then charged her for Brad’s board and lodgings whilst she arranged transport. So it’s fundamentally a breach of contract claim and a ‘conversion’ claim (that’s where you use someone else’s property as if it was your own).
The danger is they could just turn round and say “Here’s your $250 back” (that’s all he was worth in the end 🙁 ) “plus the stable fee”
So there’s also a claim for ‘outrage’. That’s based on the pain of knowing what happened to him. But that’s a tricky head to bring. Still, the ball’s rolling now so I feel a bit more upbeat.
OT from all the OT but I’m crying
Canadians receive long-awaited apology from person who first added raisins to butter tarts*
This was my favourite part
*CBC comedy
…and they aren’t going to vote on the bill today. What an embarrassment of a trainwrecked shitshow. Good job GOP and Trump, you only had 7 years to try actually come up with a healthcare plan instead of just bashing Obamacare.
REPEAL IS DEAD
WHOOO!
RESISTANCE MATTERS! RESISTANCE WORKS!
Please don’t google ‘pain olympics.’
@David Futrelle
What’s better is that Ryan pulled the bill rather than try to put said bill on the floor. Not only does that mean that Ryan and Trump are now against each other this also strikes a heavy blow to Trump’s ego.
@David
That’s great news! I was really worried that they would somehow manage to pull it off today.
Okay, that bus attack was the best news I heard in a long while. The schadenfreude feels great.
@Chio
That was awfully generous of you to at least try, and I’m sorry it went the way it did. With any luck, it might’ve stuck with at least a few of them and they might’ve eventually grown out of that swamp thanks to you.
@Alan Robertshaw:
I think the first time I heard about ‘conversion’ claims was during the whole SCO/IBM/Linux lawsuit mess, where one of the things that came up later was that SCO’s access to the Unix trademark and source code (which was the basis on which they started their lawsuit) was in fact conditional on them acting as collectors for the licence fees. They didn’t actually own the licence, they just had an authorization to collect for the actual owners and take a percentage for themselves as payment.
Which meant that all the money they’d collected and hadn’t passed on yet was, in fact, owned by somebody else and had to be dealt with before any creditors and bankruptcy claims: it wasn’t money they owed, it was somebody else’s money they were illegally still holding on to.
Not that a pesky things like those facts stopped them from skipping to another jurisdiction and filing bankruptcy papers there in front of a judge with no prior knowledge of the situation, in an attempt at making sure all the money went to the creditors that were actually owned by the same people filing for bankruptcy.
Rope’s not what came to mind when I read that.
http://68.media.tumblr.com/126a6e7756412bc9b6a7195b53ee56b3/tumblr_nsczdoqrQW1t7uuyso3_500.gif
Pretty sure this makes me a bad person. Sorry, WWTH, but I had a giggle at your expense there.
@ jenora
Oh gawd, that’s that whole resulting/constructive trust malarkey (I can never remember which is which). Since I sold my soul and started doing commercial stuff that crops up all the time. Baffles me. Just keep telling myself “It’s so you can have donkeys Al” 🙂
Incels: Waaaa! Why won’t women be nice to me?
Also incels: A woman was nice to me? What’s wrong with you? Tits or GTFO, slut!
And also incels: All women should hang, especially the ones who try to be nice to me.
Yeah, I’d say women aren’t the real problem here. Especially not the nice ones who try to inject a little daylight into those musty dungeons of inceldom, where everybody is only there to hate-masturbate over their mental image of a boot stomping on a female face, forever. Chiomara, my hat’s off to you for trying, but these guys just have to come to the appropriate conclusion for themselves. Until their mothers drag them off to a counselor and they get a whiff of fresh air along the way, they are determined to be miserable. Random acts of kindness won’t move them. And if they’re depressed, they’re going to need medication as well as counselling to help them turn around.
The one thing that will never help any of them, though, is subreddits devoted to this unholy combination of self-pity and sexualized sadism. Venting is one thing, but that place doesn’t have any airholes. They’re all smothering each other to death with their own fumes.
Also, that “roasties” thing is gross as shit. I’d much rather they learn how to cook Rösti, which is a rather nice fried-potato cake with cheese on top. It will give them something constructive to do with their hands, and maybe if they’re no longer hangry, they’ll start to clear their own dang fog.
@Alan
Many good thoughts for taking on this case pro bono.
I do not understand how cases of animal cruelty can be civil rather than criminal. Maybe some are criminal. But my understanding is that animal cruelty is part of the psychopath triad; I think it should be criminal anyway, but surely it’s an indicator…
Since owning cats and dogs, I can’t bear images of animal abuse (I just see my loved ones, too hard), so I’m not going to look at the images. Good for you for looking and making those images do some good.
I hope you get justice for Brad.
My suspicion about the ‘roastie’ term is that sexually experienced women scare the purple piss out of them.
“Oh, not *those* grapes! Those are too sour!”
That the OP incel fantasizes about ‘pleasuring’ women, then despises himself because of it, is sad and disturbing. That he refuses to admit to himself that this is a him problem, not a them problem, is just disturbing.
@Rhuu
That’s amazing.
haaaaaaaaaaa
Though, if I’m being totally honest… I love butter tarts both with and without raisins. I just love butter tarts.
Oh, to return to an innocent world where a roastie is a delicious crispy potato.
@John
Yeah, who knows? Some of them even seemed engaged with what I was saying, maybe I planted a seed, which is all I could hope for. People like me are not too uncommon in their sub either, they just tend to give up very quickly, no wonder.
@Bina
Yeah, I know 🙁 I was just hoping to convince them of that, that they need to take the initiative. It probably didn’t work, but eh, I gladly learned the lesson that we can only do what we can do, so I try my best and leave the rest. Also, it was no big deal, I was bored, felt strong that day, so meh, why not.
Incels say “females” can’t have depression because when a “female” is sad, people help her. But people are constantly trying to help incels. They just reject the help. It’s pretty hypocritical.
I use this picture a lot, but…
http://i.imgur.com/XAe5Ioq.jpg
Seriously, these “incels” are a disgrace, they make me even more ashamed and embarrassed to be in the same situation.
Truer words were never spoken. They’re absolutely petrified that they might be compared with previous lovers and found wanting – hence this ultra-creepy focus on very young women.
This comment from the same group speaks not so much volumes as encyclopaedias:
They don’t eat pussy or ass? No wonder they don’t want a sexually experienced woman. We don’t have time for two pump chumps who want to do it quietly, in the dark, missionary position, with no foreplay.
Although, I don’t believe that either. They’d jump at the chance and they know it. They just ain’t ever gonna get it and that makes them sad.
So wow. Here’s a rule to that reddit that I just now noticed.
There’s no explanation for why this rule exists, so I would only be able to speculate. It’s no wonder these dudes think they are uniquely persecuted when literally no mention of the fact that they are not is permitted.
Incels rarely acknowledge fear of lack of sexual experience.
Generally their quest for virgins is an extension of their view of women as property. So there’s a ‘r/badwomensanatomy’ belief that women ‘wear out’ like machinery. There’s also the status thing. Being with a ‘pre used’ woman is like driving a second hand car or wearing hand-me-down clothes.
The nearest they come to a non material view stems from their self loathing and their obsession with hierarchy. So if a woman has had nine previous partners then that makes the latest chap tenth ‘pick’; like when people choose teams at school sports. By definition there must be nine guys who the woman regards as better than the Incel before ‘settling’ for him.