In the real world that you and I live in, the general consensus is that Hillary Clinton won last night’s debate. In the world inhabited by the alt-right and its fellow travelers, Trump crushed the evil Hillary even though she had help from a secret video screen hidden in plain sight on her lectern, possibly installed by George Soros himself.
Here, highlights from the Twitter feeds of some of the better-known alt-right Trump fans (and their fellow travelers).
First, some dispatches from alternate universes:
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/788992551650889729
https://twitter.com/ReactionaryTree/status/789059736922648576
https://twitter.com/ConCanadian/status/789136577586876416
https://twitter.com/WhiteGenociders/status/788934321189126144
Some Red Pillers hailed Trump for allegedly being a psychopath:
https://twitter.com/Empireanalysis/status/788998872060297216
There were, of course, an assortment of conspiracy theories:
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/788967788253581312
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/788924320886185985
Look at the angle of Hillary's gaze. She is NOT looking down at her notes, she is looking AT the lit panel. pic.twitter.com/sl3eZEP5b8
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 20, 2016
Couldn’t possibly be light reflecting off of the polished wood of the lectern. Must be Hillary using her SECRET DEBATE LIFELINE.
https://twitter.com/darth/status/789117564920016896
Some tried to gin up new fake controversies, like Hillary’s allegedly TREASONOUS revelation that America’s nuclear response time is … very short!
No one caught that Crooked Hillary stated on LIVE TV what our NUKE RESPONSE TIME IS 4 MIN??@FoxNews @DRUDGE #debatenight #ChrisWallace pic.twitter.com/QBbbmGkmeL
— ChevelleSS (@cyvault) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7/status/789126925809688579
https://twitter.com/sbeckwilliams/status/789115842332073984
https://twitter.com/altrightwarfare/status/789141517378158592
TREASON! It’s not as if this was already widely known or anything oh wait never mind.
The lovely Matt Forney weighed in:
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/788924608640589824
Dude, in that pic Trump’s teeth are exactly the same shade of brown. Because the picture is dark and the colors are off. In most pics, her teeth look fine (as do Trump’s).
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/788930922448031745
Er, what? Metamucil is a fiber supplement. What relation it has to napping I have no idea.
Also, she doesn’t look tired. Just tired of Trump’s bullshit.
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/788932118801940480
But of course. How could Matt possibly discuss the debate without making at least one rape joke.
Some alt-right Trump superfans were thinking beyond the election itself:
https://twitter.com/DrDavidDuke/status/788936357234126848
https://twitter.com/thebasedviking/status/789116096670490624
Er, land?
https://twitter.com/ReactionaryTree/status/787544349064175616
https://twitter.com/DonaldjBismarck/status/788947850948284416
And finally, a thought from the biggest idiot of the bunch:
Why didn't Hillary Clinton announce that she was inappropriately given the debate questions – she secretly used them! Crooked Hillary.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 20, 2016
The debate was RIGGED, I tells ya. Rigged!
By the way, I actually wrote two posts above (about the Calvinist manosphere) but the first is still awaiting moderation. In case any of you saw only the second and wondered why the heck I was talking about Calvinism.
I want to try some of my own, but meanwhile here’s some good ones:
damn you, Violet! *shakes fist, goes back to Twitter*
eta @Hu’s on First: saw both of yours; disturbing, tremendously disturbing stuff. Oh halp.
On a completely irrelevant note: anyone else watch that new Rocky Horror Picture Show on Fox?
@Mish: *evil chuckle*
Note to self: Don’t trust any gum Mish gives to me.
Here are a few derived from the book which has my namesake:
This is one derived from A Whole New World:
@Mish: What’s your Twitter handle?
Twitter tells me the thing on Hillary’s podium is a vanity light–which makes sense if you look at the side-by-side pictures; Donald has a shadow under his chin and Hillary doesn’t. I don’t know if having one is a matter of personal preference or a masculine/feminine thing (i.e. men with wrinkles and shadows look older and ‘more serious’).
@Violet,
it’s @MishMei
I don’t tweet, myself – I just follow, like, and lurk.
I love those Charlie book reports 🙂 . You still owe me an afternoon, though!
I’d give you one but it ate mine up too…I was merely spreading the virus
It’s also entirely possible that his weaknesses and proclivities (especially the racist crap) have led him into the clutches of a bunch of obsessed weirdos. Being so self-centred and oblivious, he couldn’t even tell if he was being manipulated.
http://video.gq.com/watch/the-closer-with-keith-olbermann-maybe-trump-is-really-a-victim-in-all-this?c=series
Nidi
I’ve actually been digging and delving into her issues page – I’ve even read several of The Briefing links on some of the specific policy pages. All pretty good. You can sort of track her long-term commitments to women and children’s welfare, health and education. You can also see her determination to get the various things that she proposed as senator 10+ years ago but which failed to proceed to legislation done as president.
As far as her “belligerence” goes, you have to remember what happened internationally during the 90s while Bill was president. Bosnia. Rwanda. The UN, the whole international community and, from Hillary’s perspective, the US in particular, failed to act in time to prevent truly horrendous genocide and ethnic cleansing. (For those too young to remember, in Rwanda they killed almost a million people in 100 days.) That had a big impact on her according to someone I read the other day. No one can say that quicker action on the USA’s part back then could or would have made a lot of difference. But it’s easy to see how someone in her position would want to avoid that helplessly-standing-by feeling in the future.
Oh wow. This is fantastic.
I just went over to watch Rachel Maddow’s latest show and she has a clip of a former SC justice talking about America’s democratic processes.
Watch it.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/perils-of-eroded-civic-knowledge-forewarned-790540867791
@ Chaos-Engineer too right!
I’m picturing a film where Bill has been kidnapped by international arms dealers to try to blackmail her, and she thinks there’s a mole in the Secret Service so can’t go to them for help, so she goes on a brutal, no-holds-barred rescue mission, and ends up in a fist fight with the head of the gang on top of a building and punches him backwards over the edge and lands in a dumpster and she says something like “Time to take out the trash” and then her and Bill kiss in the rain.
@Nick
Yeah, what Axe said.
Thanks for the detailed response, Alan.
I didn’t actually know about nuclear missile submarines. Big boys, fancy toys, it seems.
@ Chaos-Engineer, Baron Jenks, I too would consider a ticket to that blockbuster to be money well spent.
If I could expand your proposed plot a little though, Baron Jenks:
See since the kidnapping, Hillary’s chums have been suggesting to her that her spouse is a cheating lying scumbag and she should maybe grasp this opportunity to get him out of her life with clean hands and public sympathy by just letting things take their course.
Of course, she says “Hell, no!” and rescues him.
Denouement scene, after punching the chief baddie over the edge and into the dumpster, instead of ending with a kiss in the rain, she turns to Bill, says something like “you’re safe and you’re free now. When we get home… Pack your bags, because you are out of my life. Forever.”
That’s a movie I’d pay more than once to see. Especially if the end credits played over a montage of first female US president ‘divorce raping’ her husband, and the alt-right Manosphere not knowing who to side with. (Neatly setting up the scene for the sequel).
Oh Jesus, has anybody else seen this bit of hilarity? Even Trump’s donation ticker is fake.
@SFHC
That is amazing. Is there anything in the world this guy won’t fuck up?
I know it’s been mentioned in other threads that Trump’s campaign has been illegally asking for donations from UK politicians. Plenty of Swedish politicians in the European Parliament and elsewhere have also been targeted with pleas for donations.
It’s pretty incredible that his superfans still fall for the Crooked Hillary catch phrase, in light of all the blatantly illegal activities Trump is guilty of committing.
@Mish
I appreciate the sentiment, Mish. Hugs and bubble wrap are always welcome!
@Violet B
Welcome back!
@BaronJenks
Kickass plot. And then kissing in the rain! Breakfast at Tiffany’s comes to mind — but your female lead is a bit more empowered than Holly Golightly.
(I adore Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Audrey Hepburn was so charming. But I’m still angry that her character put her cat out in the rain. Not to worry! That cat gets rescued. But I haven’t forgiven the movie maker. Not gonna.)
@Croquembouche of Patriarchy
Your female lead is even more empowered!
In case anyone has not seen it yet, y’all really need to check out Trump and Clinton’s speeches during the Al Smith charity dinner.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/10/21/al-smith-donald-trump-entire-speech-ac-sot.cnn
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/10/21/al-smith-clinton-entire-speech-ac-sot.cnn
Make sure to watch Trump first. I know it’s unpleasant, but power through it and it’ll make Clinton’s speech so much better.
Good pitch, BaronJenks, but could Hillary have Elizabeth Warren as wisecracking sidekick? I’m looking for some Bechdel compliance here.
@Moggie – good plan! Warren as a wisecracking yet cynical associate, shooting look-outs one after another with a sniper rifle whilst Clinton breaks into the gang’s warehouse, making deadpan comments over the radio the whole time.
Regarding the Bechdel Test, we’ll going fully the other way. The only named male character will be Bill – all other men in the film will be anonymous waiters, secretaries or bar workers. Maybe we’ll have one young male sex worker fall in love with Clinton, just to show to the audience that she’s still got it.
@ Kat
This is a staple of the ignorant right (hmmm… can I coin a new term for them: “igno-right”…?) that “we know it’s technically illegal, but we have to do it, it’s the only way to save the country from liberals/globaliss/race mixers or name that threat”
BaronJenks:
What about the gangsters; will they be women too?
As many mistakes as the Trump campaign has made in the general, I think him saying he might refuse to concede will end up proving to be the worst. With Trump already being down in the polls before the final debate, having the media put all its focus on whether or not he’s going to be a sore loser is not a good look for him. It’s kind of hard to imagine that the people who are somehow still undecided will want to vote for someone who’s cast in the ungracious loser role before all the votes are even cast.
I’ve also noticed lately that we’ve stopped getting the Bernie or busters who plan to vote Jill Stein in here. I haven’t seen it much elsewhere either. Did a lot of them finally get that Trump is so awful you simply cannot claim equivalency between the two?
… (forgive me Lord Disney of Kiddiecartoon, I cannot help myself… )
Oh, my, but I feel a SONG comin’ on….
“PUA, MRA, MGTOW… Mickey Mouse, Mickey Mouse… forever let us gripe, complain and whine… (whine, whine, whine!)”