In the real world, the general consensus is that Hillary Clinton won last night’s debate against a rambling, perpetually dishonest Donald Trump. In a snap poll by CNN last night, 57 percent of debate watchers gave the win to Clinton.
The not-so-good folks over at The Daily Stormer disagree. “Glorious Leader Hits a Home Run” reads a headline on the site today.
In the post itself, Patrick Slattery — a regular contributor to DavidDuke.com and the proprietor of an anti-Semitic, rabidly pro-Russian website called Zio Watch — declares that Trump’s performance last night was
absolutely his best performance. Now that The Donald knows how to prepare, he should be able to close this deal with the American voters.
Slattery gives high marks to Trump for resolutely taking the low road. And for his impressive time-management skills.
Basically, Trump used his time extremely efficiently and drew so much blood that I wouldn’t have been surprised if she just keeled over on the stage. I am sure she is screaming at any hapless minion who gets in her way as I write this article.
He also gives Trump props for putting the evil Jew media in its place:
I just want to say thank you to Donald Trump for doing what no one else could do in terms of doing an end run around the Jewish gatekeepers of our elections and standing strong and not backing down or cucking out.
The Daily Stormer’s skinhead-in-chief Andrew Anglin, meanwhile, is heralding a completely worthless online poll in which 88% of poll-clickers declared Trump the winner. (The number 88, as you may know, is a weird neo-Nazi in joke, a reference to the phrase “Heil Hitler,” because “H” is the 8th letter in the alphabet.)
“The people believe Trump won the debate,” Anglin writes.
It’s really just an objective fact.
Not sure how even liberal kikes could claim otherwise.
As a result of the win he imagines Trump has scored, Anglin thinks the “Glorious Leader” can put the ugliness of this weekend behind him and go on to win the election itself.
It was looking bad after pussy-grabocaust. But at the very least, the debate returned us to pre-pussy grabbing levels.
And Trump has been winning solidly for a month.
His evidence? The one outlier poll that has consistently put Trump in the lead.
Meanwhile, a new poll from NBC and the Wall Street Journal — conducted this weekend but before the debate itself — reports that Trump’s support has slipped to 35% in a four-way race, 11 points below Hillary’s 46%. FiveThirtyEight’s polls-only forecast currently gives Hillary an 82% 83.6% chance of winning the election.
I won’t be completely reassured unless and until that percentage hits 100. But at the rate we’re going, that could happen pretty soon.
Note: Updated the FiveThirtyEight number.
Everything Trump does is “winning” to these people. He could drop his pants, shit in his hand, and smear it over his own face, and these chumps would be falling all over one another to fawn over his “alpha” behavior.
So do these…er…people live in the same alternate universe where the aliens told the Egyptians how to build the pyramids or a different alternate universe? Either way, it’s some universe where stomping around the stage, babbling incoherently counts as winning a debate.
It’s a good thing they’ve already rehearsed their excuses for when Donald Trump loses.
I’m not going to relax until Hillary’s sworn in next January.
On the one hand, it warms my cold black heart to imagine how these bozos will feel when Trump loses in a landslide.
On the other, they are violent fucks and there’s a nonzero chance they will react in a violent way, which does not warm any part of my heart.
Must be since to any layperson they would see a rambling nitwit who can’t even bring back the horse race narrative. Then again these are the people who are unable to comprehend the idea of appealing to anyone else other than their core members.
Note, the grabocaust was against Trump. Not the grabbees, the grabber. Inflicting sexual violence is fine. Being appalled at sexual violence is like committing a genocide. Wait, does this mean that Anglin doesn’t believe the grabocaust happened? Or is he just doubting the ‘official numbers’?
I agree with VP, and will breathe much easier once Hilary takes the oath of office in February. I’m not worried, I’m mostly just getting sick of biting my tongue (fingers?) when I read my Facebook newsfeed featuring a not insignificant number of misguided Trump-supporting friends and family.
As for expectations of violence, maybe I’m in denial, but I just think there would have to be more of a trigger to get these louts off their computers and actually out into the streets. I’m not saying there isn’t a truly frightening violent component but I just don’t think these folks are that well-organized. Look at the clownshow the Bundys executed in Oregon, and those are somewhat organized clowns.
We’ll see, but I still have enough faith in humanity to believe it won’t result in actual civil war. But then again, it never occurred to me that Trump would make it this far, either.
I’m hoping that, after Trump loses, his fanboys create their own Dolchstoßlegende, blaming his loss on the Republican party stabbing him in the back. With any luck, they’ll be so angry at them for their supposed betrayal that they’ll refuse to vote for them in upcoming elections.
Apparently, a number of people are already planning to only vote for Trump and abstain in the other races.
I should also add, I really hope Hillary’s Secret Service detail is as diligent as the current POTUS protection detail has been.
I’m going to miss our current First Family, but I’m glad they’ve done so well.
These guys are bullies. They see Trump being a bully and they think he’s doing great and he’s winning because they think that’s the right way to behave. They think he’s a good leader because he’s king of the bullies, their “alpha male”. They’re too dumb to realize most people don’t like mean bullies.
@Paradoxy:
One wonders why, if the internet Nazis adore Trump’s actions so much, they haven’t tried to emulate their beloved leader. I haven’t noticed Duke or Anglin dyeing their skin orange and stapling a ferret to their scalps.
Perhaps he’s too alpha for them? Maybe a lesser man would be struck dead by his levels of testosterone. Who knows.
@dreemr
The US while having a bit of a crumbling infrastructure problem, isn’t so critically harmed that a majority of people are unable to have their basic needs met. There will be attacks, but nothing that will trigger another Civil War.
The 538 forecast isn’t even including post pussygate polling data yet. The comments there are filled with poll truthers. Because insisting the polls are skewed worked so well when they did it in 2012.
My partner noted during the debate that Trump seemed to be speaking to his dolt-right base with all the evocation of Soros, Blumenthal, etc. (since they love distilling their nonsensical conspiracies down to some insider-y short hand – usually the name of the the nearest Jewish person).
So, if the message was “I’m still the asshole you liked in the primaries” in order to keep his hardcore supporters, no wonder they consider this a win: He was literally speaking directly to them and telling them what they wanted to hear in order to shore up slide.
Of course, Anglin et al fail to understand that pleasing his dolt-right fans may make them happy but is not going to win him the election (I sincerely hope). So, really , if anyone is to blame if he loses, it’s them (and human decency, but you won’t see that on the Daily Stormer or Breitbart)
My real hope is that the Republican party will either completely disintegrate or at the very least move back to a more centrist position than they’ve sported for the past 35 years.
Gotta love that confirmation bias, huh? ‘This one poll is the only one that says what I want, so all the other polls must be wrong.’ I mean, we all engage in confirmation bias at least somewhat, but I feel like since Obama got elected the American right has just taken it to ludicrous extremes.
Re: violence – I don’t think we’ll see any large-scale violence on election night if Clinton wins (and if she doesn’t win then heaven help us all), but unfortunately I think we will see small acts of violence from enraged individuals.
@weirwoodtreehugger
In some cases, the data isn’t even properly including the effects of the first debate. The best polls from Georgia, for example, are from September 22 or earlier.
PI:
Well, they’re right, if you count winning in the Charlie Sheen sense of the word.
I’m now pretty darn confident that Hillary will win, but I’m in the “won’t be happy until she’s sworn in” camp. Election night is going to be horrible. I predict it’s going to be a landslide for Clinton, but I’m going to be bolted to the screen for Trump’s concession speech – if he has the guts to give one.
Because he ain’t a good loser, in multiple senses of the term. I can practically hear the words “stole the election” and “broken democracy” burbling up from his void-crab-animated lips, and that terrifies me. Domestic, right wing terrorists have been tuned to Trump’s whistles for months now, and they’re itching to hear the order to go. They’ve been waiting on that for years.
Normally I’d think that highly unlikely, but during this election? With literal Nazis and KKK brazenly calling for a return to the golden days of the Reich? It’s gonna be ugly, and Trump will be in a position to make it exponentially worse. He won’t have anything to lose by calling the election a fraud, and he has everything to defend – his pride, his social position, the rush of power from his scattered bands of sturmgruppen. The toxic dreams of President Trump.
It’s going to be an ugly, ugly night.
@Scildfreja Unnýðnes
It’s going to be a several month long period of dark times in the US.
Like PoM I think there is a non-zero chance that there will be violence. I’m sure it will be directed at some particularly vulnerable group or perhaps just at random women.
The first letter I write to President Clinton* will be one asking her to direct funds to her AG to investigate alt-right hate groups.
___
In a complete aside, but all this talk of Pussy and the election…
I once received a letter from Hillary Clinton when she was First Lady. My cat (at the time) went into some kind of vicious frenzy and literally tore it to shreds. The only time he ever reacted that way to a bit of correspondence. I always assumed it was because it smelled of Socks. Of course my cat was a sexual predator cat, he would attack and hump my arm, my leg, random strangers, etc and show his little erect kitty penis. It was kinda gross. So maybe it was some kind of weird reaction sexual predators have to Hillary.
___
*don’t assume she’ll win – vote, vote, vote
I kept thinking I was reading a parody. I wish.
There really isn’t any doubt left that Hillary is going to take the election, though I’m not putting any wagers on how wide the margin is going to be. She’s guaranteed to win in most of the bigger states, and she’s pretty definitely going to win several states that used to lean Republican. Even Texas, frickin’ Texas is closer to going blue than it’s been since Jimmy Carter.
And while I’m definitely happy to see Trump’s campaign crash and burn, I’m worried about what happens afterwards; not the day after, though something terrible’s going to happen for sure, but come midterms, come 2020. Trump’s entire candidacy has made outright bigotry and fascism viable campaign tactics; it’s within the realm of possibilities that another demagogue is going to ride the same waves of white anger Trump did, and the next time America might not have the luck of that person being, well, Trump.
@dreemr
In 1981, Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President on a platform of cutting taxes in half, deregulating everything, putting Jesus in charge of Washington, and ‘law and order’. Centrism, my ass. I vote disintegration