In news that will shock precisely zero people, fantasy author/piece of human garbage Theodore Beale thinks that Trump’s newly exposed boasts about kissing and groping unsuspecting women are just fine.
In a post on his Alpha Game blog, Beale describes Trump’s comments as “Alpha talk about women.” And in a longer post on his other blog, Vox Popoli, Beale lays into House Speaker Paul Ryan for condemning Trump.
If you ever wanted to know why I’m not a conservative or a Republican, this craven pandering to women pretty much sums it up. I’m not sickened by Trump’s locker room talk. I’m sickened by the fact that weak little gamma males like Ryan … have any influence in Western society at all. The only correct response to this “scandal” should have been a single question: “so the f*ck what?”
Never trust a moderate, a Churchian, or a cuckservative. Never. They will stab you in the back in order to virtue-signal every single time.
Uh, Ted, even Melania Trump has acknowledged that The Donald’s comments were “unacceptable and offensive.” Is she a “cuck” too?
Oh, sorry. I forgot. She’s a woman, which is apparently worse.
I hope so!
I don’t think I could bring myself to watch it, but after-action schadenfreude? Hell yeah.
I’ve just discovered this strange subculture of balding weirdos, wow! This particular balding gentleman appears to think he’s the future of the (balding) white race, I feel a bit safer now. Great site, thanks !
Fucking Nigel Farage. God damn.
OT, but I’ve just read Milo Yiannopolis’s review of The Red Pill in Breitbart; according to him this film is striking fear into the hearts of feminists everywhere
Hmm, I haven’t noticed any scared feminists, I imagine it’s more all types of feminist united in snorting derisively at this turkey.
Oh, and despite giving her film a glowing (totally not influenced by the fact he helped fund this) review, he can’t help making a sexist joke about women drivers; what a scamp!
Oh, look! A new troll to play with!
Please, please do try this.
Drat! It’s just Mark. Hopes for an exciting new troll are dashed.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsxi4u1hB41qj8akf.gif
@MyDickIsBiggerThanYours –
?
@All That Marking And Mintering
http://i.imgur.com/SwUDPx4.jpg
That’s the only good thing about having two different Marks farting up the place: Twice as many opportunities to post this.
@ snork maiden:
Milo gave a positive review to a film he helped fund?
Where is the ethics in film journalism?
I’m shocked.
@MassiveUnrepentantDick
So are you Mark or Miggy? I mean, it’s Mark’s talking points, but Miggy had funner names. Or maybe Mrs Chad, what with the phallic reference. I do like mysteries!
It’s spelled pizza, ya know? Oh, you meant pussy? Why, you little rascal you… So sorry, I meant enormous, gigantic, colossal rascal. Wouldn’t wanna bruise the old ego there. The yuuugest. Bigly
Moggie:
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee77/schnookumsfd/Memes/CaptainAmerica1_zpsw0l42r4m.jpg
@Axe
Ridiculous username, long-ass post, moaning about marriage = Miggy.
But Miggy’s also known as Mark, so that’s where the confusion comes in. =P
@SFHC
Aha! Body doubles, eh? So, which one has the pneumonia?
You know what? I’ll bite.
Okay, a few questions:
1. What is the definition of “toxic femininity”?
2. How is the government “enforc[ing] transfer of wealth from men to women”?
3. What is the definition of “female charlatanism”?
Actually, I agree. I feel like forcing anyone to enlist, regardless of gender, is overall an awful thing, and we shouldn’t have a draft at all.
However, if it is felt that we must have one, we should have a gender-neutral draft, where people of all genders sign up for it.
Though, I have another question, if you’ll indulge me: What privileges do you think women have been “handed” through “male death and suffering”, and how do you think that the death of men is necessary for women to have these privileges?
By all means, please do. I encourage you to take this action. Force the government to pay attention and stop discriminating against women in military roles, so more women can participate in the military should they so choose.
I mean, the (I assume you’re talking about the United States) government has actively banned women from front-line duties until very recently, and women were even banned from some posts in the military until last year.
I agree that we should allow women to serve in all roles in the military, instead of closing them off to just men for whatever reason.
I suppose the logic of this flies right over my head as a mere female, but allow me to ask: Why?
What do you gain from women dying besides satisfaction and petty revenge for slights you perceive have happened? You do realize that men were the ones who barred women from being in the military in the first place, correct?
Men were the ones who told women that we were too feeble, weak, frail, delicate, and distracting to properly serve in the military, and women have fought long and hard to be allowed in.
So, why force women to make “reparations” for the decisions that men have made historically, when women are pushing for these decisions to be reversed?
I would like to see stats on this, if you don’t mind. What money is being spent on women that you feel is unfairly given?
Or, at the very least, I would like to see what funding you feel is being “primarily diverted to women”, and how much of the funding you would like to see diverted to men.
I’m sure you’re exaggerating, but I do support your boycott of marriage. As it stands, it is a very archaic institution, and one that gets forced on people far too often.
No one should be forced into marriage if they don’t want to get married, and in this day and age, no one really has to unless they absolutely want to.
Back in the day, it was required for a woman to get married so she could be supported, but today women are a common part of the workforce, so they can support themselves without having to be pushed into a relationship they can’t easily leave.
So, yeah, I do support making marriage as voluntary as possible.
How do sperm banks “cheapen male biology”? Men are paid for their sperm, and the sperm is well taken care of until it is given to the person who wants to fertilize themselves with it.
Do you think it “cheapens” your biology because you don’t get to have sex?
Trust me, this won’t happen overnight. It’ll take years, if not decades, to change people’s minds about this.
Feminism has done wonders to release men from the idea that they have to be super-masculine, hyper-violent, rape machines, yes.
And you’re welcome.
If you feel like feminism has “opened your eyes to how awful females are”, then you’re also welcome to not interact with said females. That’s always an option.
But, here you are. Interacting with us. Because you apparently just can’t stay away.
Actually, one final link: You have a greater chance of being raped yourself than being falsely accused of rape.
And no one here feels that you should be forced into marriage. At all. If you don’t want to get married, good for you. If you just want to have NSA sex (or “grabbing you some puzzy”, as you so put it), then as long as you’re doing it with a consenting adult, no one here cares.
Just saying.
Day two of The Thanksgiving Siege is pretty much complete. Three more remain. So far no nervous breakdowns! The worst is over. Hooray! \o/
I have yet to see the ‘debate’, and will watch it later tonight, but for now I wanted to reply to a few dribs and drabs from the guy whose dick is, apparently, bigger than mine. I’m sure that’s true! Congratulations on your anatomy, @MyDickIsBiggerThanYours. I hope that it makes you happy.
Health research actually pretty much erases women. There’s a weird Victorian assumption that ‘male’ anatomy is the ‘default’ anatomy, and ‘female’ anatomy is a weird niche. So most medical studies seek out men for testing things. This means that drugs are designed to work for men, surgeries and their support systems are generally designed around male biology, etc, etc. “Woman problems” are their own category, instead of being, you know, human problems.
Same thing with education and welfare. The reason you see special spending for women (i.e. breast cancer research!) is because all of the “normal” spending is geared towards men. Men are default.
Congratulations again on your mighty wiener! It helps you more than you know.
I’d comment more, but Paradoxy’s done as good a job as ever. Do want to ask this though.
Care to support how you think that religious conservatism favours women, Mark?
Great a new troll I can’t wait to write some –
Dammit it’s Mark, again, again.
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Da, Da, Da! Da, Da, Dash! Oh Oh!
Dear MyDickIsBiggerThanYours,
I think you are unaware of how accusations work. You don’t actually have to have done anything to be accused of anything. Any person can at any moment accuse any other person of anything at all.
For example: Axecalibur! I accuse you of accepting campaign contributions from Russian oligarchs!
Or: rugbyyogi! I accuse you of carrying out the daring heist that stole the crown jewels of Baden-Wurttemburg!
Or: Dalillama! I accuse you of plotting to reinstate the reanimated corpse of Luis Borgia as Pope!
See? There is no way to avoid such accusations being made. It’s an impossibility for any human being to act in such a way that prevents others from accusing them of anything they…
…what’s that? I’m getting something in my earpiece…
…oh. Oh.
Apparently, when you said “prevent people from making accusations”, you meant “put social pressure on women to not reveal the fact that they were raped, in order to preserve the reputation of their rapist.”
Well then, my good sir, you can go and fuck yourself, and you can take your coy little euphemisms with you too.
@EJ (TOL)
I wasn’t before, but that sounds like an excellent idea, and I will start immediately.
Hello.
> Paradoxical Intention – Resident Cheeseburger Slut
What ? Really ? I was thinking it was based on volunteering, like blood, organs or bone marrow. Is it the same thing for ovulas ?
Have a nice day.
Idk about the US, but if you want to donate eggs in the UK you don’t TECHNICALLY get paid, because financially motivating donation is unlawful, but you’ll get your transport paid plus I think £300 renumeration to cover expenses, work missed etc. But then ova are in much shorter supply than sperm, it’s a more complex process and afaik there are only 2 or 3 donation clinics in the country.
Source: I really wanted to donate eggs until I found out my disability is probably genetic so I’ll be ineligible
@Occasional Reader:
In the US, you can be paid for sperm and eggs. I’ve heard advertisements on the radio offering up to five thousand dollars for eggs, depending on how many you donate, and what condition they’re in. I think it’s about a hundred dollars an egg, and I think that’s because we don’t have as many eggs as we do sperm banks.
Sperm banks in the US though usually pay 35-50 dollars per specimen. They also require you to come in about four to six times a month to give specimens though, so that’s three hundred dollars maximum, I believe, if you go in all six times and give six specimens.
There’s also a list of requirements as well, but both of these tend to apply to egg donors and sperm donors, and can vary from bank to bank.
I’ve been neglecting to check up on y’all, sorry. Seems that…lots has happened lately. Lots and lots has happened.
Though now I know I can donate these eggs that I don’t want. Yay.
In other news, it’s cool enough today to wear sweaters, though it’s expected to get back into the 80-degree-Fs soon enough.
In October. And I’m in a temperate area of the USA.
Butts.
Wait, Dalillama is practicing Necroanimation* for religious malfeasance? And rugbyyogi! has stolen the crown jewels of Baden-Wurttemburg?
To the Schnookumsmobile!
Ah, criminals are a cowardly and superstitious lot who are strangely afraid of adorable things….
Oh, what’s this? These were just accusations, thrown in the air like so much birdseed at an ecologically friendly wedding?
Well never mind then.
(*I believe another thread pointed out that Necromancy was specifically for divinational purposes. The more you know!)
Minor nitpick: egg donation fees aren’t per egg, they’re per stim cycle. Technically it’s illegal to reimburse for bodily tissue in the US, so donors are “paid for their time” by the recipient(s), with legal stipulations about not reselling or giving away unused embryos, etc. Fees range from around $3000-10000 per cycle, depending on the agency and how much demand there is.
Requirements and testing are pretty stringent for gamete donation, which is why I always get a chuckle out of redpillers’ revenge fantasies that they can “spread their seed” on an unwilling population by donating sperm at the local bank. Even if these guys were perfect physical specimens, the staff would kick them to the curb almost immediately as soon as they got wind of their vile beliefs. These days cryobanks make a lot of information public to prospective parents, including essays and audio interviews, and the “marketability” of the donor is a very important consideration. Recipients want donors who are generous, considerate, and altruistic, in hopes that those qualities might be passed on to their offspring. There’s not a huge demand for douchey, misogynist donors.
So, I would be very interested to hear how our troll thinks sperm banks “cheapen male biology”. Does bone marrow donation cheapen skeletons? Or is there something exceptional about sperm? Is it perhaps that he wants to prevent women from having babies on their own, because then they won’t need to make themselves dependent an abusive asshole in order to have kids?
Clearly, he thinks “male biology” should come with a steep price tag.
Buttercup,
He is complaining that women do not need men to make babies. Remember, anything that does not place women under the control of a man is evilbadwrong.