Categories
a new woman to hate alt-right antifeminism creepy empathy deficit entitled babies literal nazis matt forney men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny rape rape culture

Matt Forney hates vigilante justice so much he’s trying to dox a rape victim

Matt Forney: Literally a giant baby
Matt Forney: Literally a giant baby

Hey, remember Matt Forney, the baby-headed white supremacist woman-hater? I wonder what he’s been up to.

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/773614365211754496

Oh, that’s what he’s up to. Trying to dox a rape victim whose assailant was just released from jail after serving half of his ludicrously lenient six-month sentence.

Of course, Forney doesn’t think Brock Turner is a rapist. Oh, he has no doubt that Turner penetrated “Doe” with his fingers while she was passed out behind a dumpster. It’s just that Forney doesn’t think this counts as rape, or sexual assault, or indeed anything more than an act of rudeness.

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/773979779636822016

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774015843306991616

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774031519178448896

And even though he doesn’t consider what Turner did to be a crime, he blames leftists for it. Because of the sexual revolution, or something.

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774009954814615552

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774010601366515712

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774011050047963137

It’s a strange argument, to say the least, because most leftists and feminists I’ve ever met would have no trouble condemning Brock Turner and others of his ilk on moral grounds. You don’t have to believe that sex is “sacred,” whatever that means, to recognize that penetrating an unconscious woman (or an unconscious man, for that matter) is a repugnant and immoral act. It’s also, of course, rape.

Forney’s excuse for his attempts to dox the victim? He’s angry that “a gun-toting mob” showed up outside of Turner’s house.

Guess what, Matt? Most leftists and feminists I know aren’t exactly happy about this turn of events either. Because we have a well-founded distrust (to put it mildly) of vigilante mobs as a force for justice. We prefer things like this.

Forney, by calling for Doe’s doxing, has made clear that he’s not opposed to vigilante “justice.” He would simply prefer it directed not at Turner but at his victim.

Despite all of the attention he’s focused on the Brock Turner case, Forney still has time to offer his opinions on other important matters of the day.

https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/774108721286815744

Such a charming fellow!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

116 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kularanini
Kularanini
5 years ago

While we’re on the subject of “what has the hateful, white, bald, goatee’d guy been up to?”, I realize that we haven’t heard much from Davis Aurini in a long time.

The only thing I can think of is he’s swept up in his highly successful ‘Sarkeesian Effect’ world tour.

weirwoodtreehugger: communist bonobo

What a shit stain. Does anyone know if this violates Twitter’s tos? Would reporting him help?

EJ (The Other One)
5 years ago

@WWTH:
He’s already been banned: the reason he posts as @basedmattforney is because @realmattforney got banned.

Until Twitter get their act together and stop people re-registering, reporting him won’t do anything more than force him to rebuild his follower list yet again.

Paradoxical Intention- Mobile
Paradoxical Intention- Mobile
5 years ago

Another fine example of “It’s only okay when I do it!!!”

Seriously, fuck this guy. He’s such an awful hypocrite.

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

I don’t understand how he can talk about how sex should be sacred (whatever that means) but say that if a woman is in proximity of a man for any period of time she apparently is planning on having sex with him.

Scildfreja Unnýðnes
Scildfreja Unnýðnes
5 years ago

Eugh. Get that banner off your wall, Forney. The women who lived under it would tear your spleen out and feed it to the ravens for what you’re saying.

I don’t have the words to describe how much I loathe this guy.

Snork Maiden
Snork Maiden
5 years ago

This is worrying. If this girl’s identity is thrown to the internet wolves it could be dangerous for her.

Funny he’s not going after the men who witnessed Turner raping the girl, or the medical staff who documented her injuries, or the witnesses from the parties who saw the victim rebuffing Turner’s advances.

Axecalibur: Middle Name Danger
Axecalibur: Middle Name Danger
5 years ago

Someone inflicting sexual violence against an unconscious woman somehow “doesn’t affect” feminists or ‘leftists’. We “don’t judge” the morality of acts, as only the legal repercussions matter. I wonder how Forney thinks law come to be. Obviously, it can’t be that things already “condemned on grounds of morality” are thereafter codified as punishable. Can’t be…

I wanna write something more substantial, but nothing concrete comes out. Suffice it to say, consent isn’t a technicality. It’s the whole thing. Jackass

Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
5 years ago

Matt Forney is a great example of why some people should be banhammered off the internet itself and into oblivion. There’s for your freeze peach, asshole. I’m definitely robbed of all speech whatsoever whenever I read his shit and realize there’s apparently no limit to how low a person can go.

@Kularanini

I like to entertain the thought that Aurini is busy trying to build a volcano base to house his collection of plastic skulls and plot his next cartoonish plan.

@WWTH

Shitstain is the word I was looking for, thank you. I’d say, at the very least, reporting can’t hurt. And maybe after a few more banned accounts and sneaky comebacks under a new name, (that also goes for, say, JudgieBitch and Milo) Twitter will finally get the hint. Maaaybe.

@Scildfreja

Hate to admit it, but that’s a pleasing mental image.
Am I a bad person ._.

Makroth - Agent of the Great Degeneracy
Makroth - Agent of the Great Degeneracy
5 years ago

I forwarded his inquiry to @Twitter and Twitter support after reporting him. Maaaaaaybe that will get him banned.

Oh, who am i fucking kidding?

Valentine
Valentine
5 years ago

He’s got fucking cheeki talking about ‘sacred sex’ when he’s a fucking sex tourist himself and *alleged* PUA.

TheLazyHase
TheLazyHase
5 years ago

What ?

It’s *very* hard to not wish harm on that living excrement (with apologies to all fecal matters : at least poo serve a purpose). The “alt” right (aka people who live in an alternate reality it seem) have hit the rock bottom of decency a long time ago, and yet they still manage to top themselve in cartoonish evilness.

Dodom
Dodom
5 years ago

Is this even legal?

Bina
5 years ago

@Snork Maiden:

Funny he’s not going after the men who witnessed Turner raping the girl, or the medical staff who documented her injuries, or the witnesses from the parties who saw the victim rebuffing Turner’s advances.

Right? I mean, WHAT ABOUT TEH MENZ? There were two Swedish grad students on bikes, and they stopped him in mid-“action”. They were both male. One of them was so upset by what he saw that it reduced him to tears (which, to me, says that this was no mere act of “rudeness”, but outright RAPE). He also reported that Turner laughed afterwards when challenged on what he was doing. What about THOSE guys? Do men not count with these idiot fucking menzers?

@kupo:

I don’t understand how he can talk about how sex should be sacred (whatever that means) but say that if a woman is in proximity of a man for any period of time she apparently is planning on having sex with him.

I think that means he considers his prerogative to shove himself into any available orifice (whether its owner is willing or not) is “sacred”, and that anything blocking his cock is a violation of his sakwed wights.

Honestly, I feel sorry for any knotholes in his neighborhood.

Judas Peckerwood
5 years ago

When being a garden variety nazi just isn’t vile enough…

Lea
Lea
5 years ago

He is utter, loathesome scum. He is an abuser getting off on threatening a raped woman as a way of making her relive her rape and to further her feelings of vulnerability. He is trying to embolden rapists and scare victims into silence. I have no doubt he’d rape and abuse himself (or has already) if he thought he had a chance of getting away with it.

He is using the internet to piggyback on Turner’s actions. He has found a way to get off on abusing a woman through another man’s rape. He gets to abuse without getting his hands dirty and he’s just so pleased with himself for it.

There should be a penalty for such behavior. It has to be criminal and if not, it needs to be. At the very least, Twitter should not allow this harassment to continue.

Scildfreja Unnýðnes
Scildfreja Unnýðnes
5 years ago

Do men not count with these idiot fucking menzers?

Never a man’s fault when a woman is around to take the blame with these guys.

Hate to admit it, but that’s a pleasing mental image.
Am I a bad person ._.

It’s a bad person who isn’t filled with disgust at the rank sounds that crawl out of Forney’s slimy throat. Some days I am Scildfreja Unnýðnes, others I am Scildfreja Þrútung.

JoeB
JoeB
5 years ago

I’m impressed by those who have commented because I can’t even

MC
MC
5 years ago

OMFG he’s from Syracuse?! Gross. I hope he comes back here cause I’d love to punch him directly in the dick.

rick
rick
5 years ago

@Dodom

Some might call it a slippery slope, but this kind of thing, in regard to victims of sexual assault or abuse, should be made a criminal act.

Also, there’s a video on youtube of this internet tough guy running like a coward from an anti-fascist in Philadelphia. Its a dubious video in many ways, because I’m not an advocate of public harassment, but Forney is such a pig, he literally exists outside the norms of accepted public decency.

Saphira
Saphira
5 years ago

Too bad all the hypocrisy doesn’t make his head implode.

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

@JoeB
That was me yesterday.

OoglyBoggles
OoglyBoggles
5 years ago

Twitter you are enabling a person who is abusing a rape victim for his own fucked up pleasure. What the fuck is wrong with you?

brian
brian
5 years ago

i’ve heard babies are always losing their jobs. hopefully this giant baby will lose his (i’m assuming being a literal living feces sculpture is his job).

Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
5 years ago

@Saphira

You know when they talk about how sudden self-awareness can be really soul-crushing ? If Matt Forney was capable of self-awareness, he’d probably die of internal bleeding. That is, if he had a soul. I’m starting to doubt that.

Bodycrimes
Bodycrimes
5 years ago

Matt Forney thinks sex is sacred? Matt Forney? The same guy who boasted publicly about urinating on his Filipino girlfriend? The one who he claimed actually loved him?

A strange definition of sacred!

Imaginary Petal
Imaginary Petal
5 years ago

Fingie has reported the caviar splattered egg.

Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
5 years ago

@Bodycrimes

The same guy who boasted publicly about urinating on his Filipino girlfriend?

Wait, was that in the context of a kink or was he just being an asshole ?

The one who he claimed actually loved him?

Ah, well then. I find that so hard to believe that I’ma call bullshit on his girlfriend’s very existence.

joekster- betas bearded, sheeple shamed, dragons derailed. Reasonable rates.
joekster- betas bearded, sheeple shamed, dragons derailed. Reasonable rates.
5 years ago

@schildfreja: so, I’m assuming the flag on Forney’s wall isn’t for a sports team, which is what I thought it was. Where does it come from?

Matt Forney’s a joke. Unfortunately, if he does manage to dox this poor woman, he’s going to really hurt her. Is there any action the FBI can take to protect her?

Re. Matt Forney’s ‘argument’: does he even realize that in his imagined ‘good ol’ days’ PUA’s such as Matt Forney would also be ostracized as adulterors? I mean, that happened too…

Podkayne Lives
Podkayne Lives
5 years ago

‘In a society where sex was still regarded as sacred’. I wish he’d give a location or date, because I suspect that whenever he’s thinking of, they probably had rape there too.

Or does he mean that the young men passing by wouldn’t have helped her, or that she wouldn’t have dared take it to court?

It is interesting that his anger is not directed toward the guys who stopped and captured Turner. It’s as though they don’t exist. Perhaps because their shock, coming from male eyewitnesses, severely undermines the idea that this was all a big nothing.

Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
Sinkable John : Pansy Ass Pinko, Regicidal Beast-of-Burden
5 years ago

Nah the male eyewitnesses don’t count because MISANDRY !

Tabby Lavalamp
Tabby Lavalamp
5 years ago

When even awful people like Ian Miles Cheong are disagreeing with you, you might have gone too far.

Arctic Ape
Arctic Ape
5 years ago

I’m not too familiar with Forney but he seems like another Roosh, an aging PUA guru washout transforming into a wannabe patriarch.

He seems to be tut-tutting Turner and the victim for attempted promiscuity, an ancient sin commonly disregarded by modern SJWs. Imagine we lived in a historical utopia where young people were taught to save themselves til marriage, then maybe Turner hadn’t tried being lewd with some random girl. Of course, and more importantly, the girl wouldn’t have been there either.

Podkayne Lives
Podkayne Lives
5 years ago

Of course, that’s the tack that Turner has been going with all along: a culture of the demon drink and sexual promiscuity was his downfall. He now apparently wants to take this show on the road: he’s trying to get invited to campuses to talk about how alcohol and promiscuity is super bad, and can lead to the ruin of young men’s lives.

Scildfreja Unnýðnes
Scildfreja Unnýðnes
5 years ago

Not familiar with Forney? gosh, you must not read the blog here too often? There’s a pretty deep well of putrescence on that one.

I’m tryin’ to parse if you’re being serious about the “ancient sin commonly disregarded by modern SJWs” there. Am I over-reading? Too many trolls lately, my radar is uncalibrated.

Anyways, if you are serious about that, well.

a) the historical utopia of “saving till marriage” is a fairy tale which has never existed and can never exist; humans don’t work that way. Purity standards are just a way to shame and terrorize women. In traditional societies, men who violate purity standards are “tut-tutted”, women who violate purity standards are ostracized or stoned.

b) The idea of purity standards isn’t disregarded by people who are interested in social justice, it is actively opposed. Because the concept of purity standards does nothing but harm people, shame women into silence about rape, and encourage amoral men to rape. Comprehensive sex education is what’s needed, not “ancient sins”.

If you’re in agreement, hooray! And I’m sorry if I misread you. If you aren’t in agreement, welp, I’m sorry I was so concise. Feel free to point out where I’m wrong!

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

I seem to recall a commenter by the name of Arctic Ape in the past, but remember them as a regular, not a troll. I want to believe that was satire, but it doesn’t read that way. Please do clarify, Arctic Ape.

paul tidwell
paul tidwell
5 years ago

I tried rather naively to wane into their neck of the woods to correct them about Matt Forney’s inaccurate bullshit about Wolf-PAC and their efforts to get money out of politics and talk about all the time I’d literally spent down at the State legislature down in Salem WITH the Wolf-PAC and maybe even send photo’s but then I immediately realized who Matt Forney was a Few Seconds too late and gave up because the MRA and MGTOW aren’t worth my bloody time.

paul tidwell
paul tidwell
5 years ago
JoeB
JoeB
5 years ago

Come on twitter, be better, should have a report option for “y’all already banned this asshole”.

Scildfreja Unnýðnes
Scildfreja Unnýðnes
5 years ago

I contribute to Wolf PAC too! I’m not even American! It’s a great cause and should be supported.

AsAboveSoBelow
AsAboveSoBelow
5 years ago

I reported the tweets with which Forney calls for the survivor to be doxxed. Now we wait…and wait…and wait.

latsot
latsot
5 years ago

Remember that one kid at school? Not one of the bullies, the one who sucked up to the bullies in order to avoid getting bullied themself? The one who day after day came up with the most horrible torments for other people in order to deflect attention away from themself?

Hello, Matt.

Handsome "Punkle Stan" Jack

I’m not familiar with Forney either and I’ve been here a year. I think I remember he being mentioned here or there, but I’m shit at names, especially when they aren’t mentioned often, so, yeah. Roosh is much more prominent here than Forney, I do believe, so he’s easier to remember.

Scildfreja Unnýðnes
Scildfreja Unnýðnes
5 years ago

Yeah, I recall Arctic Ape as well from before, and I seem to recall them being one of us!

(one of us, one of us)

so I’m betting I’m just misreading things. If so, mea culpa!

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
5 years ago

@ David Futrelle

If this breaches the rules please delete and accept my apologies.

I can understand the distaste at vigilante justice, especially when it’s not about the victim but just posturing or even enjoying a pile on. On balance it’s probably better that we live in a system with the rule of law.

However, the law is inevitably an imperfect tool. Sometimes it can’t provide a remedy for victims. As a society we accept that on a grim utilitarian calculus. Some people have to be sacrificed to protect public order. That’s a pretty bad situation for any particular sacrifice though and I for one don’t blame them for trying to protect themselves, or anyone else who acts out of genuine concern for the victim.

In this instance Forney is causing actual serious harm to the poor woman at this very instant. This is bound to get back to her. I’m sure I don’t need to splain to people here that psychological harm is as real as physical harm. Forney is quite literally torturing her even as we’re discussing this. And even whilst he’s doing this he’s taking real steps to make the torture worse and put the woman in risk of serious physical harm too.

Now if you were walking down the street and you saw someone torturing a person and simultaneously broadcasting for as many people who fancied it to join in, would you start considering legal proceedings that, even if they were effective (which is by no means certain), would take weeks or months to complete?

Or would you recognise there was an ongoing escalating assault and take whatever steps might be necessary to stop that immediately and argue the legality of those actions later?

Imaginary Petal
Imaginary Petal
5 years ago

That’s definitely not the regular Arctic Ape.

Ooglyboggles
5 years ago

Seriously Wolf PAC is all about removing money in politics and end the pseudo-plutocracy, they’re a good group.

http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/federal-judge-denies-citizens-united-request-to-keep-its-donors-names-secret-160830?news=859398

Also some good news related to them. Donor names cannot be kept secret. Thank you federal judge Sidney Stein.

kupo
kupo
5 years ago

@Alan
In this situation, what can we do that’s the equivalent of rushing in and physically putting ourselves between the abuser and his victim? I’m asking seriously.

Perhaps a campaign on twitter where everyone “outs” themselves as Turner’s victim? Might be effective ad a statement but it wouldn’t stop hackers from getting her info.

ScarlettAthena
ScarlettAthena
5 years ago

I find it obnoxious that someone says “leftists and feminists” can’t judge this on moral grounds because “don’t judge” and “it doesn’t effect you”. He elides different issues, and I think this reference contains a part of the “sex as sacred” part.

I might be wrong, but I think what he wants to say is that the west is degenerate because we “tolerate” “deviant” sexualities (that gay marriage is a thing, that we are accepting of trans*, that women can have a choice of sexual partner and marriage is not required, possibly that no one bats an eye at different ethnicities marrying and/or dating). We have come to an understanding that these practices are not harmful, that there is no rational basis to outlaw aspects of sexuality, etc.

This stands in sharp contrast to acts of aggression like rape where someone is able to inflict damage on others. There is clear damage, as in someone must go to a hospital or someone is traumatized.

I think he wants to say that people who “tolerate” “deviant” sexualities (which don’t impact anyone) cannot condemn violence. And this is stupid and it is an attempt to shift away from the topic, muddy the discussion or be a jerk. That is, if he understands there is a difference.

Alan Robertshaw
Alan Robertshaw
5 years ago

@ kupo

That’s the $64k question. The only solutions I can think of would certainly cross a line here. I see potential in your “I’m Spartacus!” model though. Plenty of bright people around here, any other suggestions?

1 2 3