Juicebro lawyer/Trump superfan Mike Cernovich has been pushing the ridiculous and thoroughly debunked “Hillary Clinton is too physically frail to be President” theory for some time now.
Now he’s found DRAMATIC NEW EVIDENCE to support his dubious “sick Hillary” thesis: Photos and video footage of Hillary SITTING and sometimes LEANING ON stools at public events.
Because, clearly, anyone who doesn’t want to remain standing for hours on end in the midst of a gruelling political campaign is on DEATH’S DOOR.
In a post on his blog yesterday, Cerno promoted a new hashtag — #HillarysStools — that has taken the unhinged Hillary haters of Twitter by storm, garnering retweets by some of the finest minds in the political and media worlds, from yelly red-faced conspiracy monger Alex Jones to Alex Jones employee Paul Joseph Watson to noted Twitter commenter Cuckface von Dipshit. And of course it’s been covered by Fox News.
Some scenes from #HillarysStools so far.
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/765655466860961792
#HillarysStools – Another sign that she has major health problems & can barely stand up. https://t.co/X7Qm7Qosnv pic.twitter.com/ovQbv19M7J
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) August 16, 2016
Sits on a stool…wtf? Why can't Hillary stand? What is wrong with her? #HillarysStools pic.twitter.com/DTTwYBFU2H
— Lisa (@Rockprincess818) August 16, 2016
Hillary Clinton need a stool on stage? Maybe she should get up and excerise instead of sleep all day #HillarysStools pic.twitter.com/LSkIA85TVf
— Russell Wiley🇺🇸 (@russellwiley) August 16, 2016
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/765706769519767552
https://twitter.com/RinaValentina/status/766043658118320128
https://twitter.com/mgdavros111/status/765978916486057984
https://twitter.com/BlueFalcon3P/status/765742691913195520
https://twitter.com/Ricky_Vaughn99/status/765898072450740225
https://twitter.com/25YrsOfChaos/status/765769578718830592
There's nothing to see here #HillarysStools pic.twitter.com/LEkR3pbZRZ
— DeplorableWhiteMale (@WhiteMaleShame) August 16, 2016
https://twitter.com/PrivilegedBrah/status/765685926689247234
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/765652112252530688
https://twitter.com/danklemer1/status/765730282288844800
https://twitter.com/SoCaliMilitia1/status/765697201972457472
https://twitter.com/Yuan1557800/status/765683268888956929
https://twitter.com/roastsliberals/status/765657445100294145
https://twitter.com/DripKlap/status/765695177214144512
If any of you can decipher this message, let me know:
https://twitter.com/Cuckumber/status/765734809398349824
I’m gonna lay out a pet peeve here: Why do we refer to Hillary Clinton by her first name? It’s rare for a famous man to be referred to by his first name on the regular, but not so rare for a famous woman.
I’m definitely with you on this. I do think it’s important for the President to be in sufficiently good health for 8 years of a very stressful job. Have you looked at pictures of Obama today vs. 2008? Being president has aged him far beyond what 8 years normally should have. You can see it in every president, really, but it’s struck me particularly hard with Obama, maybe because he looked so young when elected.
But being disabled should not be a bar in itself. It is, politically, but it shouldn’t be, depending on the type of disability. A disability that impairs someone’s ability to do a high-stakes stressful job every day for 8 years = not Presidential material. There are a lot of things that disqualify someone from being President, not Constitutionally but in practical terms. A disability that required someone to sit down every couple of hours, which is what is being alleged here without evidence? No problem whatsoever, and it’s unclear to me what would be going through someone’s mind to think that standing up nonstop all day with no breaks is something Presidents have to be able to do.
@policy
I think it’s becuse to call her ‘Clinton’ is Patriarchalist, and it isn’t right to refer to an independent woman as if she is her husband’s appendage. Maybe she should have reverted to using Rodham, but the Catholics would not like that as it would imply divorce.
@ Policy
I see that so much with famous women vs famous men. Women get referred to by their first name, while men are referred to by their last name.
Its about respect, it used to be considered rude and disrespectful to call people you didn’t know by their first name. We’ve generally kept this tradition for men, but use more casual language when referring to women.
Today (in the US, anyway) that isn’t very strongly enforced…I see celebrities referred to by their first AND last names.
If you know someone well s/he is often referred to by his/her first name. I see professionals referred to as Mr./Ms./Mrs./Professional Title Last Name
Sinkable John said
35 years and STILL no cure? Please give generously to the Cranio-rectal Inversion Syndrome Society (CRISS) so that we may help the millions* who suffer from this horrific disease! /PSA
*and by this we mean, of course, the ones who have to deal with those so stricken >.<
JoeB and Alan – I guess there are loads of military jobs where most of what you do is babysit expensive equipment. I had one of those jobs; taught myself crochet and knitting, kept up correspondence with all my friends and relatives, played a lot of Spades and Hearts and a fair bit of Risk among other things. There was about three hours worth of work to do on a 12-hr. shift if we had no outages. But I had a locked room in a secure building to goof off in…
@ hambeast
When Isaac Asimov got drafted he just found a little hidey hole like that and wrote stories. I think Heinlein did too.
I once met a social forces chap who was really into knitting and crochet. He said it was something to do on long observation jobs. (He was good at needlework generally; he mended my trousers for me)
http://www.thevintageknittinglady.co.uk/images/21May2014/goodhousekeepingforcesknittingbooka.jpg
Alan – We weren’t allowed to wear anything that was non-issue except maybe socks (which I only learned to make relatively recently) so that book makes me totes jelly!
And lest anyone think my job was a complete waste of time, if there was an outage (or god forbid more than one) we were generally in panic mode for the duration due to the importance* of the comms we were responsible for.
*so much so that our building had its own backup power production plant with a 24/7/365 staff that had less to do on a non-outage shift than my shop.
Ninja’d plenty of times with the poop thing. What’s kind of funny is that a while ago, if I remember correctly, Trump did insult Clinton for using the bathroom, which would presumably include pooping. Disgusting! And then Sanders pretty much said, “I hate to break it to you, sir, but I use the toilet too.”
And for all the times she sits on stools, at least she doesn’t complain that they’re too hard for her 😛
Knitting is wonderful for babysitting-the-centrifuge types of jobs: check the the equipment at the end of x-many rows/rounds.
Speaking of Heinlein:
Heinlein and Racism
(via a tweet by N. K. Jemisin*). Can’t say I’m surprised.
* The Obelisk Gate is out! Woohoo! Looking forward to it, as soon as I finish David Cay Johnston’s The Making of Donald Trump.
@Policy of Madness
Yes, it’s a bit aggravating, but Hillary Clinton has been assumed to be Of One Entity with Bill Clinton (see: her being blamed for her husband’s policies when he was president), and referring to her as just “Clinton” would probably muddy the waters even more.
It also happened with the Bushes, George W. Bush got referred to as “Dubya” and such. (Admittedly this is also not a very big show of respect, but I do wonder if he DIDN’T also have the first name of his father that he would have been referred to by his first name).
Of course, there are plenty of other cases of women being referred to by their first name when men are referred to by their last name, so sexism definitely plays a part in it too.
Speaking of Trump and the alt-right media, Trump has now hired Stephen Bannon, executive chairman of Breitbart News, as the campaign’s new CEO. His site has been one of the purveyors of “Hillary is secretly too sick to be president” all year. Expect it to get worse, along with other aspects of the campaign, as Clinton’s campaign manager said yesterday. “We should expect in the coming weeks to see more of what, at the end of the day, really scares voters about Donald Trump: the hateful rhetoric, erratic judgment, and wild accusations and conspiracy theories.”
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-made-breitbart-great-again/
@ Policy of Madness
Well, there may be something to the first name thing being an expression of disrespect, whether consciously or not, but there is also the fact that we’ve had a Clinton in politics recently that’s still pretty famous and well-known. So for the same reason many people called the second President Bush Dubya and we have Teddy and FDR for the Roosevelts (only related through marriage, funny enough), there is probably some feeling that Hillary Clinton should be differentiated from the other Clinton. Calling her simply Hillary is probably the easiest way to do it. Of course, I tended to refer to both of the major Democratic candidates by their first names and the Republican candidates by their last, so for me it may be that I feel more warmly toward Bernie and Hillary that I do assholes like Cruz and Trump.
…how would Hillary’s hypothetical health problems make her a bad president, again? Is “she is being kept up by drugs just like Hitler was” really their entire argument?
@Michael Brew
That’s what I was thinking. Still, I don’t like that it’s still going on. Will they be calling her President Hillary come Inauguration Day?
OT: This post is amazing and I had to share. https://medium.com/@SaraJBenincasa/why-am-i-so-fat-91564fc3a0c7#.phns6emgc
Hilary’s Stools? Really?
They’re not even trying to be taken seriously any more.
Semi-OT: (Trigger warning, Nude trump statue)
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Naked-Donald-Trump-Statue-Erected-in-union-square-390597381.html
Worth it all for this:
http://i.imgur.com/apf1K6C.gif
The woman is in her 60s and LOOK AT HER SHOES. LOOK AT THOSE POINTY BASTARDS. I don’t think most people enjoy standing in heels for hours on end, let alone a woman who’s already done that for decades and decades.
For fuck’s sake, people.
@Hambeast
I laughed so hard I spilt coffee on my knees. I’m crying a little from the laughter and burning pain.
Thank you thank you thank you.
CTFU! ?
Also…I love Caleb Oberst’s jokey remark! (and not just because I’ve said the same)
Re: The first name thing, I don’t want to be out of line, but I never had a problem with that. In my book it all depends on the tone with which one uses the names. It’s all about intent.
Don’t hurt me *cringes*
Personally, I call her by her first name to separate her from Bill (and I call him by his first name for the same reason). If I didn’t, some of my posts would read like Who’s On First skits. o_O It’s a very good point in general, but there is a legitimate reason for it in this case.
@kupo
Amazing post indeed! Pretty funny short film too
Well, if it helps, AP style says you generally refer to someone with her or his first name after the first mention if multiples with the same last name are mentioned in a story. So any story that mentions Bill (or any other Clinton) will have “Hillary” afterward–but it should also have “Bill” afterward if he’s mentioned more than once. (Which he might not be since he’s not the candidate and doesn’t necessarily warrant it.)
You can write around this sometimes but it risks becoming rather awkward or depending on knowledge a reader might not have (“the former president,” or “the 2016 Democratic candidate,” or “the former Sec. of State” or “the famous saxophonist” or “the pantsuit wearer” or whatever).
I suspect the reason people are mainly using her first name is that her husband is also famous, in politics and because he’s campaigning for her is also often mentioned in the same story.
Sarah Palin is usually “Palin” and Nancy Pelosi is usually “Pelosi” that I’ve seen. Conversely, Jeb Bush usually really is “Jeb,” because you can’t throw a rock without hitting a Bush in politics.
Of course this only applies to those using AP style, and definitely does not apply to any partison punditry “news.”