With their “God Emperor” way down in the polls, some of Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters are beginning to face the fact that Hillary Clinton will quite likely be the next president of the United States.
Or should I say the next techno-matriarch?
In a post on Return of Kings, Trump supporter and “ironic” rape legalization promoter Roosh V warns his Trump-happy readers that if The Donald doesn’t win in November, Hillary Clinton will usher in a new dark age for dudes.
All men will be negatively affected under a Hillary presidency in one way or another, meaning that the globalist boot is fast approaching our faces.
After assuming office, President Hillary Clinton will
move to establish a techno-matriarchy where men are second-class citizens to any female, [and] ensure that no movement or organization will be able to challenge her or her establishment cronies ever again. This isn’t a trivial matter of getting banned from a web site like Twitter or Youtube—many of you will be forced to escape the country for no other reason than you happening to be a man who found himself on the wrong side of the establishment.
New laws will ban men from doing man things, like pestering women they don’t know on the street.
Talking to girls in public will be illegal harassment or “hate crime,” and be enforced any time you make a girl feel bad for whatever reason, even if you merely stare at her the wrong way (such laws are currently being beta tested in the UK before wider rollout). Blatantly discriminatory “gender equality” laws in the workplace will lower the incomes of all men so that less qualified females can receive job positions and promotions at male expense.
Meanwhile, those brave souls (like Roosh) who speak up against the New Girl Order will be ruthlessly repressed.
They will target us, the alt right, alternative media, patriot groups, survivalists, traditionally conservative groups, and anyone else who strongly supports Donald Trump, tradition, or masculinity. The purpose of acute attacks is to psychologically break down, impoverish, and imprison those who have a powerful ability to counter the narrative or those who have the strength and organizational skill to resist tyranny with arms.
Wait, what?
Sorry, my head is still spinning a little from Roosh’s quick slide from “countering the narrative” to literally launching an armed revolution against a freely elected government.
Shooting people because you don’t like the results of a free and fair election is not a form of free speech.
But Roosh still holds out hope that a matri-Hillary-archy can be avoided. If Trump wins, he declares,
I predict that a masculine renaissance will occur … where men can once again focus on their own individual goals with Trump as a patriarchal role model.
In Trump’s America, Roosh will be able to get back to what he does best, advising men how to date-rape women after giving them a fake name meet possible future wives.
I would devote more of my energy to helping men successfully pair bond with women, like I started my writing career with, instead of having to play political defense as masculinity becomes retroactively classified as hate speech.
Hillary cannot be elected soon enough.
Also, FYI, I’ve also been speaking to the same “insiders who understand the globalist master plan” that Roosh boasts he’s been speaking to, and they have revealed to me that in the coming techno-matriarchy all men will be forced to do weird dance routines under the supervision of girls in referee outfits. They even showed me footage of one secret training camp:
I wasn’t referring to intersex people, I meant making it so that humans had a fully functioning dual-reproduction system like certain animals and plants. Just deactivated so they could choose which set to use for reproduction, when they were ready to have children. What else would you call that?
This is unrealistic because standard mammalian biology doesn’t support hermaphroditism very well. Might even cause some weird gender identity issues, depending on how gender identity actually works. It would be a hard sell even if it were possible. No one’s researching it anyway. However… if it did happen, it could potentially solve a lot of social issues by sidestepping them entirely.
Thanks very much for that, Jack. I really appreciate you being willing to discuss it like that.
EDIT:
It seems almost banal for me to keep typing “what Lea said” in every thread, and yet she keeps completely hitting it out of the park every time.
@Virgin Mary
What Catalpa said. By his limited definition those countries are socialist. And since they benefit from a high standard of living – higher than the US overall – pointing this out counters Terrance’s silly hackneyed “free stuff”/’leach off the state’ argument.
Men: *explicitly prevent women from doing Thing*
Also men: “Why do I always have to do Thing myself?! WOMEN ARE OPPRESSING ME!!!!”
White men throughout US history have had greater access to opportunity by virtue of deliberately, explicitly excluding everyone who was unlike them (when they weren’t outright murdering or enslaving them). Then, when we begin taking the first baby steps toward not doing that anymore, suddenly other demographics start overtaking them. Then jackasses like Terrence cry entire oceans over the state of not being able to win when the game isn’t rigged in their favor. But women and brown people (and combinations thereof) are the ones who expect everything for free. Seems reasonable.
—Is a person who is intersex a hermaphrodite?, Intersex Society of North America
http://41.media.tumblr.com/7d8d009bf885263d88290295656d93b2/tumblr_nzemt2S5lu1r9idblo2_250.png
@snowberry : the idea of being able to change sex at will is an interesting one, but just the hormonal problems it will cause mean it’s a lot of research to be able to do that. It’s also pretty likely to be a Very Bad Idea to do that before adulthood (because the time where the body grow seem to be the one time where messing with hormones need to be done in the most careful possible way), which mean it won’t help any transexual at all.
That might come an unexpected development of better hormonal and brain understanding. But I would not bet on it while I am alive.
(also, saying “human aren’t hermaphrodite, only animals and plants” confuse me because humans very much are animals. But I get what you mean)
OT: Secret ledger in Ukraine lists cash for Donald Trump’s campaign chief
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/paul-manafort-ukraine-donald-trump.html?_r=0
In other news, Ivanka Trump is currently vacationing in Croatia with Wendi Deng Murdoch, the woman who was most recently married to Rupert Murdoch (Fox News) and is now the girlfriend of Vladimir Putin (president of Russia).
Chelsea Clinton is also good friends with Ivanka Trump.
I suppose I could have made this stuff up, but I didn’t.
@varilys
Actually, we kinda do… both ways though. There’s a problem in policy world and it’s that the US and UK both look at each other’s policies and effectiveness without a lot of regard to other countries’ polices and practice. Yeah, sure we’ll look at some other English speaking country policies (Canada, maybe the antipodeans) and sometimes we’ll look at Nordic country policy (because it’s published in English) and very rarely we’ll look at places like Holland. Partly this makes sense because of the common law basis, but partly it’s just the arrogance of English-speaking peoples. I’m fully guilty of this.
In health care, this has been a disaster. The American system is dire, the NHS really is in crisis – but all most hacks can do is compare these two systems to each other – often without recognising the actual strengths and fatal weaknesses of these very different approaches.
@ rugbyyogi et al
It’s not uncommon for different countries to copy legislation from one another. Sometimes it’s because they’re trying to adopt general principles as you mention. Other times it’s because they have identified a need for a particular law and someone else has done all the drafting. This is particularly the case where developments in society throw up new problems.
[This crops up a lot with international agreements. So you might get a treaty in relation to common IP protection standards. One country will draft a law and all the others will just copy that one]
So for example, historians of UK labour relation laws will find elements of The Taft Hartley Act very familiar. Also, as common law jurisdictions began to codify law there was a lot of borrowing from each other. A lot of UK, Australian and Canadian legislation is practically verbatim.
One of the ironies of the Brexit debate is that large areas of ‘Foreign’ EU law was copied word for word from existing UK law.
*Legal Nerd Warning*
EU consumer law directives were modelled directly from the UK’s Unfair Contract Terms Act, Sale of Goods Act, and Supply of Goods and Services Act. Under EU law each state must pass an act implementing each directive into its domestic law. So the Acts implementing those directives in the UK pre-date the directives themselves. The respective dates make it look like time travel was involved.
I notice that up thread there was some mention of Nottinghamshire police’s decision to treat misogyny as a hate crime. This did crop up before so, being a lazy bloke, I’ll just cut & paste my previous:
http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/still-dont-understand-sexual-consent-its-cup-tea-says-brilliant-psa-167823
another nail in the PUA coffin
@Snowberry
The idea reminds me of LeGuin’s Gethenians in ‘The Dispossessed.’ They are a human population who have developed as having both sexes in one body. Their culture displays no sexism as a result, but people being people, Gethenian society develops problems of its own.
@Snowberry
Sorry, should have been ‘The Left Hand of Darkness.’ Long time since I read the book.
@axe
Yes, the current leader of the opposition does openly identify as a socialist, but take a closer look what’s going on. The Labour NEC will stop at nothing to remove him, even invalidating members permission to vote. The Blaitite ‘Red Torys’ have a man on the Labour leadership ballot who they approve of, Owen Smith, a former lobbyist for Pfizer and Iraq war supporter in favour of austerity and privatisation. What the NEC are doing now is cheating, to improve Smith’s chances of election. You surely have heard how members of the left are being demonised in the press as Trots and communist rabble, when all we want is to properly restore the Labour Party to its rightful place as a ‘workers party’, but in actual fact, many people being labelled thus are having their democratic rights taken away. That and the employment blacklisting of union members. It is exactly what I said before, a slippery slope.
When he retired, my dad acted as a consultant to quite a few countries with regard to reforming their legal systems – he basically flew over there and explained in detail how the British system worked, and I assume they also consulted people of similar expertise in other countries.
Because of course if something has been tried in practice, it’s well worth studying in depth, at least as much if it failed as if it succeeded.
OT, but it was mentioned up-thread: I’m pleased that the latest “Zapp as Trump” videos feature Kif sighing. I guess that answers the question some had about whether Maurice LaMarche approves.
Also, I love how Billy West can make a word end with three ‘d’s.
@ wetherby
Some mates had a nice gig advising the former Soviet republics on possible legal systems post CCCP break-up.
@ moggie
Billy West said of Frank Welker “He’s the guy you go to if you need the sound of 20 ducks, and one of them has a limp”
Hey, did Roosh ever explain why it would be a “techno”-matriarchy rather than a plain ol’ regular-style matriarchy? cuz nothing in the parts David quoted sounds very “techno”…
“Techno-matriarchy” ought to be an EDM label.
@Mary
OK. You’ll appreciate, I hope, my fatigue on this issue. See, we’ve been dealing with a similar situation to what your talking about over here. For the last half year, a buncha people have been droning incessantly about how democracy is dead and everything is rigged. That a private organization having rules for who is and isn’t allowed choose it’s leader is a violation of rights. That establishment preference is very nearly treason. Not convincing, to say the least, but stubbornly memetic
Now, I looked into the NEC stuff. Not really cheating so much as clever use of rules, but it’s whatever. Semantics, right? Regardless, nobody’s rights have been taken away. Unless I’m misunderstanding how political parties work over by you, this is just a shadier version of what happened in our NY primary. Shady, however, doesn’t mean illegal and definitely not an abuse of rights
Finally, let’s talk slippery slope. I loathe the slippery slope argument. Not so much in theory as in practice. It’s almost always bullshit and it lends itself easily to hyperbole. Should Labour have sturdier rules? Absolutely. Is this a slippery slope to more finagling? Sure. Should those construction companies have done what they did? No. Is that a slippery slope to more fuckery? Seems it. Those are problems enough without invoking the idea of Her Majesty’s government forcing people to name names or face jail time. Twitter bans aren’t censorship and this ain’t anything like McCarthyism. Perspective, ya know?
Terrance
Um, you know Obama’s been president for eight years, right? There seems to have been a distinct lack of white men being herded into concentration camps so far.
So her type is ‘supervillain’.