Woman-hating internet garbage fire Return of Kings is celebrating the start of the Olympics by lamenting the fact that most of the athletes the US is sending to the games are women.
As regular RoK contributor John Carver figures it, using his very own system of mathematics,
this is actually a sad state of affairs. It means that the U.S. Olympic team will have less than a 50% chance of seeing a real champion, rather than a 2nd rate gold medalist from the weaker sex … .
According to Carver, women just plain suck at sports compared to men, but as I didn’t bother to read that portion of his post I can’t tell you why. Possibly cooties.
In any case, Carver feels that since women athletes will never be as good as men, any gold medals they win don’t really count. And so they shouldn’t be made of real gold.
Whenever female athletes are awarded a “gold medal” at the Olympics, it should just be a giant knockoff of that cheap Hanukkah gelt (chocolate gold coins) that Jewish children get for the holiday season. After the brief surge of excitement that they have won “gold” (and attention whore themselves with it on Instagram), they can peel off the tin foil and feast on the chocolatey goodness inside until it’s all gone. “You go girl!” ?
You can tell it’s funny because of the smiley and the always-fresh use of the phrase “you go girl!”
After all, since women are ultimately just big children, they merely deserve to have big children’s candy. The REAL gold medals should be allocated to the real champions of a sporting discipline’s top tier, which will always be men.
Comedy GOLD!
The Secret to a Happy Life for Men
NEVER engage in a legally, financially, psychologically, emotionally or spiritually binding committed relationship with a woman. Be ready to leave her with no regrets and no strings at all times. Ignore this carefully hidden secret and you will likely end up suffering for that mistake in ways you never imagined possible.
That’s it. It really is that simple – yet so hard for men to comprehend. Just don’t give a woman or white knight power over your life. Most of men’s life struggles occur because this one, carefully guarded and hidden secret is meant to remain a carefully guarded and hidden secret. Movies, books, TV shows, RomComs, etc., all carefully designed to hide this male life saving secret.
That’s really all there is to it – yet most men will still learn the hard way – and women will continue to profit from the destruction of men. Why? Because women don’t love men. Women love that the system is designed to forcefully transfer your wealth to themselves – so they can go fuck the pool boy. They’re in it to suck you dry (no pun). In fact, the above secret will seem counter-intuitive to most men. Why? Because they’ve been brainwashed from birth to act against their own best interests and to primarily sacrifice themselves for the best interests of women – BY THEIR OWN MOTHERS. This anti-male brainwashing is extremely effective and starts almost immediately from the moment of a boy’s birth.
Most men already know that what I just wrote is prohibited thinking and ridiculed by women and white knights. You could even lose your job if the wrong person discovers that you think non-gynocentrically and with such self-regard. My speech isn’t permitted in ‘civilized society’. Why? Because society thrives off the disposability of men. A guy like me represents and end to that usury of men. How would women and white knights survive? Can’t have that. DESTROY THE ANTI-GYNOCENTRIC BLASPHEMER!
What I just wrote is considered highly prohibited speech and/or thoughts by the matriarchy and white knights. For the sake of your own livelihood, never repeat what I just wrote in the open or in a manner that leaves you identifiable due to the attempts at retribution, social and legal condemnation (false accusations) and endless shaming sure to follow your unmasking.
MGTOW: Men who’ve discovered the above truth and have wisely acted in their own best interests.
ANTI-MGTOW: Those that hope to keep men endlessly naive and hopelessly trapped within the gynocracy’s and white knight’s anti-male meat grinder.
Take the Red Pill – or suffer the Blue Pill. It’s your call.
Meanwhile, a genderally-superior French male gymnast has suffered a horrific leg fracture. I wonder how Roosh & Co. are going to spin THIS.
(TW: link not for the faint of heart.)
I find it especially hilarious that he says that women are like children while acting like a child himself.
Maybe these MRA fart weasels are looking forward to competing in the sex Olympics? They have classes for solo masturbation, doubles, mixed doubles, points are awarded for speed, aim and distance. Gold award if they get it in their own eye.
Maybe some special sucking award as well?
Suddenly, RoK makes a lot more sense.
Lot of assumptions in this rant, #1 being that speed and strength are the be-all and end-all of athletic excellence. There’s a lot more to physical prowess than muscles. Endurance, for example – women excel at open water swimming and extreme distances, where body fat is critical for fuel. Or body compactness, which is an advantage in sports with an artistic component that requires quick rotations (gymnastics, figure skating, diving).
And yet, triple axels and quad toes are still comsidered more spectacular and difficult than Biellmanns, charlottes, and Ina Bauers. Why are flexibility, grace, and endurance less valuable athletic attributes than physical strength?
There’s also the usual thing where women have been discouraged for centuries from developing their full physical potential. And still are. Little girls are more likely to be discouraged (and/or not rewarded socially) from jumping off the jungle gym and banging up their knees.
Anyway, it’s amusing to read a childish rant about chocolate medals and fake athletes from someone that’s never faced one hundredth of the adversity, discipline, and sacrifices that Olympic competitors go through just to get to the Games. I’m betting he’s got a drawerful of “participant” trophies.
No. Because women are still getting them. OP is upset that he can’t lord his penis over women.
I am reminded of that scene from Criminal Minds (I think that was it), where three women were in a bar and a dude came up to them pretending to be an FBI agent in an attempt to run a lame pick-up game on them, and they asked to see his badge and then they asked him if it looked like this, and they pulled out theirs.
Maybe OP’s mad that he can’t pretend to be an Olympic athlete to pick women up anymore.
Or perhaps he’s incesed at the idea that all of these women are more successful than he’ll ever be, and their names are known worldwide for their athleticism and years of training their skill, instead of his shitty articles on RoK.
I mostly pay attention to soccer and I know our men didn’t make the games this year so that’s 22 men we usually bring.
@PI
I’m pretty sure that was CSI. The flirter ended up dead, I think, and the ladies in question had to solve the case
ETA: Then again, the ‘they couldn’t possibly be hot and have respectable jobs’ thing has been around forever, so you’re probably right about Criminal Minds doing it
As a matter of fact, no men should be awarded medals either. Cheetahs can run up to 75 mph and African elephants can lift 9000 kg, so only they have any right to be on a podium. Humans are just fake pathetic weaklings. Pfft.
@buttercup
It’s because of the ‘womb’ mystery, unfortunately which has prevented women from competing in sports they would be very adept at. There is no longer a female Tour De France, as a modern example. If there was, imagine the rucass it would create seeing the feeemales competing the alpine stages hours before the men. Of course, their excuse is that the men’s race would catch up the women’s race because they are all so feeble and slow, and this would cause all kinds of problems.
I remember reading about a racehorse trainer who refused to use female jockeys because he feared if they fell off it would damage their inside bits. Seems bizarre he didn’t care much about male jockeys appendages which tend to get squashed into codpieces and stuck between their legs.
@Axecalibur: I am a huge fan of Criminal Minds and CSI (RIP) and I am pretty sure it was in Criminal Minds because they are FBI agents and the CSI ladies aren’t (I don’t think CSI original flavour has them as cops either Brass and Curtis tended to do the policework and CSI were the science peeps). Also we’re shown fairly regularly that the Criminal Minds women socialise together quite a bit and the CSI ones don’t. However I freely admit I marathoned both series early this year (11 Criminal Minds and 15 CSI seasons!) and might have blended the two.
As for the original post: I just… what.. I mean WHAT?! Argh! I need to find the thread where we made up mild insults and curses to express my utter contempt for this douchebag.
I bought the first “52” omnibus today (DC comic series) I am going to go read it in bed and try not to fume about all this.
@varalys
Holy shit, how’d I miss that? I’ve seen way more CM than CSI (all of the versions combined), so the ‘girls night out becomes the basis for the plot’ thing from CSI stands out more, I guess. Also, at this point, the BAU is just the BAU, ya know? I forget they’re a subsection of a larger agency. Sorry, PI, ignore me…
People like this think that they’re affecting people’s enjoyment of the Games. They’re not going to, because these people are so inane it is ridiculous.
So, the MRA movement views women as being “big children”. The same movement also makes demands to have sex with women…
Am I understanding their position correctly?
@Axecalibur: There was an episode in the second to last CSI season I think where the three main cast women, Finn, Sara and Morgan went to a forensics conference mainly as an excuse to get pampered at a nice Las Vegas resort and there was a mass shooting during one of the lectures, but no lechery. I like that story because it really emphasied female friendship and passed The Bechdel Test with flying colours.
I think the Criminal Minds scene was just a teaser for a story about a revolting PUA, but not the same guy who hit on them at the bar. Damn, you’re making me want to watch all the episodes again!
Back when I was foolish enough to go on ROK and tell them how vile they are I had a brief altercation with some wanker who said that they do articles like this for the clickbait value. How petty and immature is that? And so freely admitting it?!
By the tone of this ‘article’ I would say that they have certainly not matured at all since, and are really struggling to find ways to put down women – I mean ffs OLYMPIC ATHELETES?! No one with a single rational thought in their head could confuse any Olympic athelete with ‘big children’, but it would be pretty understandable to assume that ROK writers are big children.
I do not want to insult children, but immaturity is easily described in those terms, and having raised children I do recognise many of ROK’s common strategies are consistent with simplistic anti social behaviour often seen in children.
mywall – you are understanding them perfectly. Many in the manosphere are in favour of having sex with underage girls and want the age of consent lowered or abolished.
So John Carver, who claims that if you “[follow] him on Twitter … you might learn a little sumpin’ sumpin’,” is clearly not “attention-whoring,” but Olympic gold fucking medalists who post photos with their medals… are. If they’re female, that is, and especially if it’s on INSTAGRAM, I mean, come on, SJW much? If he won a gold medal he’d naturally hide his face in modesty, tell only his very closest friends at a private intellectual gathering, and donate his winnings to charity anonymously. Then he would live a life of thankless generosity as a masked superhero using his supreme strength and nimbleness.
Soliciting attention from your friends and followers who like hearing about your life is for entitled bitches.
@Buttercup Q. Skullpants Exactly.
This argument sometimes reminds me of that episode of Extras where Ricky Gervais feels like he’s more “deserving” of Warwick Davis’s fiancee because he’s taller.
@varalys
Aren’t, like, 1/3 of the unsubs they deal with at least PUA adjacent? ‘Feemales are terrible and gross, but I want em’, then we skip to Garcia briefing the team about what some joggers found in a New Mexico state park or summat. ‘Wheels up in 20’, theme song, deep ass quote
Now I wanna watch the episodes again too 🙂
Also, remember the CSI episode (there mighta been 2 of em) with Justin fuckin Bieber in it? I suppose that put eyes on the screen in 2010. I was being obnoxious about it when the commercials 1st came on. ‘Bieber? *dismissive snort* Network television, amirite?’
But then it turns out he’s actually a solid actor, so… He shut me up 🙂
@Lady Mondegreen
Thanks for posting that amazing story of heroism. Yusra Mardini is my new inspiration.
If I didn’t know the manosphere as well as I do (eye roll), I would think that “John Carver” was trolling the manosphere with his transparently jealous posting about female Olympic athletes.
See, guys? This is how stupid you sound! How about you do something constructive with your lives instead of badmouthing women because they won’t give you the time of day! Maybe clean up your local beach — it’ll be a start on improving your character!
But no. Sadly, no. “John Carver” is just one example of how unimaginative the manosphere is. Also, not so bright.
“John,” sweetie, try harder.
Why do they moan so much about feeeemales “attention whoring”? Is it because they get to say “whore”?
Because I see a lot of variations about this image:
http://www.ihaveapc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fbmfm.jpg
Isn’t this classic jealousy? And also they seem to think that these memes should say “look how unfair the world is! Surely the female kind deserved none of this popularity, she just used her boobs!” instead of how I always read it: “I make all these cool memes about how women are terrible and yet I am surprised by how unpopular I have become.”
I actually saw the TV episode of whatever in which the women pull out their FBI badges. I haven’t felt this connected to contemporary popular culture in years!
What, it happened over five years ago?
Never mind.
The CSI with Beiber is worth watching – to see him die. Same reason I watched Star Trek Generations, to watch Kirk die
Wow RoK, where’s your medal? Where’s your qualification? Last time I checked when you talk game of athletics, you’re expected some level of participation. I really, really doubt you can face even one of them in a fight.