We’ve met “Ian Ironwood” before, the prolific red pill mememaker with a fondness for retro images and retrograde sexual politics.
Today, I’ve assemble what you might call a little meme essay made up of images he’s posted. Prepare yourself in advance for a BIG IRONIC SURPRISE TWIST ENDING!
Oh dear, I’ve kind of spoiled the surprise. Oops.
Directed by M. Night Shyamalan!
I had no idea that “idealism” consisted of thinking of women as little more than vagina delivery systems. I guess that’s what the red pill teaches you, huh?
Please, sir, I beg you not to use “vagina” and “delivery” in the same sentence. It reminds one of babies, which are not sexy and are in fact inherently icky, taking a woman’s attention away from her man, to whom it properly belongs.
Once again proving the only real “misandrists” are MRAs/redpill morons.
No man has ever told me that they like “interesting women.” In what context would that be a thing that a person would say.
Haha, I love this. “I’m only a sexist if by sexist, you mean doer of sex!” seems to be their life philosophy generally, but this seems to just plain admit misogyny instead of pretending otherwise. Nice.
I look at these memes and my thoughts are what kind of damaged human being produced them?
Did this guy spend one two many summers with his domestic violence having grandfather? Did he grow up in a House where they only watched fox news? Does he come from an alternate dimension where women are literal monsters?
I know I shouldn’t be surprised by anything I see here but how did this guy go so wrong?
Men Love Vagidealistically!!!
“Sexuality is our prime interest, and to think otherwise is to fundamentally misunderstand masculinity.”
I’m manning wrong, it seems. I’ll have to stick to less important things like science. Thank goodness this deep thinker was here to tell me!
That chap needs to literally keep his cards close to his chest as the woman behind him is clearly signalling his hand to her mates.
To actually believe that sexuality is men’s prime interest sounds… very limiting. I’m too busy feeling sad for him to hate him. His blog contains some of the most deppresingly distopian rationalizations i’ve ever read. Misoginy. Misandry. Misanthropy. It has it all. These people are so invested in perfecting their social cages.
“Idealistically” in this context seems to mean “ideally she’d be a 1950s pinup!”
How did he even go from the rest of these to the last? “We only talk to you gross women because vagina” –>???????? –>”men love idealistically”. Can someone fill in the blanks for me here?
And how the heck is “having open options” different from loving opportunistically? My english isn’t perfect but these seem to be pretty much the same thing?
Dear Ian (and all your ilk): Kindly keep your masculine “idealism” in your pants.
FOREVER.
Is Ian planning on going his own way any time soon?
Oh but it’s TOTES different if it’s a man doing it. If she does it she’s an evil monster. /sarcasm This guy loves that ‘double standard’ thing. 😛
@ fishy goat
Maybe it’s the fact that women have standards but these guys have double standards that justifies the wage gap in their eyes?
Should we round them up and keep them on a stud farm?
Would hate to confuse them with big complex ideas they can’t grasp.
Can’t have men around open flames, caustic chemicals or load-bearing anything. According to Ian, sexuality is always their prime interest. Can’t have a man around in a dangerous situation, if the thought of a boob will get their minds wandering. Best give all STEM jobs to women instead.
Man, idealistic love has really come down a lot since the days of Sir Lancelot.
@Alan Robertshaw:
Yeah, I was gonna say, “I found the mark!” but you beat me to it. Bravo.
Man nobody paints a darker image of men than MRA’s.
@ Alan Robertshaw
Doubleplusgood! 😛
A little of that idealistic man-love, please!
David,
I think you are using shaming language. How do you know Ian does not follow the Vaginaist religion?
I demand that you apologize for the bigoted language and change your post so it does not offended my concern troll sensibilities.
He is mansplaining to me, what I do and don’t look for a person. I don’t ever asking for his opinion or be told why I am into someone for whatever reason. Romanticism, objectification and douchebags speaking for me, the trifecta of pet hates.
Also “Says women love opportunistically”
Literally has another one where he says to love opportunistically by having multiple “options”
Sure breh sure.
Are there any New Yorkers here? My Otter and I have been hunting pokémon around Bryant Park and Grand Central for the last few hours. 🙂
No gay men in his sad sorry world, clearly.
And why does he believe that all men are the same? Obvs he despises women and we are all holes, but surely he believes in the inherent supremacy of men, so why, in that case are men incapable of anything regarding women that doesn’t involve sex?
Brings up a bit of a problematic issue when dealing with women as mothers, daughters, colleagues, bosses, medical personnel – etc etc ad nauseam!