Categories
antifeminism entitled babies memeday memes men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny MRA projection PUA

Memeday: Men love idealistically (in their pants)

Adapted from a meme by Ian Ironwood
Adapted from a terrible meme by Ian Ironwood

We’ve met “Ian Ironwood” before, the prolific red pill mememaker with a fondness for retro images and retrograde sexual politics.

Today, I’ve assemble what you might call a little meme essay made up of images he’s posted. Prepare yourself in advance for a BIG IRONIC SURPRISE TWIST ENDING!

Oh dear, I’ve kind of spoiled the surprise. Oops.

I cropped out her cleavage here but you can imagine.
I cropped out about a foot of cleavage here

 

I would think the most interesting thing about her , at least medically speaking, would be her crushed internal organs
I guess that’s why she has an arrow pointing to it?

 

You met this gal, or at least her legs, earlier
We met this gal, or at least her legs, earlier

 

Yep, this one ACTUALLY starts with ACTUALLY
Yep, this one ACTUALLY starts with ACTUALLY

 

idealoptions
You have the option of a narrow tie, or the narrowest tie

 

Wait, what?
Wait, what?

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan!

I had no idea that “idealism” consisted of thinking of women as little more than vagina delivery systems. I guess that’s what the red pill teaches you, huh?

105 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sillybill
sillybill
8 years ago

Virgin Mary,
Yep, ick indeed.

I never saw that movie, the only Brian Aldiss story I think I remember is about aliens who worshipped poop. The whole starship was just crusted up with it.

Redsilkphoenix
Redsilkphoenix
8 years ago

Re: ironwood:

There is a tree – I think it’s the yellow popular tree – that has the nickname ‘ironwood’ because its wood is really that tough to work with. I recall a workman doing work on my parent’s house years ago mentioning that his drill started smoking a bit when he tried to drill holes into a plank of that wood. Tough stuff, that species.

Well, instead of sexbots and their attendant moral problems, can we encourage these guys to go for VR women instead? VR women can be literally any size and shape desired, while a sexbot’s shape would still be constrained by the laws of physics. I mean, there’s a limit to how large the breasts can go and how small the waist can be before the machine falls on its face and breaks in half.

And again, because they wouldn’t be bound by the laws of physics, a VR woman can do any sex act or position wanted without complaint. Unless the guy wants his VR woman to complain; then it would do so to please him. And no AI’s are put into a position where they can be abused so that shouldn’t be a problem there.

Workable? Or not?

Scildfreja
Scildfreja
8 years ago

Don’t need to have a robutt body or be physically present in order to have a discriminating algorithm like I described, actually! Would it be conscious? I dunno; we can barely even describe what consciousness is right now, so it’s impossible to say. But it’d have the outward features of consciousness, so that suddenly becomes very uncomfortable for me.

The real problem is that, well. If it looks like a woman, and behaves like a woman, but you’re allowed to treat it like a machine, a non-human? That’s training people in a very horrible way.

I’m much more of a kindness-first sort of person. If it behaves in a manner which deserves kindness, it should be given that kindness. Doesn’t matter what it is.

Virgin Mary
Virgin Mary
8 years ago

@redsilkphoenix

VR would be useful if you were into weird kinks like vore etc, you could have programs for actually being eaten and being inside somebody’s stomach. Stuff that you can’t really do IRL.

Orion
Orion
8 years ago

Whatever ethical concerns you have about the well-being of highly advanced/intelligent metal-and-plastic simulacra should apply equally to digital simulacra, in my opinion.

1 3 4 5