Well, this is a bit of a shock. The UK has voted to leave the EU — a victory for the forces of racism and unreason that could mean disaster for the UK economy and the EU as a whole. The pound is crashing; markets are poised to plunge.
So naturally the internet’s worst people are thrilled. Let’s start with a literal Anime Nazi before moving on to some more familiar names.
https://twitter.com/iloveluluco/status/746193892484120576
https://twitter.com/iloveluluco/status/746197447664230400
https://twitter.com/MatthewHeimbach/status/746192464789151745
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/746183657606418433
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/746197245817565187
Trump's going to win too, you know. #Brexit pic.twitter.com/HCHHW7tAqo
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) June 24, 2016
Fuck the global economy. We have to save our civilisation.
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) June 24, 2016
Sorry about it, (((Soros))) pic.twitter.com/6IOuvreNVT
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) June 24, 2016
https://twitter.com/MikeMa_/status/746188180756500480
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/746201340309704704
https://twitter.com/basedmattforney/status/746189310915796997
https://twitter.com/GamerGate4Life/status/746198340866441217
https://twitter.com/villainial/status/746195435987963905
https://twitter.com/Q1776/status/746192575954984960
https://twitter.com/Q1776/status/746193500983590914
https://twitter.com/JoKaiGonZo/status/746187559563206657
https://twitter.com/prowhitesunite/status/746204706691702784
https://twitter.com/Ricky_Vaughn99/status/746191933979009024
https://twitter.com/EnochProle/status/746200584601010176
Meme magic is real lads. Praise Kek and Rule Britannia .
— VDARE (@vdare) June 24, 2016
And there will be many more even worse than these in the days to come.
The weirdest hot take of the night so far?
Ann Coulter cheering the plunge everyone expects when European markets open:
The good news keeps rolling in! https://t.co/ty4NS6sdVA
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) June 24, 2016
EDITED TO ADD: Hail to the Gynocracy has also been watching the reactions of white nationalists to the #Brexit win.
Here are a couple of the creepiest tweets I missed:
Lovely.
@Beyond Ocean:
You were doing so well, but I’m afraid you gave yourself away with this remark:
Finger monkeys:
http://www.rantpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Finger-Monkey3.jpg
http://www.rantpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Finger-Monkey.jpg
http://www.rantpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Finger-Monkey14.jpg
http://www.rantpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Finger-Monkey5.jpg
http://www.rantpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Finger-Monkey9.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mmBw3uzPnJI/TQje-hkvfUI/AAAAAAAB0n0/hFT4IFKpc3k/s1600/finger_monkeys_14.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_mmBw3uzPnJI/TQjfgb87V1I/AAAAAAAB0o0/fJuk2Wj8Yio/s1600/finger_monkeys_06.jpg
@ paradoxy
Although Farage is good at making himself the centre of things, he had no official standing in the referendum campaign whatsoever.
There was an official leave campaign. That’s not a party though. It contained people from all the mainstream parties, but their role was limited to campaigning purely for Brexit itself, they couldn’t comment on what would happen afterwards, that’s purely a matter for parliament. (If that seems a bit daft, it probably is)
Farage is generally referred to over here, even by the mainstream media, in terms that would breach the mammoth comments policy. Some local authorities regard supporting UKIP as grounds for removing children (that is admittedly controversial).
@richardbillericay
That’s a very good point. I voted Remain and was totally confident Remain would win, because it had most of the establishment behind it. At the same time I felt that a Remain result would have been an anti-climax. If nothing changes, why did we bother?
The referendum seems to have become a protest vote against the establishment. People were unhappy with austerity, with the lack of democracy in Europe, with rapid social and demographic change that they hadn’t consented to, and with an out-of-touch political elite which increasingly consists of privately-educated career politicians. We’re hearing reports of some people who voted Leave without actually believing it would win, and are horrified at the result.
Not everyone is horrified, though. ‘Leave’ ran a positive campaign, emphasizing hope and independence, while ‘Remain’ focused on negativity – ‘Project Fear’. Two people at my workplace voted Leave, and both are jubilant at the result. They are convinced that the risk to the economy has been massively exaggerated. Neither likes our current politicians and they want radical change, which as they see it can only be for the better.
Personally I think we’ve shot ourselves in the foot, but the establishment brought it upon themselves. They’ve been ignoring the concerns of ordinary people for years and now it’s come back to bite them.
@EJ
Shit, that sentence was so dense with buzzwords and dog whistles that I’m wondering which returning troll they are.
@wwth & Axecalibur
It’s worth noting that not all forms of immigration are equally hated by racists. They especially hate Muslims, brown people in general, and refugees. These three groups, of course, have a large overlap.
While it’s true that the % of UK residents born abroad has gone up, this is not only due to higher immigration, but emigration has also gone down.
The number of yearly asylum applicants has come way down from the highest levels in the late 90s and early 00s. It’s currently at its lowest level since the 1980s.
@Cyberwulf Wales as a whole voted Leave, but Welsh-speaking Wales voted Remain, which is pretty damned significant. Cardiff also voted Remain, but as the capital, there’s much more awareness here of just how much Wales depends on EU funding.
Leave won here because of the way Labour has abandoned the Welsh people. There’s real poverty and desperation in parts of Wales, and I’m so angry that the Leave campaign callously exploited that for their own ends.
@Axecalibur Gender- neutral forms for Welsh/English are the same as for many other nationalities: “Welsh person,” “English person,” “French person,” “Japanese person,” etc.
Just noticed a mistake I made in the comment above.
This doesn’t make sense. What I meant to say was that the rise in net immigration is also in part due to lower emigration.
Ironically, this is an attitude that is very common in the “Murica” you seem to be so distasteful of. It’s a big part of why we have a shitty reputation everywhere else in the world.
It actually does matter what people in other countries think of your people.
What WWTH said. Plus, one (out of many) reasons that the UK is in the mess it is now is due to its pathetic toadying to the US and the “special relationship.” A relationship where the fawning and eyelash-batting is all on one side.
So to say that the UK “doesn’t give a toss” about what ‘Murica thinks is both hypocritical and, well, *sad*.
@Croi Leave ran a positive campaign???!!?!? On what planet is thundering about how EU immigrants are coming here to rape you and swamp your culture and serve as cover for the infiltration of Daesh terrorists and rip every last penny out of your hands “positive”???!? How does that give anyone “hope”????
There are currently stories pouring in from all over the UK of people who aren’t quite British enough (some of them born here) who are being screamed at and intimidated by random passers-by who’ve been consumed by the hate the Leave campaign has whipped up.
You have one seriously fucked-up definition of a positive campaign, and the fact that you can come here and say that shit with a straight face boggles the mind. A woman was FUCKING STABBED AND SHOT DEAD IN THE STREETS because of this “positive.,” “hopeful” campaign.
Her name was Jo Cox, and just because you seem to have forgotten it, don’t you dare fucking assume the rest of us will.
How fucking dare you try to peddle that shit.
@IP
Yep
@Crys
Aww, but ‘person’ is boring *pouts*
@Croi
*Massive, extended sigh*
http://bamahammer.com/files/2015/09/z4vwbt_4.jpg
@EJ (TOO)
To clarify: I’m not saying that it happened because Germany let in refugees, or that it shouldn’t have. Far from it!
But – and I do hate to say it – most people seem to be dangerously simplistic. They see a lot of (mostly Muslim) foreigners at EU borders, the hear news all the time about Islamist terrorist attacks, they come to the simple conclusion “oh noes, what if we are letting terrorists in?”.
And in swoop fascists, who promise that “yes, your fears are all real, you smart and insightful cookies, but we can defend our way of life if we only expel the dirty outsiders”.
And from what I’ve seen, the response from the other political side was along the lines of (I don’t mean to pick on Axecalibur; I agree with them for the most part) “you’re racist and wicked and get to fuck off”. The “establishment” (for what it is) seems to be convinced that xenophobes and racists can’t win because most people are just too decent to vote such views into power again, so we can just condemn them and move on.
But it seems that most people aren’t decent at all.
Combine it with pre-existing resentment of EU (for various mentioned reasons, some more, some less valid) and here we are.
I’m sorry, maybe I’m rambling, not really on the subject of this particular Brexit. I don’t really know the political situation in Britain all that well, be reactions and commentaries are so familiar…
I just feel that Europe is about to devour itself. And seems that no one knows how to prevent it. And I’m afraid.
@SFHC
I actually posted a few times before under this nickname, though I don’t remember which posts exactly. Haven’t posted under any other.
I understand that sentence may be poorly phrased, though I don’t know what are the buzzwords you’re referring to. I’m not that up to date with rightist media.
@Valentine
Uh, thanks. 🙂
I chose that name because I’m in Europe and this blog deals mostly with the USA…
It’s true that persecution and xenophobia have always existed in Europe, but the situation nowadays seems so similar to when early modern democracies were swayed by hateful nationalists… as if we’ve learned nothing since.
Croi
FIFY 🙁
@croi
I’m with Chrys T. The leave campaign was the most fear and lie peddling campaign I’ve ever seen. The “hope” part you speak of was nothing more than vague platitudes like “Believe in Britain” to whip up feelings of national pride and motivate people to vote for Brexit. The rest? “IMMIGRANTS! MUSLIMS! FEDERAL STATE! WAAAAH!”
@Beyond Ocean (I have the sudden and utterly unexplainable urge to listen to Caribbean Queen)
And no worries about picking on me. I need it sometimes?
My problem isn’t that these people are all racist. Everyone’s a little racist, but most people are just that: a little racist. That’s fine enough. My problem is that simplicity you brought up
We have ‘the people’ to keep the government in check. BUT. We also have the government to keep the people in check. People regress to the mean. Biases and ingrained heuristics lead people to the easiest answer. Parliament is also people, but more accountable than the general public and more able to make up for their myriad mistakes
That tribalistic “oh noes!” started turning into street harassment of remainers and minorities. Some people get hopped up on this stuff. When they do, it’s difficult to come down, even assuming they want to. As I mentioned before, there’s enough animosity towards one’s neighbors as it is without adding the volitility of direct democracy to the mix
The problem isn’t that racists can’t win. They can and do. Often. All by themselves or by playing on the fears of the less bigoted. They’re good at that. Good, republican government stops those tendencies from boiling over all at once and by a 3 point margin. Racist populace or not, none of this shoulda come up for a referendum
Does that make sense?
On positivity: My uncle, a big Quebec separatist supporter (but not a xenophobe, which marks him as an exception), mentions that what convinced his mother (my grandmother) to vote “no” in the 1995 referendum wasn’t the rampant economic fear mongering from the “no” camp but an image of the Rocky Mountains. The Rockies were a positive part of her country, and she wasn’t going to vote to change that.
Fear-mongering doesn’t seem to work that well at convincing people to stick around. Works great at convincing people to put up walls though.
Just when I thought I would enter the job market when the recession was over. Fuck me.
The nationalism bubbling around Britan us frightening and disgusting. I don’t look very there, but I understand this country still has quite a bit if influence.
@numerobis,
I love your grandmother <3 I live by those Rockies, and the Canada of my heart includes la belle province. Thank you for sticking with us.
#Brexit, and especially
This thinking is “dangerously simplistic”. I don’t like the fact that Leave won, and I don’t like the fear, intolerance, racism, etc. But it hasn’t happened because they’re simplistic, or easily led. You – me – all of us are just as “easily led” and “simplistic” as they are. We have no magical powers of deduction that they lack, we aren’t the enlightened few.
They voted Leave for valid reasons. They fear foreigners for valid reasons. I believe that they’ve had an error in what brought them to these reasons, but that doesn’t make them simple, stupid, or “tribal (and what a loaded term that is)”.
The first step in bridging this gap is understanding that we walk the same road as they, and we have the same tools of cognition as they.
As the Trump story and the Brexit story have been developing over the past year, I have been increasingly uncomfortable with the standard left-wing analyses of these phenomena.
I grew up in a small New Hampshire mill town that, like so many others, was well past its boom days. I know how most of my peers were brought up, and how the standard social indoctrination made them into moderately racist, xenophobic, sexist — but not evil — people. I escaped the full force of that indoctrination for two reasons. First, I was raised by a man with strong democratic socialist leanings and a powerful tendency to question received wisdom and to rebel against what he thought was wrong. He was talking about the greatest problem of capitalism being the tendency to overconcentration of wealth at a time when that could get you accused of being a crypto-communist and Bernie Sanders hadn’t even been born yet. When I went to prison as a Vietnam War draft resister in the 70s, I could claim to be a second-generation political prisoner because my father had gone to jail in NY in the 30s for putting tear gas into the ventilation system of the New York Stock Exchange. (He blamed Wall Street for the general misery caused by the Great Depression. His own father was a reckless speculator.) Second, I went to Harvard as a legacy — apparently they didn’t look at my father’s record, or they might have thought better of letting me in. Going to an establishment but liberal-leaning university during a time of intellectual ferment made it difficult for anyone with more intellectual curiosity than George W. Bush not to question authority and tradition.
Here’s what bothers me. The US conservative movement has been aware all along that the Democratic-favored welfare state is highly popular, and since they have in contrast evolved as a socially authoritarian but economically libertarian movement whose policies strongly favor the interests of the rich, they have been aware that to have any power as a minority movement in a democracy they must somehow attract voters whose economic interests are damaged by their policies. They have done this by identifying social issues such as abortion, gay rights, and gun rights, and aspects of established belief systems including religion, racism, homophobia, xenophobia, and so forth. They have then taken advantage of the relatively poor education (and, to be truthful, lower intelligence) of their target audience to encourage, nurture, and as much as possible turn into political support, the conditioned prejudices of these people. My belief is that, in general, hatred is based on fear, and fear is based on ignorance, and the Republican’ts have been able to exploit the relative ignorance of less-educated Americans using sophisticated techniques (nudge, wink, dog whistle) to inflame already existing fears What Trump has done is to turn the dog whistles into screams and channel and validate the fears and hatreds that are already there, while blurring and disguising the economic policies that are objectionable to the base (e.g., cutting Social Security and Medicare).
The problem I have with the left-wing is that, while there is a lot of quasi-Marxist prattle about “the workers”, there has been very little effort to understand what makes the actual workers tick and to develop was to speak to their fears and overcome them. Most progressives have had the advantages I had, of a more liberal non-traditional upbringing and/or a liberalizing college education. But too often our response to the destructive attitudes that have been ingrained and nurtured in these people is to speak of them in a highly condescending manner, to point and blame and ridicule, which has the predictable result of hardening the attitudes we object to. The right-wing works hard to understand these people and nurture and exploit their backward-looking views. We don’t. We make virtually no effort to compete with the right, to try to diminish the ignorance and fear that the right exploits. And so the left has to shoulder part of the blame for Trump and Brexit, because we (and I emphatically include myself) did not work as hard to liberate them from their prejudices as the right did to enslave them.
yes, that. Exactly what the grumpy old kitty cat above said.
@Grumpy I think you’ve got very good points. History gives us lots of examples of people moving down extremist paths when they’re put in extreme situations. There are people in real poverty in the UK, this is increasing, and many must be terrified that they are in danger of toppling into that pit, too. And many of them very well may be.
Also, the left in many countries has a frankly abysmal record of reaching the people who should be the most willing to embrace it. Which does leave the door open for the demagogues to come in and spin their tales about how everything would be rainbows and puppies if only wecould get rid of those X People. And I can imagine that if your back is against the wall, it’s tempting to believe in a neatly contained solution.
Brexit was odd, though, in that it wasn’t a strictly Left v Right situation. There were people from all parts of the political spectrum on both sides. Maybe the fractured nature of it is why it was so easy for the hate-mongers to grab the spotlight?
It also wasn’t a strictly class-divided issue, either, as Leavers seem to be from the highest and lowest on the socioeconomic scale.
So I think there are a lot of simplistic arguments going on here, with people trying to frame it in ways that don’t apply just because those frames are familiar to them. Criticising the racism of the Leave campaign is not just elite lefties sneering at the working-classes – though a lot of Leave voters want you to think that so critics look bad – because a lot of that shit came/is coming from the upper classes.
And again I point out: Trump supporters, MRAs, MGTOWs, Honey Badgers – all the people this blog regularly mocks for their shit behaviour and gullibility are ALSO people who feel disenfranchised and forgotten. And as far as justification goes, they run the same gamut as the absurd middle class Brit who feels they’re being oppressed by having to see brown faces in the street to the steel worker with three kids who’s about to lose their job with no prospect of a new one in sight and ever-decreasing benefits available.
So why do no regular commenters rush to defend these poor manospherians from the insensitive attacks of out-of-touch lefty snobs? Why no pleas to just stop the mocking lest we push them into even more extreme positions?
Ah yes: because none of that stuff is a valid excuse for being a bigoted shithead.
PS. Also, why do so few seem to get that assuming “working-class” = “ignorant and more inclined to racism” is ALSO a pretty snobbish and condescending attitude? I’ve seen some pretty cogent condemnations of Leave tactics by working-class critics.
@Scildfreja
I assume that was for me? If so, point taken
@ crys t et al
People are making some great points here. I think your MRA analogy is especially helpful. Don’t know how long you’ve followed this site, but I sometimes make a parallel between the way the manosphere grooms and radicalises naive/vulnerable/bitter men the same was terrorist groups do (although I think MRA groups are terrorists anyway)
But anyway, to get back to your point. One thing I’ve noticed on this site is that whilst people quote rightly mock guys who just come here to spew the usual MRA hate, if someone does come along who seems this perhaps they have just been lead down that path because they don’t know any better, people here will offer sympathy and steer them in the direction of better advice.
So if someone comes along and says “I’m a great guy but women are cu*nts, so MGTOW!” then it’s rightly gloves off time. However if a guy seems he might just have been unsuccessful with women because he genuinely was shy or inexperienced or not brilliant at social interaction and has been fed the “thats cos women only like douchbags” line then people will step in and maybe recommend sites like dr nerdlove and the like where such guys can get a healthier perspective.
Maybe there’s a similar approach to be had? Personally I think that some people are just shits, and they’re irredeemable. So there’s no point wasting time on inherent racists. Merely engaging with them lends false validity to their views. But there is, I would suggest, scope for engaging with people who’s situation has left them vulnerable to being mislead by racists?
You get my drift; or am I just making a distinction where’s there’s no real difference?
@ crys t et al
People are making some great points here. I think your MRA analogy is especially helpful. Don’t know how long you’ve followed this site, but I sometimes make a parallel between the way the manosphere grooms, exploits and radicalises naive/vulnerable/bitter men the same was terrorist groups do (although I think MRA groups are terrorists anyway)
But anyway, to get back to your point. One thing I’ve noticed on this site is that whilst people quote rightly mock guys who just come here to spew the usual MRA hate, if someone does come along who seems this perhaps they have just been lead down that path because they don’t know any better, people here will offer sympathy and steer them in the direction of better advice.
So if someone comes along and says “I’m a great guy but women are cu*nts, so MGTOW!” then it’s rightly gloves off time. However if a guy seems he might just have been unsuccessful with women because he genuinely was shy or inexperienced or not brilliant at social interaction and has been fed the “thats cos women only like douchbags” line then people will step in and maybe recommend sites like dr nerdlove and the like where such guys can get a healthier perspective.
Maybe there’s a similar approach to be had? Personally I think that some people are just shits, and they’re irredeemable. So there’s no point wasting time on inherent racists. Merely engaging with them lends false validity to their views. But there is, I would suggest, scope for engaging with people who’s situation has left them vulnerable to being mislead by racists?
You get my drift; or am I just making a distinction where’s there’s no real difference?