It’s time for another episode of It Came From the Comments I Don’t Let Through, in which I post notable comments by drive-by commenters that I think regular readers here will find, er, instructive.
Today, a heaping pile of homophobia from a fellow identifying himself as Reg Handford. Are you sitting comfortably? Good, then let’s begin.
I know what you want.
We’re off to a bad start here, because pretty much everyone who’s ever said this to me has not known what I want at all.
A society run by feminists and powered by lesbians, where the feminists have the gays under their thumb so that they say exactly the right words and visions on the media they control.
Here’s what a lesbian-powered society might look like, with the lesbians represented for no good reason by totally adorable dogs.
Mr. Handford continues:
Control is placed on judges and educators and professors who know they must obey your ideological dictates or suffer savaging in the media.
The people you attack are meek limp men, ‘guilty’ whites, and christians confused about their religion, praying for forgiveness, lol.
Well, actually, the people I write about tend to be raging bigots; that’s kind of the point of the blog. Most of them aren’t actually what you’d call “meek,” unless, say, calling women the c-word online is a form of meekness I just haven’t heard about.
Indeed, Mr. Handford’s comment was a response to my recent post about The Daily Stormer celebrating the Orlando massacre for supposedly “secur[ing] the election for Trump.” “And the best part?” the Daily Stormer’s Andrew Anglin added. “Nothing of value was lost. Fifty dead homos.”
Again, I’m having a little trouble seeing how this counts as “meekness.”
Gays have already hijacked the rainbow; the populace is so stupid that they think gays own the rainbow. Really!!! That stupid!!!
Technically, the rainbow is co-owned by the gays and Skittles.
The mistake you are making is that you are attacking males, whites and christians so intensely that they have no more cheeks to turn; they have no choice but to fight back.
Yeah, the guys I write about aren’t exactly turning the other cheek. Nor are they all guys. Or white, or Christian.
Personally I will fight you to the end of life, to hell and back, in words, pictures and vitriol, until I am able to see your ideology discarded in the toxic wastebin of history.
Vocabulary.com defines “vitriol” as “language so mean-spirited and bitter that it could eat through metal.” Clearly the language of a great and noble human rights movement!
Let me help you understand gaiety. Lets get down and dirty on that.. Gaiety advocates the
Ok, Reg, let me cut you off right there. What follows is a puerile description of sexual acts that are often performed by gay men, straight women, and straight men. The word “weenies” is used.
That’s All It Is. Nothing more. Just the Pride of unsanitary acts. That is who you are worshipping. Too stupid to know what an anus is for.
Says someone who seems to use his own anus as a storage place for his head.
The next bit is a little unexpected.
As for Trump, his books emphasize safety, and economic changes to improve living standards. Solid ideas. He passes no comment on butt-worshippers. But he has no plans how we can crush gay propaganda. And that is the issue of the era. So he is a wimp.
Donald Trump: Tool of the Butt-Worshipping, Lesbian-Powered Elite.
Rabukurafuto: which Roosh interview are you referring to?
Oh my, the images THIS calls up! Faces skeletonized from the eye sockets down, and backs of pelvises likewise bare from sacrum to coccyx. Creepy. But hey! No more butts left to worship…or kick, as the case may be. Maybe Reggie is onto something! Good job, Reggie!
Being under someone else’s control means not being able to make your own decisions. Having the ability to make decisions, but having to weigh the potential consequences of each option, including public criticism from a free press, isn’t being controlled. That’s just… making a decision.
NiOg:
It’s actually something of an unnaturally structured phrase in Latin, give me a sec…
“Adorator culorum actus lesbiis.”
Oof. Worshipper of the butts, powered by lesbians. “Compulsus” might be better than “actus” but I’m done trying.
I thought all us straight guys were supposed to love anal sex these days. Or does he think that women don’t poop?
@Paradoxical Intention and @pitshade
The movie adaptation will be titled No More Cheeks to Turn.
The tagline: “No choice butt to fight back.”
Special effects by Rob Buttin.
OK I’ll stop now.
I would say there is a very good reason for lesbians (or anyone else, for that matter) to be represented by totally adorable dogs.
Donald Trump is a wimp, but Reg Handford could do the job. Sadly, if I recall correctly, Mr. Handford does not reside in the USA.
So, like his ideological comrade in arms, Andrea Hardie, he cannot participate in the upcoming USA elections, as a candidate or even a voter.
We must muddle on without them.
***
In other news, those doggies!
Those two on the treadmill remind of a scene I observed yesterday. I was in the Castro, the famously gay San Francisco neighborhood.
One guy passed another, who was lugging a suitcase, and the first guy said, “I saw your husband.” The second guy said that he hadn’t seen him yet. Then he called someone on his cell and I saw him seem to look down the block, as though he knew the other person was there. Suddenly, two adorable dogs — with wiry, curly gray fur — exploded onto the scene. They rushed to the guy, who had put his suitcase to the side and crouched down to receive their kisses. Our dad is back!!! Then the dogs turned and galloped back to the first guy, who was now crouched down, and they jumped on him.
So the Castro is still living and loving, and the dogs are still happy.
When he appeared on The Dr. Oz Show.
Despite the beauty and elegance of their butts, zebras are super farty.
@Kat, that is beautiful!
On-topic, this guy thinks a lot about teh buttsecs. Weird.
Also, I couldn’t resist either. 😛
@Weirdwood
@Heinz
“Butt-worshipper”?
I knew this would be a Tina thread.
But I prefer tats…
KadeKo,
http://www.btchflcks.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/happyending.gif
http://67.media.tumblr.com/29ff6d4cde96a88e2a2a9290da87e305/tumblr_myc7i1wJE41qev7uto1_1280.gif
“Says someone who seems to use his own anus as a storage place for his head.”
Savage 😀
Joekster: I have this strange vision of a long-haired Iranian dude sipping on a glass of Porto.
I’ve seen most of that IRL, but it was a long-haired woman or a short-haired man.
Butt is it stupider than using three exclamation points?
@EJ(TOO)
I always thought it was more about ignorace than projection, but I could be wrong. I hope I’m not – the second option seems sadder.
Kat: your story is adorbs! Last night I had a similar scene, upon my return (coincidentally from SF) my cats exploded on the scene to ostentatiously ignore me and run away if I tried to pet them.
@tim gueguen,
Close. Women don’t poop, except as an act of misandry to ruin anal sex or come up with an excuse not to have it.
Okay, I just made that up, but I’m guessing that it’s not that far from their logic. They claimed that women who fart around men are being disrespectful and misandrous.
“Pounded in the Butt by Her Butt-Worshipping Lesbian Tool”
Now I’m confused. I’m still not sure if butt-worshipping refers to everyone who’s super into big female butts nowadays or if it refers to gay men who have the nerve to consensually and mutually enjoy the buttsex with other men. Don’t those men know that anal sex is supposed to be degrading and only women are supposed to be degraded?
Corgis and their damn adorable fluffy butts. Damn those cute fluffy butts!
Joekster: thanks for drawing that connection to “positive Christianity.” I’ve seen the Knights Who Say Cuck elsewhere talking up “uncucked Christianity” and been confused because I’d think any fairly straightforward reading of the new testament, or the sermon on the mount alone, would set off all these jerks’ alarms.
okay who has a problem with butts butts are good
“The word “weenies” is used.”
I’m dying, here. No, really. Dying. I think I pulled a muscle.